Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

The Store

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Recent Blogs


Photo

Over moderation

  • Please log in to reply
240 replies to this topic

#31 B Richard

B Richard

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 523 posts

Posted 01 February 2014 - 04:50 PM

Maybe so. But this thread is in a part of the TD site, "Questions about Twins Daily", where it's an appropriate topic. As in other parts of the site, if a subject isn't to one's liking, no one compels anyone to read it, and certainly there is no compulsion to contribute. Indeed, posting (in effect) that the subject of the thread itself is not worth discussing, is covered in the TD Comments Policy.


Ha, ha. Yes, I am more than familiar with the policy. No harm was intended- though I do appreciate the depth of your stilted response.

#32 snepp

snepp

    Curve Hanger

  • Twins Mods
  • 4,339 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls

Posted 01 February 2014 - 06:37 PM

Ha, ha. Yes, I am more than familiar with the policy. No harm was intended


If it makes you feel better, I laughed at it.

:)

#33 ChiTownTwinsFan

ChiTownTwinsFan

    Moderation in all things ...

  • Twins Mods
  • 6,485 posts

Posted 01 February 2014 - 06:56 PM

If it makes you feel better, I laughed at it.

:)


My thought was 'yeeesh ... no kidding!' ;)
When life gives you lemons, suck on them and persevere.

#34 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,641 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 02 February 2014 - 11:57 AM

though I do appreciate the depth of your stilted response.


Uh, thank you, I think. :)

#35 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 02 February 2014 - 09:43 PM

Many posters, including some of the moderators, successfully include sarcasm among their rhetorical devices, without running close to the boundary.

I got nothin'.

Sometimes I disappoint me.

#36 Bark's Lounge

Bark's Lounge

    Whatchamacallit is the Best Candy Bar

  • Members
  • 1,910 posts
  • LocationKerguelen Island

Posted 02 February 2014 - 10:02 PM

I actually think this site is under moderated. If a dress code is established, and uniforms are distributed, I would probably change my mind.

There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.


#37 big dog

big dog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,542 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:09 AM

I actually think this site is under moderated. If a dress code is established, and uniforms are distributed, I would probably change my mind.


Give it up, Bark. Great idea about the uniforms, but we never even got those badges we were discussing last summer in various game threads.

#38 Oldgoat_MN

Oldgoat_MN

    Ancient Member

  • Members
  • 694 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:33 AM

Give it up, Bark. Great idea about the uniforms, but we never even got those badges we were discussing last summer in various game threads.


We don't need no stinkin' badges.

I'm on a whiskey diet. I've lost 3 days already.


#39 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,641 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 03 February 2014 - 11:11 AM

If a dress code is established, and uniforms are distributed, I would probably change my mind.


The idea of you in a skirt is what keeps this proposal on the table.

#40 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,184 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 12:00 PM

Sarcasm has no place in our society.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- L. Harvey Oswald

:whacky028::whacky028: :whacky028::whacky028:

#41 Joe A. Preusser

Joe A. Preusser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 726 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 12:47 PM

Sarcasm has no place in our society.


Was that sarcasm?

Also, if there is to be a dress code we need look no further than Mr. Garza in my avatar.

#42 Dave T

Dave T

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 133 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 12:56 PM

I definitely agree we need a dress code for our avatars. How else would we know when we'd found a good one? (What would Bartman do?)

#43 chuchadoro

chuchadoro

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 112 posts
  • LocationNordeast

Posted 03 February 2014 - 01:27 PM

I have a specific complaint regarding the editing of comments. I commented a few years ago that "at least Mauer would continue to lead the league in lady b*ners". Pretty questionable, I would have had no issue if it had been deleted.

Instead, a mod changed the phrase to "swooning ladies". If I wanted to say "swooning ladies" I would have sent my closest chap a Western Union regarding his favorite baseballer, Cap Anson. Delete, warn, ban; do what you need. Don't put words in others' mouths.

#44 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,641 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 03 February 2014 - 01:28 PM

Sarcasm has no place in our society.


Would Dave be sarcastic? Noooo.

"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- L. Harvey Oswald

:whacky028::whacky028::whacky028::whacky028:


Good one.

#45 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,184 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 01:40 PM

Would Dave be sarcastic? Noooo.



Good one.


Ha!
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- L. Harvey Oswald

:whacky028::whacky028: :whacky028::whacky028:

#46 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,641 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 03 February 2014 - 02:40 PM

I have a specific complaint regarding the editing of comments. I commented a few years ago that "at least Mauer would continue to lead the league in lady b*ners". Pretty questionable, I would have had no issue if it had been deleted.

Instead, a mod changed the phrase to "swooning ladies". If I wanted to say "swooning ladies" I would have sent my closest chap a Western Union regarding his favorite baseballer, Cap Anson. Delete, warn, ban; do what you need. Don't put words in others' mouths.


A moderation action from "a few years ago" may or may not have involved the current crew. The moderators have discussed the topic of editing recently, and the consensus is that it is rarely superior to just deleting the post, for reasons such as you allude to. Deletion of a post isn't the end of the world anyway, and the poster can always try again with the same message restated.

#47 chuchadoro

chuchadoro

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 112 posts
  • LocationNordeast

Posted 03 February 2014 - 04:28 PM

A moderation action from "a few years ago" may or may not have involved the current crew. The moderators have discussed the topic of editing recently, and the consensus is that it is rarely superior to just deleting the post, for reasons such as you allude to. Deletion of a post isn't the end of the world anyway, and the poster can always try again with the same message restated.


The person who executed the moderation action is still very much a part of the crew and I appreciate his hard work that goes into making this the best Twins site around. I didn't mention the editing issue to demand satisfaction but to discuss it and find out if it was an ongoing practice. I'm glad to hear about the consensus.

#48 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,184 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 05:52 PM

So just to be clear, the word boner is not allowed? This is a semi serious question, where do we draw the line on language?
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- L. Harvey Oswald

:whacky028::whacky028: :whacky028::whacky028:

#49 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,641 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 03 February 2014 - 05:59 PM

So just to be clear, the word boner is not allowed? This is a semi serious question, where do we draw the line on language?


I can't do better than point to the way John Bonnes said it a while back, contained in a longer essay that is found in the Comment Policy thread:

[T]here is no line. There is no limit. There are a lot of them, and they're always changing and that's the way it has to be. So just stay the hell away from it.

Edited by ashburyjohn, 03 February 2014 - 06:02 PM.


#50 Joe A. Preusser

Joe A. Preusser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 726 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 06:21 PM

So just to be clear, the word boner is not allowed? This is a semi serious question, where do we draw the line on language?


Well "swooning ladies" is over some line.

#51 ChiTownTwinsFan

ChiTownTwinsFan

    Moderation in all things ...

  • Twins Mods
  • 6,485 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 06:24 PM

So just to be clear, the word boner is not allowed? This is a semi serious question, where do we draw the line on language?


There are no absolutes, which makes moderating difficult. All I can say for myself is that I try to keep a few things in mind ... context, intent, tone, poster history; it's certainly not a literal, word by word approach. Even with all that it's still difficult but we all try to remain fair and consistent even if it doesn't always seem so. Also, each of us is only human and sometimes we misread a situation, which is why our collective discussions are ongoing and endless. Mostly what we want for and from the community is respect, even if you abhor another poster's POV, so that we can have the best discussions possible.
When life gives you lemons, suck on them and persevere.

#52 Bark's Lounge

Bark's Lounge

    Whatchamacallit is the Best Candy Bar

  • Members
  • 1,910 posts
  • LocationKerguelen Island

Posted 03 February 2014 - 07:39 PM

The idea of you in a skirt is what keeps this proposal on the table.


It's not easy being the sex symbol of Twins Daily... but what the heck, somebody has to bring sexy back.
Sexy.jpg

There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.


#53 CRArko

CRArko

    Agent of SHIELD

  • Members
  • 1,766 posts
  • LocationIn the shadows.
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 03 February 2014 - 07:51 PM

Are threads in this forum really intended to be treated as jokes?

#54 big dog

big dog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,542 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:01 PM

It's not easy being the sex symbol of Twins Daily... but what the heck, somebody has to bring sexy back.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]6440[/ATTACH]


Game, set, and match.

#55 big dog

big dog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,542 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:02 PM

Are threads in this forum really intended to be treated as jokes?


I just hope you aren't demanding accountability.

#56 CRArko

CRArko

    Agent of SHIELD

  • Members
  • 1,766 posts
  • LocationIn the shadows.
  • Twitter: crarko

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:22 PM

I just hope you aren't demanding accountability.


I don't demand anything. It's not my site.

#57 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 797 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 10:06 PM

You can't say #erection either. Had the post deleted last week. My 10th graders get away with more in class. Over moderation muchmuch

#58 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 5,004 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 07:28 AM

You can't say #erection either. Had the post deleted last week. My 10th graders get away with more in class. Over moderation muchmuch


I will say this - if one's entry doesn't rise above that of an immature 10th grader, it risks being deleted. And if that is as high a standard as a member tends to repeatedly reach, we'll likely encourage him to go someplace else, where he can more easily fulfill his wishes.

If that's over moderation, then so be it. I don't think that's an unseasonable standard. At the very least, the opposite standard seems to be an odd one for which to campaign.

#59 LimestoneBaggy

LimestoneBaggy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 204 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 08:17 AM

All,

I don't post much, but I do read quite a bit on this site. Has over moderation happened? Perhaps. But ask yourself this. These gentlemen have been trying to build a flagship for Twins discussions that all can enjoy (young and old). If you put yourselves in the shoes of the founders, moderators, and admin, and read some of the posts with that effort in mind, it's not hard to write threads, blogs, and posts that reflect their mission. It's their ballpark people, and if you want the field, you're going to have to beat them and maybe get a few balls from old man Mertle's yard.

I'm as dirty minded as the next, and quite frankly I listen to the Sportive to get my fill on that (and dear Lord those guys are hilarious and intelligent-witty), but I come hear to learn and laugh. From the time I've been involved, I've gotten to know most of you by reading your stuff, and I'm positive you can be hilarious without the cheap bathroom humor (but save it, one day maybe I'll meet you at a Twins Daily event, and we can unload it all).

In the end, I haven't paid a dime (outside of Seth's book) since I've been following these guys (and you), and if they say the line is here...then the line is here.

The real question I have is why does anyone care (off season notwithstanding)?

Edited by LimestoneBaggy, 04 February 2014 - 08:49 AM.
Stupid grammar, why do you hate me.

I will one day successfully sneak onto the Sportive Podcast, and have nothing intelligent to say or add to the conversation.

#60 Don't Feed the Greed Guy

Don't Feed the Greed Guy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 451 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 08:40 AM

If that's over moderation, then so be it. I don't think that's an unseasonable standard. At the very least, the opposite standard seems to be an odd one for which to campaign.


Touche'. In the immortal words of Baron Von Raschke, "Dat is all dat da people need to know!" (at 1:12)