Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store


Photo

Blackburn coming back?

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 2,931 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 25 October 2013 - 10:04 AM

When questioned about the 2014 budget, Terry Ryan said the sub-60m figure the Twins are projected to spend doesn't include Blackburn.

TD: Well, the estimation at the end of the year was like 55 or 56
million.

TR: You counting Blackburn?

TD: Probably not, no.

TR: OK, so you don’t know. [Smiles] I do, so we’ll be OK.


Buckle in for some Blackie!

#2 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,751 posts

Posted 25 October 2013 - 10:35 AM

Is he under contract for next year? I thought next year was an option year that the Twins would clearly not exercise. I suppose they could invite him back on a minor league deal but I guess I'm not really seeing the connection of your quoted material.

#3 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,062 posts

Posted 25 October 2013 - 10:40 AM

I think that was a simple miscommunication. Ryan thought Parker was referring to the 2013 payroll (which technically included Blackburn's $5.5M salary for this year), whereas Parker was referring more to the present commitments, which no longer include guys like Blackburn, Pelfrey, etc.

#4 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 2,931 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 25 October 2013 - 10:46 AM

Is he under contract for next year? I thought next year was an option year that the Twins would clearly not exercise. I suppose they could invite him back on a minor league deal but I guess I'm not really seeing the connection of your quoted material.

Yes there is an 8m option on Blackie's contract for 2014 which would push the Twins projected payroll from the high 50s to around 67m.

#5 S.

S.

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts

Posted 25 October 2013 - 10:46 AM

I think that was a simple miscommunication.

Posted Image

#6 Alex

Alex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 978 posts

Posted 25 October 2013 - 01:10 PM

I think that was a simple miscommunication. Ryan thought Parker was referring to the 2013 payroll (which technically included Blackburn's $5.5M salary for this year), whereas Parker was referring more to the present commitments, which no longer include guys like Blackburn, Pelfrey, etc.


I hated that exchange. I hope it sounded better than it came across in reading it because TR came across as a smug jerk who acted as if he had hidden information and that fans have no clue.