Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Mauer to 1st?

  • Please log in to reply
92 replies to this topic

#1 Rocky

Rocky

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 02:07 PM

I don't see any reason why not move Mauer to first. We are in need of a first baseman and it would surely lower his risk to injury. Then we could go about picking up a free agent like McCann or Navarro, plus about 4/5 2014 mock drafts have us picking up a solid catcher in Alex Jackson.

#2 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,091 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 02:28 PM

It makes sense but I think they'll have Mauer stay behind the plate and catch some more. (Twins won't spend 80m or more on McCann). His durability has been frustrating these last few years but it works best for the team if he can catch.

#3 PSzalapski

PSzalapski

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 02:36 PM

I'm assuming that you want Josmil Pinto to start at Catcher in the near term, right? Is he good enough behind the plate to play 100 games there?

#4 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,011 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 02:36 PM

I think having him at first/DH 160 games, is signficantly more valuable than 80 at catcher and 40 at 1B/DH. But I dont' think anyone is going to change anyone's mind here.....

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#5 stringer bell

stringer bell

    Shaking the rust off................my golf game

  • Twins News Team
  • 5,777 posts
  • LocationZumbrota MN

Posted 23 October 2013 - 03:23 PM

I am totally on board with Mauer converting to a full-time first baseman, who would catch only in an emergency. I would expect that he could play 150+ games and hit better and probably for more power. While Mauer is a fine catcher, he isn't the freak of nature that the most durable catchers have been. He is a Hall-of-Fame hitter and moving to first is good for his long-term future as a hitter. The next blow to the head from a foul tip could cost him at least a month or might cost him the rest of his career. Something like 50% of the players disabled on the concussion list were catchers. It is undoubtedly less risk for him to be a first baseman. That the Twins have a clear vacancy at first only makes this decision easier.

#6 SpiritofVodkaDave

SpiritofVodkaDave

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,007 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 03:29 PM

They should do the same plan as this year, the concussion was a freak injury and they kept him out for the rest of the season out of an abundance of caution.

80 games at C
40 games at 1B
25 games at DH

Let Pinto and Doumit catch the other 80 games.

#7 Marta Shearing

Marta Shearing

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 417 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 03:59 PM

It makes sense but I think they'll have Mauer stay behind the plate and catch some more. (Twins won't spend 80m or more on McCann). His durability has been frustrating these last few years but it works best for the team if he can catch.

So you're saying its best for the team having a banged up Mauer behind the plate? His offense suffers when he catches. It wears him down. Not to mention the whole concussion thing. Not to mention Pinto deserves a shot and looks very promising. Not to mention I don't want Chris Colabello at 1B.

#8 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,868 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 04:15 PM

So you're saying its best for the team having a banged up Mauer behind the plate? His offense suffers when he catches. It wears him down. Not to mention the whole concussion thing. Not to mention Pinto deserves a shot and looks very promising. Not to mention I don't want Chris Colabello at 1B.


He's been a better hitter as a catcher.



C - 408/481/889
1B - 397/435/831

We need to just kill that falsehood. The Twins are best when that 800+ OPS is behind the plate and he should continue to play there primarily until Pinto or someone else can full time.

#9 LaBombo

LaBombo

    3 TD warning points and the death sentence in 12 systems.

  • Members
  • 3,392 posts
  • Location...in a galaxy far, far away...

Posted 23 October 2013 - 04:21 PM

I think having him at first/DH 160 games, is signficantly more valuable than 80 at catcher and 40 at 1B/DH. But I dont' think anyone is going to change anyone's mind here.....

What about 80 at catcher and 80 mostly at DH with some 1st mixed in?

Gardenhire doesn't believe DH'ing is a day off. But even a man of Mauer's advancing years should be able to handle the exertion of running out two grounders and an opposite-field single, plus a walk to first, every other game between starts at catcher.

#10 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,091 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 05:40 PM

So you're saying its best for the team having a banged up Mauer behind the plate? His offense suffers when he catches. It wears him down. Not to mention the whole concussion thing. Not to mention Pinto deserves a shot and looks very promising. Not to mention I don't want Chris Colabello at 1B.


Yes, it's better for the Twins to have Mauer get as many AB as a catcher because he is one of the 10 best catchers of all time, his bat is incredible for a catcher (For his career, his OPS+ (not adjusted for position) is better than Adrian Gonzalez, Teixeira, Hamilton, HanRam etc). Moving him for Pinto is not a good idea. If Mauer isn't healthy enough to play catcher, obviously that changes things.

Twins hopefully will have more options that Colabello at first.

#11 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 4,100 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 23 October 2013 - 05:42 PM

The Twins are best when that 800+ OPS is behind the plate and he should continue to play there primarily until Pinto or someone else can full time.


Or until he hits the DL, whichever comes first.

#12 Alex

Alex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 978 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 05:53 PM

He's been a better hitter as a catcher.



C - 408/481/889
1B - 397/435/831

We need to just kill that falsehood. The Twins are best when that 800+ OPS is behind the plate and he should continue to play there primarily until Pinto or someone else can full time.


I agree that Mauer has more value at catcher -- there's no doubt. But for his health, I'd have no problem with a move to first.

And come on, there there's no falsehood to kill. Simply posting those numbers is incomplete analysis at best.

Mauer has just 232 PAs at 1B and most has often played 1B as a day off of catching (so his legs wouldn't be fresh) or coming off of injury (again, likely not at the top of his game). So, it's not surprising that his numbers are lower. Not to mention his peak season, 2009, he didn't play 1B at all. His 29 HR were all hit at catcher, skewing that slugging heavily in his favor.

Edited by Alex, 23 October 2013 - 05:56 PM.


#13 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,868 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 05:59 PM

I agree that Mauer has more value at catcher -- there's no doubt. But for his health, I'd have no problem with a move to first.

And come on, there there's no falsehood to kill. Simply posting those numbers is incomplete analysis at best.

Mauer has just 232 PAs at 1B and most has often played 1B as a day off of catching (so his legs wouldn't be fresh) or coming off of injury. So, it's not surprising that his numbers are lower. Not to mention his peak season, 2009, he didn't play 1B at all. His 29 HR were all hit at catcher, skewing that slugging heavily in his favor.


Please provide some evidence that he is a better hitter when he's not catching. The stats don't back that claim. Until they do, it's a false claim. This isn't a matter of opinion or excuses....stats tell the story.

As for the DL, the day may come to protect him but you can't ever completely do it. The only certain thing is that you dramatically reduce his value to the team.

#14 Alex

Alex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 978 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 06:21 PM

Please provide some evidence that he is a better hitter when he's not catching. The stats don't back that claim. Until they do, it's a false claim.


If you think throwing up those two statlines (one of which involves less than 300 PAs) is sufficient evidence that he'd be a better hitter at catcher, that's fine. To me, because I realize the context that those at-bats came, they mean pretty much next to nothing, especially in terms of future predictability. If he gets 500 PAs at 1B in the next season (2014) and then returns to catching after that and hits better (2015) I could be convinced.

Or, have there been a lot of studies that show players hit differently moving positions? If there are, I haven't read any.

To your question, I'm not convinced he WILL be a better hitter at 1B, but I can't imagine he'd be worse. It's also tough to compare as he'll be a year older (unless something similar to what I suggested happens above).

Back to DL---no, you can't protect him completely, but if he catches, he will get more foul balls off the facemask, which led to concussions for several catchers last season, and the next time it happens is likely to be more severe. Did first baseman last season have more concussions? If so, I'd agree that we should keep him at catcher. At some point, especially in terms of brain injuries, I think there's more responsibility involved than simply what value he provides. If that does nothing for you, then consider that the next foul ball of his mask could end his career and then you get very little value after that.

Finally, if the Twins are headed to 90 losses again next season, there's really no point, in my opinion, to him catching at all.

Edited by Alex, 23 October 2013 - 06:26 PM.


#15 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 6,036 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 06:35 PM

I'll say what I've said before, moving him to first permanently is foolish. His value as a catcher is far greater than his value as a 1B. I don't have a problem playing him at both positions in order to get him in more and keep him from wearing down as much, but he should be playing catcher until he can no longer do it. He isn't there yet.

#16 Marta Shearing

Marta Shearing

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 417 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 06:42 PM

He's been a better hitter as a catcher.



C - 408/481/889
1B - 397/435/831

We need to just kill that falsehood. The Twins are best when that 800+ OPS is behind the plate and he should continue to play there primarily until Pinto or someone else can full time.


Three words: Small sample size. So lets put that to rest. Remind me what his numbers are when he's not playing. I want him in the lineup for 162 games. 1st base is the least physically demanding position. He needs to play EVERYDAY. This team needs offense.

#17 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,868 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 06:46 PM

If you think throwing up those two statlines (one of which involves less than 300 PAs) is sufficient evidence that he'd be a better hitter at catcher, that's fine. To me, because I realize the context that those at-bats came, they mean pretty much next to nothing, especially in terms of future predictability. If he gets 500 PAs at 1B in the next season (2014) and then returns to catching after that and hits better (2015) I could be convinced.


This isn't a "convincing" matter. The claim was that he hits better when he's not catching. Other than his injury shortened 2011, that has never been true even in individual seasons. So it's both not true over his career and it's not true even in isolated seasons.

Again, I'll repeat:There is zero evidence that shows he is a better hitter when he's not catching. Zero. So you can't make that claim.

As for next year - I'm fine resting him more in bad seasons, but I don't "move" him anywhere at this point.

#18 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,868 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 06:48 PM

Three words: Small sample size. So lets put that to rest. Remind me what his numbers are when he's not playing. I want him in the lineup for 162 games. 1st base is the least physically demanding position. He needs to play EVERYDAY. This team needs offense.


You claimed he's a better hitter when he's not catching. There is no truth in that statement. You can claim small sample size until you're blue in the face, but you made a very definitive statement that is not supported by the stats.

If it was true you'd have a persuasive argument for moving him. But it's not true - so find a better argument and drop that one.

#19 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,011 posts

Posted 23 October 2013 - 06:58 PM

What is better, Mauer at first and pinto at catcher, or Mauer catching and random guy from the system playing first? What is better, more at bats from Mauer, or less at bats from Mauer? Who gets hurt more, first basemen or catchers? Is Mauer more or less likely to play longer if he moves off catcher sooner, or later?

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#20 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 23 October 2013 - 07:57 PM

What about 80 at catcher and 80 mostly at DH with some 1st mixed in?

Gardenhire doesn't believe DH'ing is a day off. But even a man of Mauer's advancing years should be able to handle the exertion of running out two grounders and an opposite-field single, plus a walk to first, every other game between starts at catcher.

The next time Mauer appears in 160 games in a season will be the first.

He doesn't even have a 150 game season under his belt. He's gotten 600 PAs in a season 4 times.

If he catches 80 games, he won't get into 80 more no matter the position.