Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Sickels: Top 20 Twins prospects for 2014

  • Please log in to reply
107 replies to this topic

#1 cmb0252

cmb0252

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,848 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:16 AM

John Sickels over at minorleagueball released his Twins top 20 prospect list.

Buxton/Sano are both A prospects
Stewart/Meyer are both B+
Rosario/Berrios are both Bs

What does he have to say and how does he rank the rest? Who is too high and who is too low? I guess you will just have to look for yourself. Link below:

Minnesota Twins Top 20 Prospects for 2014 - Minor League Ball

Edited by Nick Nelson, 18 October 2013 - 09:42 AM.
corrected spelling of "Sickels"


#2 2wins87

2wins87

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 228 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:18 AM

I was a little surprised that Thorpe was as high as he was, given that John is usually pretty conservative on guys in the lower levels. He must have heard a lot of really good things about him.

#3 cmb0252

cmb0252

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,848 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:31 AM

I was a little surprised that Thorpe was as high as he was, given that John is usually pretty conservative on guys in the lower levels. He must have heard a lot of really good things about him.


That jumped out at me too. I'm hoping the Twins challenge Thorpe next year so we can see what we have.

#4 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,584 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:49 AM

That is pretty aggressive on Thorpe! That's an *incredible* signing if he pans out. Have to think E-Town this year for the whole season there.

#5 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 7,304 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 15 October 2013 - 12:10 PM

Waiting for his next team report or two, to gauge just how much fun it is to have 24 C+ or better prospects.

#6 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 9,101 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 12:13 PM

Interesting list. The ones I differed most with him on were, to no one's surprise, the Relievers. I have Tonkin at 21 and Z Jones at 24 right now. Other than that, pretty similar. I still had Pinto down at 12, I guess. Good list.

#7 best game in the world

best game in the world

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 12:18 PM

Great list. Hope Travis Harrison can have a strong power year and show better defense and increase his value.

#8 righty8383

righty8383

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 594 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 12:22 PM

One very small thing I found odd. He puts Stewart ahead of Meyer even though he gave them both the same grade. I would think the edge would go to Meyer since he is closer the show.

I was also surprised about Thorpe. Very encouraging to hear he added some ticks to his fastball. Like many, I usually don't put much stock into GCL stats especially for pitchers. But if he's added velocity, we could really have something.

#9 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,751 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 12:34 PM

Fun read. Of the non-elites, I think Harrison could jump up a lot next year. I like him and the reports on his defense were better this year. Another season of improvement there and, hopefully, a few less strikeouts and he could turn into a real nice prospect to have. I'm still not convinced in Rosario but hopefully I'm wrong. Like May a lot more than Sickels. I think he'll be better in the majors but maybe it's just blind optimism. I like seeing Polanco in our top 10.

Next year it'll be a lot of fun watching how the young pitchers - Stewart, Berrios, Eades, Thorpe, Jorge, Gonzalez - perform. There's some serious upside among them. Maybe we'll add that Texan HS pitcher in the draft.

#10 cmb0252

cmb0252

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,848 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 12:36 PM

One very small thing I found odd. He puts Stewart ahead of Meyer even though he gave them both the same grade. I would think the edge would go to Meyer since he is closer the show.

I was also surprised about Thorpe. Very encouraging to hear he added some ticks to his fastball. Like many, I usually don't put much stock into GCL stats especially for pitchers. But if he's added velocity, we could really have something.


As Sickel notes he had scouts who preferred Stewart to Appel/Gray so that says a lot. Proximity is important but it isn't everything.

#11 peterukavina

peterukavina

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 12:39 PM

Interesting list. The ones I differed most with him on were, to no one's surprise, the Relievers. I have Tonkin at 21 and Z Jones at 24 right now. Other than that, pretty similar. I still had Pinto down at 12, I guess. Good list.


Perhaps a positional rating - relievers just don't matter as much.

#12 righty8383

righty8383

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 594 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 01:55 PM

As Sickel notes he had scouts who preferred Stewart to Appel/Gray so that says a lot. Proximity is important but it isn't everything.


I don't put much stock into proximity. But as I pointed out, he gave them the same grade, so I figured proximity would be the tie breaker. I asked Sickels about this on twitter, he said he went back and forth with these two and the recent shoulder issue for Meyer was the tiebreaker. He also says he was trying to stay consistent with his last top 75 list.

#13 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 9,101 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 02:19 PM

I don't put much stock into proximity. But as I pointed out, he gave them the same grade, so I figured proximity would be the tie breaker. I asked Sickels about this on twitter, he said he went back and forth with these two and the recent shoulder issue for Meyer was the tiebreaker. He also says he was trying to stay consistent with his last top 75 list.


I would go Meyer then Stewart too, but it's close. For me, they both have high upside, and Meyer is closer. It gets foggy when you consider Meyer's injury, but then you remember the 100 mph stuff and I can't help it.

#14 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,069 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 02:33 PM

I like Sickels' site a lot. Great site.

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#15 JustinCB

JustinCB

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 40 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 02:42 PM

I was a little surprised that Thorpe was as high as he was, given that John is usually pretty conservative on guys in the lower levels. He must have heard a lot of really good things about him.


Sickels also noted in the comments that Thorpe has potential to be a top pitching prospect in all of baseball in 12 months, based on the way he's pitched in the GCL so far.

Edited by JustinCB, 15 October 2013 - 03:00 PM.


#16 Brandon

Brandon

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,078 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 03:08 PM

I liked that we have C+ or better prospects at almost all positions.

#17 birdwatcher

birdwatcher

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,582 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 04:26 PM

To have that many prospects grade out at C+ or better is extraordinary. Sickels mentioned about 45 names, and left these guys off the list: Baxendale, Wimmers, Bard, Ortiz, Chargois, Nate Roberts, and Levi Michael. If we have 45 prospects better than any of those guys, we're in decent shape.

#18 Bob Sacamento

Bob Sacamento

    Member

  • Members
  • 154 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 07:17 PM

I saw him in some GCL games but more in Instructionals and he is good, I hope the Twins are as aggressive with him as they were with Berrios last year but then again we all know how reserve the Twins are about callups.

#19 Joe A. Preusser

Joe A. Preusser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 751 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 08:00 PM

I saw him in some GCL games but more in Instructionals and he is good, I hope the Twins are as aggressive with him as they were with Berrios last year but then again we all know how reserve the Twins are about callups.


The Twins showed this year that they will move prospects very aggressively if they deserve it. It is a welcome change, I prefer to push the kids rather then lead them along by the hand.

#20 lightfoot789

lightfoot789

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 832 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 08:49 PM

I enjoyed the fact that Walker has moved up some and was considered a C+/B- type player. Lets hope he can have a repeat performance or better at A+ and/or AA next year. I'm glad to see I wasn't the only one who thought his defense was a little underrated. Would be nice to see all this potential power in the Twins farm sytem on one team moving forward.