Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Article: 8 Reasons To NOT Worry About Aaron Hicks And Kyle Gibson

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Brad Swanson

Brad Swanson

    Señior Member

  • Members
  • 675 posts

Posted 21 September 2013 - 07:59 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...and-Kyle-Gibson

"Let's get after it." ~ Someone on the Twins, probably.
Kevin Slowey was Framed!


#2 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 22 September 2013 - 09:24 AM

Good points, and I hope no one is discounting either of these two based on first year performances.

That said, how many other players struggled in their first season, and then continued to struggle simply because, for whatever reason, they just couldn't make the transition? Obviously I hope Gibson and Hicks don't end up in that category (and I suspect they won't) but we never know for sure until they show they can cut it up here.

#3 Rosterman

Rosterman

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,334 posts

Posted 22 September 2013 - 09:46 AM

Happily, Gibson got innings in this year, coming off surgery, and should be better next year. He may not be great -- it might be another year of getting used to higher play. Hicks was dismal when he went back to Rochester. He needs work. Maybe a winter with Carew will help, but do expect him to start next season at AAA as the Twins work on bad habits and such.

#4 Brad Swanson

Brad Swanson

    Señior Member

  • Members
  • 675 posts

Posted 22 September 2013 - 10:36 AM

Good points, and I hope no one is discounting either of these two based on first year performances.

That said, how many other players struggled in their first season, and then continued to struggle simply because, for whatever reason, they just couldn't make the transition? Obviously I hope Gibson and Hicks don't end up in that category (and I suspect they won't) but we never know for sure until they show they can cut it up here.


Tons. I found quite a few guys who had horrible first seasons and horrible careers. Of course, not as many who were top 5 prospects like Hicks and Gibson.

Most who were actual prospects were pitchers - Willie Banks, Pat Mahomes, Frankie Rodriguez, and Todd Ritchie. The only real notable hitter was David McCarty.

Edited by Brad Swanson, 22 September 2013 - 10:42 AM.

"Let's get after it." ~ Someone on the Twins, probably.
Kevin Slowey was Framed!


#5 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,685 posts

Posted 22 September 2013 - 03:14 PM

Hicks was "dismal" at AAA while he was hurt. He got better at the very end. I am not worried in the slightest about either one of these two.

#6 YourHouseIsMyHouse

YourHouseIsMyHouse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,235 posts

Posted 22 September 2013 - 06:13 PM

I actually didn't think Hicks' season was a disaster at all. He showed more power than expected, he led the league in outfield assists with his cannon arm, had a fair share of web gems (and improved defensively), and wasn't much below average after April. 3 acceptable tools shown. We know he's fast and the baserunning will get better with practice too. He didn't draw enough walks either, but he's proven he can be patient and thankfully quite a bit of his strikeouts were caught looking. Better to have someone who's picky, then someone who hacks away. Overall, the main concern is will he hit for batting average? And judging from this season's reaction to Hicks, that's the most important tool. Dropping the switch hitting might be the best bet that he'll hit over .250. Ideally I'd like to get .260/.340/.450 or better from him in the future. I'm much more concerned about Gibson, since having him fail isn't an option. If Anderson continues instructing him and the rest our rotation, we have even more reason to worry. Gibson was very unlucky as it was posted prior and perhaps the issues were only minor. On both's behalf, it's really the 3rd or 4th season we'll know what we have. Unless they pull a "Hendriks" when we know sooner rather than later.

Edited by YourHouseIsMyHouse, 22 September 2013 - 06:17 PM.


#7 spycake

spycake

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,576 posts

Posted 23 September 2013 - 08:18 AM

I actually didn't think Hicks' season was a disaster at all. He showed more power than expected, he led the league in outfield assists with his cannon arm, had a fair share of web gems (and improved defensively), and wasn't much below average after April. 3


Although Hicks' best asset (offensively) was his plate discipline, and after walking 11 times during that horrendous April, he only walked 13 times the rest of the year.

#8 Monkeypaws

Monkeypaws

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 879 posts

Posted 23 September 2013 - 08:52 AM

They both have the talent to succeed. Hopefully they will return next spring with the knowledge of what needed work, and will work to adjust their games accordingly.

#9 kab21

kab21

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,861 posts

Posted 23 September 2013 - 06:13 PM

There are valid reasons to believe that both Hicks and Gibson will both still become solid MLB'ers but there are valid reasons to believe that neither has the upside that many believed they had before the season.

I tried to find some numbers for Gibson that showed his numbers were better than his results this year but in the end he was really hittable this year. His BAPIP was pretty high (luck?) but his K%, swstr%, and contact rate (pitches swung at) were all bad/terrible. Gibson would have tied for dead last in K% (if qualified) and nearly last at contact rate (esp in pitches in the strike zone). These are not good indicators.

The hopeful part is that he will regain some movement on his pitches next year and he won't be so hittable but this year his results weren't an issue of bad luck.

#10 Ultima Ratio

Ultima Ratio

    PMS jokes are the best, period.

  • Members
  • 1,751 posts
  • LocationHere

Posted 23 September 2013 - 11:58 PM

Only in the past was the past like the future, so it gives me no comfort to look at past failures as evidence of future successes.
Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains.