Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Article: Twins Center Field Depth Is Tested

  • Please log in to reply
79 replies to this topic

#1 Cody Christie

Cody Christie

    Twins Contributor

  • Twins Writers
  • 873 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 10:03 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...th-to-be-tested

#2 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 8,623 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 11:14 PM

Thomas might not be the ideal man for center field but the Twins have to play with the hand they were dealt.

Even if it seems like the hand is a couple cards short...


This was a self-inflicted wound, they dealt this hand to themselves, and now they look quite foolish playing 52-pickup.

#3 twinsnorth49

twinsnorth49

    Moderately Moderate

  • Twins Mods
  • 4,124 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 11:27 PM

This was a self-inflicted wound, they dealt this hand to themselves, and now they look quite foolish playing 52-pickup.


+1, as much as I'm ok with the return on Span and Revere, the fact that TR was willing to bluff his way through not having a legitimate CF always baffled me. It was Hicks or Hicks from the beginning, Benson being waived a third of the way in is proof positive if that.

#4 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,681 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 11:45 PM

All this talk about CF depth? Yikes! There are so many holes on this team that to focus on a short-term problem is myopic. Power-hitting, timely hitting, plain 'ol hitting are a lot bigger problem than CF. Middle infield? Wasn't Sunday's doubleheader sufficient evidence to realize that problem is far worse? No need to even mention the elephant in the room.

#5 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 8,623 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 11:53 PM

Both middle infield and CF, the most critical players on the field besides the battery-mates, were one-option-only bluffs by TR, that have been called. And neither are "short-term problems"- there aren't any more cards left in the deck for the near-to-intermediate-term, anyways.

#6 mlhouse

mlhouse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 12:13 AM

We are not a competitive team so this is really not a problem.

#7 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 8,623 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 12:29 AM

We are not a competitive team so this is really not a problem.




We're not a competitive team BECAUSE this is just one of many problems that weren't properly addressed.

#8 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:10 AM

This was a self-inflicted wound, they dealt this hand to themselves, and now they look quite foolish playing 52-pickup.


What would you have done different? It's not like the Twins can decide who gets injured and who doesn't. This is just one of those situations where you have multiple injuries at one position. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen. When that happens, most franchises have to struggle to fill the spot until some of the injuries get resolved.

#9 Blackjack

Blackjack

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 167 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:14 AM

Terry Ryan is damned if you do, damned if you don't. After last season they needed pitching, he dealt from a position of strength at the time - centerfielders - most people on here applauded his trades and would have done the same thing if they were the GM but now the perfect storm of injuries has made them a little thin.

In hindsight maybe they should have kept Benson around a little longer - but is an outfielder that hits .189 or a few missed fly balls going to make or break their losing season? I think not.

#10 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 5,017 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:33 AM

I just don't get this.


Hicks aside (injuries happen,) the Twins have plenty of replacement level CF depth. Lamenting about the loss of 3 of those (Mastroianni, Benson and Ramirez, the latter not really a CF) while having Thomas, Richardson, Pettit and Morales still around, does not make much sense.

Do the Twins have 2 starting CFs like they did last season? No. Was that an uber luxury in a 99+96 loss team? Yes.

It will be fine. If Thomas does not work, get Richardson until Hicksie is healed or Mastroianni healthy (and Hicksie is not exactly hitting the cover off the ball) and call it a day. You can plug any of those guys and have pretty much the same results.

CF is not much of the problem in this team. Really. If Correia is your best SP, you are doomed even if Kirby were the Centerfielder.

This is like someone with terminal stage cancer complaining about a hangnail.

Edited by Thrylos, 11 June 2013 - 06:37 AM.

-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#11 launchingthrees

launchingthrees

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 107 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:40 AM

We are not a competitive team so this is really not a problem.


This. Let's see how they hit. We'll worry about positions in 2 years when it matters.

#12 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,069 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 07:01 AM

Two years? Ugh. I do not blame Ryan, three center fielders are now hurt. Of course, none of those were any good, but that is another issue entirely.

#13 Gernzy

Gernzy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 449 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 07:08 AM

I cannot believe it but I agree with Thrylos! CF is not the reason we are a losing team. We made the correct moves in trading Span and Revere. Benson needed to go as well. We could not have imagined these injures were going to happen. Plus who knows if Benson would do any better then Thomas.

#14 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,515 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 07:33 AM

I'm not sure what the fuss is. Forget about Clete Thomas or anyone else and put Arcia there. I know Arcia is not a CF, but this season is lost anyways. Put him in CF for 2 weeks while Hicks is out and see if he's adjusted offensively. I couldn't care less about the defense there as it's not his natural position. This keeps Parmalee in the lineup to see if his development continues.

I agree depth has changed. Trading Span and Revere was likely the right decision. While I don't agree with releasing Benson, it isn't as if people would be clamoring to see him right now.

#15 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,583 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 07:38 AM

The trades were the correct trades to make. I don't see how anyone could have predicted Worley to be this damn terrible. Maybe bad, but not like this.

Benson didn't need to go anywhere so he would have been available instead of using true organizational filler to fill-in with a likely sub-500 OPS.

#16 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,583 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 07:40 AM

I honestly don't get the "this isn't our biggest problem" crowd? So . . . smaller problems don't add up to a big one?

#17 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,069 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 08:12 AM

I honestly don't get the "this isn't our biggest problem" crowd? So . . . smaller problems don't add up to a big one?


Wish I could double like this post. can I love a post?

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#18 Siehbiscuit

Siehbiscuit

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 328 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 08:30 AM

@Shane - You nailed it. "The trades were the correct trades to make. I don't see how anyone could have predicted Worley to be this damn terrible." If Worley was pitching like the Worley we all thought we were getting, the Twins could possibly .500 right now. He has been that terrible. Injuries happen, the next guy has to step up.

#19 big dog

big dog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,781 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 09:03 AM

I'd rather have May and Meyer, however they turn out, than a light-hitting good-fielding CF who gets worn down chasing line drives all over the outfield for the next 5 years. The pitching has to be fixed or nothing else matters. If Hermann/Thomas can't back up Hicks for a couple weeks there are more outfielders to try.

The biggest problem the Twins have right now is that it's not 2014. I think the goal this year is to field a half-competitive team while figuring out who to keep and who to trade/release over the next 18 months. Cycling through minor-league outfielders is part of that. Oh yeah, finding a middle infield and a few reliable starters wouldn't hurt either.

#20 terencemann

terencemann

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 27 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 09:20 AM

Terry Ryan is damned if you do, damned if you don't. After last season they needed pitching, he dealt from a position of strength at the time - centerfielders - most people on here applauded his trades and would have done the same thing if they were the GM but now the perfect storm of injuries has made them a little thin.

In hindsight maybe they should have kept Benson around a little longer - but is an outfielder that hits .189 or a few missed fly balls going to make or break their losing season? I think not.


My problem with Ryan is that, once he made the trades, he decided that the team's best option was to sacrifice a year of control on Hicks and rush him up the the majors and then leave him there once it was clear he wasn't ready. It's a wasted year no matter what at the ML level (and if they didn't think it was going to be a wasted year, they would have gone after much better pitching than they did) but now they may have wasted one of the better assets they had in the organization at the moment.