Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Official Day 1 Draft Thread

  • Please log in to reply
301 replies to this topic

#1 Twins Daily Admin

Twins Daily Admin

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 202 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 09:03 PM

Here it is: our thread for Day 1 where we'll all race to update the various picks and live and die with each rumor and choice. I'm going to try and close the various other threads. Let's gather here.

(I'm feeling like somehow the Twins end up with Mark Appel. And I will NOT tolerate any calls for a return to reality.)

#2 InfraRen

InfraRen

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 300 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 09:18 PM

Here it is: our thread for Day 1 where we'll all race to update the various picks and live and die with each rumor and choice. I'm going to try and close the various other threads. Let's gather here.

(I'm feeling like somehow the Twins end up with Mark Appel. And I will NOT tolerate any calls for a return to reality.)


Can't wait!!! If the Big 3 go 1-2-3 I'm 100% Stewart. If there's a shake-up I prefer one of Gray, Appel or Stewart. Bryant would be fine, just prefer one of those 3.

Tomorrow!!
Till I Collapse

#3 twinsin17

twinsin17

    Member

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 09:25 PM

There has been a lot of talk about Twins targeting Kohl Stewart. By all accounts his "stuff" seems highly regarded in the scouting community. As a potential #4 pick shouldn't his stats show he has been dominating inferior HS competition? According to MaxPreps (Kohl Stewart (St. Pius X High School) Baseball Stats - MaxPreps) his numbers appear marginal at best. In 47.2 innings he has allowed 38 hits and walked 31 batters for a pedestrian 1.45 WHIP. He has struck out 42 batters (8.81 K/9) and has a 2.50 ERA. Not exactly an exciting stat line to say the least. Where is the line between projecting a prospect's future success and seeing in-game results? Is too much weight given to potential based on what a radar gun says? I would feel a lot better picking him if his results were more in line with the outstanding "stuff" you hear scouts raving about.

#4 cmb0252

cmb0252

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,817 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 09:40 PM

Keith Law backed up this Peter Gammons tweet that the Rockies are interested in Smith at #3. Update, also confirmed by McDaniels.

[FONT=Mercury SSm A]Peter Gammons @pgammo 6m [/FONT]

[FONT=Mercury SSm A]Draft is so unpredictable that it appears the ’Stros and Cubs @1-2 are in quandaries, and teams think the Rockies @3 go 1B Dominic Smith.

A[/FONT]

Edited by cmb0252, 05 June 2013 - 09:52 PM.


#5 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 930 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 09:52 PM

Still hoping the Twins go Gray or Stewart. If three pitchers go before the Twins, they probably should take Bryant(though I am not enthusiastic with this direction). Best for me would be Gray, but could not well get to #4

#6 Okie

Okie

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 10:29 PM

After lurking here for the past month, I finally had to register...couldn't take it any longer.

Stewart has grown on me so much recently that the only person I'd rather have is Appel. Bryant is equally intriguing, but I honestly look at him and Stewart to be at pretty much the same level, so I'd rather have a potential ace than another potential slugger.

With that said, though, Appel, Gray, Bryant, and Stewart are separated from the rest, and I don't want to see any of them fall past the Twins at #4. I don't want to deal with passing on one and potentially dealing with "what if we would have drafted _____" for years, and I especially don't want the Indians to be the ones reminding us of that. Obviously you run that risk with every player in the draft, and prospects in the MLB are the furthest things from sure things, but I just feel that each of these four could be special.

#7 snepp

snepp

    Curve Hanger

  • Twins Mods
  • 4,339 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls

Posted 05 June 2013 - 10:45 PM

Link for convenience...

Twins Daily - Twins 2013 MLB Draft Primer

#8 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 5,046 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 10:52 PM

Well, I'll take Bryant over Stewart (but Gray or Appel over either). After the year Bryant had - i feel like every team that passed on him is going to be wondering why they outsmarted themselves. I don't think his historical performance has had the time to sink in yet.

#9 Red Bull

Red Bull

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 115 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 12:22 AM

Well, I'll take Bryant over Stewart (but Gray or Appel over either). After the year Bryant had - i feel like every team that passed on him is going to be wondering why they outsmarted themselves. I don't think his historical performance has had the time to sink in yet.


Couldnt agree more, you cant pass on a guy that had that type of season for a super risky HS pitcher thats 4+ years away from the bigs. I think if he drops to the Twins they have to take him, it would be a steal for sure.

#10 Red Bull

Red Bull

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 115 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 12:36 AM

The more I think about it and talk to people I am wondering if the Twins could somehow mis out on Stewart, Appel and Gray. What if HOU takes Stewart because they want a pitcher with high upside and that is cheap which Stewart is both. Then CHC could take Appel or Gray and COL could take the other. Idk how likely that would be but it kinda makes sense...

#11 howieramone1406390264

howieramone1406390264

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 715 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 01:24 AM

Well, I'll take Bryant over Stewart (but Gray or Appel over either). After the year Bryant had - i feel like every team that passed on him is going to be wondering why they outsmarted themselves. I don't think his historical performance has had the time to sink in yet.


Good point, but I don't think the Twins will. Can't pass up that type of power.

#12 Vera

Vera

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 2 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 02:20 AM

ugh all this is confusing. Im trying to learn stuff about the Twins and was reading all this and decided to sign up so I could ask for some info. Can you guys tell me some stuff about the Twins? School project btw... :)

#13 Vera

Vera

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 2 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 02:25 AM

lol its 3am and im doin school stuff, im guessing nodoby is on here?? oh well I will check tommorow...

#14 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,222 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 05:58 AM

ugh all this is confusing. Im trying to learn stuff about the Twins and was reading all this and decided to sign up so I could ask for some info. Can you guys tell me some stuff about the Twins? School project btw... :)


What exactly do you want us to tell you? There's lots of good reading material in these forums about our thoughts on our favorite team.

As for the draft, they need to take one of the big 4. I do really hope it's one of the pitchers, but if Stewart, Gray, and Appel go 1-3 in some order, Bryant is quite the consolation prize.

#15 markos

markos

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 294 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 06:02 AM

There has been a lot of talk about Twins targeting Kohl Stewart. By all accounts his "stuff" seems highly regarded in the scouting community. As a potential #4 pick shouldn't his stats show he has been dominating inferior HS competition? According to MaxPreps (Kohl Stewart (St. Pius X High School) Baseball Stats - MaxPreps) his numbers appear marginal at best. In 47.2 innings he has allowed 38 hits and walked 31 batters for a pedestrian 1.45 WHIP. He has struck out 42 batters (8.81 K/9) and has a 2.50 ERA. Not exactly an exciting stat line to say the least. Where is the line between projecting a prospect's future success and seeing in-game results? Is too much weight given to potential based on what a radar gun says? I would feel a lot better picking him if his results were more in line with the outstanding "stuff" you hear scouts raving about.


Those are his 2011 stats from when he was a sophomore. Here are his stats from this past season: Kohl Stewart (St. Pius X High School) Baseball Stats - MaxPreps

40 innings, 13 hits, 16 walks, 59 SO and 0.18 ERA. (1 earned run allowed all season).

MaxPreps isn't the most intuitive about finding the correct seasons for players. I made the same mistake yesterday looking at Reese McGuire's stats.

#16 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,772 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 06:48 AM

Couldnt agree more, you cant pass on a guy that had that type of season for a super risky HS pitcher thats 4+ years away from the bigs. I think if he drops to the Twins they have to take him, it would be a steal for sure.

It has been proven that a HS starter is no more risky than a college starter. College starters are just closer to the MLB. On the other hand, with a HS starter you can refine his delivery while he is young and monitor the stress put on the arm. IMO, college coaches can be pretty hard on arms. I just don't like the argument that since he is a HS pitcher he is "super risky."
Do or do not. There is no try.

#17 Blackjack

Blackjack

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 154 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 06:48 AM

Grey scares me because of the banned substance report. Coincidently his fastball is better and he has a great year?? Wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole - or the 4th pick.

Don't like Stewart just because he is so young, a HS pick, lots of years for things to go wrong.

Really hope they get Bryant!!! For so many years the Twins were lucky to have one or two players with 20 HR's, would be nice to get Sano, Buxton, Bryant and some others together and do some mashing!! Think back to the days of Puckett, Hrbek, Gaetti, Brunanski, one guy would get hot for a week and carry the team, when he'd cool off, then one of the others would get hot and carry the team. That was fun!!

#18 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 9,652 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 06:53 AM

It has been proven that a HS starter is no more risky than a college starter. College starters are just closer to the MLB. On the other hand, with a HS starter you can refine his delivery while he is young and monitor the stress put on the arm. IMO, college coaches can be pretty hard on arms. I just don't like the argument that since he is a HS pitcher he is "super risky."


Everybody knows high school pitchers are more prone to spontaneous combustion.

And it's really hard to get that "dead pitcher" smell out of the bus.

#19 PeanutsFromHeaven

PeanutsFromHeaven

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 144 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 07:08 AM

I'm intrigued by Adderall being a "banned substance". I'm about to give final exams to a horde of rampaging teenagers, and at least a few of them will have taken "Adderall" to help them focus (as it helps with ADD/ADHD--those with diagnoses and even those without try to take it at times). Does Gray have a diagnosis for Attention Deficit, or was it just supposed to be an added boost? I guess I could see how it might "enhance performance" but....

Thank goodness for Twins Daily, for years I thought I was a weirdo, alone in my interest in the MLB draft. Now I know that I'm a weirdo among many saner people who have an interest in the MLB draft.
Peanuts From Heaven

#20 InfraRen

InfraRen

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 300 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 07:28 AM

[FONT=Arial]Kiley McDaniel@kileymcd21m[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial]And for those wondering my mock draft isn't done because I still have no idea what will happen tonight.[/FONT]
Till I Collapse