Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Article: Over and Under: Evaluating The White Sox

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 John Bonnes

John Bonnes


  • Administrators
  • 5,700 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 07:00 AM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...g-The-White-Sox

#2 beckmt


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,852 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:00 AM

White Sox have starting pitching which should be better than last year if healty. Offense with losses and some regression could be far worse. Bullpen is good. Team should be in most games, I do not feel they will score enough to compete, and if the issues start early, could wear the pitching down later in the year.

#3 Gernzy


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 478 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:00 AM

This would be a hard one to bet on. I see them winning 75-80 games. Hopefully less. They could finish third behind a suprising Cleveland team.

#4 Willihammer



  • Members
  • 7,252 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:04 AM

I am pretty high on the Sox. Very solid pitching top to bottom, and a lineup that is built to play in the Cell. I could flip a coin between the Sox and the Tigers for the Division.

#5 diehardtwinsfan


    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 11,289 posts
  • LocationThe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:17 AM

I hate the Sox. They have a history however of generally outperforming expectations while not being dominant... kind of like a team I cheer for. I'd take the over if forced, though I think a smart man would shy away from this bet.

#6 wavedog


    Twins fan since 1969

  • Members
  • 617 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 12:15 PM

I hate the Sox as well so I will pick the under. I'll go with 75 wins and 4th place in the division.

#7 DAM DC Twins Fans

DAM DC Twins Fans

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 594 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 03:36 PM

This would be a hard one to bet on. I see them winning 75-80 games. Hopefully less. They could finish third behind a suprising Cleveland team.

I agree--they will miss AJ and Youk...I dont expect Peavy to regress much keeping them around 78 wins and in the pack in the AL Central.

#8 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 03:44 PM

I probably would stay away, but I checked the "over" box. That's more a reflection of how poor I think the AL Central will be than any real confidence in the Sox being good. Given how many games they'll have against Minn, KC and Cleveland (not to mention that the entire league now gets to play a few games against Houston), it's hard for me to imagine Chicago not reaching .500.

#9 Wookiee of the Year

Wookiee of the Year

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 217 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 06:26 PM

I took the under, and it looks like my reasoning is just about opposite Jim Crikket's.

I expect some downward regression from Dunn, Rios, and Peavy, and some further damage due to the losses of Pierzynski and Youkillis. Given an expected record of 88, though, that's probably not going to be more than enough to push them into 80-83 territory.

So what really seals the deal for me is that I'm expecting a stronger AL Central this year. The Tigers, Indians, and Royals all look like they should be better than last year (at least marginally); the Twins can't really get much worse. That modestly-improved division plus the above-mentioned regression is enough for me to think the White Sox will be at 80 or less.

#10 ltwedt



  • Members
  • 83 posts

Posted 10 March 2013 - 05:29 PM

I bet the over - Never been a big Sox fan, but they are still better than KC, Cleveland, and the Twins - . . . so they'll be playing those teams and that should guarantee at least 80

#11 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 23,135 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 11:14 AM

Under, I see a major regression here.

#12 birdwatcher


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,188 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 11:54 AM

Under, mainly because KC and Cleveland are underrated. And partly because of their lack of depth and therefore the ability to overcome injuries.

#13 Cris E

Cris E


  • Members
  • 107 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 03:05 PM

Over, but that's just because 80 is so low and Houston is so bad. They're not getting anywhere near 85 because they'll easily be worse and CLE and KC won't be the empty jerseys they were last year. (I am just not a believer in Peavy holding up for a whole year either. Not sure why, I don't hate the man, but he just feels like one of those really talented guys that only flashes the whole package a few times in his career.)

#14 Mr. Brooks

Mr. Brooks

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,360 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 05:43 PM

When evaluating other teams, I notice people tend to always subtract for the losses and regressions, but I rarely see them give credit for the young players who should be expected to improve.

De Aza will be a really good player. Viciedo looks to have some real pop, and supposedly they've worked hard with him to add a leg kick that should improve his timing and help out his AVG and K rate a little bit.
Everyone expects a huge regression from Rios, and while I see a small one, I'm just not seeing anything too "fluky" about his numbers last year.
Same thing with Peavy. He's completely healthy now, and people forget that he was borderline dominant before his injuries.
Sale is the real deal. If he can keep his arm from flying into the 5th row any time soon, he will join the ranks of Price, Weaver, Felix and CC as one of the premiere aces in the AL.
Konerko is Mr. Reliable, year in and year out you are going to get .300 with close to 30 HR's.
Not sure why everyone expects a major regression from Dunn. Looking at his career numbers, it was 2011 that deviates from the norm, not seeing anything unrepeatable about last year.
Alexei Ramirez and Gordon Beckham have both underachieved compared to what was expected of them, no doubt, but both have seemingly settled nicely in as average to above average middle infielders. I'd take them over our duo any day of the week.
The rest of their rotation is a bunch of ???, but same can be said for every team in this division except the Tigers.
For all this talk about their lineup not scoring a bunch of runs, I'm not seeing that.
Its not elite, but I think its solid, and will probably score more runs than ours.
I'll take the over.