Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Article: Rational Thinking on an Irrational Topic

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 PeanutsFromHeaven


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 172 posts

Posted 09 January 2013 - 05:10 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...rrational-Topic
Peanuts From Heaven

#2 108 Double Stitches

108 Double Stitches


  • Members
  • 33 posts

Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:35 PM

Nice to see this. I did a website vote on HOFers. And I
came to 9 votes with Barry and Clemens not in the
first 9. And I added Bonds not Clemens for the same
reason you did.

Consequently, I was the only person in the poll who
didn't pair Bonds and Clemens.

Edited by 108 Double Stitches, 10 January 2013 - 03:37 PM.
formatting, grammer

#3 SweetOne69


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 648 posts

Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:55 PM

If I were to vote for one of the alleged cheaters (Bonds or Clemens), I would vote for Clemens 1st.

The reason being is that I believe that beginning of his alleged PED use happened in New York. His 5 CY awards in Boston and Toronto are more than enough qualifications for the HOF.

#4 nicksaviking


    Billy G.O.A.T

  • Twins Mods
  • 10,626 posts

Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:11 PM

Nice rationalization of how guys who get to the 50-60% range start gaining momentum. The steriod guys are trending away from that magic range though, not towards it.

#5 108 Double Stitches

108 Double Stitches


  • Members
  • 33 posts

Posted 10 January 2013 - 05:07 PM

I think splitting them is an anomaly and don't really want to overthnk it.
>95% of voters will likely go either or neither. I would have preferred not
to split them myself. My guess is they will eventually go in together.

Clemens got 8 more actual HOF votes.

Posnaski believed that the extra votes were because Clemens ended on
slightly better legal grounds (Bonds getting Indicted, Clemens not). Pure