Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

The Store

Photo

Article: Scott Diamond looks to avoid sophomore slump

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Cody Christie

Cody Christie

    Twins Contributor

  • Twins Contributors
  • 821 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 10:30 AM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...sophomore-slump

#2 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,660 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 02:50 PM

Well here's hoping; but he better find a way to lower that contact rate or my money is on one-hit-wonder.

#3 h2oface

h2oface

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 377 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 03:43 PM

A lot of fans are banking on Diamond. Personally, I think it is a fools bet at this time, but who else has the Front Office given anyone to bank on? Some pretty high odds at this time.

#4 twinsfaninsaudi

twinsfaninsaudi

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 150 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 10:59 AM

I think Diamond is going to be a pitcher much like Brad Radke and have a similar career. I'm predicting a year of 200+ innings and sub 3.90 ERA. Don't agree with the doubters and pouters.

#5 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:06 AM

I think Diamond is going to be a pitcher much like Brad Radke and have a similar career. I'm predicting a year of 200+ innings and sub 3.90 ERA. Don't agree with the doubters and pouters.


Sounds more like Morris than Radke. Radke only had 3 seasons sub 3.90, whereas Morris' career ERA was 3.90

BTW, the doubters have a lot of info to base their opinion on, what do you have?

#6 snepp

snepp

    Curve Hanger

  • Twins Moderators
  • 4,148 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls

Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:10 AM

Sounds more like Morris than Radke. Radke only had 3 seasons sub 3.90, whereas Morris' career ERA was 3.90


It sounds more like you completely ignored the context of the eras they pitched in when making this post.

#7 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:23 AM

It sounds more like you completely ignored the context of the eras they pitched in when making this post.


Well, Radke had a better ERA+ than Morris even though his actual ERA was bigger.

Darvish posted an ERA of 3.90 this year which gave him an ERA+ of 116...which is is closer to Radke than Morris. Good call. I stand corrected.

I guess the overall point is, why are the doubters wrong?

#8 twinsfaninsaudi

twinsfaninsaudi

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 150 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 07:36 AM

Sounds more like Morris than Radke. Radke only had 3 seasons sub 3.90, whereas Morris' career ERA was 3.90

BTW, the doubters have a lot of info to base their opinion on, what do you have?


I know that about Radke, I did not say that is what I think an average Scott Diamond season will be when his career is over, but it is what I predict for him next season.

I would say my predictions are based more on gut feeling and emotional whim than they are on numbers and information. Generally, I think a prediction is only worth making if goes against what others might expect.

#9 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2013 - 09:30 AM

I would say my predictions are based more on gut feeling and emotional whim than they are on numbers and information. Generally, I think a prediction is only worth making if goes against what others might expect.

I predict this model of making predictions will serve you well, in all areas of interest, throughout your life.

#10 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,520 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 09:36 AM

I predict this model of making predictions will serve you well, in all areas of interest, throughout your life.


And when that fails, tea leaves are always a solid fallback option.

#11 twinsnorth49

twinsnorth49

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Moderators
  • 3,679 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 09:52 AM

I'm a fan of Diamond's but I doubt we see more than the pitcher we saw in Aug/Sept. I think the doubter's are the ones who will end up supporting Diamond for just what he is, I get the feeling people with overflated expectations are going to come down hardest on him when their balloon gets burst.

Yes he was our best pitcher last year, think about what that actually means for a minute.

#12 mnfanforlife

mnfanforlife

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 492 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:17 AM

Yes he was our best pitcher last year, think about what that actually means for a minute.


Wonderful point. I am usually very optimistic with prospects that produce. But the problem with Diamond is that I have seen his "stuff" on TV, alot. And I am afraid we may see his stats go back to where they were in AAA in 2010 and 2011.

He has very little movement on a 89-91mph fastball. His curve-in-the-dirt is his best pitch, and his change-up is straight-as-an-arrow but slow enough. I just can't see him having an ERA under 4.00 with what he has in his arsenal. The second half of last year will continue, I'm afraid.

#13 Alex

Alex

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 978 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 11:16 AM

I'm a fan of Diamond's but I doubt we see more than the pitcher we saw in Aug/Sept. I think the doubter's are the ones who will end up supporting Diamond for just what he is, I get the feeling people with overflated expectations are going to come down hardest on him when their balloon gets burst.


Fantastic point. This is exactly what happened with Dozier last year, I think even from the Twins perspective. They over-estimated both his readiness and talent and then punished him for it.



As for the Radke/Diamond Comparison, Radke had some very good years, but early in his career, he struck out almost six batters p/game (except for when he was 22 in his rookie season).