Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email
Photo

So...uh....does this team actually have a uh....chance?

  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 DaveW

DaveW

    Bullies never win

  • Members
  • 11,738 posts

Posted 30 December 2012 - 09:01 PM

Beat Green Bay at home today and outplayed em, we outplayed em in Green Bay as well bust lost to a couple stupid turnovers.

As the playoffs shape up now we play:

@ Green Bay
then
@ Atlanta

Am I crazy to think we actually have a shot to win both of those games?

#2 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 12,910 posts

Posted 30 December 2012 - 09:17 PM

I actually think we have a better chance to beat Atlanta. But I've been down on this team all year, maybe I'll just stay pessimistic.

#3 DaveW

DaveW

    Bullies never win

  • Members
  • 11,738 posts

Posted 30 December 2012 - 09:23 PM

I actually think we have a better chance to beat Atlanta. But I've been down on this team all year, maybe I'll just stay pessimistic.


Heh, yeah.

As much as we can talk **** on Ponder (for which there is many) the kid came up HUGGGGE in about 4 of 5 3rd and longs, and the one long pass he threw was right on the money. If we stay healthy and play like we did today...dare I say we can hang with anyone?

#4 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 12,910 posts

Posted 30 December 2012 - 09:33 PM

Ponder certainly made some huge throws today, have to tip my hat to his performance. He helped us win today, which is what we need him to do.

#5 kydoty

kydoty

    First of His Name, King of the Andals and the First Men

  • Members
  • 533 posts

Posted 30 December 2012 - 10:44 PM

Ponder the last couples of weeks likely cemented his status as the starting quarterback for 2013.

"Mediocre breaking balls are a gift from God." - Kirby Puckett


#6 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,552 posts

Posted 31 December 2012 - 08:57 AM

Ponder the last couples of weeks likely cemented his status as the starting quarterback for 2013.


Regretfully. I was surprised he could throw the ball as far as he did, where the **** has that been all year? He still made some terrible throws and I believe the Vikings would do well to draft a project QB in the middle rounds or trade Percy for one.

This team might have shot. It is all going to depend on how well the defense can play. AP will put up 150 yards again because this defense can't hold him and Blair Walsh is money so they will put points on the board. Can't let them get big plays. Hopefully Winnfield plays next weekend, his absence was felt in the running game and passing game.
Do or do not. There is no try.

#7 Kirby_waved_at_me

Kirby_waved_at_me

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,140 posts

Posted 31 December 2012 - 09:06 AM

they also missed Winfield's presence on special teams because Marcus Sherels was playing in the secondary and not returning / covering kicks. That meant a few players playing less comfortable positions (like Aromashodu on Special teams).
Does anyone happen to know if the Vikings will try to add another player for depth in the secondary? Could they if they want to?
I'm not sure they would place Winfield on IR at this point, he may be willing to give it another shot.

#8 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 19,465 posts

Posted 31 December 2012 - 09:31 AM

The last two super bowl champions were 6 seeds, at least I hears that yesterday...if you make the playoffs, you have a chance.

#9 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,552 posts

Posted 31 December 2012 - 10:28 AM

The team I fear the most is Seattle. If the Vike GB and win there, they can win at SF or ATL (I saw they would play SF, not ATL... doesn't matter). They are winning games unlike any team in this era. They have an explosive running game and a passing attack that is starting to find some footing and a defense that can shut you down. I don't think they will win at GB, but it is fun to speculate. At least we can feel like they have a chance... I thought for sure they were destined for a last place finish in the NFC North after they started sliding. The Packers have to some doubts about this game, they got lucky the first time and played behind the whole second game.
Do or do not. There is no try.

#10 biggentleben

biggentleben

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,228 posts

Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:15 PM

freshinthehouse said they're not sniffing the playoffs. What is all this playoff talk about?!

Contributor/Minor League Analyst for Tomahawktake.com and CallToThePen.com, come check them out!


#11 Willihammer

Willihammer

    Nostrombolimus

  • Members
  • 6,696 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 31 December 2012 - 02:56 PM

They could win in Atlanta and in NO if they are playing their best. I'm not so optimistic about their chances at Lambeau, or SF or SEA, they haven't been able to win on the road, on grass, since 2009. You need a QB for that.

#12 mikecgrimes

mikecgrimes

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 966 posts

Posted 31 December 2012 - 05:30 PM

They have a great chance to make it to Super Bowl as a 14 point underdog, but one pick 6 and it's over.

#13 Kobs

Kobs

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 305 posts

Posted 01 January 2013 - 12:01 PM

Regretfully. I was surprised he could throw the ball as far as he did


Why? He wouldn't have been drafted in the first round if he couldn't throw the ball 50 yards in the air.

#14 one_eyed_jack

one_eyed_jack

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 617 posts

Posted 01 January 2013 - 12:10 PM

If we can get that first win, then a deep run is possile. But that first win will be tough. Really hard to win in Lambeau, really hard to beat the same team 2 weeks in a row.

The way Rodgers was carving up our secondary after Winfield went down did not leave me with a lot of happy feelings about Saturday night.

I think we need a monster day from AP and an effective, mistake-free day from Ponder, grind out some long, drives that end in 7, not 3, and keep Rodgers on the sideline.

We'll see. In any case, it's fun to have one of the local boys teams in the postseason again, it's only been a couple of years, but it sure feels like forever.

#15 DaveW

DaveW

    Bullies never win

  • Members
  • 11,738 posts

Posted 01 January 2013 - 12:22 PM

Yeah Winfield needs to play, but if that isn't the case as least they will be able to defensively scheme with the knowledge that he won't be in the game. Rather then just running out Sherrils cold.

#16 Joe

Joe

    Member

  • Members
  • 93 posts

Posted 01 January 2013 - 01:11 PM

If they can get past Green Bay in Green Bay, sure. Winfield needs to play though.

The Vikings are 9 point underdogs currently.

#17 Badsmerf

Badsmerf

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,552 posts

Posted 02 January 2013 - 06:35 AM

Why? He wouldn't have been drafted in the first round if he couldn't throw the ball 50 yards in the air.

Because he's proven to lack the arm strength of what most would consider an NFL QB. Maybe its a confidence thing, but I just don't see him ever being able to overcome it.
Do or do not. There is no try.

#18 gil4

gil4

    The irrational optimism is back!

  • Members
  • 1,284 posts
  • LocationOklahoma

Posted 02 January 2013 - 07:37 AM

Ponder certainly made some huge throws today, have to tip my hat to his performance. He helped us win today, which is what we need him to do.


Ponder was better, but more lucky than good. A lot of passes that need some touch he just floats too much, including all three of the TD passes he threw. The one to Peterson was horrible - he ran the bootleg and looked up about 2 steps too late and then lobbed it out there. I was afraid Peterson was going to go out of bounds because it took so long to get him the ball. The stat line looked better, but he didn't play as well as it indicated.

On long passes he's not accurate enough and on short passes he doesn't put the right pace on the ball. He could still improve, but I'm not sure he can be a QB that can win consistently.

#19 Willihammer

Willihammer

    Nostrombolimus

  • Members
  • 6,696 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 02 January 2013 - 12:38 PM

Yeah don't forget that 20 yard floating jump ball that Wright somehow caught, in a sea of Packers. Or the falling down non-intentional grounding which on review was a sack (knee down) that never got credited to the Packers. Its plays like those that make the Vikings, and Ponder's successes look like smoke and mirrors. Then there are the third and 4 shotgun plays which I've been bitching about all year long. Why this team would ever take AP out of that situation still baffles me. They are averaging better yardage on running attempts than passing attempts.

I think two things will need to happen for the Vikings to have a prayer: no turnovers, and the D-line will have to hit Rodgers more, or he will carve up that secondary all day. They had a lot of near-sacks that Rodgers managed to slip out of last week and turn into 20 yard gains.

Edited by Willihammer, 02 January 2013 - 12:41 PM.


#20 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 19,465 posts

Posted 02 January 2013 - 01:20 PM

Does not matter what Ponder does, people will rip him. The team won 7 more games than last year, the QB deserves some credit, lucky or not.