Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Espn's Hall of 100...

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Hoss4476


    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 22 December 2012 - 09:06 AM

Some of the things on this list are just complete BS. Talk about Eastern Sports Promotional Network.. Killebrew at #64? Blyleven at #72? Carew at #53!? Kirby Puckett doesn't even receive honorable mentions..? My view might be biased, but seriously Killebrew should be a top 30 atleast.

ESPN's Hall of 100 -- Ranking the all-time greatest MLB players - ESPN

#2 edavis0308


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 576 posts

Posted 22 December 2012 - 05:51 PM

Walter Johnson as #12 is nice though.

#3 DaveW


    Aaron Hicks update (5/17): .326 BA .464 OBP .616 SLG 1.080 OPS

  • Members
  • 12,791 posts
  • LocationNYC aka Aaron Hicks Ville

Posted 23 December 2012 - 10:51 AM

Curt Schlling makes the list and Puckett doesn't? Give me a break.

#4 glunn


    Head Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 8,112 posts
  • LocationBeverly Hills, CA

Posted 23 December 2012 - 01:56 PM

Barry Bonds at #3 seems questionable. And Roger Clemens at #7. With steroids, I suspect that Killebrew would have hit over 1,000 homers.

#5 stringer bell

stringer bell

    WAR? What is it good for?

  • Twins Mods
  • 7,899 posts
  • LocationZumbrota MN

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:00 PM

I guess I pretty much agree with ESPN--the Twins' best players were great, but they weren't all-time greats.

#6 one_eyed_jack


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 618 posts

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:27 PM

I think Puckett should have at least made the honorable mentions, but other than that, I don't have a huge problem with where the Twins players are ranked.

There are some other egregious errors on that list, starting with Reggie Jackson at 55.

#7 jmlease1


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 153 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 10:34 AM

Oakland A's Reggie Jackson was phenomenal. Angels Reggie was overrated, overweight and in decline. But Reggie had 10+ all-star caliber seasons, including MVP caliber ones. Toss out the rookie year and the last 5 (although even at 39 Reggie had a very nice year and was decent at 40) and you get a better picture.

Schilling isn't a good choice. He was a great pitcher and has a legitimate HoF case, but if you're narrowing it down to a top 100, they should be no-doubters. Schilling isn't an easy call. His first 4 years he couldn't get out of the bullpen. He had his first all-star type season and then got hurt for a couple of years. Went on a nice run as a very good pitcher...and got hurt again for a couple of years. He had 4 more dominant, elite years...and got hurt again. He was never a big "black ink" guy. He gets some additional credit for post-season success, but any extra credit he gets for being terrific late in his career is offset by doing nothing at the start.

I'd rank Killer a bit higher myself, but I'm guessing his lack of defensive value drove him down a bit; he was a better hitter & slugger than Reggie.

Puckett should have at least gotten honorable mention, IMHO, but I'm guessing he's getting caught in the debate over a) his defensive value, and B) longevity. I mean, bRef has Puck as a net-negative for defense over his career and piled up most of his positive value in one season: his rookie year. Now, I have trouble seeing it that way, but without giving him the defense, Puck falls closer to the lower end of HoF CFs than the top in terms of WAR. Admittedly, that's not the end-all, be-all. But there are probably some reactionary fools who look at Puck and think he got too much of a sentimental bonus and needed to be pushed down.

There are a lot of goofy things on this list, but I suspect they did it hoping to stir people up more than anything else.

#8 Boom Boom

Boom Boom

    Cham-Peen of the World

  • Members
  • 1,757 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 10:44 AM

We Minnesotans get our feelings hurt over this kind of unofficial popularity contest way too easily.