Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

MinnCentric Forums


Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Josh Willingham+Justin Morneau for Mike Olt

  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic

#1 DaveW

DaveW

    <3 Mark Derosa <3

  • Members
  • 5,728 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:07 PM

Boom. Do it.

#2 LoganJones

LoganJones

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 172 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:08 PM

Why would they want to do that? They being Texas.

#3 DaveW

DaveW

    <3 Mark Derosa <3

  • Members
  • 5,728 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:10 PM

Desperation.

They need bats, now that they don't have Hamilton or Upton a guy like Willigham would slot in perfectly in that ball park.

#4 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,091 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:35 PM

That's not a totally insane trade idea. Morneau would do great in Texas and they need a first baseman. And Willingham would obviously be a good fit. Olt's a good prospect but not without concerns, mainly his defense.

#5 Mr. Ed

Mr. Ed

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 827 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:39 PM

That's not a totally insane trade idea. Morneau would do great in Texas and they need a first baseman. And Willingham would obviously be a good fit. Olt's a good prospect but not without concerns, mainly his defense.


If there are defensive concerns then this trade will never happen. Defensive concerns won't work with your fundamentally sound MN Twins.

#6 Brad Swanson

Brad Swanson

    Señior Member

  • Members
  • 675 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:48 PM

If there are defensive concerns then this trade will never happen. Defensive concerns won't work with your fundamentally sound MN Twins.


There are no defensive concerns with Olt. Scouting Report: Mike Olt (3B) | Baseball Prospect Nation

No chance Texas would make this trade.

#7 SgtSchmidt11

SgtSchmidt11

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 278 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:55 PM

There are no defensive concerns with Olt. Scouting Report: Mike Olt (3B) | Baseball Prospect Nation

No chance Texas would make this trade.


And here I am thinking that the Twins should at least get a second piece of some kind in this deal...

#8 Brad Swanson

Brad Swanson

    Señior Member

  • Members
  • 675 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:03 PM

I should say that the deal isn't really unfair, it just doesn't make a lot of sense for Texas. If they really want to trade Olt, they probably can get a better deal. Olt also could just play first for Texas.

#9 Lesser Dali

Lesser Dali

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 102 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:06 PM

Straight up for Olt - Hecks Nah. Straight up for Profar - Hecks Yah, but that's not going to happen.

Since the Twins will most probably be dragging their knuckles on the cellar floor next season - it is best to give Plouffe a solid final look over at the hot corner in 2013, even though most people on this site think he is destined for failure - whats the worst thing that can happen? An error he commits loses the Twins a game. I believe the game(s) he loses for the Twins will be lost in a sea of losses caused by embarrassing awful starting pitching.

#10 DaveW

DaveW

    <3 Mark Derosa <3

  • Members
  • 5,728 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:15 PM

I should say that the deal isn't really unfair, it just doesn't make a lot of sense for Texas. If they really want to trade Olt, they probably can get a better deal. Olt also could just play first for Texas.

yeah it would prob take another piece from the Twins...maybe? I dunno though, Olt is a very nice prospect but is more in the 15-20 range then the top 5 range IMO.

Didn't they try to get Upton for Olt and the Diamondbacks declined? (I could be totally wrong on this)

I also think Morneau brings some value to the plate as well for them, and you never know....teams do tend to do silly things sometimes when a rival goes out and makes a huge splash.

#11 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 11,511 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:17 PM

teams do tend to do silly things sometimes when a rival goes out and makes a huge splash.


See Revere, Ben and Phillies, Philadelphia.

#12 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,091 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:21 PM

There are no defensive concerns with Olt. Scouting Report: Mike Olt (3B) | Baseball Prospect Nation

No chance Texas would make this trade.


Yep, you're right. My bad.

#13 LimestoneBaggy

LimestoneBaggy

    Self-Appointed Chief Executive Twins Daily Lurker

  • Members
  • 252 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:26 PM

I don't think I've ever agreed with Dave on something like this, but man I would love that trade. Olt to 3rd, Plouffe to 2nd......give them Dozier if they want a third piece....this also would provide protection from Sano's likely move to first, frees up Parmalee out of lost ville (population 1) and for the craps of it, bring up Arcia and Hicks when the timing is right to keep them under control longer.

--> And this is why this would never happen.

#14 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 11,739 posts
  • LocationGrand Rapids Michigan

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:32 PM

I'd be more inclined to go after Perez... even if Olt is considered the better prospect.

#15 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,483 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:46 PM

I'd be interested but average fan backlash could be quite vicious. It would be hard to argue attendance wouldn't take a large hit losing those two. You also don't often see two established vets moved for one prospect. I'm interested but it would take guts to make that move. Even if Ryan had it in him, this is the kind of move that could get vetoed by ownership due to short-sighted attendance concerns.

#16 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,513 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:50 PM

Short sighted? How are attendance concerns not relevant at all? That said, I would consider the trade, because it isn't my reputation and money on the line....

#17 LimestoneBaggy

LimestoneBaggy

    Self-Appointed Chief Executive Twins Daily Lurker

  • Members
  • 252 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:59 PM

River...you're supposed to agree with me, to prove the Forks stand united.

#18 lee_the_twins_fan

lee_the_twins_fan

    Member

  • Members
  • 87 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:24 PM

This trade makes no sense – for the Twins. A) We're looking for pitching. B) Why trade our last two pieces of any value for someone who may be a flash in the pan? I'm sorry, but I don't see this happening. And C) Plouffe is not going to second base. Maybe to OF, but not 2B.

#19 AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 399 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:42 PM

And here I am thinking that the Twins should at least get a second piece of some kind in this deal...


I dont think the Rangers would make this trade, but I do believe that it would be a fair trade, and I dont think youre too far off to say the Twins maybe should get a lower level pitching prospect with moderate upside.

#20 JP3700

JP3700

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 294 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:57 PM

Although I like the idea. Corner infield power isn't really a problem right now. With Plouffe, Morneau and Parmelee. Along with possibly Sano, Vargas and Harrison in the future.

With the Mariners missing out on Hamilton, my hope is that they also miss out on Swisher and become desperate for that power bat they've been seeking. That's when we jump in with Willingham, and look for a package similar to the Revere deal. Maybe a return of Brandon Maurer and Hector Noesi