Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Article: Is Marcum the Twins' Best Hope?

  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,265 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:05 AM

You can view the page at http://www.twinsdail...Twins-Best-Hope

#2 Top Gun

Top Gun

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,253 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:57 AM

Gamble ya but you got to find someone better than this.

#3 AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 399 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:58 AM

Everything free agent is a gamble basically, I wouldnt say Marcum is the Center piece to a rotation. In my mind hes a number 3 pitcher. I would love to have him, but he will probably get more than he is worth, im sure the Twins wont spend somewhere around 20 million for 2 years on a guy like Marcum.

#4 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 01:13 AM

It would be good if he wasn't THE BEST HOPE, but the guy would be a very good addition. He fits well for the Twins and Target Field and does manage to strike more people out than what one might expect. I would find it ridiculous to be out-bid on Marcum. A Pavanoesque deal plus inflation might do it, and he is significantly better than Pavano. 2/20 and an option year with 2 million buyout seems easy for the Twins to do. The Twins should have $30 million to spend if ownership wants to. There are great smart pitching moves to be made for that money. AND AGAIN, the dollars are dropping after this season with Morneau, Blackburn, and Carroll off . . . so that 23 million reduction for next year should factor into this. Dempster and Marcum, Jackson and Marcum. Money should be no object there. And they would provide the key for 2014 and 2015.

#5 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 976 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 01:46 AM

Please no Dempster(too old). Would love Marcum for 2 - 3 years. Would help the blow of the rest of the pitchers the Twins are likely to sign.

#6 Paul Pleiss

Paul Pleiss

    Drew Butera's Fastball

  • Members
  • 1,021 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 02:42 AM

I'm beginning to think that signing Marcum, or any other pseudo-big name this off-season is a bad move. I prefer the idea of moving Revere, staying away from big money guys and building for 2014+

-P

#7 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,358 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:47 AM

And then spending money in 2014? Why not spend some now? Or do you have another plan for getting players in 2014?

#8 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:51 AM

I'm all for getting Marcum. He's a good pitcher.

#9 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 11,099 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:56 AM

It would be good if he wasn't THE BEST HOPE, but the guy would be a very good addition. He fits well for the Twins and Target Field and does manage to strike more people out than what one might expect. I would find it ridiculous to be out-bid on Marcum. A Pavanoesque deal plus inflation might do it, and he is significantly better than Pavano. 2/20 and an option year with 2 million buyout seems easy for the Twins to do. The Twins should have $30 million to spend if ownership wants to. There are great smart pitching moves to be made for that money. AND AGAIN, the dollars are dropping after this season with Morneau, Blackburn, and Carroll off . . . so that 23 million reduction for next year should factor into this. Dempster and Marcum, Jackson and Marcum. Money should be no object there. And they would provide the key for 2014 and 2015.


I agree... Although I have condensed my hope to just one arm. I do agree. This waiting for something to happen is hard.

It would be nice if I could be multiple fly's on multiple walls providing no one has a fly swatter.

#10 old nurse

old nurse

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,896 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 09:14 AM

Marcum might be the highest rank pitcher the Twins can sign without grossly overpaying

#11 ericchri

ericchri

    Generally Clueless

  • Members
  • 404 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 09:33 AM

He seem like the high end of what the Twins will realistically get. I'm not sure if that qualifies as a 'best hope' or not, though.

#12 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:18 AM

Maybe the Twins' crack medical staff believes they've spotted something in Marcum's medical history that they believe they can fix. #sarcasm

#13 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,358 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:30 AM

Jim is on fire across threads.....

#14 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 11:12 AM

Jim is on fire across threads.....


Shhhhh... my bosses think all this typing I'm doing means I'm working my butt off!

Actually, one of my bosses is in Dallas and the other in Los Angeles... which probably does partially explain how I can get away with this :)
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#15 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 7,797 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:08 PM

I'm beginning to think that signing Marcum, or any other pseudo-big name this off-season is a bad move. I prefer the idea of moving Revere, staying away from big money guys and building for 2014+


2015, more like. And then you have to have somebody to do more than simply fill out the roster for those two years - you can't commit to 110-loss seasons, this market will quit on you if you did. Contracts have to be viewed in that light. I'd be all for Dempster except he apparently wants 3 years and he's a risk to be bad by that third year, so no-go. I'm fine with trading Revere but you have to have a cost-effective yet capable replacement in mind until the young'uns are really ready (the alternative being to start the arbitration/free-agent clock prematurely on the guys you want to have contributing after 2015 too, in effect paying arbitration money later on for a 2013 of below-par play by a future stud). And so forth.

#16 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 7,797 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:09 PM

Actually, one of my bosses is in Dallas and the other in Los Angeles... which probably does partially explain how I can get away with this :)


They have teh internets in Dallas and LA too, y'know.

#17 AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 399 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:17 PM

actually, one of my bosses is in dallas and the other in los angeles... Which probably does partially explain how i can get away with this :)


they have teh internets in dallas and la too, y'know.


^^^ buzzkill

#18 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:25 PM

Actually, one of my bosses is in Dallas and the other in Los Angeles... which probably does partially explain how I can get away with this :)


They have teh internets in Dallas and LA too, y'know.


You'd have to know my bosses. I'm pretty sure the availability of the internet would be news to at least one of them :)

Besides... I'm really good at what I do, so they tend to make allowances for some of my less productive "hobbies".
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#19 DAM DC Twins Fans

DAM DC Twins Fans

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 556 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 02:52 PM

While Marcum seems to be a (slight) step up from Edwin Jackson and the rest--I agree with those above--he is at best a weak number 2 (like Diamond). Maybe the best thing for Twins is sign him to a 2 year deal (with 3rd year option) for about 25mill and give DeVries, Deduno, Walters, etc one last shot to show something this year. Hope gibson is good in June and trade at deadline for pitcher.

#20 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 8,358 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 03:18 PM

What exactly is wrong with a number 2 pitcher, and what do people think those cost?