Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

How high would you go for Brandon McCarthy?

  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#1 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 5,093 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:53 AM

Given the escalated salaries for starting pitchers, how high would you be willing to go for Brandon McCarthy? He's been very good when healthy, but also has only thrown 111 and 170 innings the last two years. He was out all of 2010. So there is plenty of gamble there.

Would you be willing to go three years?
Would you be willing to go up to $10M/year? $11M?

Think of this as a blind bid situation. If you get the biggest total number, you get him. What would you be willing to do?

(I think I top out at 2/22 or 3/30.)

#2 raindog

raindog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 310 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:05 AM

(I think I top out at 2/22 or 3/30.)


This. No higher.

#3 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 821 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:13 AM

2 for 20 with a team option of 11 mil for a third year. A guy who got his head almost knocked off for 10mil scares me.

#4 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 7,631 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:13 AM

Well, Haren just went 13 million for 1 year.

#5 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,562 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:29 AM

I'd probably leave him alone but 3/24 would be my limit. Pitching in Oakland, I think, helps him a great deal.

He does have a stunning wife though.

#6 powrwrap

powrwrap

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 451 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:45 AM

Assuming he's healthy (good point Twerp) I'd go 2/24 or 3/33. If you want starting pitching, and you are in a secondary market, better pay. Look at Carlos Silva in Seattle and Gil Meche in KC. McCarthy's 3.66 ERA and 1.22 WHIP over the past 4 years is solid and easily better than any 4 year stretch by Meche or Silva.
[FONT=comic sans ms]"Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand." [/FONT]

#7 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 8,773 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:49 AM

I'd go 2 years, $18 million, with a $10 million option for 2015... with a $1 million buyout.

So, that'd be a 2 year, $19 million deal with option.

#8 drivlikejehu

drivlikejehu

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 534 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:51 AM

Pitching has always been expensive. Revenues have risen, and payrolls along with it, but even back in the day there was Mike Hampton and so forth.

McCarthy doesn't have a great track record for his career like Haren. I just don't think teams will go totally crazy over a limited-upside question mark, even in this market. I wouldn't offer more than 2/16.

#9 fittdogg

fittdogg

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 19 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:08 PM

3 years $36 million or even 4 years $48 million. When you put up ERA numbers like that in the American League, he's worth it.

#10 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,373 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:12 PM

I wouldn't push it at all. I guess two years guaranteed for a walking injury concern is not terrible. A Pavano-esque deal then. I would prefer a 1/10 with a 12 million option and 1 million buyout the best though. Or let the White Sox throw 4 years at him and watch that fail miserably.

#11 syves

syves

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 21 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:21 PM

With his history, as high as that referendum is gonna make Colorado.

I'm not gonna pay someone $10 million who has pitched over 150 innings one time since 2006.

#12 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,373 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:30 PM

With his history, as high as that referendum is gonna make Colorado.

I'm not gonna pay someone $10 million who has pitched over 150 innings one time since 2006.


Yeah, I really find the love for him around here bizarre. 3 or 4 years!!!???

#13 Jim H

Jim H

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 439 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:41 PM

The problem with this question for me is what are other options and what really is the budget? It is hard to say what amount of money should be committed to a pretty risky guy like McCarthy when you really don't know how much the Twins are willing to spend for 2013 and for future years. I would likely rather have McCarthy then Edwin Jackson but that depends on money and years. Maybe the best stragedy here, is find 4 reasonable risk starters for 1 year each for $20-25 mil. It gives you some depth, it would allow to address other areas and may save some be spent during the season if the Twins happened to be better than expected.

Investing money in a McCarthy is a large gamble if you have to go multiple years. A guy like Jackson might have ace stuff, but generally pitches like a back of rotation guy, plus no team seems to want him after watching pitch for a year. So maybe you sign 4 moderate risk, moderate reward guys to 1 year deals and see what your team looks like in July.

#14 whydidnt

whydidnt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 405 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:43 PM

I guess I'd be surprised if he got the kind of money most are floating around here. His track record of injuries is going to cause teams to pause on anything more than a year. 1 Year 8.5 or 2 yrs 16 should be pretty competitive. Haren has a much longer track record of success and fewer injuries and just got 1 -13 from the Nationals, I really can't see McCarthy approaching those numbers.

#15 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 821 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:50 PM

I guess I'd be surprised if he got the kind of money most are floating around here. His track record of injuries is going to cause teams to pause on anything more than a year. 1 Year 8.5 or 2 yrs 16 should be pretty competitive. Haren has a much longer track record of success and fewer injuries and just got 1 -13 from the Nationals, I really can't see McCarthy approaching those numbers.


Because he is only 29, still has potential as a mid-rotation guy, and multiple team are bidding on him. The guy is going to take the best deal with the most money or multiple years. My guess is someone will be willing to put in a second year. He will take the second year and run to the bank with it.

#16 old nurse

old nurse

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,875 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 01:03 PM

You could be creative and go a little lower around 16 for 2 with a generous bonus for IP. Make it a win/win.

#17 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,614 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 01:26 PM

1st year 6MM with incentives that go as high as 10MM, 2nd year opion 12MM with a 1.5MM buyout.

#18 whydidnt

whydidnt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 405 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 01:42 PM

Because he is only 29, still has potential as a mid-rotation guy, and multiple team are bidding on him. The guy is going to take the best deal with the most money or multiple years. My guess is someone will be willing to put in a second year. He will take the second year and run to the bank with it.

I agree that he'll probably get 2 years, but I still think teams are going to be shy because of the injury track record. He's had serious shoulder injuries throughout his career and those are the one's that are the most difficult to overcome. I'm not saying a don't like the guy or that he wouldn't be an upgrade here, but I also think if you're going to invest 10+ million a year you want someone that you think has a good chance of making it through the season.

#19 JP3700

JP3700

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 294 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 01:45 PM

You could be creative and go a little lower around 16 for 2 with a generous bonus for IP. Make it a win/win.


I agree. 2 years, $16 million with up to $3 million in incentives each year based on IP. I'd also add a third year vesting option.

#20 johnnydakota

johnnydakota

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 1,498 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 01:48 PM

Off subject , but can anyone tell me why Salcedo is rated higher as a prospect then Berrois is?