Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Scott Feldman, the Cubs, and how Theo Epstien is making Terry Ryan's life miserable

  • Please log in to reply
112 replies to this topic

#1 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,536 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:35 AM

The Cubs just gave Scott Feldman, a back end of the rotation/swingman, a $6 million base salary plus incentives. The Cubs certainly seem to be setting the market for low-end starting pitching options with this signing and the generous deal they gave to Scott Baker. I'd guess moves like this indicate there will be little to no starting pitching bargain shopping this holiday season, even to get a guy who should profile to be a number five starter, Terry Ryan is still going to have to overpay.

I sure hope he has a few deals in the works for young controlable starters because I'm going to be pretty disappointed if the Twins walk away from this offseason having to overpay for a soft tossing number 4 starter like Joe Saunders or Brandon McCarthy and still be forced to pay $8 million+. In doing so, Ryan would then have to try to con the fanbase into believing that one of these bums is actually an ace.

#2 DaveW

DaveW

    <3 Mark Derosa <3

  • Members
  • 5,901 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:43 AM

Just because two terrible teams like the Cubs and Royals are overpaying for garbage doesn't mean the rest of the teams are going to follow suit.

Feldman for 6 million is a freaking joke. Anything over 2.5 mil for him is overpaying.

#3 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 11,618 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:44 AM

Just because two terrible teams like the Cubs and Royals are overpaying for garbage doesn't mean the rest of the teams are going to follow suit.

Feldman for 6 million is a freaking joke. Anything over 2.5 mil for him is overpaying.


A rising tide lifts all boats.

The Cubs aren't doing the Twins any favors, that's for sure.

#4 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,661 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:47 AM

Fangraphs believes he will be league average and is a great value. I do not think he is the pitcher you all think he is. He us making Ryan's job hard because he is taking all the bargains off the table, reducing the supply of pitchers....

#5 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 5,202 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:03 AM

Darn. Feldman was a sleeper that I liked.

#6 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,536 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:03 AM

Fangraphs believes he will be league average and is a great value. I do not think he is the pitcher you all think he is. He us making Ryan's job hard because he is taking all the bargains off the table, reducing the supply of pitchers....


I would have been happy with Feldmen as a sleeper pick up, but when you pay a guy $6 million it kind of erases the UNDERRATED/SLEEPER label from your title. If the Twins pay a starter $6 million, he's probably going to be expected to 2-3 starter.

#7 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,661 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:08 AM

A number 2 starter is worth 12 to 15 million a year, not 6.

#8 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,536 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:10 AM

Terry Ryan doesn't have Fangraphs bookmarked. $6 million is a 2-3 for the Twins.

#9 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 9,854 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:27 AM

I'm in agreement with those that anything over about $3-4 million for Feldman was too much, so this signing does nothing for me...

#10 Boom Boom

Boom Boom

    Hydraulic Choppers

  • Members
  • 1,388 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:31 AM

Poor TR. How's he supposed to put together a contending rotation on a shoestring budget now?

#11 minn55441

minn55441

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 522 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:51 AM

TR was on talkin' Twins last night.

After listening the three things I cam away from the discussion. I"m para-phrasing here, so give me a little latitude.

1) Essentially all of the free agent money will be devoted to Pitching.
2) Signing prior to the winter meetings tend to be overpriced.
3) He is expecting to sign enough quality starting pitching so that the team can compete in 2013

The Jury is obviously still out, but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt until we start to see him actually make some moves.

He either knows what he is doing and will put together a quality pitching staff or the game has passed him by and it is time for a change. Either way we should know on April 1st.

#12 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:24 PM

We can keep consoling ourselves by saying this GM paid too much for that starter and that GM paid too much for that starter...until it finally clicks that the only way you sign anyone decent is by 'spending too much'...which turns into it really not being too much cause it's the amount needed to get the job done.

#13 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:25 PM

Fangraphs believes he will be league average and is a great value. I do not think he is the pitcher you all think he is. He us making Ryan's job hard because he is taking all the bargains off the table, reducing the supply of pitchers....


I would have been happy with Feldmen as a sleeper pick up, but when you pay a guy $6 million it kind of erases the UNDERRATED/SLEEPER label from your title. If the Twins pay a starter $6 million, he's probably going to be expected to 2-3 starter.


6 million isn't gonna get you a #2 or even a top notch #3.

#14 Jim Crikket

Jim Crikket

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:38 PM

[quote name='ThePuck'][quote name='nicksaviking'][quote name='mike wants wins']Fangraphs believes he will be league average and is a great value. I do not think he is the pitcher you all think he is. He us making Ryan's job hard because he is taking all the bargains off the table, reducing the supply of pitchers....[/QUOTE]

I would have been happy with Feldmen as a sleeper pick up, but when you pay a guy $6 million it kind of erases the UNDERRATED/SLEEPER label from your title. If the Twins pay a starter $6 million, he's probably going to be expected to 2-3 starter.[/QUOTE]

6 million isn't gonna get you a #2 or even a top notch #3.[/QUOTE]

If you change a couple of words to re-write the sentence as, "If the Twins pay a starter $6 million, he's probably going to be expected to BE THE TWINS' 2-3 starter," it becomes a much more accurate statement... unfortunately.
I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#15 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 842 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:40 PM

[quote name='ThePuck'][quote name='nicksaviking'][quote name='mike wants wins']Fangraphs believes he will be league average and is a great value. I do not think he is the pitcher you all think he is. He us making Ryan's job hard because he is taking all the bargains off the table, reducing the supply of pitchers....[/QUOTE]

I would have been happy with Feldmen as a sleeper pick up, but when you pay a guy $6 million it kind of erases the UNDERRATED/SLEEPER label from your title. If the Twins pay a starter $6 million, he's probably going to be expected to 2-3 starter.[/QUOTE]

6 million isn't gonna get you a #2 or even a top notch #3.[/QUOTE]

Would a "Top Notch #3" be a bottom notch #2?

#16 birdwatcher

birdwatcher

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,751 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:41 PM

Like minn55441, I listened to Ryan on ESPN 1500 with Mackey and Pelissaro last night. I was heartened in particular by one statement in response to a question about the trade involving Buehrle: "I respect Buehrle a lot....but we need several Buehrle's". He left the very distinct impression that he intends to solve the rotation problem, to do it with at least Buehrle quality pitchers, and that he has the financial muscle to do it.

I agree with minn55441. Time will tell. I personally am optimistic, and think the critics are premature in judging things, especially ahead of the winter meetings next week.

There are tons of Feldman's and Baker's out there. I'm holding out for two pitchers better than those two, maybe a third.

#17 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:42 PM

[quote name='Twins Twerp'][quote name='ThePuck'][quote name='nicksaviking'][quote name='mike wants wins']Fangraphs believes he will be league average and is a great value. I do not think he is the pitcher you all think he is. He us making Ryan's job hard because he is taking all the bargains off the table, reducing the supply of pitchers....[/QUOTE]

I would have been happy with Feldmen as a sleeper pick up, but when you pay a guy $6 million it kind of erases the UNDERRATED/SLEEPER label from your title. If the Twins pay a starter $6 million, he's probably going to be expected to 2-3 starter.[/QUOTE]

6 million isn't gonna get you a #2 or even a top notch #3.[/QUOTE]

Would a "Top Notch #3" be a bottom notch #2?[/QUOTE]

Sure, why not :-)

#18 twinkiesfan11

twinkiesfan11

    Member

  • Members
  • 66 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:52 PM

I'm in agreement with those that anything over about $3-4 million for Feldman was too much, so this signing does nothing for me...


I'm so sick of Twins apologists and statements like this, quit trying to be an armchair GM. IT'S A ONE YEAR FRICKING DEAL! I don't even care about Feldman specifically, but to justify passing on a player over $2-3 million on a ONE YEAR contract?!?! Come on!!

#19 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 12:59 PM

I'm in agreement with those that anything over about $3-4 million for Feldman was too much, so this signing does nothing for me...


I'm so sick of Twins apologists and statements like this, quit trying to be an armchair GM. IT'S A ONE YEAR FRICKING DEAL! I don't even care about Feldman specifically, but to justify passing on a player over $2-3 million on a ONE YEAR contract?!?! Come on!!


Makes one wonder what kind of free agent pitcher you'd expect to be able to sign for 6M a year...

#20 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 9,661 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:10 PM

Tons of Feldmans and Bakers? What is your definition of "tons"? Because I would put them in the top 20 easily.