Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Anibal looking for 6/90

  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#1 Willihammer

Willihammer

    ice cream correspondent

  • Members
  • 4,402 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 09 November 2012 - 09:59 AM

http://www.mlbtrader...m-contract.html

MLBTR thinks the deciding factor could be whether 6th year is guaranteed,

#2 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,091 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:04 AM

I really want Sanchez so I'd do it but no one is ever going to be dumb enough to make me a GM. If Sanchez breaks down like Santana did, it'll be a horrible deal.

#3 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 843 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:15 AM

Haha, 6 years. You lost me at and TR at multiple years. I could see going 3-4 years for a pitcher in free agency, but six is stupid. I don't think anyone, except a hometown hero who plays a premium position and is a sure fire hall of famer, is worth 6 years. Especially with the frequency of Tommy John surgeries nowadays.

#4 ThePuck

ThePuck

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,232 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:18 AM

http://www.mlbtrader...m-contract.html

MLBTR thinks the deciding factor could be whether 6th year is guaranteed,


Absolutely ridiculous. I'm gonna laugh at the team that does that...he's a good pitcher, but not worth THAT kind of money

#5 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 12,199 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:41 AM

Yeah, not so much. Anything over four years is a mistake when acquiring a pitcher, especially this offseason where there are so many quality arms to be had.

#6 kab21

kab21

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,159 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:41 AM

I think Anibal is going to be the 2nd highest paid pitcher this offseason. I have him pegged at around CJ Wilson's contract last year (5/75) so this isn't surprising. And I had already crossed him off my wishlist.

#7 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 12,199 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:42 AM

I think Anibal is going to be the 2nd highest paid pitcher this offseason. I have him pegged at around CJ Wilson's contract last year (5/75) so this isn't surprising. And I had already crossed him off my wishlist.


Yep, I had pretty much crossed him off. He hasn't proven enough in the AL to warrant even five years, in my opinion. At least Wilson had years under his belt of pitching half his games in Arlington and against American League offenses.

#8 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 5,272 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:47 AM

I feel a little bad about our estimate in the Handbook right now, which is quite a bit lower. But the reason it was lower is interesting, especially given this report...

It's because the initial writeup of him was done at the end of August. And at that point, his time with the Tigers was a big question mark. He really struggled early with them, his numbers were down, and initially we wondered if he wouldn't need to sign a "make good" deal to show he was healthy or could pitch in the AL. Then he finished strong, seemingly answered those questions and became everyone's darling. We revised our estimate when the season was over, but it still weighed down the number a little bit.

I just think it's interesting that a small number of starts - just eight - can change the paradigm or story, and suddenly the guy is guaranteed tens of millions of more dollars. Teams really are fishing in the dark on a lot of this stuff.

#9 sorney

sorney

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 177 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:59 AM

I feel a little bad about our estimate in the Handbook right now, which is quite a bit lower. But the reason it was lower is interesting, especially given this report...

It's because the initial writeup of him was done at the end of August. And at that point, his time with the Tigers was a big question mark. He really struggled early with them, his numbers were down, and initially we wondered if he wouldn't need to sign a "make good" deal to show he was healthy or could pitch in the AL. Then he finished strong, seemingly answered those questions and became everyone's darling. We revised our estimate when the season was over, but it still weighed down the number a little bit.

I just think it's interesting that a small number of starts - just eight - can change the paradigm or story, and suddenly the guy is guaranteed tens of millions of more dollars. Teams really are fishing in the dark on a lot of this stuff.



This probably shows why quality pitchers are such a scarce commodity....8 starts and GM's are drooling over themselves.

#10 iastfan112

iastfan112

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 208 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 02:00 PM

Worth mention it's what he's looking for, not necessarily what he'll get, Edwin Jackson wanted a multiyear deal last year and no one sprang for that. I see teams shying away from offering that many years with his injury history. The 15 million per year wouldn't surprise me at all but I see a 4 year deal as much more likely, perhaps an option for a 5th year.

#11 AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 399 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 03:48 PM

This guy has to be nuts! 6/90? No way an injury prone pitcher who has around a 4 ERA in the NL? No thank you. 3 years 24 million is more like it.

#12 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 5,341 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 09 November 2012 - 05:30 PM

Good luck. Maybe 3/40. Maybe. More like 3/30-35
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#13 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 843 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 05:51 PM

I am looking for a 5 year 6 million dollar deal to coach another elementary basketball job.

#14 minn55441

minn55441

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 522 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 05:53 PM

I guess he wanted to start his opening negotiation price a little on the high side. I can't imagine a team offering even close to that in years or dollars.

#15 kab21

kab21

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,159 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 08:05 PM

This probably shows why quality pitchers are such a scarce commodity....8 starts and GM's are drooling over themselves.


I think the reverse is true. Some were pointing to his early struggles as a reason that he wouldn't be successful. Both are small sample size. The fact is that he's been good (not great) and he hasn't missed a start in 3.5 yrs. He's also the youngest FA pitcher available this offseason. the only argument that people really have is this AL/NL thing and I think people completely blow that out of proportion.

Edited by kab21, 09 November 2012 - 08:12 PM.


#16 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 5,341 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 09 November 2012 - 08:31 PM

the only argument that people really have is this AL/NL thing and I think people completely blow that out of proportion.


ok. Any evidence to suggest that NL pitchers can be as successful in the AL?
I can throw over a slew for the other way. Mater of fact, when I am trying to evaluate NL performance for SPs and try to translate it to AL performance, I start with a factor of about 1.2 for most metrics...

Edited by Thrylos, 09 November 2012 - 08:41 PM.

-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#17 Fire Dan Gladden

Fire Dan Gladden

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 382 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 08:35 PM

Nope. 3/30 is as high as I would go for him.

#18 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,027 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:06 PM

If he gets 6 years for 90 this market is out of whack. 3 - 4 years is the max I would pay for a pitcher that rates to be a #2 or #3 starter. It may be that $15 mil a year may be standard.

#19 YourHouseIsMyHouse

YourHouseIsMyHouse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,235 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:16 PM

In other news, Gerald Laird looking for 5 years/50 million.

#20 kab21

kab21

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,159 posts

Posted 10 November 2012 - 12:14 AM

the only argument that people really have is this AL/NL thing and I think people completely blow that out of proportion.


ok. Any evidence to suggest that NL pitchers can be as successful in the AL?
I can throw over a slew for the other way. Mater of fact, when I am trying to evaluate NL performance for SPs and try to translate it to AL performance, I start with a factor of about 1.2 for most metrics...


Yeah I remember your adjustments. it was something like subtract 1.5 K/9 and add 1 BB/9. There should be an adjustment but these numbers are completely ridiculous. NL pitchers don't become pumpkins when they move over to the AL and AL pitchers don't become aces when they do it.