Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Recent Blogs


Twins Daily 2020 Top Prospects: #9 Brent Rooker

brent rooker
  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson


  • Owner
  • 4,270 posts

Posted 06 February 2020 - 08:52 PM

The Minnesota Twins are not short on slugging talents presently, but that doesn't negate the excitement of having a truly prodigious power hitter, fresh off crushing at the highest level of the minors, ready to join the big-league ranks.

Brent Rooker has left little doubt that he can hit. All he needs now is an opportunity.Position: LF
Age: 25 (DOB: 11/1/1995)
2019 Stats (AAA): 274 PA, .281/.398/.535, 14 HR, 47 RBI
ETA: 2020
2019 Ranking: 6

National Top 100 Rankings

What's To Like

Power-hitting has been commoditized to a large degree in the modern MLB environment. Players who can straight-up mash, but don't excel in any defensive capacity, are not the coveted assets they once were. But that's not to say they aren't valued: Just take a look at Miguel Sano and his freshly minted $30 million contract extension.

And what Rooker can do is MASH. The Mississippi State product was widely considered one of the best hitters in the country when taken 35th overall by Minnesota in the 2017 draft, becoming the second player drafted under the Falvine Regime after they went with Royce Lewis No. 1 overall.

Rooker has backed up his prestigious offensive rep since entering pro ball, slashing .267/.357/.505 with 54 home runs through 259 total games. In 2019 he put up a .928 OPS at Triple-A, with a jaw-dropping .319/.463/.572 line in 41 games after June 1st. Sounds like a guy who's about major-league ready. In fact, he might've gotten there last summer if a groin injury hadn't derailed him in mid-July.

When he was on-stage as a guest at the recent Twins Daily Winter Meltdown, Kent Hrbek made an interesting a comment about the ferocity of uppercut swings that are now commonplace: "There's a lot of [retired] guys that talk about that nowadays, that there could've been a lot more home runs hit if you just sit and try to launch all day long. I mean you take a swing like they take swings off of guys now, you'd get the ball on the side of the head the next time up."

Rooker pretty much epitomizes what Hrbek was describing. He swings very hard and aims to put it in the air. His immense power is legitimately eye-catching; the ball just rockets off his bat, and tends to go very far, very fast.

While the continuance of his slugging success was a positive last year, the most promising development was his sharpening patience at the plate. Rooker walked 12.8% of the time, enabling him to reach base at a nearly .400 clip in Triple-A. He made enormous improvements with his discipline over the course of the year.

What's Left To Work On

The tough thing with Rooker's profile is that it leaves so little margin for error. He needs to maintain as an offensive force at the highest level to be a long-term regular in the majors. Defensively he's rather limited, whether in left field or at first base, and his best future fit seems to be as a designated hitter.

That's all well and good if he keeps on producing like he has, since Minnesota's DH spot is presently unspoken for after this year, but there is reason to wonder if he can translate his dominance to the highest level.

Namely, it's the strikeouts.

As a result of his relentlessly aggressive cuts, Rooker whiffs quite a bit. His 34.7% K-rate last year was ninth-highest in the International League (min. 200 PA), and would've been seventh-highest in the majors (two spots behind the previously mentioned Sano, another notorious hard-swinger). Rooker's .281 batting average for the Red Wings in 2019 was buoyed by a blatantly unsustainable .417 BABIP.

The lack of contact, if it continues, could make it tough for Rooker to find stable footing in the big leagues. Sano is one of the few productive hitters in that realm, though Joey Gallo is another notable example.

But, again, Rooker's studious nature and proven adaptiveness offer valid reason to hope he can cut down the strikeouts. He did lower his K-rate to 29% in his final 25 games for Rochester last year, after posting an egregious 38% rate his first 40.

What's Next

The Twins have been very successful – so far – with their top draft picks in recent years. Rooker is sort of a victim to this success. He's basically been the player they hoped he would be, but Minnesota also looks to have struck gold on fellow first-rounders and corner guys Alex Kirilloff (2016) and Trevor Larnach (2018), who project as more well-rounded big-leaguers and have fewer question marks.

Rooker is a step ahead of the others in development, having conquered Triple-A, but that doesn't help him much now, with nothing currently resembling a short-term opening on the MLB radar. That can of course change in a hurry when the current DH occupant is a 39-year-old with a balky wrist, and indeed, a Nelson Cruz absence is probably the most likely avenue for Rooker to reach the majors in short order. An injury to Sano or Eddie Rosario could also create an opening, to the extent the Twins are willing to tolerate Rooker's defense.

Until such an opportunity presents itself, Rooker will head back to Triple-A, where he will likely keep on mashing.

Twins Daily 2020 Top 20 Prospects
Honorable Mentions
20. Jose Miranda, 3B/2B
19. Cole Sands, RHP
18. Travis Blankenhorn, 2B/LF
17. Misael Urbina, OF
16. Edwar Colina, RP
15. Matt Canterino, RHP
14. Matt Wallner, OF
13. Wander Javier, SS
12. Gilberto Celestino, OF
11. Lewis Thorpe, LHP
10. Blayne Enlow, RHP
9. Brent Rooker, OF
Stop by Monday for prospect #8!

— Latest Twins coverage from our writers
— Recent Twins discussion in our forums
— Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

Click here to view the article

#2 Danchat


    Pro Bowl Armchair QB

  • Member
  • 5,763 posts

Posted 06 February 2020 - 09:00 PM

He had nearly .400 OBP with a 34.7 K% at AAA? Wow, he's quite the 3 outcome hitter.


I do hope we get to see him this year... but it that will only likely happen with Sano/Cruz getting hurt. With Larnach and Kiriloff coming up eventually, I hope Rooker can find MLB success somewhere, but I find it hard to see that happening with the Twins.

  • JoshDungan1 and SF Twins Fan like this

#3 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs


  • Owner
  • 18,471 posts

Posted 06 February 2020 - 10:56 PM

Our rankings:


Seth: 14

Nick: 8

Tom: 8

Cody: 13


I think that Brent Rooker can be a long-term, 200+ MLB home run type of player, and I think that's very realistic... And I ranked him #14 in this system, and I don't know, in looking at my personal rankings, that I have him behind anyone that I shouldn't... Which tells me again that this Twins system is so strong... and that I could probably lump my #8 through #15 prospects into a group and you could put them in any order. 


April 2019:16 G, .214/.279/.464 (.743) with 2 doubles, 4 HR. 45.9% K%

After April 2019: 49 G, .302/.432/.558 (.990) with 14 doubles, 10 HR, 31.4% K%


Contact will be the biggest thing for him. When he makes contact, good things happen. 


Defense is the question. 

  • Tibs, dbminn, JoshDungan1 and 3 others like this

#4 High heat

High heat

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 131 posts

Posted 06 February 2020 - 11:28 PM

id be on the phone with Boston asking if they want to swap Rooker and something with Graterol.They still need a 1B if im not mistaken.

  • Bill Tanner, Minny505 and wabene like this

#5 Richard Swerdlick

Richard Swerdlick

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 148 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 04:36 AM

He sounds like trade bait to me.

  • DannySD likes this

#6 blindeke



  • Member
  • 626 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 07:03 AM

Just how bad is his defense? Like who are you comparing him to out there, on a scale of Kepler to Delmon?

  • Tibs, SF Twins Fan and rdehring like this

#7 rdehring


    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 2,087 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 07:25 AM

Didn't know what to expect when drafted.To be honest, he has performed better than I expected.Still don't know what we have.Rather than going down, will the strikeouts increase when he faces major league pitching?As blindeke asks above, how bad is his defense? 


Expect we will learn a lot more this year and if he is the studious hard worker and improves a bit in both areas of concern, may be another big bat.Just don't know where he will fit with the Twins this year or beyond.I know everyone keeps assuming the DH spot will be open in 2021.What if Nelson has a repeat performance of 2019, does he return on a one year contract?I sure as heck would hope so.  

  • Minny505 likes this

#8 MN_ExPat


    I had fun once... It was awful.

  • Member
  • 543 posts
  • LocationSouth Georgia (the state, not the country)

Posted 07 February 2020 - 08:17 AM


Just how bad is his defense? Like who are you comparing him to out there, on a scale of Kepler to Delmon?

The games I saw him play with Chattanooga... I wouldn't say he's a Gold Glover, but honestly... he was passable.


Rooker is a very athletic guy and moves very well.He may not have great natural defensive instincts, but at the end of the day I truly believe he can be at least adequate. 

  • USNMCPO, TNTwinsFan, DocBauer and 4 others like this

#9 rdehring


    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 2,087 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 08:22 AM


The games I saw him play with Chattanooga... I wouldn't say he's a Gold Glover, but honestly... he was passable.


Rooker is a very athletic guy and moves very well.He may not have great natural defensive instincts, but at the end of the day I truly believe he can be at least adequate. 

Thanks ExPat.When you saw him, was he at first base or in the outfield?

#10 MN_ExPat


    I had fun once... It was awful.

  • Member
  • 543 posts
  • LocationSouth Georgia (the state, not the country)

Posted 07 February 2020 - 08:46 AM


Thanks ExPat.When you saw him, was he at first base or in the outfield?

Mostly 1B. The game in the outfield, I don't remember a lot being hit to him or at least nothing challenging. 

  • rdehring likes this

#11 Yoke


    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 91 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 08:52 AM

I think he'll be good insurance to have at AAA for if Sano gets hurt. Miguel is usually good for an injury or two during the season, so having Rooker around to come up would be nice. If he comes up, he can find some things to work on when he goes back down.


Later in the season he could be a good 26th man, then, and it hurts me on the inside to say this, Astudillo can go to AAA.

  • TNTwinsFan and wabene like this

#12 Shaitan


    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,530 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 09:20 AM

I think opening with "little doubt that he can hit" and burying that he doesn't make contact in 1/3 of his ABs is misleading.


I see the strikeouts in MiLB as a major concern. It seems like he's closer to Sano on his cold streaks.

  • chpettit19 and jkcarew like this

#13 mikelink45


    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 3,515 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 09:27 AM

We have Raley, Kiriloff and Larnach.I think Rooker is a trade candidate.


I hate his strikeouts.If you ask me what he has to work on - its defense first, become a valuable player not a very young DH.Second learn contact.With that much power if he makes contact there will be more home runs.


I prefer Seth's rating. 

  • Dman, DocBauer, chpettit19 and 1 other like this

#14 Aerodeliria


    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 711 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 09:33 AM

I got to watch him play on team USA during the WBC here in Japan. Obviously, his range in the OF is somewhat limited, but he ran good routes on balls hit his way and didn't make any gaffes on the field, which could not be said of the other OFs.

As for hitting, he appeared quite patient and boasted a +.400 BA. Granted, these are miniscule samples, but I liked his approach.
  • DocBauer, Minny505, MN_ExPat and 1 other like this

#15 Litdus


    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 9 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 09:35 AM

I though it was interesting the Twins Caravan radio commercials called him a First aseman when he played no frst base last year

  • jkcarew likes this

#16 gunnarthor


    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 10,182 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 09:52 AM

I like Rooker. He'll get some time in the majors this year when Donaldson, Cruz or Sano go to the DL.


With the new roster expansion to 26 players, I wonder if the Twins would risk having a thunder bat on the bench for a few pinch hit opportunities over the year and spot starts or go with a more flexible option. Obviously, you generally want young guys to get constant playing time over bench time but if A) you think he's more or less ML ready now and B) his future is closer to platoon bat/bench player anyway ...


There are going to be a lot of games where the Twins start Astudillo or Adrianza and maybe even Jake Cave or Wade. Having a big pinch hit bat on the bench might be an interesting experiment for the team. 

#17 rdehring


    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 2,087 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 10:02 AM

What will be interesting is to see who gets the call if Sano spends any time on the IL.Will it be Rooker?Or will it be Kirilloff.Doubt they would bring Kirilloff north if Sano was injured for opening day.But a month or two later, could be either.

#18 DocBauer


    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 6,883 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 11:19 AM

What I have always appreciated, and where I have found faith/hope with Rooker is he has shown the ability to make adjustments at every level.

2018, IIRC, he started rather abysmal at AA and then flipped a switch. He was OK in 2019 at Rochester and then the same thing happened before his injury.

He may not mash immediately at the ML level when he gets a chance, but I believe he will make adjustments, as he's always done, and build from there.
  • Steve Lein, Dman, MN_ExPat and 1 other like this
"Nice catch Hayes...don't ever f*****g do it again."

--Lou Brown

#19 jkcarew


    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,893 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 11:53 AM

I'd be a low-teens guy on Rooker. The 2019 number are inflated...both in terms of what the International league was in 2019 (there were 4 guys at Rochester last year that slashed better than Rooker)...and in terms of his unsustainably high BABiP.


In 2018, as a 23-year-old in AA, he was .254/.333/.465. That's not bad, but it's not great either. And he's 25 now. Could be a late bloomer like Garver (was Garver ever ranked as high as #9?)...but Rooker has a much slimmer margin of error. Guys that can hit for power and play a bad corner outfield or first base are a dime a dozen. Catcher, not so much.

  • mikelink45 and chpettit19 like this

#20 drivlikejehu


    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 2,214 posts

Posted 07 February 2020 - 12:14 PM

I like Fangraphs #17 ranking. His current approach doesn't seem like it's going to work, and he's 25 years old . . . just not sure where the value comes from, given lack of defense and the likelihood of very low batting averages with only average walk rates (i.e., low OBP). 

  • mikelink45 and chpettit19 like this

If you ain't got no haters, you ain't poppin'.

Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: brent rooker