Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Photo

Trading for Price and Betts

windows starting pitching trade market all in dreams
  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

#1 Twinsrule1991

Twinsrule1991

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 15 posts
  • LocationHam Lake, MN

Posted 21 January 2020 - 10:36 AM

Good Morning,

 

Per the MLBTR article linked, how would y'all feel about trying to swing a deal with the Red Sox for Mookie Betts and David Price? It appears the Sox are trying to package them together for a couple of high end prospects and it could be a nice opportunity for the Twins.

 

What does a deal look like in this case? Would the Pohlads ever eat this much money to go after a World Series championship?

 

My proposed deal would look something like this:

 

Twins Receive:

Mookie Betts (OF)

  • 2020 Salary - $27,000,000
  • Free Agent at end of 2020 Season

David Price (SP)

  • 2020-2022 Salary - $32,000,000
  • Free Agent at end of 2022 Season
  • Red Sox retain 20% of salary ($6,400,000 per year, $19,200,000 total)

Thaddeus Ward (RHP)

  • Red Sox #10 Prospect, 2018 5th Round Pick from UCF
  • Rule 5 Draft Eligible: December 2021
  • Projected to hit the Majors in Late 2021

 

Red Sox Receive:

 

Eddie Rosario (OF)

  • 2020 Salary - $7,750,000
  • Free Agent at end of 2021 Season

Fernando Romero (RHP)

  • Pre-Arb with 6 years of control remaining
  • Former top prospect

Royce Lewis (SS/CF)

  • Twins #1 Prospect (per TD)
  • Pre-arb with 6 years of control remaining
  • ETA of Late 2021/2022

Jordan Balazovic (RHP)

  • Twins #4 Prospect (per TD)
  • Pre-arb with 6 years of control remaining
  • ETA of Late 2021

Brent Rooker (1B/OF)

  • Twins #14 Prospect (per TD)
  • Pre-arb with 6 years of control remaining
  • ETA of Mid to Late 2020

Wander Javier (SS)

  • Twins #20 Prosper (per TD)
  • Pre-arb with 6 years of control remaining
  • ETA of Late 2022-2023

This deal offers the Red Sox some much needed prospect capital and salary relief, as well as a cheap replacement for Mookie Betts in Eddie Rosario. I feel JD Martinez could really help Eddie become a dynamite player in Boston. This deal also offers Romero a much needed change of scenery and an opportunity to get back on track. 

 

For the Twins, this takes their "wide open window" and shatters the frame around it. Betts is a former MVP in the prime of his career who can catapult this team to the best record in baseball. While we probably won't be able to re-sign him, one year of Betts is enough to make this team the definitive favorite to come out of the American League. Secondly, which is crazy, is the addition on a legitimate #2-3 starter in David Price. He provides much needed help at the top of the rotation and has postseason credibility that goes back over a decade.

 

It might take a one or two more low end prospects from the Twins to push the needle on this, but I think this could be a framework to getting a massive lineup upgrade and a very good starting pitcher.

 

Thanks for any comments or ideas you may have!

  • Vanimal46 likes this

#2 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    A Little Teapot

  • Owner
  • 23,438 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 10:47 AM

While I believe the Twins should be closer to $160m in payroll, this would put them around $180m, which is probably unreasonable.
  • Twins33, Mike Frasier Law, Brandon and 7 others like this

#3 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    G.O.A.T.

  • Moderator
  • 15,001 posts
  • Locationthe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 21 January 2020 - 10:55 AM

that and I'm not sure how tradeable price is at his salary... I doubt Boston wants to combine them.... not sure the return (given their salaries) will be that high either... 

 

And what Brock said, I don't see payroll that high. 

  • Twins33 and SF Twins Fan like this

#4 Twinsrule1991

Twinsrule1991

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 15 posts
  • LocationHam Lake, MN

Posted 21 January 2020 - 10:56 AM

 

While I believe the Twins should be closer to $160m in payroll, this would put them around $180m, which is probably unreasonable.

That's a good point. This is still a Pohlad-owned team.

My thoughts on that are with this being the probable last year of Nelson Cruz in a Twins uniform and with us not having any playoff success for over a decade, wouldn't this be the time to overspend and to push the chips in? 


#5 twinkiesfan11

twinkiesfan11

    Member

  • Member
  • 160 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 10:56 AM

No way I’d be in favor of giving up Lewis in a trade for one year of Mookie Betts and three years of David Price’s contract. Highly doubt Betts resigns here and not sure I’d even want them to at the cost which will almost certainly be in the Rendon range or higher. Offense is not and will not be the problem here for several years. They should save their ammo for a better fit and longer term solution.
  • Twins33, Mike Frasier Law, adjacent and 15 others like this

#6 Twinsrule1991

Twinsrule1991

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 15 posts
  • LocationHam Lake, MN

Posted 21 January 2020 - 10:57 AM

 

that and I'm not sure how tradeable price is at his salary... I doubt Boston wants to combine them.... not sure the return (given their salaries) will be that high either... 

 

And what Brock said, I don't see payroll that high. 

The MLBTR article says the exact opposite.

 

"Olney’s report is most interesting for its indications of the sort of structure the Red Sox would be willing to consider. He writes that the Sox would look to package Betts (and his big upcoming arbitration salary) with veteran hurler David Price (including “most or all” of his remaining $96MM in guaranteed earnings). To acquire those quality but highly compensated veterans, a rival organization would have to part with “two high-end prospects to front the deal."


#7 Twinsrule1991

Twinsrule1991

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 15 posts
  • LocationHam Lake, MN

Posted 21 January 2020 - 11:00 AM

 

No way I’d be in favor of giving up Lewis in a trade for one year of Mookie Betts and three years of David Price’s contract. Highly doubt Betts resigns here and not sure I’d even want them to at the cost which will almost certainly be in the Rendon range or higher. Offense is not and will not be the problem here for several years. They should save their ammo for a better fit and longer term solution.

I fully admit we won't be able to resign Betts, but the Twins have a deep enough farm system to survive the loss of Royce Lewis. I think this could be the type of deal that greatly increases our odds of winning now, without hemorrhaging the future in any long-lasting way. I think you are right on keeping the vision long-term, but at some point, you need to win championships and take risks. Otherwise, what's the point?

  • mplsman and Heiny like this

#8 twinkiesfan11

twinkiesfan11

    Member

  • Member
  • 160 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 11:17 AM

I fully admit we won't be able to resign Betts, but the Twins have a deep enough farm system to survive the loss of Royce Lewis. I think this could be the type of deal that greatly increases our odds of winning now, without hemorrhaging the future in any long-lasting way. I think you are right on keeping the vision long-term, but at some point, you need to win championships and take risks. Otherwise, what's the point?


The point is to not end up like the Red Sox, Cubs or Tigers as recent examples. Yes the Cubs and Red Sox won WS titles but the lasting effect of emptying their farm systems and blowing wads of money on expensive aging free agents and trade acquisitions catches up eventually. A combination of a barren farm system and zero payroll flexibility is what leads to prolonged rebuilding periods which is no fun for anyone. I’d much rather see the Twins remain competitive, nimble enough to make a big move when it counts but always with an eye to the future. Much more along the lines of the Cardinals for example.

I could get behind a trade involving Lewis or any of the top prospects for a better fit/longer term solution. I just don’t think Betts and Price make sense for the Twins given the reported asking price and contract situations.
  • Dantes929, beckmt, PseudoSABR and 18 others like this

#9 SwainZag

SwainZag

    Member

  • Moderator
  • 2,634 posts
  • LocationMontana

Posted 21 January 2020 - 11:25 AM

 

I fully admit we won't be able to resign Betts, but the Twins have a deep enough farm system to survive the loss of Royce Lewis. I think this could be the type of deal that greatly increases our odds of winning now, without hemorrhaging the future in any long-lasting way. I think you are right on keeping the vision long-term, but at some point, you need to win championships and take risks. Otherwise, what's the point?

 

Without being able to re-sign Betts, you are giving up a whole heck of a lot for 2 more years of Price.While Betts and Price being in the fold for 2020 would increase the Twins WS odds, it doesn't guarantee them anything.I'd have to pass.If you are going to trade away Lewis, IMO, it needs to be for a younger SP with at least 2 years or control.

  • SQUIRREL, Steve Lein, twinkiesfan11 and 12 others like this

#10 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    G.O.A.T.

  • Moderator
  • 15,001 posts
  • Locationthe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 21 January 2020 - 11:37 AM

 

The MLBTR article says the exact opposite.

 

"Olney’s report is most interesting for its indications of the sort of structure the Red Sox would be willing to consider. He writes that the Sox would look to package Betts (and his big upcoming arbitration salary) with veteran hurler David Price (including “most or all” of his remaining $96MM in guaranteed earnings). To acquire those quality but highly compensated veterans, a rival organization would have to part with “two high-end prospects to front the deal."

the original piece didn't mention include most/all of that 96M (and I didn't read the article)... that certainly changes the dynamic a bit. I'm still not sure if that return is required. Price and Sale (who I'm guessing would the options) really haven't been that good lately and are on the wrong end of the aging curve.

 

That's a lot of risk for what end up being a league average starter. 

  • Mike Frasier Law likes this

#11 jud6312

jud6312

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,633 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 11:55 AM

So, three of their Top-10 prospects, massive salary relief, plus a sold major leaguer and two other prospects that aren't that far removed from being viewed as jewels of the system?

 

For one year of Mookie Betts, three ridiculously expensive seasons of an aging and oft-injured pitcher and a prospect that looks to be Balzovic light?

 

Hard, hard, hard pass. Betts helps, but I don't believe for a second that Price helps this team win now or in the future.

 

I'm not averse to moving any prospect or established player ... if it helps the team in either short- or long-term. I don't think this move would accomplish either.

  • scottz, gil4, Twins33 and 7 others like this

#12 spycake

spycake

    Senior Member

  • Moderator
  • 17,693 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 11:57 AM

This would be a spectacularly bad deal by baseballtradevalues.com -- $97 mil vs $19 mil.

 

There's no way the Red Sox are getting anyone to take on that much salary and getting value like that back in return.

  • SQUIRREL, scottz, Twins33 and 19 others like this

#13 SQUIRREL

SQUIRREL

    Rally SQUIRREL!!!!

  • Moderator
  • 25,916 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:07 PM

 

This would be a spectacularly bad deal by baseballtradevalues.com -- $97 mil vs $19 mil.

 

There's no way the Red Sox are getting anyone to take on that much salary and getting value like that back in return.

 

Right ... if we are going take on salary ... they aren't getting that many good prospects in return, especially not BOTH Lewis and Belazovic. Just, no way. For either of them. And if Boston really wants the salary relief, they'd better not be expecting a return like that.

  • Blake, Twins33, Dantes929 and 2 others like this
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

#14 Twinsrule1991

Twinsrule1991

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 15 posts
  • LocationHam Lake, MN

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:21 PM

 

This would be a spectacularly bad deal by baseballtradevalues.com -- $97 mil vs $19 mil.

 

There's no way the Red Sox are getting anyone to take on that much salary and getting value like that back in return.

 

You are also getting a first round pick when Betts turns down your qualifying offer, but I appreciate the insight.


#15 howieramone2

howieramone2

    Just say no to myths!

  • Member
  • 2,021 posts
  • LocationMaple Grove/Schaumburg

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:23 PM

Boston is the team sitting out not us. I like 3 years of Price for 10-12M per.


#16 Twinsrule1991

Twinsrule1991

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 15 posts
  • LocationHam Lake, MN

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:24 PM

 

The point is to not end up like the Red Sox, Cubs or Tigers as recent examples. Yes the Cubs and Red Sox won WS titles but the lasting effect of emptying their farm systems and blowing wads of money on expensive aging free agents and trade acquisitions catches up eventually. A combination of a barren farm system and zero payroll flexibility is what leads to prolonged rebuilding periods which is no fun for anyone. I’d much rather see the Twins remain competitive, nimble enough to make a big move when it counts but always with an eye to the future. Much more along the lines of the Cardinals for example.

I could get behind a trade involving Lewis or any of the top prospects for a better fit/longer term solution. I just don’t think Betts and Price make sense for the Twins given the reported asking price and contract situations.

Would we be though? I guess I view the farm different

You still have Graterol, Kiriloff, Duran amongst others.

I will fully admit I am more wary of Lewis than most. He was not good last year, but he still has a lot of talent. I just want to maximize the current window. I don't believe this hemorrhages the future, but that's just my thoughts.

 


#17 Battle ur tail off

Battle ur tail off

    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 655 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:26 PM

I'd rather they just look into what it would take to get Price. 

 

We don't need Betts. He's a great player, no doubt, but the Twins have lots of outfielders, that don't cost nearly as much. 

 

Have them eat half or so of Price's contract and we give them a prospect outside of our top 10 and I would be in. 

  • Twins33, adjacent, Major League Ready and 6 others like this

#18 spycake

spycake

    Senior Member

  • Moderator
  • 17,693 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:29 PM

 

You are also getting a first round pick when Betts turns down your qualifying offer, but I appreciate the insight.

It would be a comp pick *after* round 1, and according to this site the estimated value of such a pick would only be in the $9-10 mil range:

 

https://blogs.fangra...ue-draft-picks/

 

  • Mike Frasier Law likes this

#19 redstorm

redstorm

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 127 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:30 PM

The trade you laid out is a hard pass.

 

If you switch Sale in for Price, and have the Red Sox eat some salary, I would consider it, but it still seems rather steep.

  • 70charger, specialiststeve and rdehring like this

#20 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    A Little Teapot

  • Owner
  • 23,438 posts

Posted 21 January 2020 - 12:41 PM

That's a good point. This is still a Pohlad-owned team.
My thoughts on that are with this being the probable last year of Nelson Cruz in a Twins uniform and with us not having any playoff success for over a decade, wouldn't this be the time to overspend and to push the chips in?

I definitely think it’s time to go for it, I’m only saying that pushing payroll from $130m to $180m in a single offseason is unlikely to happen and, with Price involved, might not even be a good idea.
  • SF Twins Fan and Twinsrule1991 like this



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: windows, starting pitching, trade market, all in, dreams