Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Photo

Front Page: Is Infield Defense Really That Important for the 2020 Minnesota Twins?

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 Patrick Wozniak

Patrick Wozniak

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Twins Daily Contributor
  • 118 posts
  • LocationAmnatcharoen, Thailand

Posted 17 January 2020 - 09:00 PM

There’s no denying the Infield Outs Above Average (OAA) stat by Baseball Savant painted an ugly picture for the Minnesota Twins. Sliding Miguel Sano to first base and inserting Josh Donaldson into third will certainly help. Regardless of the Donaldson effect, how concerned do we need to be about the defense?All things being equal, it would be great to have an infield full of slick fielders who can also hit. But in reality, that is a very difficult thing to do and the Twins as they are currently constructed are definitely a bat-first infield. Donaldson, Sano, Jorge Polanco, and Luis Arraez all bring incredibly potent bats (132, 137, 119, and 125 wRC+ respectively – is there a better hitting infield in the MLB?) but Polanco and Arraez still leave a lot to be desired on the defensive side (-16 and -6 OAA respectively) and we don’t know how Sano will fare at first.

One thing to consider is the degree of importance infield defense plays in today’s game. In the past when hitters were routinely advised to hit the ball on the ground, having someone like Ozzie Smith in place to gobble it up was invaluable. And while it would still be nice to have someone with Smith’s wizardly defensive skills, although he’s probably lost a step or two, one could argue that it is of lower magnitude with hitters putting the ball on the ground less and less due to increasing strikeout rates and the launch-angle revolution.

Another consideration is the amount of shifting teams now do. With the dramatic increase in the shift in recent years, players are put in a better position to field the ball where it is hit, thus somewhat diminishing the value of range. And although the Twins did a lot of shifting in 2019, infield positioning may be an area where the defense could further improve.

Eno Sarris of The Athletic recently wrote about his thoughts on OAA and one of the interesting tidbits compares OAA with Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR). Sarris speculates that teams with a higher UZR (which is not position-dependent) than OAA (which is position based), theoretically should be better at positioning their players. Minnesota’s infield had a -15.0 OAA compared to a -20.1 UZR for a difference of -5.1. According to this logic, the infield has some room for improvement based on positioning.

Minnesota’s current pitching rotation also helps to mitigate some of the potential damage caused by the infield defense. Of the top-five projected starters, newcomer Homer Bailey leads the staff with just a 44.3% ground ball rate for his career and Jake Odorizzi sits at an extremely low 33.1%. Contrast that with Kyle Gibson and Martin Perez from 2019’s rotation, who have career rates of 51.5% and 50.6%. The only starter likely to see much MLB action who could be defined as a “ground ball” pitcher is Randy Dobnak, and it is not yet known what kind of role he will play.

An infield full of Francisco Lindors or Javier Baezes who can hit and field would be great, but given the batting proficiency of the current infield , the offensive benefits certainly seem to outweigh the defensive cost. Combined with a Byron Buxton-led outfield defense, a flyball-oriented pitching staff, increased infield shifting, and a higher strikeout/launch angle environment, Minnesota’s below-average defense may be less of a problem than Outs Above Average is making it seem.

Let us know what you think. How big of an issue is the infield defense and does the addition of Josh Donaldson erase any concerns you may have had? Please leave your comments below.

For more on Minnesota's infield defense check out these recent Twins Daily Articles:
A Bigger Twins Problem Than Pitching - Ted Schwerzler
Statcast Reveals Ugly Truth About Minnesota Twins' Infield Defense - Nate Palmer

MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
— Latest Twins coverage from our writers
— Recent Twins discussion in our forums
— Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

Click here to view the article
  • nclahammer likes this

#2 SQUIRREL

SQUIRREL

    Rally SQUIRREL!!!!

  • Moderator
  • 25,474 posts

Posted 17 January 2020 - 09:12 PM

Test

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. But a skunkweed will always be a skunkweed and instantly recognizable. 


#3 mikelink45

mikelink45

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 3,000 posts

Posted 17 January 2020 - 09:24 PM

I have written about this in many posts, OF seems to be the key defensive place right now, although I do not want four left handed infielders even if they can hit. 

  • Platoon likes this

#4 Darius

Darius

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,751 posts

Posted 17 January 2020 - 10:32 PM

At the end of the day it boils down to run differential. Isn’t that the ultimate objective?

Opponents will score fewer runs with Donaldson at third than Sano. The Twins will score more runs with Donaldson in the lineup than Cron. It makes the team better, and not just a little bit (20-30 runs, net?).

I was one pounding the table for pitching. But, if you were to ask me in a vacuum if I’d rather have Donaldson or Ryu, it’s not even a question (Donaldson). It’s also a heck of a lot better than nothing, which is where they were left on pitching when the music stopped.
  • Twins33, TNTwinsFan, Major League Ready and 4 others like this

#5 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    A Little Teapot

  • Owner
  • 23,266 posts

Posted 17 January 2020 - 11:04 PM

 

At the end of the day it boils down to run differential. Isn’t that the ultimate objective?

Opponents will score fewer runs with Donaldson at third than Sano. The Twins will score more runs with Donaldson in the lineup than Cron. It makes the team better, and not just a little bit (20-30 runs, net?).

I was one pounding the table for pitching. But, if you were to ask me in a vacuum if I’d rather have Donaldson or Ryu, it’s not even a question (Donaldson). It’s also a heck of a lot better than nothing, which is where they were left on pitching when the music stopped.

I think 20 runs might be realistic given health, 30 runs a bit much. Cron was pretty damned good for most of the season.

 

Still, 20 runs is A LOT. That's a couple of wins in itself.

 

But I've always felt that the Twins didn't need to worry about the 2020 season as much as they needed to worry about the 2020 postseason. They were good enough to get there as-is but they weren't good enough to advance.

 

I'm not sure Donaldson gets them there, though if he's enough to push them to a one or two seed, that might do it.

 

It's all a numbers game. You could have the greatest pitcher in the world (Johan Santana) but if the rest of the team craps the bed, that's basically it. Maybe the Twins can finally see the opposite happen.

  • SD Buhr, Doctor Wu and JDubs like this

#6 Platoon

Platoon

    Cooperstown

  • Member
  • 5,164 posts
  • LocationTwinsWorld

Posted 18 January 2020 - 07:03 AM

While IF range may be a problem, so is kicking the two hopper, which is a Polanco specialty. To a degree I sort of felt the same way about Sano. It wasn’t the balls he didn’t get to, it was the ones he did and didn’t hang on to. No doubt Donaldson will help and was a good add. But I will repeat: If one doesn’t think defense isn’t important, one wasn’t watching the Yankees whitewash of our beloved nine. There was a stark contrast on display. 

  • adorduan, Dan Engebretson, JoshDungan1 and 2 others like this
TwinsWorld: Did you hear we just updated the Stadium Club?

If I wanted balls and strikes called by a robot, I would get an Xbox!

#7 JDubs

JDubs

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 10 posts

Posted 18 January 2020 - 07:51 AM

Whether it works or not is obviously an open question, but after spending the majority of my life watching the Twins field a bunch of slick-fielding infielders who couldn't hit to save their life, I'm more than willing to give the opposite a shot. Here's to winning a bunch of games 12-11.


#8 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 22,580 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks, ND

Posted 18 January 2020 - 08:29 AM

When Polanco and Adrianza are in the lineup together. Polanco plays SS every time.

 

Isn't that the Twins letting us all know (through action) how important they feel it is? 

A Skeleton walks into a bar and says... "Give me a beer... And a mop".

 

President of the "Baseball Player Positional Flexibility" Club 

Founded 4-23-16 

 

Strike Zone Automation Advocate

 

I'm not a starting 9 guy!!!


#9 ashbury

ashbury

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Moderator
  • 25,054 posts
  • LocationNatick, MA

Posted 18 January 2020 - 10:50 AM

Isn't that the Twins letting us all know (through action) how important they feel it is? 

I don't make that particular inference.

 

The Twins are acutely aware of the defensive deficiency, surely. The players themselves probably are too. But it could be a big management blunder (clubhouse chemistry, player's confidence, etc) to publicly rub your starting shortstop's nose in it. That cost could be bigger than the cost of an occasional extra baserunner.

 

If and when the Twins decide to move Polanco off of SS, they will likely do it decisively. Not one benchwarmer appearance at a time.
 

  • Riverbrian and Platoon like this

The actions of men are the best interpreters of their thoughts. -- John Locke


#10 jkcarew

jkcarew

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,723 posts

Posted 18 January 2020 - 11:25 AM

Yes, infield defense is important (although it's becoming less important all the time). It's just not nearly as important as infield offense.


#11 jorgenswest

jorgenswest

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 4,688 posts

Posted 18 January 2020 - 12:19 PM

Poor defense has side effects that are not seen in the individual runs saved calculations. More balls in play leads to longer more stressful innings, shorter starts and a greater burden on the pen. Poorer pitching results.

As a team the Twins turned 69% of balls in play into outs ranking 25th. The Astros and Dodgers were at 73% followed by the A’s, Marlins and Cardinals. The Twins were in the depths with the Royals, Red Sox and Rangers and slightly better than the a Pirates and Tigers. They need to do better this year.
  • beckmt and adorduan like this

#12 SD Buhr

SD Buhr

    Majoring in minors, minoring in Majors

  • Twins Daily Staff
  • 1,744 posts

Posted 18 January 2020 - 12:41 PM

 

When Polanco and Adrianza are in the lineup together. Polanco plays SS every time.

 

Isn't that the Twins letting us all know (through action) how important they feel it is? 

I think that just assuming Polanco could switch over to the right side of 2nd base once in a while and automatically be proficient there at an MLB level (especially with the shifts now being used) requires a leap of faith.

 

He played a lot of 2B in the minors but if you're going to move him over there for anything short of an emergency, he needs to get practice over there. For now, I'd prefer that any practice time he gets comes at SS. Let the utility IF, who gets regular reps at multiple positions, play all over the IF. 

  • Don Walcott likes this
Writing about the Minnesota Twins and their minor league organization, with an emphasis on the Cedar Rapids Kernels, at Knuckleballsblog.com since 2010.

~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

#13 Don Walcott

Don Walcott

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 2,292 posts
  • LocationSanta Fe, NM

Posted 18 January 2020 - 01:00 PM

 

I think 20 runs might be realistic given health, 30 runs a bit much. Cron was pretty damned good for most of the season.

 

Still, 20 runs is A LOT. That's a couple of wins in itself.

 

But I've always felt that the Twins didn't need to worry about the 2020 season as much as they needed to worry about the 2020 postseason. They were good enough to get there as-is but they weren't good enough to advance.

 

I'm not sure Donaldson gets them there, though if he's enough to push them to a one or two seed, that might do it.

 

It's all a numbers game. You could have the greatest pitcher in the world (Johan Santana) but if the rest of the team craps the bed, that's basically it. Maybe the Twins can finally see the opposite happen.

Is it worse to refer to players as coming from a dumpster or as bed crappers? Either way, I'm not sure I'd refer to the human beings who used to play for our team as bed crappers. ;)

  • Craig Arko likes this

#14 Don Walcott

Don Walcott

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 2,292 posts
  • LocationSanta Fe, NM

Posted 18 January 2020 - 01:02 PM

I think Polanco is a very professional young baseball player who will work hard to improve on his defense, as are Arraez and Sano. While all three of them have inherent limitations, I think we'll be pleasantly surprised by their improvement on defense this year. And Adrianza and Gonzalez won't hurt us when they come into the lineup as well.


#15 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    A Little Teapot

  • Owner
  • 23,266 posts

Posted 18 January 2020 - 01:09 PM

 

Is it worse to refer to players as coming from a dumpster or as bed crappers? Either way, I'm not sure I'd refer to the human beings who used to play for our team as bed crappers. ;)

My phrasing was unnecessarily lewd but I don't hold any ill will against a single individual Twin from the 2000s.

 

But there's no denying that those experiences were painful to watch from a fan perspective. Some very good teams simply did not compete when it really mattered.

 

I'm not mad about it or anything, just pointing out that the teams did not come anywhere close to our (or their) expectations. Ask any player from one of those teams and I doubt they'd disagree with me on that.

 

It required a team effort to be beaten that soundly and consistently, year in, year out.

  • Don Walcott likes this

#16 Don Walcott

Don Walcott

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 2,292 posts
  • LocationSanta Fe, NM

Posted 18 January 2020 - 01:12 PM

 

My phrasing was unnecessarily lewd but I don't hold any ill will against a single individual Twin from the 2000s.

 

But there's no denying that those experiences were painful to watch from a fan perspective. Some very good teams simply did not compete when it really mattered.

 

I'm not mad about it or anything, just pointing out that the teams did not come anywhere close to our (or their) expectations. Ask any player from one of those teams and I doubt they'd disagree with me on that.

 

It required a team effort to be beaten that soundly and consistently, year in, year out.

I was joking. I wouldn't think you meant anything bad about our players.

  • Brock Beauchamp likes this

#17 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    A Little Teapot

  • Owner
  • 23,266 posts

Posted 18 January 2020 - 01:14 PM

 

I was joking. I wouldn't think you meant anything bad about our players.

Fair enough, someone else privately questioned my use of that phrase, which was a bit off the cuff and slightly inappropriate. I just wanted to clear the air on what I meant.

  • Don Walcott likes this

#18 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 22,580 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks, ND

Posted 18 January 2020 - 01:58 PM

 

I don't make that particular inference.

 

The Twins are acutely aware of the defensive deficiency, surely. The players themselves probably are too. But it could be a big management blunder (clubhouse chemistry, player's confidence, etc) to publicly rub your starting shortstop's nose in it. That cost could be bigger than the cost of an occasional extra baserunner.

 

If and when the Twins decide to move Polanco off of SS, they will likely do it decisively. Not one benchwarmer appearance at a time.
 

 

I'll make that blunder. My best SS is playing SS if he is in the lineup.

 

If my best SS is not in the lineup, then the next best SS who is in the lineup will play SS. 

 

05509c85f187981cd90ac0e1e17da9dd622ec5e2

  • ashbury likes this

A Skeleton walks into a bar and says... "Give me a beer... And a mop".

 

President of the "Baseball Player Positional Flexibility" Club 

Founded 4-23-16 

 

Strike Zone Automation Advocate

 

I'm not a starting 9 guy!!!


#19 ashbury

ashbury

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Moderator
  • 25,054 posts
  • LocationNatick, MA

Posted 18 January 2020 - 02:49 PM

05509c85f187981cd90ac0e1e17da9dd622ec5e2

 

3mixpj.jpg
 

  • Riverbrian and Sconnie like this

The actions of men are the best interpreters of their thoughts. -- John Locke


#20 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 22,580 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks, ND

Posted 18 January 2020 - 03:09 PM

 

I think that just assuming Polanco could switch over to the right side of 2nd base once in a while and automatically be proficient there at an MLB level (especially with the shifts now being used) requires a leap of faith.

 

He played a lot of 2B in the minors but if you're going to move him over there for anything short of an emergency, he needs to get practice over there. For now, I'd prefer that any practice time he gets comes at SS. Let the utility IF, who gets regular reps at multiple positions, play all over the IF. 

 

I've already taken that leap of faith.:)

 

I believe that "Utility Players" in the traditional sense are complete wastes of roster space and I believe the traditional "utility" role should be stricken completely from baseball if a team is serious about consistent winning. 

 

Traditional "Utility Players" don't play regular innings because they are not good enough and they are only "utility" because roster limitations forces them to backup multiple positions regardless if they are proficient at it. This will force a team to roster a player who either can't hit but can field multiple positions or a player who can hit but can't field multiple positions but has to anyway because you can't provide backup's for every position and the team will only play them on getaway days or in the case of injury and they are not good enough to play when the injury occurs because that's why they are utility in the first place.  

 

The end result of utility players is 3 or 4 players out of 12 or 13 position players on your 25 (26) man roster that will not increase in value because they are not given regular playing time so they can increase in value. Only less talented players will agree or deserve a diminished playing time role. If they were talented enough to play every day... they would. So a team must roster 4 guys of less talent and do so on purpose.  

 

This means the traditional "utility player" model is actually a club purposely deciding to only incubate 9 eggs when the incubator can hold 13 eggs, therefore limiting their production of chickens and allowing each failed chicken to kill you. 

 

I only believe in "Super Utility Players". Players who are good enough to play every day and can play multiple positions so they can be fit into any lineup. Super utility players allow a team to roster 13 players and give them all significant playing time. Therefore maximizing each egg slot in the incubator. Much like the Twins did last year... I hope to see them continue forever. 

 

I also don't believe in making elite defensive performers super utility. Byron Buxton is elite... he should only play CF... Josh Donaldson is close enough to elite to only play him at 3B. Polanco is not elite at SS and capable of other positions.

 

I also believe that Elite players should play every day, while less than elite players can share time with other less than elite players and no one has to sit on the bench for an extended time unless they EARN it by playing poorly. 

 

I'm ready for the leap of faith trust fall. 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

A Skeleton walks into a bar and says... "Give me a beer... And a mop".

 

President of the "Baseball Player Positional Flexibility" Club 

Founded 4-23-16 

 

Strike Zone Automation Advocate

 

I'm not a starting 9 guy!!!