Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Photo

Front Page: Should the Twins Trade for Kris Bryant?

kris bryant minnesota twins kris bryant trade
  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

#1 Andrew Thares

Andrew Thares

    Ft Myers Miracle

  • Twins Daily Staff
  • 253 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 01:28 PM

After missing on all of the big-name free agent starting pitchers this offseason, the Minnesota Twins have shifted their focus to former MVP third baseman Josh Donaldson, to try to make their big splash this winter. However, with reports coming out that the Twins are increasingly pessimistic about their chances of signing Donaldson, they may have to change their course yet again. One potential option that they could set their sights on is another former MVP third basemen, in Kris Bryant.After years spent building up their core players, the Chicago Cubs appear to be stuck in no-mans land this offseason. They would like to add to their team (which greatly underperformed in 2019), but they do not have the payroll flexibility to do so. Additionally, their farm system is all but depleted of impactful prospects that can help the team in the short term. As a result, the Cubs have moved in the direction of potentially trading away some of their core pieces, with an aim at more long-term success. On such piece that has become available is Kris Bryant.

The former second overall pick in the MLB Draft, has been an excellent player since he entered the league in 2015. His debut sparked some controversy, as the Cubs intentionally left him off their opening day roster. Instead, Bryant didn’t make his MLB debut until April 17th, 2015. As a result, the Cubs bought themselves an extra year of team control before Bryant becomes a free agent, which will be after the 2021 season instead of after the 2020 season.

Early reports suggest that the Cubs are asking for a king’s ransom in exchange for Bryant, which could inevitably sway the Twins from making a move for him. However, if the Cubs do see moving Bryant as aligning with their plans for the future of their organization, they might have to come down on their asking price, just to get other teams to enter into the conversation.

When you look around the rest of major league baseball, there aren’t many teams where trading for Kris Bryant makes more sense than it does for the Minnesota Twins. They have a clear need to upgrade at third base (hence their interest in Josh Donaldson), they have the the cap space to take on the expensive final two years of arbitration (Bryant is due $18.6 M in 2020), and they have the prospect capital to make this deal work.

So, what kind of package could the Twins offer that would realistically get the Cubs to bite on a trade for Kris Bryant? I think the starter to this conversation would be around the Twins giving up one of either Royce Lewis or Alex Kirilloff. If the Cubs are insistent on both, then I don’t think this is a deal that makes much sense for the Twins, but one or the other is reasonable. The Twins might also need to include another prospect a tier down from Lewis and Kiriloff. This includes the likes of Brusdar Graterol, Trevor Larnach and Jordan Balazovic. Personally, I see Balazovic the least likely of these players to get dealt away to the Cubs, as they are still trying to compete, and of the group mentioned he is the furthest prospect away. Finally, the Twins might also have to include another prospect or two as kickers, someone like a Cole Sands or Travis Blankenhorn would make sense.

Now, many of you might be thinking this is far too much to give up for two seasons of Kris Bryant, and if so, you are probably right, but the idea is to explore a trade package that could actually get the Cubs to trade away one of the faces of their franchise, while they are still clearly within a competitive window. The Cubs are also reportedly interested in acquiring MLB-ready talent, which could cause the Twins to pull back as they don’t really have much to offer in that regard (outside of Eddie Rosario who would make zero sense for the Cubs to acquire given their current outfield state). At the end of the day, this could be the deciding factor that keeps the Cubs from actually trading away Bryant, but when an opportunity to acquire a player of Kris Bryant’s ability is available, the Twins should at least consider taking a stab at it.

What do you think? Should the Twins look to make a big move for Kris Bryant if they miss out on Josh Donaldson, or look for other alternatives to improve this team for 2020 and beyond? Let us know in the comment section down below.

MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
— Latest Twins coverage from our writers
— Recent Twins discussion in our forums
— Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

Click here to view the article
  • glunn likes this

#2 Doctor Gast

Doctor Gast

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 94 posts
  • LocationBelo Horizonte, Brazil

Posted 11 January 2020 - 01:49 PM

Makes total sense to at least start a dialogue w/ Chicago, to see what`ll it cost. 

  • glunn likes this

#3 Brandon

Brandon

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 2,094 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 02:08 PM

I don't know. If we are already willing to spend 20 million on Bryant or Donaldson, I think paying Donaldson an extra 5 million or even 8 million a year and having Killeroff and Graterol during their low cost years makes more sense then a trade.
  • SQUIRREL, glunn, PseudoSABR and 16 others like this

#4 tony&rodney

tony&rodney

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 163 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 02:14 PM

No. 

  • Major League Ready, sftwinsfan and bighat like this

#5 howieramone2

howieramone2

    Just say no to myths!

  • Member
  • 1,791 posts
  • LocationMaple Grove/Schaumburg

Posted 11 January 2020 - 03:21 PM

I would talk to them. This is the second offseason in a row, King Theo has been forced to sit out. No one knows better than he, free agency is not Christmas.

#6 Linus

Linus

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 2,356 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 03:26 PM

Hard pass. If we are going to hit the farm system it needs to be for a good pitching prospect. I don’t understand the recent obsession on TD about acquiring a third baseman.
  • Monkeypaws, goulik, Doctor Wu and 1 other like this

#7 DocBauer

DocBauer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 6,034 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 03:31 PM

I understand the premise completely, but I'm just not sure I follow the logic. The Twins would get him for only 2yrs, possibly only 1yr, which is yet to be determined. (Though I don't think Bryant will win his case).

Financially, that $18M is very affordable! Not sure how saving $18M helps the Cubs any this year with all the major FA parts having been signed. I would assume any savings is directed towards next off season along with acquiring a couple nice young prospects.

With Sano still able to play 3B on 2020, as good as Bryant is, does moving 3 or 4 top 20 prospects for 2yrs of him move the needle enough vs saving those prospects and using them on a SP move?

One if the nice things about Donaldson is there is no prospect cost. Guess I don't have an immediate answer, just questions.
  • glunn, VOMG and jkcarew like this
"Nice catch Hayes...don't ever f*****g do it again."

--Lou Brown


#8 howieramone2

howieramone2

    Just say no to myths!

  • Member
  • 1,791 posts
  • LocationMaple Grove/Schaumburg

Posted 11 January 2020 - 04:18 PM

Doc, he may be desperate. Poor farm system with few if any pitching prospects and a contract that runs out after the 2021 season. A friend in need, is a friend indeed.
  • DocBauer and Doctor Gast like this

#9 jkcarew

jkcarew

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,641 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 04:24 PM

 

Hard pass. If we are going to hit the farm system it needs to be for a good pitching prospect. I don’t understand the recent obsession on TD about acquiring a third baseman.

But, why? The Twins don't have both a third-baseman and a first-baseman. They either need a first-baseman or a third-baseman. The season starts in 2 1/2 months. That's a fairly big deal for a team that is expected to compete for a pennant.

 

Meanwhile, using anything other than a proven player to fill the gap in a year where the team has a chance to seriously contend....well, I would expect the topic of what to do about third (or first) isn't going away anytime real soon.

  • DannySD likes this

#10 jkcarew

jkcarew

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,641 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 04:31 PM

 

With Sano still able to play 3B on 2020, as good as Bryant is, does moving 3 or 4 top 20 prospects for 2yrs of him move the needle enough vs saving those prospects and using them on a SP move?

But you need a first-baseman and a third-baseman.

 

IMO, the Twins should be exploring a proven first-baseman or a proven third baseman for 2020. Can they slap a rookie in there...or a bench player...or Garver? Well, there's been no indication that the Twins want Garver to play first-base on 'rest' days. A current bench player would make the entire lineup less deep and less flexible. And slapping a rookie into a premier offensive position for a contending team...that's probably pretty risky as well.


#11 sweetmusicviola16

sweetmusicviola16

    Ft Myers Miracle

  • Member
  • 458 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 04:45 PM

 

I don't know. If we are already willing to spend 20 million on Bryant or Donaldson, I think paying Donaldson an extra 5 million or even 8 million a year and having Killeroff and Graterol during their low cost years makes more sense then a trade.

Exactly. Cruz and Gonzalez come off the books after 2020 and Donaldson's contract would replace their money essentially. Save the prospects and sign JD if you insist on getting a 3B other than Sano.

  • Cap'n Piranha likes this

#12 USAFChief

USAFChief

    Bad puns. That's how eye roll.

  • Moderator
  • 25,652 posts
  • LocationTucson

Posted 11 January 2020 - 05:33 PM

Pay Donaldson, or pay AND give up prospects for Bryant, and have less years of control.

Let me think about that...


...

No.
  • Cap'n Piranha, Twins33, Danchat and 6 others like this

Cutting my carbs...with a pizza slicer.


#13 JLease

JLease

    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 691 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 07:37 PM

You're suggesting the Twins deal 2 of their top 5 prospects and throw in another one that's probably in the mid-20's for a player that's suing his current organization and is already going to be making $15M+ in year 1 with us, will get close to $20M in year 2 and could possibly be gone after that? Pretty sure we could get Syndergaard out of the Mets for less. I know we could get Jon Gray for less of a prospect haul.

 

If we're giving up top prospects, I want top pitching, not a rental of a guy getting spendy at 3B., especially when he hasn't been anywhere near his MVP form for 2 years. Note: Bryant's D has taken a significant hit the last two seasons, so let's not pretend that he's going to suddenly turnaround our 3B defense. Yes, he's better at 3B than Sano but both guys value is tied to their offense right now.

  • glunn, TL, DocBauer and 4 others like this

#14 DocBauer

DocBauer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 6,034 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 07:59 PM

But you need a first-baseman and a third-baseman.
 
IMO, the Twins should be exploring a proven first-baseman or a proven third baseman for 2020. Can they slap a rookie in there...or a bench player...or Garver? Well, there's been no indication that the Twins want Garver to play first-base on 'rest' days. A current bench player would make the entire lineup less deep and less flexible. And slapping a rookie into a premier offensive position for a contending team...that's probably pretty risky as well.


I think you meant to say they need a 3B OR a 1B. And I agree. I mean, it's pretty glaring we need one or the other, right? Personally, i was hoping for Cron back on a 1yr until someone else was ready. The FO didn't see it that way. Personally, I think they just didn't trust him being 100%. And that's OK. IMO, Sano is servicable at 3B for now, with room at 26yo and slimmed down and seemingly re-dedicated to fitness, etc, to show improvement. But I absolutely GET the idea of moving him to 1B, where I think he would be OK to good. I'm still surprised we didn't make a move sooner on Moose. I also thought bringing in Shaw for a rebound season made an awful lot of sense as well.

IDK if Donaldson and his agent are simply trying to play the Twins, or if he has real interest. I do know the Braves haven't blinked, nor have the Nationals, who's offer almost certainly has deferred $ involved. While we can only speculate what each team has truly offered, it would seem the Twins offer is right there with everyone else, and probably higher than any current Atlanta offer. Personally, I don't believe Donaldson is going to get his $110M. It's all part of a power play, and I get that. And I'm 100% OK if the Twins blink just a little and up their offer a bit and tell him "here ya go". There is risk involved if he signs with us, but sometimes you have to take a shot.

If he says no, I'm queasy on Bryant. He's a nice player and a great bat. But I say again, is the prospect capital worth the 2yrs in hopes of a later re-sign? Or are we better off with a Frazier or Moreland type 1yr signing and save that prospect capital for a different trade addition, most notably a pitcher?

I wish Donaldson would say YES and we can mkve forward, and enjoy the ride and hope against the risk. Otherwise...I'm hesitant on the Bryant trade and leaning toward the shorter, smaller route for now.
  • rdehring, RaoulDuke and jkcarew like this
"Nice catch Hayes...don't ever f*****g do it again."

--Lou Brown


#15 sftwinsfan

sftwinsfan

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 200 posts

Posted 11 January 2020 - 08:03 PM

If the Twins had unlimited resources, sure I'd do it, but they don't. If the Twins are going to blow that much prospect capital it should be to obtain pitching. They'd be better off having Sano focus on improving his defense. 

  • glunn and Doctor Wu like this

#16 terrydactyls1947

terrydactyls1947

    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 675 posts
  • LocationCumberland Center, Maine

Posted 11 January 2020 - 10:53 PM

If you're going to trade all those prospects, then throw in Rosario also and see if you can get Trevor Storey and Jon Gray (or Marquez German) from the Rockies. And then offer Donaldson $110M and call it a successful off season.
  • glunn likes this

#17 IndianaTwin

IndianaTwin

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 1,475 posts

Posted 12 January 2020 - 12:14 AM

I haven’t played with sites like baseballtradevalues.com, but they would suggest that either Lewis or Kiriloff is a big overpay for Bryant straight up.

 

Graterol or Larnach are the two that are closest to Bryant in a 1 for 1. In a 2 for 1, think something like Balzovic and Urbina. In a 3 for 1, Jeffers, Urbina and one of Gordon, Enlow, or Celestino.

 

The second paragraph has names I like, but none that are untouchable. Between Bryant and Donaldson, I think they are pretty comparable for 2020 and 2021, and I think we’d be glad not to be paying Donaldson $25MM in 2022 and 2023. 


#18 laloesch

laloesch

    Member

  • Member
  • 1,895 posts

Posted 12 January 2020 - 07:57 AM

Hard pass. If we are going to hit the farm system it needs to be for a good pitching prospect. I don’t understand the recent obsession on TD about acquiring a third baseman.


Because Sano is pushing 300 pounds and his sabremetric fielding stats have gotten much worse the past couple of years.
  • alphanumeric likes this

#19 rv78

rv78

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 239 posts

Posted 12 January 2020 - 07:59 AM

Bryant is a tier 1 type player. The Twins don't acquire tier 1 players. No need to speculate on this one. It won't happen. And he really isn't much of an upgrade defensively over Sano. If 3B is really a concern then Donaldson is the guy. If 3B isn't much of a concern then the Twins will continue to wait on Donaldson until he signs elsewhere instead of giving him what he wants and then saying, well we were in the mix, we tried, he didn't want to play here. Nothing new. Another feeble attempt was made, let's move on. Yippee!

  • Doctor Wu likes this

#20 howieramone2

howieramone2

    Just say no to myths!

  • Member
  • 1,791 posts
  • LocationMaple Grove/Schaumburg

Posted 12 January 2020 - 08:16 AM

Win or lose, another outstanding effort to improve our favorite team. The biggest wiff this offseason, was the Red Sox not pushing harder to hire Falvey.
  • Sconnie likes this



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: kris bryant, minnesota twins, kris bryant trade