Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Sickels: Top 20 Twins Prospects for 2013

  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#21 Physics Guy

Physics Guy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 981 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 11:17 AM

I don't think it necessarily indicates a bad system. Buxton was regarded by some as the #1 overall prospect in last year's draft. He would have been top 5 in most organizations. Most of the new guys are in the bottom half of the list. I would agree that the fact that so many of the new guys are pitchers doesn't reflect well on our pitching in the minors, but then we already knew our pitching wasn't good. Part of the high rankings of this year's draft has to be because they were high picks, plus the luster hasn't worn off due to a couple of years in the system Their "warts" haven't started to show.

#22 kab21


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,446 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 11:17 AM

I don't think I'm comfortable with having this many players on the list that were drafted last year. I don't think that's a sign of a strong system.

that's a pretty lazy analysis especially since the Twins had a lot of high picks last year. You'll also find that many disagree on where to rank the relief arms. If you look at Seth's list you'll see fewer draftees since he doesn't value RP'ers as highly as Sickels.