Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Photo

Front Page: Wish List: Circa 2012 and 2020 (Kevin Gausman)

kevin gausman byron buxton jose berrios carlos correa jake odorizzi
  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 17,971 posts

Posted 03 December 2019 - 10:40 PM

At Twins Daily, we spent a lot of time preparing for the 2012 Major League Baseball Draft. The Minnesota Twins had the #2 pick and we spent more than a month, behind the leadership of Jeremy Nygaard, considering who the options might be for the Twins. After the Astros selected Carlos Correa with the first pick, the Twins drafted outfielder Byron Buxton, a prep star from Appling County High School in Georgia. Two picks later, the Baltimore Orioles drafted right-handed pitcher Kevin Gausman from LSU.

I really liked the idea of the Twins drafting Gausman then. Now, you can count me as someone who would love to see the Twins sign Gausman now that the Cincinnati Reds have non-tendered him.LOOKING BACK

With a quick look back at the days leading up to the 2012 draft, it was pretty apparent that Byron Buxton was the best athlete in the draft. The Twins were in need of a catcher, and Mike Zunino was early the top college catching prospect in the draft. Gausman, along with Kyle Zimmer (University of San Francisco) and Mark Appel (Stanford, and the #1 overall pick the previous year) were the college pitching names to know.

Many were surprised when the Astros took Carlos Correa from the Puerto Rico Baseball Academy with the first overall pick. Of course, we have since learned that the Twins had Correa in ahead of the draft and most believe that he was Number One on their draft list as well. The Twins took Buxton. The Mariners drafted Zunino next and then the Orioles selected Gausman one pick before the Royals selected Zimmer.

In mid-May of 2012, Jeremy posted an interview with Kevin Gausman while he was still pitching for LSU.

While I am always intrigued by immensely athletic baseball players from the prep ranks, as we got closer to the draft, I admit that I went public with the though that I would like to see the Twins draft Gausman.

Why?

Several reasons. First and foremost, he was a college pitcher who could be ready for the big leagues very quickly. And he was. He debuted with the Orioles less than a year later, on May 23rd, 2013.

But it wasn't just that. It was reports of his stuff. Not only was he consistently working with a fastball in the mid-90s, but he sometimes had games where he reached 98 mph regularly. In addition, he had a really, really good changeup and great makeup. There were some concerns about his ability to spin the ball but there was hope that he could develop his curve ball and his slider.

A college pitcher at one of the best baseball schools in the country who throws in the mid-90s with five pitches and plus-plus makeup.


His Career To Date

Gausman debuted in 2013 and spent parts of six seasons with the Orioles. He pitched in 150 games and made 127 starts. 15 of those 23 relief appearances came in his rookie season. In 2016, he worked 179 2/3 innings and posted a 3.61 ERA while pitching mostly in the AL East. The following season, he made 34 starts and posted a 4.68 ERA in 186 2/3 innings. In 21 starts at the beginning of 2018, he was 5-8 with a 4.43 ERA.

At the July trade deadline in 2018, he was traded to Atlanta with reliever Darren O'Day in exchange for four minor leaguers and some international bonus pool money. He went 5-3 with a 2.87 ERA in ten starts.

Last season, he earned $9.35 million in his second year of arbitration. But 2019 did not go well for Gausman. He made 16 starts for the Braves and went 3-7 with a 6.19 ERA and a 1.49 WHIP over 80 innings. He had a couple of stints on the injured list with plantar fasciitis. Atlanta DFAd him and Cincinnati claimed him in early August. He made 15 appearances for the Reds (one start) and went 0-2 with a 4.03 ERA in 22 1/3 innings.

That brings us to Monday when the Reds non-tendered him, making him a free agent.


The "Stuff"

In 2019, 57% of Gausman's pitches were fastballs which averaged 94.0 mph. That is up slightly from where he was in 2018. From 2013-2017, his fastball averaged between 94.7 and 95.9 mph. In college, his "typical" fastball was about 94 mph but he threw it anywhere from 92 to 98 mph.

After throwing his slider about 13-14% of the time between 2016 and 2018, he threw just his slider just 2% of the time in 2019.

He threw his changeup about 5.5% of the time the last couple of seasons. The pitch has consistently been ten mph slower than his fastball, which is a good differential.

In 2019, he threw his split-finger pitch 35% of the time after it has been between 16-22% previously in his career.

I won't pretend to be an expert or a video guy, but he continued to throw hard and throw pitches in the strike zone. He got equal or even higher percentages of swings and misses. In other words, he has the same or at least similar stuff now as he had at the beginning of his major league career.

I do know who has a good reputation for being able to find the strengths of a pitcher and even add some velocity. That's the reputation that Wes Johnson has, and with the help of the Research and Development group, just maybe they can find the key to getting Gausman to top form.

Gausman has the pedigree, the high draft pick status, and the stuff that earned him that spot. His arm has remained pretty healthy through his first seven big league seasons. That report of "plus makeup" certainly indicates his ability to work and to work within a team environment. And, he won't turn 29 until days after the calendar changes to 2020.


And Now...

Seven-and-a-half years later, I would love to see a scenario where the Twins have Byron Buxton manning centerfield and Kevin Gausman on the mound.

Teaming the duo with another 2012 first-round draft pick in Jose Berrios and the team might have three strong 5.5 players.

If Johnson and company can work their magic on Gausman and just get him back to his peak performance, the Twins could have found a very solid #3 starter to fall right between Berrios and Odorizzi in the rotation. Even if they can just get him to his career average numbers, he would make a solid #5 starter for 150 to 170 innings.

Because of his relative youth, I don't expect that Gausman's services will come terribly cheaply. I would also expect that he might prefer a one-year, make-good deal. The Twins made a similar deal a year ago with Jonathan Schoop. Schoop was coming off of an injury-plagued season which followed a solid career. Schoop played well for the Twins and would have played more if not for the emergence of Luis Arraez.

Personally, and admittedly, I'm probably a bit high on Gausman and believe in his stuff and the makeup he is touted for. I would be willing to get a little creative. I'd consider offering a one year, $5.5 million deal. I would structure it such that Gausman would make $4 million in 2020. I'd include a team option for 2021 at about $8 million but have a $1.5 million buyout. In fact, I would love to include a second option year, at about $10 million, but in that, I would prefer the buyout drop to $1 million. That would mean Gausman could then become a free agent at age 31, the more "normal" free agency age.

At those numbers, it would be fairly low risk but there could be some relatively high reward. Even better, it wouldn't keep them from going after he upper-echelon free agents that are out there this offseason.

In my mind, of all of the non-tendered free agents, I think that Kevin Gausman clearly has the highest potential.

What do you think?


MORE FROM TWINS DAILY

- Non-Tendered Players That Could Interest the Twins
- Get To Know 'Em: Kevin Gausman
- Looking Forward by Looking Back (2012 Draft)

Click here to view the article
  • nicksaviking and Sconnie like this

#2 Otwins

Otwins

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 430 posts

Posted 03 December 2019 - 11:40 PM

Love it Seth as long as we add 2 other starting pitchers either through free agency or trade. I hope we do not leave the 5th spot open for Dobnek, Thorpe, Smeltzer or Graterol.They will get thier chances as starters may be ineffective or hurt. You need at least eight possible starters. 

  • birdwatcher likes this

#3 Richard Swerdlick

Richard Swerdlick

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 92 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 05:34 AM

So then if he is so wonderful, why did Cincy non tender him?
  • peterb18 and jud6312 like this

#4 dbminn

dbminn

    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 800 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul, MN

Posted 04 December 2019 - 05:35 AM

The Twins need 3 more starters, so they should be aggressive. Gausman would be a good one to sign early this offseason. I don't think I would go more than one year/one team option, but I might up the $$ for the first year of the contract. Gausman was an above-average starter for 2016-18. It's hard to find SP like that for under $10M/yr. 

 

One concern is the plantar fascitis, which can linger for a long time. The other is his propensity to give up the long ball. If the Twins FO is satisfied that both of these issues can be addressed, sign him.

 


#5 the_brute_squad

the_brute_squad

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 80 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 05:36 AM

If he's the best of what the Twins won't go after (top line pitcher) then I say do it. The potential is certainly there.


#6 Doctor Wu

Doctor Wu

    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 836 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 05:41 AM

Obviously is he's healthy he's worth a look. As Seth wrote, he seems like the perfect low risk and potentially high reward sort of signing.


#7 mikelink45

mikelink45

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 2,921 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 07:03 AM

Load up the rack with all the arms we can find and let them compete!I am not particularly interested in Gausman, but I do know that the Reds play in a home run heaven so his HR rate is inflated.  

 

I do not want to remove Graterol, Dobnak, Smeltzer...from the competition, I want them to win it, but I want them to win it by beating out other good pitchers, not because they are the only arms left. 

  • peterb18, beckmt, DocBauer and 3 others like this

#8 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 2,568 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 07:18 AM

I agree, a low risk, high reward type of player.I also believe, and I could be wrong, these contracts are not guaranteed until the end of spring training with a growing buyout, so go for it.If it is fully guaranteed at signing I am a little more skeptical. 


#9 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 2,568 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 07:19 AM

And Glausman could want a fully guaranteed contract, he might get that from a club that does not rate to contend, and use him as a flip special at the trading deadline.

  • peterb18 likes this

#10 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 17,971 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 08:14 AM

 

So then if he is so wonderful, why did Cincy non tender him?

 

I don't recall writing that he is "so wonderful" just that I still think he's very intriguing and after being a solid mid-rotation starter for 3 years, he had a rough 2019 so he's a possible candidate for coming back... 

  • Danchat, mikelink45, DocBauer and 1 other like this

#11 Cody Pirkl

Cody Pirkl

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Twins Daily Contributor
  • 123 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 08:40 AM

 

So then if he is so wonderful, why did Cincy non tender him?

Basically the Reds saw him as more of a reliever and his raise in arbitration would have overpaid him for his role. He had a pretty unlucky year in terms of ERA and he looks like a classic case of a guy who could take a next step, but the arbitration process would have paid too much for what he was in 2019.


#12 Shaitan

Shaitan

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,240 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 09:03 AM

This might be a rare article that swayed my opinion.

 

Also, I love the rare first-person take from Seth.


#13 Vanimal46

Vanimal46

    Getting Ready to Show Up to ST in the Best Shape of My Life!

  • Member
  • 13,239 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 04 December 2019 - 09:08 AM

The trend this off-season appears to be teams not willing to pay for bounce back potential. Gausman is one of a dozen or so players now who were non-tendered because they are coming back from injury, need time to recover from an injury, or had a rough 2019. 

 

If other teams aren't willing to do it, why should the Twins?

  • mikelink45 and jud6312 like this

#14 sweetmusicviola16

sweetmusicviola16

    Ft Myers Miracle

  • Member
  • 458 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 09:25 AM

Gausman is what makes being a Twins fan frustrating. Year after year we are left with dreaming about bounce back candidates and drooling about never has beens. Really sick of this. 

 

Spend for Wheeler and Ryu. Or Cole. Enough of the Pelfrey's ,Perez's and Correia's. Enough.

  • mikelink45 and jud6312 like this

#15 rdehring

rdehring

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,653 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 09:44 AM

Know little about him, Seth.But will go with your recommendation and get on board.Right now that would be as one of three starters.You put him between Berrios and Odorizzi.Of that pair, who do you consider #1?Personally, could see arguments to go with either as #1.

 

And a question, Seth.Do you think it is possible the FO decides to go into spring training with the #5 spot open?Let the four rookies from last year and a couple reclamation projects (or AAAA) battle it out?That would mean they only need to fill two more spots.


#16 JLease

JLease

    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 689 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 09:52 AM

 

So then if he is so wonderful, why did Cincy non tender him?

 

because they didn't think he was worth spending $10-12M on? Baseball arbitration is an odd duck where no one who is eligible for it ever gets less money than the previous year, only increases. So even if you had a bad year, you get more money in arbitration. It's one of the better things the players have in the CBA.

 

I think he's a very interesting choice to grab up as a 5th starter. The ceiling is someone who is a good #3 on a contending team, the floor is a replaceable 5th starter. I think Seth's contract proposal makes sense for the Twins, but not sure Gausman will go for the team option (definitely won't do a 2nd team option, IMHO). He's made about $20M in MLB already so unless he's been foolish with his money he doesn't need to worry about a 2nd year as much. But I'd be willing to take a run at him even without the option.

 

Gausman could be a nifty replacement for Perez/Gibson's production at a smart price and if he flunks out as a starter would still have value as a relief option. Again, i think one of the keys to regular season success is putting as few innings and ABs in the hands of bad players as you can. Raising the floor has real value, and even in his down years, Gausman was a better pitcher than Martin Perez (whom we gave 29 starts to last season). Working with a good pitching coach in a stable environment as a 4th or 5th starter, I think he could chew up 180 productive innings with an ERA floating around 4.10-4.25. I like that a lot at $6M.

  • birdwatcher, James, mikelink45 and 3 others like this

#17 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 09:52 AM

I won't complain if the Twins nab him. (He was my #2 choice after Buxton in 2012). I'm not sure why he was so bad last year but if the Twins think they can fix him, go for it.

  • James and Sconnie like this

#18 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 17,971 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 10:08 AM

 

The trend this off-season appears to be teams not willing to pay for bounce back potential. Gausman is one of a dozen or so players now who were non-tendered because they are coming back from injury, need time to recover from an injury, or had a rough 2019. 

 

If other teams aren't willing to do it, why should the Twins?

 

I think the trend was for teams not being willing to pay the arbitration cost for guys looking to come back because arbitration numbers are high. But it's too early to know what teams are willing to pay for these types. Cron fits into the category as well. 

 

Gausman, through arbitration, probably would have made $10 million. He's not worth that, so he gets non-tendered... but getting him for 1 year and $4-6 million could be a steal... or not. 

  • mikelink45, DocBauer, JLease and 1 other like this

#19 Vanimal46

Vanimal46

    Getting Ready to Show Up to ST in the Best Shape of My Life!

  • Member
  • 13,239 posts
  • LocationAustin, TX

Posted 04 December 2019 - 10:36 AM

 

I think the trend was for teams not being willing to pay the arbitration cost for guys looking to come back because arbitration numbers are high. But it's too early to know what teams are willing to pay for these types. Cron fits into the category as well. 

 

Gausman, through arbitration, probably would have made $10 million. He's not worth that, so he gets non-tendered... but getting him for 1 year and $4-6 million could be a steal... or not. 

 

Owners have already suppressed free agency costs. I guess the next logical step for them is suppressing arbitration costs so they can pocket MOAR money. 

 

Would the decision with Gausman change at all if he was projected to receive $8 million instead of $10 million? Or $6 million instead of $10 million? We'll never know, but I'm willing to guess the additional $2-3 million dollars wasn't the primary reason he was non-tendered. 

 

 


#20 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 17,971 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 10:37 AM

 

Gausman is what makes being a Twins fan frustrating. Year after year we are left with dreaming about bounce back candidates and drooling about never has beens. Really sick of this. 

 

Spend for Wheeler and Ryu. Or Cole. Enough of the Pelfrey's ,Perez's and Correia's. Enough.

 

Can't they do both? The beauty of a bounce-back guy like Gausman is that he has no impact on their efforts toward Wheeler, Ryu or Bumgarner. 

  • birdwatcher, Twins33, Dantes929 and 7 others like this



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: kevin gausman, byron buxton, jose berrios, carlos correa, jake odorizzi