Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Photo

Front Page: Eddie Rosario's Actual Value Is an Offseason Sticking Point

eddie rosario
  • Please log in to reply
91 replies to this topic

#41 tarheeltwinsfan

tarheeltwinsfan

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 1,287 posts

Posted 15 November 2019 - 06:11 PM

 

RBIs count. 

 

They are, as is every statistic, opportunistic. 

 

Aside from the rare bases loaded walk/HBP, you can't get RBIs unless you swing the bat.

 

Kepler, Polanco, and Cruz, often hit in front of Rosario, and often in that order. They all have good OBP, all higher than Rosario's. Scenario: Kepler draws a walk to lead off. Polanco hits a weak ground ball, getting thrown out but advancing Kepler to second. Cruz strikes out. Rosario hits a single. Kepler scores. Sano Strikes out. Inning over, RUN SCORED. Flip Kepler and Rosario- same scenario, same individual production for each player. Rosario singles, advances on Polonco's out. Cruz Ks. Kepler walks. Sano Ks. Inning over, NO RUN SCORED. 

 

It's just one scenario, right. But it exemplifies the value of the single in comparison to the walk depending on lineup construction. The best a walk can be is equal to a single, but often, a single is far greater than a walk. Kepler's walk total is comparable to Rosario's singles total. If Rosario traded 20 of his singles for 30 walks, it would be a significant bump to his OBP, but his RBI total goes down, probably under 100. 

 

Taking a walk when given it, and having a measured, consistent approach to batting are valuable to a team's success, undoubtedly. These are not a part of Rosario's game. Everyone crushed Mauer, wrongly, for the duration of his career for being one of the best ever at practicing such an approach. He got crushed for not being willing to guess or expand or surprise. Mauer is an all-time Twins great, but he wasn't willing (in his approach to batting) to take a risk or a chance to be a hero. He wasn't willing to gamble on his own natural ability as a hitter in favor of doing the right thing as a batter. I'm a fan of Joe. I loved watching him play. I wish he was in the dugout/on the field for the 2019 run. But, there were many times when I was ready to lose my mind watching Joe take a walk with a runner on when we needed an RBI. And that doesn't mean he was wrong. It does mean I'm happy to have Eddie up there going after that RBI, even when he ends up looking like a fool.

 

It's pretty hard to strike a balance between patience and aggression. I mean, they are pretty antonymous. Most guys are going to sacrifice a fair bit of one for the other. The guys that have it balanced, the best of both, are Mike Trout. So if Rosario could add 20 walks to his 2019 total, without losing any singles, he'd be even higher on that list of MVP candidates, he'd be a lot closer to Mike Trout. 

Great post Sam.

  • birdwatcher and wabene like this

#42 jorgenswest

jorgenswest

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 4,519 posts

Posted 15 November 2019 - 06:15 PM

Rosario is valuable. He can’t be adequately replaced by Cave or Wade.

Sadly he doesn’t have excess value beyond his likely contract figure to give him some trade value. I order for a veteran to have trade value they either need to be on a friendly contract or be at a level of play the us in short supply. At this point Rosario doesn’t fit either group. If a team needs a corner OF they can get Garcia or Dickerson over the next two years without giving up any prospect.

Eddie is a valuable LF solution until one of the corner prospects is ready. He just isn’t very valuable as a trade chip.
  • Nick Nelson, birdwatcher, Riverbrian and 3 others like this

#43 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 3,944 posts

Posted 15 November 2019 - 07:24 PM

 

Rosario is valuable. He can’t be adequately replaced by Cave or Wade.

Sadly he doesn’t have excess value beyond his likely contract figure to give him some trade value. I order for a veteran to have trade value they either need to be on a friendly contract or be at a level of play the us in short supply. At this point Rosario doesn’t fit either group. If a team needs a corner OF they can get Garcia or Dickerson over the next two years without giving up any prospect.

Eddie is a valuable LF solution until one of the corner prospects is ready. He just isn’t very valuable as a trade chip.

Well said 


#44 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Touch ‘em all!

  • Moderator
  • 5,457 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 15 November 2019 - 08:26 PM

Mod note:

We’ve already had several debates around Eddie Rosario. In this thread have already been a couple of pet subjects carried over from other threads.

Please keep this thread to subject of the OP.

How does the delta between metrics used by the FO and the metrics used by the arbitrators impact decisions made in regards to Eddie Rosario?
  • SQUIRREL, glunn and Riverbrian like this

#45 AZTwin

AZTwin

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,018 posts

Posted 15 November 2019 - 09:08 PM

I’m totally for trading Eddie Rosario but we better be getting Mackenzie Gore, Taylor Trammel and CJ Abrams

#46 DavidGould

DavidGould

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 17 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 12:20 AM

Rosario’s no mvp, but I don’t agree with a word you wrote here.. offense is all we have and since the twins don’t seem to want any of the free agents pitchers or hitters.. then we gotta keep our lineup together.. if we trade Rosario for John gray I will be PISSED.. John gray isn’t worth as much as Rosario by a long shot
  • birdwatcher and mikelink45 like this

#47 Jham

Jham

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 2,225 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 01:06 AM

Nick needs to realize that how he says things is as important as what he says. The facts and analysis is good. The condescending attitude is offputting and borderline bullying, imo. A writer should never ever start a rebuttal with an LOL at someone who bothered to read and comment.

Both sides are arguing the same point. Rosie's success in some areas is incongruent with his abject failure in other areas. Most players that struggle with obp also struggle with k's and getting hits. Rosie didn't. Does that mean that going forward his counting stats are likely to decline to be on par with his advanced metrics and suspect plate approach, or does the power and contract despite ridiculous approach suggest that major step forward is well within reach. What's easier to improve, skill or approach?
  • mikelink45 likes this

#48 The Wise One

The Wise One

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 1,750 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 02:25 AM

 

It is not an "opinion" to suggest that creating outs at an almost unparalleled rate on offense, and giving up outs at an almost unparalleled rate on defense, are detrimental to winning baseball games. It is statistically proven.

 

Opinions about a player are shaped by what we see and what we remember. The big flashy highlights and bat flips tend to stick in our heads. Which was basically the point of this article. 

Rosario struck out at a 14% rate. How is that creating outs at an unparalleled rates. BABIP.273, BABIP was luck hence unlucky Eddie. 

In terms of defense, when do the numbers on defense normalize? Clearly the year Gordon was leading in WAR based on defense showed what the populace thought of defensive WAR.How do they account for baserunners not taking an extra base or tagging up? 

People remember bat flips stick in peoples heads? This bit of generalization from the person arguing statistics should be the only guide. Unscientifically I would say that the people here are more likely to remember the misses and failures more than any player's success.. Both of us now have a stated opinion on what people remember, neither has a fact.

Edited by The Wise One, 16 November 2019 - 02:30 AM.

  • mikelink45 and Jham like this

#49 Major League Ready

Major League Ready

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 1,993 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:15 AM

 

 

Taking a walk when given it, and having a measured, consistent approach to batting are valuable to a team's success, undoubtedly. These are not a part of Rosario's game. Everyone crushed Mauer, wrongly, for the duration of his career for being one of the best ever at practicing such an approach. He got crushed for not being willing to guess or expand or surprise. Mauer is an all-time Twins great, but he wasn't willing (in his approach to batting) to take a risk or a chance to be a hero. He wasn't willing to gamble on his own natural ability as a hitter in favor of doing the right thing as a batter. I'm a fan of Joe. I loved watching him play. I wish he was in the dugout/on the field for the 2019 run. But, there were many times when I was ready to lose my mind watching Joe take a walk with a runner on when we needed an RBI. And that doesn't mean he was wrong. It does mean I'm happy to have Eddie up there going after that RBI, even when he ends up looking like a fool.

 

It's pretty hard to strike a balance between patience and aggression. I mean, they are pretty antonymous. Most guys are going to sacrifice a fair bit of one for the other. The guys that have it balanced, the best of both, are Mike Trout. So if Rosario could add 20 walks to his 2019 total, without losing any singles, he'd be even higher on that list of MVP candidates, he'd be a lot closer to Mike Trout. 

 

Aggressive within the strike zone is great but there are a high percentage of ABs where Eddie swings at a borderline pitch or a pitch outside the zone on the first pitch or even when he is ahead in the count. There is no selection once he gets two strikes. He is swinging. Being aggressive is not helping. Nobody can hit the crap pitchers throw at him now. He is so skilled that he is still able to hit some of those pitches but he would have Yehlich like numbers if he made opposing pitchers give him something in the strike zone. This is frustrating to watch because I can’t help but wonder what we would have in Eddie if he took more professional ABs.

  • 70charger, ewen21 and Battle ur tail off like this

#50 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,908 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:26 AM

 

Aggressive within the strike zone is great but there are a high percentage of ABs where Eddie swings at a borderline pitch or a pitch outside the zone on the first pitch or even when he is ahead in the count. There is no selection once he gets two strikes. He is swinging. Being aggressive is not helping. Nobody can hit the crap pitchers throw at him now. He is so skilled that he is still able to hit some of those pitches but he would have Yehlich like numbers if he made opposing pitchers give him something in the strike zone. This is frustrating to watch because I can’t help but wonder what we would have in Eddie if he took more professional ABs.

He is very good at striking a baseball and he is very confident in his ability to do so.As far as learning situational hitting, he has not


#51 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,908 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:33 AM

 

Nick needs to realize that how he says things is as important as what he says. The facts and analysis is good. The condescending attitude is offputting and borderline bullying, imo. 

Bullying?Really?

 

The overreaction to critical analysis never ceases to disappoint me here.  

  • Mike Sixel, Cap'n Piranha and Major League Ready like this

#52 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,908 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:36 AM

 

I was thinking, what TD really needs is yet another article attacking Eddie Rosario. Can't get enough of those. 

This is an "attack" in your estimation.

 

He laid out a pretty fair narrative backed with lots of support.He dedicated a paragraph to how he likes the guy as well and this is your reaction?How about constructing and articulating your own view before you start with an accusation?


#53 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,908 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:42 AM

Nobody has "attacked" Rosario or is guilty of "bullying" here.

 

These kinds of reactions are accusations that are not accurate.It is an attempt to marginalize the original post and if we are going to be a place centering on discussion that kind of thing should not be accepted.Instead of torpedoing the guy with an accusation, why not make your own point and try to have a conversation with the dude?Why insist there is some pernicious agenda against Eddie Rosario?Most of the stuff Nick said isn't even controversial.What gives?

 

I think that is silly and I would rather have a discussion with all sides freely expressing themselves.I swear, some people are just dying to be "offended"

Edited by ewen21, 16 November 2019 - 07:43 AM.

  • birdwatcher likes this

#54 AZTwin

AZTwin

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,018 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:52 AM

This is like the 10th article that wants to give him away for nothing. If that’s not an agenda I don’t know what is.
  • mikelink45 likes this

#55 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,908 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 08:17 AM

 

This is like the 10th article that wants to give him away for nothing. If that’s not an agenda I don’t know what is.

Is there something mean and nasty about that?


#56 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,908 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 08:21 AM

I am not advocating to trade him, by the way.I was more interested in trading Buxton and if we didn't get Syndergaard because we thought Buxton was all that and a bag of chips then that was a big BIG mistake.

 

I want to read different takes.I agree that Eddie is a reckless player in a lot of ways.I like what he brings to the table, though.However, at the same time, I would like to see people make their case.I am not interested in shuttting it down whereas these terse bitter responses seem to indicate the discussion should be shut down.

 

WHY???? This is the hot stove.Any intelligent input should be good enough whether your or I like it or not


#57 AZTwin

AZTwin

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,018 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 08:25 AM

Is there something mean and nasty about that?


It’s an absolute disgrace to Eddie who has given so much to the franchise and also a disgrace to Twins fans that value his contribution. If we want to talk about trading him sure but let’s recognize how talented he is and accurately reflect the type of talent he should command in the market. I would fully expect a top 25 prospect in baseball along with other strong prospects for an everyday outfielder with 30+ homers and hits for high average. Players like him don’t come around often. If they’re strong in minors, they’re still likely to fizzle and not meet eddies production. We definitely would need a lot. Plus he’s a great clubhouse guy

#58 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 9,950 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 08:39 AM

 

How bout pointing out what you felt was so unfair of off-base in the analysis? The harshest things I said here were that he had a "complicated" and "very ordinary season."

WHOA, BRING OUT THE PITCHFORKS! 

It's been addressed ad nauseam in the 15 other threads on Rosario.


#59 Major League Ready

Major League Ready

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 1,993 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 08:48 AM

We had a lot of the same indignant responses when Sano was first criticized here. A couple years later the majority of people were pretty down on Sano. It was pretty much the same thing as I recall. Nobody thought he was a terrible player but he did not have the commitment necessary to make him the star he could be.

 

I have great hope that Rosario finally recognizes he could be a far better / far more consistent player if he improves his plate discipline. I believe he wants to be great so badly that he can't help himself. The good news is that it is all together possible he will get sick and tired of pitchers making him look foolish and dedicate himself to taking better ABs like Sano did last year.You would think Sano's resurgence would be a great lesson for Eddie.

  • birdwatcher, 70charger, ewen21 and 1 other like this

#60 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 22,389 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks, ND

Posted 16 November 2019 - 09:02 AM

You trade Rosario if the return makes the 2020 Twins better. I can't see that happening but if possible... Yeah go ahead obviously. 

 

Short of that... He will be on the roster in 2020 and he will help us win games. He has talent and he can really really exhibit even more talent if he improves that plate discipline. 

  • jorgenswest, glunn, birdwatcher and 5 others like this

A Skeleton walks into a bar and says... "Give me a beer... And a mop".

 

President of the "Baseball Player Positional Flexibility" Club 

Founded 4-23-16 

 

Strike Zone Automation Advocate

 

I'm not a starting 9 guy!!!




Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: eddie rosario