Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Photo

Front Page: Should the Twins Be In on Cole Hamels?

  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1 Cooper Carlson

Cooper Carlson

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Twins Daily Contributor
  • 136 posts

Posted 13 November 2019 - 08:45 PM

Cole Hamels is one of the best starting pitchers on the open market and teams are definitely looking into him. It is rumored that 13 teams are interested, but the teams were not revealed. It is probably a safe bet to say the Twins will be checking in on him, but how much of an upgrade would he be?With only Jose Berrios locked into the 2020 rotation, the Twins will likely be looking to add at least two starters, and Cole Hamels certainly makes sense on a similar contract to what Nelson Cruz signed last season. If the Twins sign him to a $17 million contract with a $13-$15 million option for 2021, it would be a solid move.

The 35-year old veteran starter is coming off another solid season where he threw 141 innings with a 3.81 ERA, 4.09 FIP, 2.55 K/BB, 47.3 GB%, and 2.5 WAR. He has indicated he would be open to signing a one year deal as long as the team he signs with is a championship-caliber team. The Twins would certainly check that box, and signing Hamels would push them closer to the end goal.

Since his debut in 2006, Cole Hamels has been one of the most consistently good pitchers in the game. Over his 14 seasons, his highest ERA was just 4.20 and he finished in the threes or lower for ERA in 11 of his 14 seasons. He has also finished with a WAR of 2.5 or higher in 12 of his seasons.

His strikeout rate started to take a dip in 2017, but he had it back to a 9.08 K/9 this season. His velocity has dipped on the fastball, so he has had to adjust and he has done so by learning how to get batters out without velocity and with a great breaking ball and changeup. Maybe Wes Johnson can wave his magic wand and get a couple miles per hour back on that arm.

Hamels certainly isn’t the top end starting pitcher many want like Gerrit Cole or Stephen Strasburg, but he is on the end of the second tier group of Madison Bumgarner, Zack Wheeler, and Jake Odorizzi. If the Twins are looking for just a one- or two-year deal with a consistent pitcher, he is a good option for the number three or four spot in the rotation.

What do you think of Cole Hamels? Is he someone you hope to see the Twins pick up via free agency? Leave a comment and get the discussion started below.

Click here to view the article
  • Oldgoat_MN likes this

#2 yeahyabetcha

yeahyabetcha

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 7 posts

Posted 13 November 2019 - 09:18 PM

Maybe an option, but hopefully the Twins can do better than Hamels
  • Oldgoat_MN and Sconnie like this

#3 beckmt

beckmt

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 2,540 posts

Posted 13 November 2019 - 09:35 PM

As a 4th or 5th option, do not have a problem, if he is 2 or 3 Twins have not done a good job this winter.

  • Oldgoat_MN, notoriousgod71, mikelink45 and 3 others like this

#4 Twodogs

Twodogs

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,016 posts

Posted 13 November 2019 - 09:51 PM

Twins need to be in on everyone.
  • USAFChief, Blake, adjacent and 10 others like this

You cannot succeed without hate for your enemy


#5 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    G.O.A.T.

  • Moderator
  • 14,741 posts
  • Locationthe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 13 November 2019 - 09:54 PM

Not a bad option. Not my first choice. 

  • LA VIkes Fan and dgwills like this

#6 DocBauer

DocBauer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 5,883 posts

Posted 13 November 2019 - 10:13 PM

As a 4th SP option, or maybe as a budget 5th option on a 1yr if the market continues as we've seen the last couple of years. He misses the first month of the season plus, but would you rather have Pineda or Hamels as your #4 SP for 2020 considering the season as a whole?
  • beckmt likes this
"Nice catch Hayes...don't ever f*****g do it again."

--Lou Brown


#7 darin617

darin617

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 1,480 posts

Posted 13 November 2019 - 11:16 PM

He is no longer a $17M a year pitcher. He most likely ends up with a contender or closer to wherever is home for himself for like 2/25M.


#8 theBOMisthebomb

theBOMisthebomb

    Pensacola Blue Wahoos

  • Member
  • 770 posts

Posted 13 November 2019 - 11:44 PM

Twins need to be in on everyone.

That's the same thought that's been rattling around in my brain since the end of the World Series. The Twins have the budget and the need and the motive to acquire as much (starting) pitching as possible. There's nothing wrong with an abundance of options.
  • adjacent, bighat and MN_ExPat like this

#9 Post-Concussive Blues

Post-Concussive Blues

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 97 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 06:44 AM

If we sign Hamels and Bumgarner, we will have an awesome rotation for Fantasy Baseball in 2012!

But seriously, Hamels would be a great addition to our staff, probably similar to Odorizzi last year.
  • LA VIkes Fan and MN_ExPat like this

#10 mikelink45

mikelink45

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 2,819 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 06:50 AM

His 1.4 Whip worries me.Loss of velocity is an issue, if control is an issue too that is not good.

  • Oldgoat_MN and D.C Twins like this

#11 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 6,131 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 07:03 AM

1) If Odo returns and takes the #3 spot, I'd be thrilled with Hamels for the 4 spot, and the Twins payroll should allow as much. If Odo does not return, then I would be borderline frantic to try and end up with Hamels to replace Odo in that #3 spot. 

 

2) FWIW, this management team seems to love veterans that have a good locker room rep, and Hamels fills that bill. He seems like exactly the kind of guy this group would target. 

  • Blake, LA VIkes Fan, DocBauer and 5 others like this

#12 JW24

JW24

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 189 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 07:55 AM

Hamels averaged just over 5 innings per start last season. If the Twins bring back Odorizzi, my interest in Hamels would be minimal. Having 2 (relatively) expensive SP who you can't count on to get through 6 innings consistently is not how you build a World Series capable rotation.

 

As with all theoretical signings, it all comes down to dollars. If Hamels is willing to sign for a reasonable price, I wouldn't have any problem with it regardless of Odorizzi's status. 

  • KGB likes this

#13 Dome Dogg

Dome Dogg

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 77 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 08:22 AM

Per the picture above, I'm a little concerned with the nipple growing out of his elbow.

  • Kevin, adorduan, PDX Twin and 2 others like this

"Kid, don't you think there's a problem when you get that excited over a seeing-eye single?"


#14 Harrison Greeley III

Harrison Greeley III

    Member

  • Member
  • 96 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 08:51 AM

I believe a key stat that front offices are looking at right now that I'm not seeing baseball writers adequately discuss is HR/9 or some advanced, proprietary version of that data. The ball is juiced and you're better off assuming it will continue to be juiced. Lineups are more stacked with hitters capable of 20 HR than ever before. If you can give up fewer home runs than you're hitting, you're in good shape. Manufacturing runs is out of style right now.

From that standpoint, Hamels willing to take a 1 year deal with a contender makes him extremely appealing. Hamels has been pitching in HR-friendly parks his entire career (PHI, TEX, CHC) has done a great job not giving up HRs for the most part. 

He had a really good first half in 2019 (allowed 0.81 HR/9). Then he wasn't healthy in the second half (allowed 1.71 HR/9). So the question is a similar one teams are going to have for Gibson as to whether his health will improve. 

I'm definitely for pursuing him on that 1 year deal.  

  • kenbuddha, gagu, MN_ExPat and 1 other like this
AKA: TMW

#15 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    G.O.A.T.

  • Moderator
  • 14,741 posts
  • Locationthe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 14 November 2019 - 08:56 AM

 

He is no longer a $17M a year pitcher. He most likely ends up with a contender or closer to wherever is home for himself for like 2/25M.

 

To be fair, I don't think he'd cost that much, and will most certainly be a 1 year deal unless the market changes. He was decent, but do remember those numbers are nothing special for the NL and will certainly drop in the AL. It would be interesting to see if Wes Johnson can work some mojo with him to get the velo back up, but I wouldn't hold my breath in him being reinvented as his old self. 

 

Bottom line, I really hope this isn't the target. They have money to spend, so spend it on more of a sure thing. 


#16 LA VIkes Fan

LA VIkes Fan

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 10:20 AM

Hamels makes sense IF we get a Wheeler type in free agency, and re-sign at least Odorizzi. even better if we re-sign Pineda. A starting group of Berrios, Wheeler, Odorizzi, Pineda and Hamels would be a HUGE upgrade. 

 

Who's the #1? Probably Berrios. It's almost impossible to get a #1 SP in free agency without breaking the bank and limiting your other options. You really do have to develop your own. Berrios is only 25 and has been a solid to strong #2 each of the last 3 years.He's the guy with Wheeler more a #2 or #1B.  

  • adorduan and DocBauer like this

#17 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Billy G.O.A.T

  • Moderator
  • 15,235 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 10:30 AM

 

Hamels averaged just over 5 innings per start last season. If the Twins bring back Odorizzi, my interest in Hamels would be minimal. Having 2 (relatively) expensive SP who you can't count on to get through 6 innings consistently is not how you build a World Series capable rotation.

 

As with all theoretical signings, it all comes down to dollars. If Hamels is willing to sign for a reasonable price, I wouldn't have any problem with it regardless of Odorizzi's status. 

 

I think Hamels' lower innings per outing was likely a product of being in the NL and/or game planning by the Cubs. At least last year, he was an uncommon pitcher and actually pitched BETTER to batters the third time he faced them holding them to a .706 OPS as opposed to the .896 OPS the 2nd time through the order.

 

My interest in Hamels is minimal, but it's not because I think he'd tax the bullpen any more than most other pitchers. Though, going forward it's very possible the Twins intentionally restrict a starters innings.

 

 

  • MN_ExPat likes this

#18 Rosterman

Rosterman

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 3,456 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 10:37 AM

You have Berrios. Hopefully there is an upside to Berrios and he will continue to improve.

 

Who do you replace Odorizzi with? Someone who can go five innings? Someone not tied into a 3-4 year contract? Imagine there are quite a few possibilities.

 

Who do you repalce Gibson with. ANyone. Here I would consider adding a bigger name free agent, be it Wheeler or Bumgarner. 

 

Who replaces Pineda? My concern with Pineda is - did he get better because of what he was taking? If you can get Gibson and Pineda on rasonable one year ofers, I would sign both and hope Gibson shows up strong in spring training. Gibson still ahs health concerns. Will they come abck? Pineda will miss the first month-and-a-half.

 

Who replaces Perez? Agan, anyone. Heck, I would consider Odorizzi a fine upgrade if he takes the one year deal. But I am afraid of Odorizzi over the longterm.

 

The Twins also need a spot or a way to look at future arms in their organization. Do they have enough worthwhile arms to devote one roster spot to giving them experience. Thorpe, Dobnak, Smeltzer are this year's cropy. Graterol is also a strong consieation. The Twins have 4-5 othre names that could be contributing at the backend of the rotation starting in 2021 and maybe being a futrue major league star.

 

But the question always is...if you BUY rotation arms, then what do you do with the arms in the system. Do you basically let them walk over time (see Stewart, Slegers, Gonsalves) or do you package them when they still have some perceivd worth for offense, or other prospects that you can, in turn, apckage still at another date.

 

Simply by throwing money at the fan the Twins should be able to upgrade over Odorizzi, Gibson, Pineda and Perez. Within their own system they should be able to upgrade over Perez and Gibson 2019. I am not comfortable with Odorizzi longterm. I am not sure how bad the Twins need to be the second-round rehab for Pineda.

 

They have the money to spend. They need a swecond catcher (still cheap). They also need a closer, which should be job one. Spend big on this arm, and the otehr aprts of the bullpen will thrive. You should still have $30-40-50 million to spend on rotation arms.

 

Joel Thingvall
www.joelthingvall.com
rosterman at www.twinscards.com

#19 ChiefsKid

ChiefsKid

    Elizabethton Twins

  • Member
  • 22 posts
  • LocationEnid OK

Posted 14 November 2019 - 11:06 AM

1) If Odo returns and takes the #3 spot, I'd be thrilled with Hamels for the 4 spot, and the Twins payroll should allow as much. If Odo does not return, then I would be borderline frantic to try and end up with Hamels to replace Odo in that #3 spot. 
 
2) FWIW, this management team seems to love veterans that have a good locker room rep, and Hamels fills that bill. He seems like exactly the kind of guy this group would target.


I'm confused as to why bringing Odorizzi back is the determining factor of interest in Hamels as the #4.
If Hamels is a good #4, he'll be a good #4 regardless of who is the #3.
  • Kelly Vance, D.C Twins and MN_ExPat like this

#20 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Member
  • 31,168 posts

Posted 14 November 2019 - 11:18 AM

I like this option, as long as they also acquire two starters on multi year deals. They can't afford to be in this position again next year, only having 1 year deals on 80% of their rotation....

  • Sconnie, dbminn, D.C Twins and 1 other like this

It's been a fun year so far, GO Twins.