Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:37 PM
What on earth were they thinking?
Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:45 PM
they are goin back to old way next year already
Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:49 PM
2-2-1 is awkward but it's really the only format that makes sense in a five game series.
Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:56 PM
Posted 07 October 2012 - 09:32 PM
Posted 08 October 2012 - 07:01 AM
I understand you don't want to go into November for the playoffs...easy solution: Knock the regular season down to a 158 games. Problem solved.
Posted 08 October 2012 - 07:21 AM
Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:34 AM
I don't think anybody is thrilled with it, but everybody agreed to it, including the players.
Posted 08 October 2012 - 11:44 AM
Posted 08 October 2012 - 12:02 PM
I don't see why a 2-2-1 series with the extra travel is such a horrible thing. I have flown on a plane many times before and it really isn't that difficult to sit in a chair for a couple hours. There's no reason why teams can't play on five consecutive days with two flights in between games.
Using this years series as examples--5 games in 5 days works fine for Yanks/Os and maybe Cards/Nats. Not so cool with longer flights for Cincy/Giants and As/Tiggers.
Yes Selig is a complete moron--there is no need for second WC anyway. Just to give BoSox a better shot...go with one WC per league and 3 division champs.
Posted 08 October 2012 - 01:52 PM
~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~
Posted 08 October 2012 - 09:20 PM
Yeah the 2-3 format is a one-year deal. Not ideal, but whatever. I love that wild card teams are placed at a significant disadvantage to division winning teams. Any team that doesn't like the single game issue can solve that by winning their division. If you don't do that, you're just lucky to even have a chance to play in the postseason. Next season, they'll be able to change back to the preferred 2-2-1 format for the LDS. so just not a big deal. If the A's were going to lose 2 games in Detroit, they were going to have to win all 3 in Oakland anyway... might as well do it 3 straight.
I'm annoyed by this "logic" because I keep hearing people say it and it just doesn't hold up once you go into any depth of thought. Again - the hype about the wildcard is "now it matters to win the division in the regular season!" and then they promptly strip that advantage to give the lower seeds the first home games. If there wasn't an advantage to starting a series at home - you wouldn't do it. But there clearly is and it was clearly earned by the higher seeds. So in the very season in which the league itself is promoting an emphasis on regular season success they strip one perk of that success away?
It's stupid. The league controls scheduling, this could have been fixed without this hypocritical result.
Posted 09 October 2012 - 06:52 AM
Posted 09 October 2012 - 08:13 AM
"I think you're like me in that you subscribe to the idea that there is some randomness to the playoffs," he said. "That randomness is more pronounced the smaller the sample. The beauty for a team with a $55 million payroll playing a $170 million payroll is our risk is a lot less and our reward is a lot greater. A one-game playoff is going to help the weakest team and the lowest payroll."