Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Photo

Article: Report From The Fort: Looking For A Bounceback (Part 2)

trevor hildenberger addison reed
  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 6,108 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 09:23 PM

FORT MYERS - Somehow a season that starts well and devolves is a more damning narrative than a season which never gets on track. If a player’s season just stinks from start to finish, the reaction is “how can he get back on track” or “he’s a good buy-low candidate, because that had to be an aberration.” But a season that goes downhill has less hope attached to it. We conclude he’s just not healthy, or the tank is empty, or he can’t make “the adjustment” or he just isn’t that good. This is the second part of a three-part series of interviews with Twins bounceback candidates. Part 1.  Maybe that’s because we saw it happen, or maybe we already invested our emotions in the turnaround last year, so there’s nothing left. Whatever the reason, I don’t think it’s because the player is less likely to come back. Certainly, the two Twins players who fit that description seem hopeful, even anxious, for the season to begin. Their success could make a world of difference to the Twins bullpen.

Addison Reed

The plan for last year was for Addison Reed, who had been signed for a two-year, $17 million contract, to be the Twins bullpen’s cornerstone. He was early, posting a 2.83 ERA and 9.3 K/9 through the end of May. But his effectiveness and strikeout rate plummeted in June. Then in July he was on the disabled list for three weeks with an elbow inpingement.

He never really got back on track. The numbers tell the story. Reed threw 28.2 innings in the first two months of the season, striking out 29 batters. He threw almost the same number of innings in the last four months of the season - 27.1, and struck out just 15. All his pitching stats - ERA, WHIP, hits - fell apart over those last four months, as did the Twins reliance on him.

So what happened? “I ran into some arm troubles midseason. It’s one of those things that just caught up to me,” says Reed. He adds, “My workload in 2016 and 2017 was pretty heavy.”

Yes, yes it was. Reed pitched in 157 games over those two years, throwing 143.2 innings. But that’s not all. “This is the first offseason in four years where I didn’t have to play extra baseball in the playoffs,” adds Reed. The postseason adds four games and 3.1 innings to that total, along with a shorter offseason for recovery.

That kind of workload is one of the reasons the Twins signed Reed. So the injuries and ineffectiveness came as a surprise, especially after his strong start. “I felt fine, everything felt fine, but something can still pop up out of nowhere,” laments Reed. “I think that’s what happend. I felt fine. I didn’t change anything. I was doing everything the same.”

So the plan this year is rely on last year’s relatively easy workload to give his arm the rest he needed to recover. “With the limited workload last year, I think things are going to be good this year,” Reed says. With only 56 innings last year and no postseason, his arm certainly got some extra rest.

It’s also worth noting (although it was unsaid by Reed), that Reed was on pace for a career high mark in games and innings through April and May last year. That last week of May, he was used five times in seven days, including four days in a row. Changes to the coaching staff, along with a more measured approach might also help with a return to form.

Trevor Hildenberger

Despite being a rookie, Trevor Hildenberger was also supposed to be one of the pillars of the Twins 2018 bullpen. His impact late in the 2017 was as explosive as his side-arm delivery, racking up 44 strikeouts in 42 innings. The only concern was that he had faded in September; his ERA climbed from 2.29 to 3.21 over his last eight games.

His 2018 started out well enough. Even after a below average April, he rebounded to a 3.33 ERA and an even better 1.13 WHIP through the All-Star break. Opponents had just a .689 OPS against him. But the second half was a disaster. His ERA was 9.00 over that half with opponents knocking a .974 OPS against him. Was he, like Reed, battling injuries?

“I felt good. I felt healthy. My body felt fine. My arm felt fine,” says Hildenberger. Instead, he thinks the problem was with his command. “Inconsistencies led to that,” Hildenberger says. “My fastball command got away from me a little bit. So I worked on that this offseason, and in spring training I’m working on that, and hopefully get back to where I was at the end of 2017.”

What kind of training does one do to fix command? “It’s mechanics for me, so i worked on keeping my front shoulder closed before my foot landed, and separating my hips and my shoulders in my delivery,” reveals Hildenberger. “if they’re firing together that’s when the ball starts to spray a lot more.”

Hildenberger’s sidearm delivery means that when he misses his spot, the ball tends to miss side to side, rather than up and down. Since he’s throwing to the outside or inside edge of the strike zone, that presents a problem. “You’re missing either by a long ways, so it’s an easy take. Or you leave it over the middle,” Hildenberger explains.

Again it’s worth noting that Hildenberger was called into action 43 times before the All-Star break, due to being so effective. That’s again pretty heavy usage for a reliever. It’s conceivable that more conservative usage by a new coaching staff could pay off in more success over the course of a long season.

The Twins had two key components of their bullpen last year succeed early and fall apart midseason. The two showed different symptoms, and have addressed their struggles differently this offseason. But both also had extremely high usage for relievers early in the year. Perhaps the struggles we saw over the second half of the season can be remedied by individual offseason efforts, combined with a team approach to usage.

Click here to view the article

#2 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 17,783 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 09:29 PM

Reed is a great example of why I have no problem with the Twins staying away from signing 30+ relievers. Reed had been healthy and really good for 7+ seasons, and he was only 29 and getting over-used over 2-3 years, he finally broke down. Kimbrel's a little older and has been used a lot as well (not even considering playoff innings/games). If healthy, however, Reed is really good, here's hoping he does return to form.

 

Hildenberger is going to be just fine as well. Again, when he went well, he got used all the time... when your arm gets tired, you lose mechanics, which is what Hildy is saying affected his command. 

  • brvama, mikelink45, Minny505 and 2 others like this

#3 DocBauer

DocBauer

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 5,784 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 09:59 PM

NOT a fan or apologist of Molitor as a manager. Simply stating that there were games when the Twins seemed to be obviously on the short end of things and he would put out his most trusted RP in hope of a surprising comeback instead of letting a game maybe go by.

To his defense, the pen may not have always been as deep as needed. But again, don't you just toss a "someone" out there at times and hope vs riding your best relievers in a possible no win situation?

I don't like Romero and Mejia in the pen. Mostly because I think both have real starter potential. But if the FO and Rocco see this as best arms on hand, and not limiting their potential to such, and being fluid in their usage and future roles, then I'm on board with starting 2019 in the pen.
  • Mike Sixel, diehardtwinsfan, brvama and 7 others like this
"Nice catch Hayes...don't ever f*****g do it again."

--Lou Brown


#4 Danchat

Danchat

    Pro Bowl Armchair QB

  • Member
  • 5,176 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 10:44 PM

I understand Molitor was put in a tough situation and forced to use his favorites in the bullpen time after time, but the overuse of certain relievers was simply blatant. Add that to the times relievers went missing (Matt Magill was hidden better than Waldo at one point), and I hope that Rocco will be able to preserve the bullpen better. 

 

I am worried about the depth, both for high leverage and AAA depth. I don't think putting Parker and Hildenberger into high leverage situations is a good idea, and we don't have a ton of reinforcements at AAA that I see becoming viable relievers. There's only so much Rocco's going to be able to do with this weak bullpen.

  • diehardtwinsfan, LA VIkes Fan, mikelink45 and 2 others like this

Check out my work at Purple Pain, a Vikings forum: 

Analyzing the Past Decade of Vikings Offseasons


#5 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Member
  • 30,861 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 10:54 PM

Reed is a great example of why I have no problem with the Twins staying away from signing 30+ relievers. Reed had been healthy and really good for 7+ seasons, and he was only 29 and getting over-used over 2-3 years, he finally broke down. Kimbrel's a little older and has been used a lot as well (not even considering playoff innings/games). If healthy, however, Reed is really good, here's hoping he does return to form.
 
Hildenberger is going to be just fine as well. Again, when he went well, he got used all the time... when your arm gets tired, you lose mechanics, which is what Hildy is saying affected his command.


The alternative being to use the next guy in the minors? Who's probably going to provide negative value?

It's been a fun year so far, GO Twins. 


#6 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 17,783 posts

Posted 19 February 2019 - 11:37 PM

 

The alternative being to use the next guy in the minors? Who's probably going to provide negative value?

 

The alternatives being signing the 2nd-tier guys for reasonable money and less years and with about the same odds of staying healthy after 30.

 

Or,

 

Turning things over to a Fernando Romero.

 

I'm not saying any of those are sure things. None of them are.

  • birdwatcher, beckmt, Major League Ready and 5 others like this

#7 Dantes929

Dantes929

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 2,667 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 12:31 AM

 

The alternative being to use the next guy in the minors? Who's probably going to provide negative value?

Isn't that preferable to turning a pitcher with positive value into a pitcher with negative value through over use? Fans used to get on Gardy for playing Butera to give Mauer rest but through 2010 Mauer was strong in the final 6 weeks. On the other hand Morneau had an MVP season going but played all 163 games along with the all star game and home run derby and his poor showing in the final month was probably what kept us out of the playoffs.Guerrier used to get dead arm from over use.Not an exact science but 5 appearances in 7 games after heavy use in the rest of the first two months is probably too much.Molitor should have been reading Tom Froemming;'s game logs to analyze his bullpen usage.

  • birdwatcher, Kevin, brvama and 6 others like this
If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.
If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

#8 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Touch ‘em all!

  • Moderator
  • 5,385 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 20 February 2019 - 06:52 AM

The alternatives being signing the 2nd-tier guys for reasonable money and less years and with about the same odds of staying healthy after 30.

Or,

Turning things over to a Fernando Romero.

I'm not saying any of those are sure things. None of them are.

Isnt Reed the poster child for not signing the second tier relievers? He was a 2 year deal for reasonable money. Like you said, nothing is certain, but if you fail to develop pitchers for a decade, you gotta do something, right?
  • Mike Sixel, DocBauer, Vanimal46 and 2 others like this

#9 Blackjack

Blackjack

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • 949 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 07:30 AM

Thats one concern I have about the hiring of Rocco, he's another rookie manager that like Molitor, has never managed in the minors, never had to make the actual decisions on pitching changes, never had to make out a lineup. You can't tell me that managing 200-300 games at a lower level wouldn't give you a better handle on how to manage.  

  • Dave The Dastardly likes this

#10 gman

gman

    Cedar Rapids Kernels

  • Member
  • 234 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 07:55 AM

It wasn't just Reed or Hildenberger. Every year the relievers doing best got rode into the ground. That was part of Molitor's m.o. So hopefully Johnson and Baldelli will have a better game plan and these 2 will come back this year and be part of a better bullpen.

  • blindeke, DocBauer, Minny505 and 1 other like this

#11 mikelink45

mikelink45

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 2,712 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 08:22 AM

I agree with Seth - I always fear the high stat reliever in FA - relievers have an up and down history because over use is part of the system.I hear the Molitor whiners already, but the fact is, unless you are a Yankee you do not have a lot of viable relievers to turn to and when you lose a game by leaving your best reliever on the bench the whines get louder and reverse themselves. 

 

I am not anxious to see the current reliever trend continue.There are not enough relievers to fill the opener, closer, 7th,8th inning roles every day without over using them.The discussions that are opening up in mlb are interesting because of the three player minimum for pitchers - does that get rid of the Loogy or Roogy?The negotiations also are looking at a 26 man active roster and limiting the pitchers to 12!That means 7 relievers. so if you look at the four reliever per game model that means the pitchers will all be in half the games. 

Give me a good starter!Let them pitch 7 innings or better yet, give me back the complete game.

 

The only way to sustain the new model is to have an active AAA -MLB shuttle and if you do that you might as well have a 30 man roster and 15 pitchers or more. 

  • brvama, DocBauer, birddog and 1 other like this

#12 Parker Hageman

Parker Hageman

    Owner

  • Owner
  • 2,805 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 08:24 AM

It would be interesting to find out if Hildenberger has done anything to combat the possible pitch tipping. 

 

http://twinsdaily.co...g-pitches-r7123

  • birdwatcher, nicksaviking, brvama and 1 other like this

"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball and in the end it turns out that it was the other way around all the time." -- Jim Bouton, "Ball Four"


#13 Shaitan

Shaitan

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,162 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 09:40 AM

 

Reed is a great example of why I have no problem with the Twins staying away from signing 30+ relievers. Reed had been healthy and really good for 7+ seasons, and he was only 29 and getting over-used over 2-3 years, he finally broke down. Kimbrel's a little older and has been used a lot as well (not even considering playoff innings/games). If healthy, however, Reed is really good, here's hoping he does return to form.

 

This is exactly why I have no problem with chasing 30+ relievers: they usually sign 1-3 year deals. If they bomb, it's a short commitment and you eat the money. Unless it's a "proven closer" it's under $10million/year. Given the volatile performance of all RP, you don't want a 5 year deal with a 27 year-old very often. 

  • birdwatcher likes this

#14 birddog

birddog

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 284 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 10:46 AM

I am not a believer in the 100-pitch limit except at the beginning of the season. So many times a Twins SP goes 5 innings with 90-100 pitches and is pulled. Starters have to start going at least 6 innings in low scoring games. If not, coaches have to get them to stop nibbling after getting ahead of the count. I detest getting ahead 0-2 only to end up with a walk because of nibbling. And too often the pitch after 0-2 is not even in the same zip code so it's just a wasted pitch. 

 

Our starters without the dominant stuff have high pitch counts because they can't trust their stuff without a perfect pitch. Hopefully our new staff will demand 6+ innings as we have lots of starters to choose from. One novel way to speed up the game--throw strikes. Hopefully our offense can score enough runs to give our pitchers the confidence to do just that.

  • brvama, mikelink45, DocBauer and 1 other like this

#15 MMMordabito

MMMordabito

    Formerly nasu1970

  • Member
  • 1,040 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 10:56 AM

I know one way of helping Hildenberger bounce back. Don't have him pitch to Lindor!

  • h2oface likes this

#16 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,854 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 11:34 AM

 

 but if you fail to develop pitchers for a decade, you gotta do something, right?

Yup.Lose.

  • Sconnie likes this

#17 ewen21

ewen21

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,854 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 11:37 AM

Hard to say Hildy or others like him need to "bounce back" when he only pitched 42 major league innings prior to last season


#18 LA VIkes Fan

LA VIkes Fan

    Junior Member

  • Member
  • 1,743 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 04:29 PM

Rocco may find himself on the horns of the same dilemma Molitor had - not enough Starting pitching to go more than 5-6 innings a game and not enough Relief pitching to cover 3-4 innings game after game. Molitor handled it by overusing RPs.That didn't work because the overused guys got tired or hurt and the others didn't develop. To paraphrase Einstein- Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results. Can't do it the Molitor way again.

 

So, we gotta try something different.It sure would've been nice to get some better RPs in or starters who can go longer, but we have what we have. So, I expect to see May, Rogers, Romero, Reed, Parker and Hildenberger to get a lot of high leverage innings. Also maybe Magill or Vasquez, Duffy (kill me) and even Mejia, Moya or Reed. The last few innings of a close Twins game are going to be entertaining for all of the wrong reasons. Let the roller coaster ride begin!

  • DocBauer likes this

#19 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Member
  • 30,861 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 05:08 PM

Most pitchers in all of baseball don't go six innings in a start.... The average last year was 5.2..... It's on the manager and FO to adjust given that reality.
  • Sconnie likes this

It's been a fun year so far, GO Twins. 


#20 nater79a

nater79a

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Member
  • 1,010 posts

Posted 20 February 2019 - 09:11 PM

Didn't help that the Twins were a man short in the bullpen in April and May when Addison Reed was overused. Tyler Kinley, and later Phil Hughes, were out there but hardly ever used.Certainly not in high leverage situations.

  • Mike Sixel and Danchat like this



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: trevor hildenberger, addison reed