Posted 13 July 2018 - 06:40 AM
Wouldn’t we settle for 6 or 7 under 500, and about 7 back heading into the All Star Break?
Posted 13 July 2018 - 09:48 AM
Overall, no. But most of their important players aren't old, either.
Sure, but there is a middle between "really young" and "old"....
And, if a player is in their 3rd or 4th year, are they really "young" or "inexperienced" as the implication keeps being here?
There's always next year, or the next, or maybe by the time I'm Chief's age, I guess....
Posted 13 July 2018 - 10:08 AM
Just change the middle D to an L...