Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email
Photo

Article: Why I Believe The Twins Are Going To Sign Yu Darvish

yu darvish
  • Please log in to reply
210 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 3,424 posts

Posted 08 January 2018 - 10:29 PM

Call it a hot take. I'm fine with that. It's been cold out, and the frozen state of affairs this offseason is only deepening the chill.

But I've become convinced that the Twins are destined to sign Yu Darvish. And while it's very possible that my desperation for something – anything – to happen this winter is driving me into delirium, I really don't think it's a totally baseless prognostication.

When hundreds of Minnesota baseball diehards congregate at the Winter Meltdown in a couple of weeks, I think we'll all be celebrating the biggest free agency splash in Twins franchise history.What leads me to this conclusion? Well, part of it is wishful thinking, I'll admit. Darvish would be an awesome fit on the Twins and would lift them to serious championship contender status almost instantly. I badly want to see it, so long as the price makes any sense.

But there are also plenty of legitimate indications that this could very realistically go down. I'll lay out the two biggest ones, and you can add your own (or dispute mine) in the comments.

Only Eyes For Yu
The Twins have been openly connected to Darvish throughout the offseason, and GM Thad Levine hasn't been shy about his pursuit. But there've been few other substantive rumors tying Minnesota to any other prominent free agents. A rumbling of trade buzz here and there, sure, but despite their outward interest in adding a frontline starter, the Twins have been conspicuously silent in relation to other free agent starters like Jake Arrieta, Alex Cobb and Lance Lynn.

Meanwhile, they've been operating as a team that's gearing up for a big spend. Fernando Rodney and Zach Duke were both low-dollar one year commitments. The Twins have added around $7 million in salary by signing them, but offset part of it by shedding ByungHo Park's contract.

So right now they are treading water below $100 million in committed payroll, at a time where they're making their contention push in earnest.

Darvish in No Hurry
Last week it was reported that Darvish's and his reps had yet to meet with the Twins front office, and that the two sides "don't see it as necessary -- not yet anyway."

Many took this as a sign the Twins aren't really in the running for Darvish. We're headlong into January now and there hasn't even been a meeting? Sounds unpromising.

But, in my irrationally and unfoundedly optimistic state, I'm clinging to the hypothetical premise I laid out in the forums here at Twins Daily last month:

"Here's what is playing out right now – from my hopeful view:

Levine has a good enough relationship with Darvish and his agent that the two sides have kept an open line of communication. Thad signaled early on that his interest was very serious, and Darvish's camp indicated that the interest was mutual.

So over the past couple of weeks, Darvish has been meeting with other legit suitors to hear their pitches and receive their offers. Now he'll be able to go into a meeting with the Twins knowing full well what else is out there, and what his options are. Meanwhile, Levine will know exactly what kind of bids he's up against.

No matter how you look at it, I think Minnesota meeting with Darvish later in the process rather than earlier almost has to be viewed as a good thing... as long as it actually happens."

It was a shot in the dark at the time, but nothing that's happened since has made it feel any less plausible.

Darvish has met with the Cubs. He's met with the Astros. Neither of those engagements resulted in remotely immediate action, and the Yankees seem to be distantly waiting for the righty's price to drop.

The Twins are said to be prepared to offer a "market deal" to Darvish. And as it happens, through all of his courting elsewhere, the realities of his market have become pretty much solidified.

It's clear that Minnesota is at least interested in a meeting with Darvish. And while jaded Twins fans love to opt toward the ol' "he's just not that into you" quip, it's kinda silly to think he'd actually be opposed to linking up, given that he evidently hasn't been blown away by any other suitors.

It's almost as though Darvish is biding his time, content in the knowledge that his destination is set, and a meeting is merely a formality.

What say you?

Click here to view the article
  • luckylager, glunn, Jerr and 8 others like this

#2 Wizard11

Wizard11

    Elizabethton

  • Members
  • 48 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 08 January 2018 - 10:45 PM

Nick, It seems that you are either experiencing an ephinal satori or H2N3 delirium. Here’s hoping for satori
  • USAFChief, glunn, MN_ExPat and 1 other like this

#3 Han Joelo

Han Joelo

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,346 posts

Posted 08 January 2018 - 11:11 PM

I endorse this analysis. Or at least the rationale behind it. I don't have anything to add, although I should get in a preemptive "his contract is an albatross that will prevent the Twins from signing Royce Lewis to a long term deal" comment, a few years early.
  • glunn, nytwinsfan and Original Whizzinator like this

#4 h2oface

h2oface

    Lifelong since '61

  • Members
  • 3,322 posts
  • LocationTralfamadore

Posted 08 January 2018 - 11:26 PM

It would be great to sign Darvish. But if he does sign, and helps take the Twins to a World Series, he will have to pitch in said Series, and I can't say I look forward to that.

 

And while I desperately want the Twins to sign a pitcher with the status and talent of a Darvish, I guarantee that, by the end of the contract, they will regret the signing. 

  • glunn likes this

#5 Shaitan

Shaitan

    Chattanooga Lookouts

  • Members
  • 754 posts

Posted 08 January 2018 - 11:29 PM

If nothing else, you've created a nice narrative here that makes me want to believe.

  • glunn and Tomj14 like this

#6 Dantes929

Dantes929

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,092 posts

Posted 08 January 2018 - 11:41 PM

 

It would be great to sign Darvish. But if he does sign, and helps take the Twins to a World Series, he will have to pitch in said Series, and I can't say I look forward to that.

 

And while I desperately want the Twins to sign a pitcher with the status and talent of a Darvish, I guarantee that, by the end of the contract, they will regret the signing. 

Not disagreeing with your 2nd paragraph but why in the world would you not look forward to Darvish pitching in the World Series? 

  • Steve Lein, glunn, Jerr and 9 others like this
Don't Sweat the Small Stuff ... and it's all small stuff.

#7 h2oface

h2oface

    Lifelong since '61

  • Members
  • 3,322 posts
  • LocationTralfamadore

Posted 09 January 2018 - 01:18 AM

 

Not disagreeing with your 2nd paragraph but why in the world would you not look forward to Darvish pitching in the World Series? 

 

 

???

 

..... because I saw him pitch in the last one? and one could say that the high priced rental, and sticking with him, cost the Dodgers the World Series. You must have watched, no?


#8 Platoon

Platoon

    Minnesota Twins

  • Members
  • 4,711 posts
  • LocationTwinsWorld

Posted 09 January 2018 - 06:16 AM

You had me until you said "market deal". Perhaps I am jaded by years of MN sports history, but when one lists the Twins, Astros, and Cubs in the hunt, it doesn't seem a market deal will suffice.
  • KirbyDome89 likes this
TwinsWorld: Did you hear we just updated the Stadium Club?

If I wanted balls and strikes called by a robot, I would get an Xbox!

#9 TwinsWonWithHunter

TwinsWonWithHunter

    Elizabethton

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 06:49 AM

This is probably the first time I have ever suggested that the Twins do not spend money, but I am against signing Darvish. I don't think he is worth $200 million.

 

There are only a handful of true aces in all of baseball. Verlander, Scherzer, Bumgarner. An argument could be made for one or two others.

 

In (relative) recent history, we have had aces in 1987-1988, 1991, and 2004-2007. These horses just don't come around often. 

 

But then you have this next tier of "top of the rotation" guys --not aces, but guys that fit into the "1" slot on a staff. Darvish qualifies as that. But he is not appreciably better than the other available starters out there. All of whom, Arietta excepting, will command far less money.

 

Meaning, at the end of the day, if we get Alex Cobb for five years, we will look back at having made a sound investment if he can win 65 games in that time. No one can reasonably argue that Darvish would win any more than that. But Cobb will come cheaper.

 

This is a long way of saying that, as long as the Twins refuse to announce what their upcoming season's payroll will be - which they have never done - we can only assume that it will be modest. So it is tough to advocate for supreme top dollar unless that player is a True Ace or a generational talent.

 

So I am not on the Darvish train, for the Twins, as a free agent signing.  

  • Dantes929 and rv78 like this

#10 rv78

rv78

    Cedar Rapids

  • Members
  • 75 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 07:24 AM

I totally agree. Not a big fan of Darvish and would rather see them go after Cobb or Lynn. They will give the Twins what they need and be much cheaper. Ervin Santana was not a top pitcher at the time they signed him and he has been a solid investment.Avoid the big money free agents that usually end up in busts and go after the next tier free agents like a Cobb or Lynn. I would not be very happy if they cannot afford to spend money on some of their young talent they have now tying them to longer term contracts if they overspend for Darvish. As far as I know he doesn't come with a guarantee that he'll take us to the WS. 

  • Dantes929 and TwinsWonWithHunter like this

#11 amjgt

amjgt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,337 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 07:24 AM

4/120 - yes
5/140 - yes
5/150 - reasonable, but I’m getting uneasy.
6/155 - yes
6/165 - I could talk myself into it.
6/175 - pass, but I’ll be sad
6/200 - run!

Edited by amjgt, 09 January 2018 - 07:27 AM.

  • Carole Keller, glunn, Jerr and 8 others like this

#12 tarheeltwinsfan

tarheeltwinsfan

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 649 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 07:26 AM

1) The GM's of TD must all agree that the Twins need better starting pitching. We have been writing this for as long as I have been reading TD. 2) Darvish will most likely improve the starting pitching for the Twins. I say "most likely" because the future is not certain for any of us and even less certain for major league starting pitchers, who violently fling baseballs, resulting in all kinds of problems for their arms, backs, necks, and legs. 3) There are several ways of getting a #1 starting pitcher: a) develop him through the draft and minor leagues and patience. Let me ask a question here: Even with numerous top draft picks in recent years, I ask Question #1: How has that worked out for the Twins the last 10 years? or :cool: Trade for a #1 pitcher, which involves the same injury risks PLUS the Twins lose some good prospects and good players, who may have Hall of Fame careers with other teams, thereby causing us Twins fans to post laments and regrets about "what might have been" for the next 10 years. I ask Question #2: How has that worked out for the Twins the last 10 years? or c) Sign a consensus top ranked free agent, starting pitcher, which is something I don't remember the Twins ever doing. One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. This is my argument about why the Twins need to sign Darvish. Let's get off the porch and run with the big dogs. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead! Take the high ground! Charge!

  • glunn, Riverbrian, beckmt and 8 others like this

#13 amjgt

amjgt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,337 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 07:31 AM

Falvey and Levine seem like logical men. It seems completely logical to me, that if you sign Darvish, you trade for Archer (unless the asking price is just completely over the top). Signing Darvish opens the door and with a little prospect luck could move you toward WS contention. Doing both flings that door wide open and gives you a legit 4 year window of WS contention.
  • glunn, bteichr, Twins33 and 7 others like this

#14 Tommygun921

Tommygun921

    Cedar Rapids

  • Members
  • 195 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 07:36 AM

I've been thinking all along that they could legitimately sign him. I thought they'd shock the baseball world and sign Otani and Darvish. But that didn't happen. That being said I don't think Darvish will live up to a contract that's anything more than 3 maybe 4 years. Which is what it's gonna take to sign him. If he'd sign for 4 years with the twins for "market value" then I'd be good with the signing. Otherwise I don't think he'll live up to it. I'd love to see the twins be aggressive on the starting pitching front while they're on the rise. Instead of squandering the prime years of their offense like they did during the 2000s.
  • jrod23 likes this

#15 jrod23

jrod23

    Cedar Rapids

  • Members
  • 80 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 08:09 AM

 

I've been thinking all along that they could legitimately sign him. I thought they'd shock the baseball world and sign Otani and Darvish. But that didn't happen. That being said I don't think Darvish will live up to a contract that's anything more than 3 maybe 4 years. Which is what it's gonna take to sign him. If he'd sign for 4 years with the twins for "market value" then I'd be good with the signing.

I agree here.  

 

I found this article on the ESPN.Not sure if it's kosher to post the link, but I'll try.It's all about signing pitchers long-term.Jayson Stark wrote it after the Max Scherzer signing in Washington back in '15.

 

http://www.espn.com/...ers-big-trouble

 

Two years into that contract and Scherzer is looking like he's making good.However, I can't comprehend signing a pitcher, any pitcher, to a 6-7 year deal after the age of 30.Pitchers know the risk of their position and want the longest deal possible, but why should they get it?

 

I want Darvish, but just because the going long-term rate may be 6-7 years, doesn't mean he should get it...from any team.4-5 year deal, I'm alright with.


#16 clutterheart

clutterheart

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,533 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 08:22 AM

I believe Flavine can't be as lackadaisical as they appear to be, so they must be following some incomprehensible master-plan that ends in Darvish (or some other good pitcher) being a Twin.  

 

Right???

Please?

  • tarheeltwinsfan and gagu like this

#17 JaleelWhite FanClub

JaleelWhite FanClub

    Ft Myers

  • Members
  • 339 posts
  • LocationOmaha, NE

Posted 09 January 2018 - 08:30 AM

Would much rather see the Twins get an ace via trade. Go get Archer or Cole for less money. In the next two years the club is going to see a log jam of prospects ready to graduate to the Twins in the middle infield and in the middle or at the back end of the rotation.

 

We all love prospects and cringe at losing players we've seen develop through the minors, but a progressive-thinking, winning organization has to see minor league development as a tool to not only supplement the big league roster, but to acquire talent outside the organization.

  • Hosken Bombo Disco and howieramone2 like this

#18 Puckett34

Puckett34

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,236 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls, SD

Posted 09 January 2018 - 08:46 AM

tenor.png

  • Jerr, Twins33, TheLeviathan and 5 others like this

Hit dingers.  Never bunt.


#19 sploorp

sploorp

    Cedar Rapids

  • Members
  • 162 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 08:48 AM

 

It would be great to sign Darvish. But if he does sign, and helps take the Twins to a World Series, he will have to pitch in said Series, and I can't say I look forward to that.

It's been widely reported that Darvish was tipping his pitches.I'm confident he'll do just fine if the Twins make it to the series.

  • bteichr, RaymondLuxuryYacht, gagu and 1 other like this

#20 Dantes929

Dantes929

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,092 posts

Posted 09 January 2018 - 08:50 AM

 

???

 

..... because I saw him pitch in the last one? and one could say that the high priced rental, and sticking with him, cost the Dodgers the World Series. You must have watched, no?

Well, first of all if we see Darvish pitch for the Twins in the WS it must mean the Twins made it to the WS, no? Kershaw has been Klyle Gibson like in the past postseasons.If we got him would you not look forward to watching him in the WS? Broncos lost 3 Super Bowls with Elway. Would you have said "hey, not looking forward to seeing him in another Super Bowl"? I'm not saying I want the Twins to sign Darvish but if they do I am not worried about how he might do in the WS.

  • Steve Lein, glunn, pbrezeasap and 9 others like this
Don't Sweat the Small Stuff ... and it's all small stuff.



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: yu darvish