Posted 29 February 2012 - 11:59 PM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 05:19 AM
Edited by Fanatic Jack, 01 March 2012 - 05:23 AM.
Posted 01 March 2012 - 06:44 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:15 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:19 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:29 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 08:23 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:03 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:30 AM
(only one detail: Deduno is not a power pitcher, his average fastball is in the high 80s)
A couple of those players will have break-through STs and break-through seasons. Burnett is due. 3 seasons ago he was brilliant in AA and then rushed to the majors too soon. Hopefully he puts it together this Spring and carries through the seasons. Lots of early acolades about Waldrop's sinker in the camp too. Grey, Vasquez, Burton and Bulger could be the next Guerrier and Reyes. Oliveros has a ton of potential (and the hardest thower among everyone in camp now that Zumaya is done) and he is 24. Interesting group and will be intersting to see them fight for a spot through out the Spring.
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:30 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:08 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:47 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:56 AM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 02:30 PM
I don't think there's anything wrong with suggesting that the Twins would be better served with at least one proven big-league relief arm that doesn't carry enormous question marks.
I presume this is directed at me. To be clear, I did not ask you to stop reading or commenting on my posts, I simply suggested that you might be better off doing so considering that you seem so sensitive to any vaguely critical analysis. I got accused all the time last offseason of being overly negative -- then the team lost 99 games. Much of the time, what you perceive as negativity is just being realistic. If you find it so offensive, don't read it. That's all I'm saying.
Is also tough when one disagrees and is immediately asked to no longer read/comment on certain individuals posts.
Posted 01 March 2012 - 03:06 PM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 03:56 PM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 03:57 PM
Reyes had been decent in 2004 before developing extreme control problems in 2005. He had a multi-year track record of good to very great K rates and good groundball rates. His control returned with the Twins and he was effective again.
Young, failed MLB starters like Guardado and Hawkins and Romero - pitchers once perceived by scouts to have the stuff to succeed as starters, who were accordingly given significant playing time by their big league clubs as starters - regularly turn into effective bullpen arms. This is a truism.
And Guardado pretty much just sucked for two full seasons after going to the bullpen, had a good season, then posted mediocre peripherals for a looong time. It was 2001 - 7 years after his second failed starting stint - before he became a reliable, effective guy.
Breslow had fantastic K rates and was effective overall in both 2006 and 2007 at Pawtucket and with the Red Sox.
Willis is one guy for whom there is no blueprint: his minor league journeyman time between 88 and 91 looks like just that: a guy who wasn't even AAAA. His peripherals with the Twins FAR outstrip anything he'd done the last two years in AAA. Presumably they saw something they thought they could fix and did so. Or he juiced or something. That one's a stumper.
My question is: what do you see as the analogs to these guys among this year's crop, and how does the fact that some of the historical guys succeeded only after significant time had passed help assuage naysayers of the off-season bullpen handling? Understand, I have NO problem with the idea that Swarzak and Duensing might be effective relief pitchers. They both pretty much fit the "failed starter" mold, although Swarzak got his MLB reps more from need than perceived MLB starter stuff/MiLB track record.
Likewise, I have no problem with the idea that Gutierrez or Waldrop or Guerra or Bromberg might be worthwhile out of the bullpen at some point. Waldrop is probably at make or break time. I'm just not seeing how your historical examples correlate with the list of names the Twins have brought in. Most of these guy just appear to just not be very good at major league baseball. Bulger is 33, which makes a Reyes analogy tenuous, but at least he still struck out guys last year in AAA.
The reason these guys are cast-offs becomes apparent. You can see that many of them once had some promise, and I it's certainly possible somebody could figure something out or have it figured out for him by Randerson or whatever.
But to conclude "The Twins are correct to have signed the arms they did and passed on the other proven stuff" just does not follow.
Posted 01 March 2012 - 05:21 PM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 05:38 PM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 05:47 PM