Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email
Photo

Heyman: Twins still are not willing to deal Willingham

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 Parker Hageman

Parker Hageman

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,527 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:18 PM

A tweet by CBSSports.com's Jon Heyman shows what the Twins front office's mindset is right now:
Heyman.JPG
I know from a public relations standpoint, trading Willingham would cause a firestorm among fans but in terms of gaining the most value, outside of this coming offseason, Willingham's value may never be higher. He's got a friendly contract but he's also 33 years old and has had a history of injuries throughout his career. Additionally, those power numbers are likely to regress too. At 25% HR/FB, that's well above his career norm of 16% and due from some drainage. His style is conducive to Target Field but it is not like we are talking about him playing in Fenway Park. While he may be able to provide good value in the next two years, it is not likely going to be at this current pace. Trade, or don't trade? Why or why not?

#2 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 22,801 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:20 PM

Trade, trade, trade. They stink, they stunk last year, they'll stink next year. Why NOT deal him?

I don't know, it is a site to discuss sports, not airline safety.....maybe we should take it less seriously?


#3 Willihammer

Willihammer

    Nostrombolimus

  • Members
  • 7,252 posts
  • LocationSaint Paul

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:21 PM

The Twins will have a hard time selling those outfield seats next year if they don't have at least 1 guy who can hit the ball out there once in a while. Willingham stays.

#4 Dilligaf69

Dilligaf69

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 365 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:21 PM

I'm leaning towards maybe trading him now...doubtfull he has this kind of yr again, would need a top stater prospect though and a good middle infield prospect as well as 1 or two mid level guys preferably pitchers.

#5 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let's Keep Winning!

  • Members
  • 5,986 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:23 PM

No problem with trading him (or anyone else) for the right deal. He was a good signing for the Twins this off-season. Now they need to take advantage of the signing they made. Look to 2014 and beyond not 2013.

#6 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 7,922 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:26 PM

Trade him if someone offers a good deal but they shouldn't trade him for 70 cents on the dollar. It seems that some teams think the Twins should trade him just b/c a prospect will help some future team.

#7 SDTwinsFan

SDTwinsFan

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 35 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:34 PM

Trade him if someone offers a good deal but they shouldn't trade him for 70 cents on the dollar. It seems that some teams think the Twins should trade him just b/c a prospect will help some future team.


Exactly! I'm sick of people thinking the Twins should just blow up the team for a future that may never come! I am all for trading Willingham, but he has been killing it with little help behind him in the line-up. To get that production, a team needs to pony up. Why should the Twins feel the need to let him go for any less than a superb package?

#8 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 22,801 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:39 PM

Sigh, where has anyone in this thread said "trade him for 70 cents on the dollar". No one has said that. What we've said, is that he should be dealt if they can get a fair return. We've also repeatedly pointed out, that even with him, they stink, just like last year, even with a healthy and awesome Mauer.....Look, I spent years saying the Twins should deal prospects while they had great teams to close holes, I'm not a play for the future that will never come kind of guy, but this team isn't 1 player away, or even 3 or 4. This team is one of the worst teams in baseball two years in a row, with no immediate help in the minors to close their weaknesses. Their only strength in the minors is in the OF, a place where they are already pretty good.

I don't know, it is a site to discuss sports, not airline safety.....maybe we should take it less seriously?


#9 twinswon1991

twinswon1991

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 256 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:40 PM

Trade, trade, trade. They stink, they stunk last year, they'll stink next year. Why NOT deal him?


Agree 100%

#10 DPJ

DPJ

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 636 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:42 PM

It seems that teams are hot and heavy for Josh, be stupid not to atleast take offers.

#11 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 17,299 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks, ND

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:46 PM

A tweet by CBSSports.com's Jon Heyman shows what the Twins front office's mindset is right now:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]1674[/ATTACH]
I know from a public relations standpoint, trading Willingham would cause a firestorm among fans but in terms of gaining the most value, outside of this coming offseason, Willingham's value may never be higher. He's got a friendly contract but he's also 33 years old and has had a history of injuries throughout his career. Additionally, those power numbers are likely to regress too. At 25% HR/FB, that's well above his career norm of 16% and due from some drainage. His style is conducive to Target Field but it is not like we are talking about him playing in Fenway Park. While he may be able to provide good value in the next two years, it is not likely going to be at this current pace.

Trade, or don't trade? Why or why not?


If it brings quality arms into the organization in return... Yes... The Twins need pitching... All this shopping of players at the trade deadline is fun and to try and shop along with them is a great way to pass time. But... In the end... You can't lose focus on the primary reason for the shopping. Pitching... Pitching and more Pitching... If Willingham is the price to bring talented arms into the organization. Yes by all means.

If it doesn't bring quality arms into the organization... No Way... I don't think he's a flash in the pan. He has legit power and we don't have a replacement for that. He's ours lets keep him. No reason to dump his salary.

#12 Winston Smith

Winston Smith

    2 + 2 = 5

  • Members
  • 2,588 posts
  • LocationOceania

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:48 PM

We are in last place with him if you get an offer you can't refuse do it! Before this team is good again without a lot of new talent he'll be retired.

#13 SDTwinsFan

SDTwinsFan

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 35 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:50 PM

Sigh, where has anyone in this thread said "trade him for 70 cents on the dollar". No one has said that. What we've said, is that he should be dealt if they can get a fair return. We've also repeatedly pointed out, that even with him, they stink, just like last year, even with a healthy and awesome Mauer.....Look, I spent years saying the Twins should deal prospects while they had great teams to close holes, I'm not a play for the future that will never come kind of guy, but this team isn't 1 player away, or even 3 or 4. This team is one of the worst teams in baseball two years in a row, with no immediate help in the minors to close their weaknesses. Their only strength in the minors is in the OF, a place where they are already pretty good.


When I said that I'm sick of "people" suggesting a trade of 70 cents on the dollar, I should have been more specific. I was referring to some reporters (like Bowden) who are suggesting the Twins give away their players for anything less than great offers.

#14 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 22,801 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:52 PM

Ah, well, I'm no Bowden fan, so I get that.....

I don't know, it is a site to discuss sports, not airline safety.....maybe we should take it less seriously?


#15 Thrylos

Thrylos

    They Finally fired ’em. Play Ball!

  • Members
  • 8,558 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:57 PM

It all depends on what they will get in return. Lets not forget that Willingham is not getting any younger and his fielding projects at DH... That said, I find it interesting that this un-named "Twins' person" directly contradicted what the interim GM said openly a few days ago (i.e. that they are listening on anybody.) Either someone is lying (maybe trying to increase Willingham's value) or they are not all on the same page. On the other hand, Stark reported yesterday that the Twins have a really really high price on Willingham (as told by a rival GM) which means that at least they are talking, which means that Heyman's tweet is garbage (or that mystery Twins' person is out of the loop)
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#16 Andrew Bryz-Gornia

Andrew Bryz-Gornia

    Member

  • Members
  • 57 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:58 PM

Yes, trade him. http://www.twinsdail...ngham-Available

#17 Winston Smith

Winston Smith

    2 + 2 = 5

  • Members
  • 2,588 posts
  • LocationOceania

Posted 26 July 2012 - 02:08 PM

They certainly have played like a farm team the last year and a half so I can see how it could be confusing.

#18 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Members
  • 13,240 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 07:37 PM

This is an awful, awful mistake not to at least field offers.

#19 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 11,041 posts
  • LocationThe charred ruins of BYTO

Posted 26 July 2012 - 07:57 PM

I'm sure he's fielding offers, but he's probably also asking for the stars... that's partly a negotiation thing as I suspect he will come down in price... but it's better than the previous guy who would flip him for the other team's nick blackburn.

#20 Mchans24

Mchans24

    Member

  • Members
  • 86 posts

Posted 26 July 2012 - 08:00 PM

Trade him right now!! Get a stud pitcher that is in high A somewhere for him along with a B prospect in AA and be VERY HAPPY!! They should have done this last year with Cuddyer and Kubel instead we got draft picks that are at least five years away!! I would like to see who the twins have drafted as supplemental picks that have panned out? That would show us the real value of getting draft picks for losing FA!