Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
Subscribe to Twins Daily Email
Photo

Article: Are Span's Days in Minnesota Numbered?

  • Please log in to reply
69 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 3,313 posts

Posted 01 July 2012 - 10:34 PM

You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.co...nesota-Numbered

#2 jorgenswest

jorgenswest

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,434 posts

Posted 01 July 2012 - 10:58 PM

Let's hope not. The Twins need to be blown away with an offer for any of their 2013 assets. I would hate to see a deal like the Astros received last year for Bourn. Bourn comps better than Span so it is unlikely they will do better. It is very rare for a top prospect to be traded midseason for a Span level player. In hindsight, you will find all kinds of deals for players who later turned out to be great players (Carlos Santana for example). That credit goes to the team that made the trade for a player who was not a top prospect at the time. Last year Beltran, Jimenez and Pence were the only players who returned top 100 prospects in a midseason trade. I love Span, but I don't he is valued at their level by other teams. Do we trust the Twins scouts to be able to pick a diamond out of the vast array of middling prospects? Other than possibly Diamond, they haven't done so well lately.

#3 clutterheart

clutterheart

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,509 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 04:32 AM

I would still rather trade Revere

#4 Obie

Obie

    Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 05:26 AM

I agree that Span is prime trade bait for the reasons stated. However, Span isn't quite the stellar star you make him out to be. He is an average major league center fielder. His OPS is 22nd in the top forty big league center fielders. His OPS is 20th out the top forty leadoff hitters and 16th in OBP.

#5 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 06:02 AM

Much as I would hate to see it and lose his defensive skills (I would love to see an outfield of Span, Revere & Mastroianni - nothing would fall in), I understand his value as a trade chip. But we had better get at least one player in return who is a very good bet to be starting in a couple years at most. I would be upset to see him traded for a handful of B prospects, none of whom may ever pan out.

#6 luckylager

luckylager

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 222 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 06:19 AM

I would hate to see him go. He plays hard, plays well and is a class act. If he does go, we had better get some high ceiling pitching prospects in return.

#7 DPJ

DPJ

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 636 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 06:21 AM

It would suck to see him go, but this is what bad teams have to do. Hopefully moving Span will bring back to pieces to help this rebuild go quicker. But sadly I have my doubts about the Twins identifying the right pieces in a trade.

#8 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 8,652 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 06:53 AM

I think the Twins are in great shape with Span. They don't have to trade him like they had to trade Santana. While some of his offensive stats might be depressed a bit by playing in Target Field, he's been worth 4.5 WAR over his last 140 games and is on pace for about 5 WAR this year. That should lead to a lot of teams being interested in him and, hopefully, a seller's market. His contract means that, unlike Pence, more teams can be in on him as well.

#9 spideyo

spideyo

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 603 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 07:21 AM

I think he's more valuable to other teams than some realize. In MN, we have a lot of high-defense, high-speed outfielders. We also have a lot of (theoretically) high production left handed bats. How many other organizations have both those things? Now, left handed bats and speedy outfielders don't win us championships, but they do make Span much more replaceable.

#10 jmlease1

jmlease1

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 153 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 07:44 AM

I think Span is the Twins best trade asset right now; he's a solid MLB CF who is under contract for a couple of years at a very good price. He's proven to be a real asset at the top of the order, and the health concerns appear to be a thing of the past. He should be a very attractive to a number of teams. I'd hate to lose Span for all of those reasons, but for the right price he should be traded. We do have a replacement for him in CF in Ben Revere, who seems to be showing that he can hit at this level. (would I be happier if Revere got a few more walks, had a little more pop in his bat? sure, but if he can hit .320 you just roll with it.) But it has to be the right deal. I don't want to deal a quality MLB starter for a couple of maybe prospects sitting in A-ball. Moving Span for a couple of C prospects isn't a good use of the team's assets. There needs to be some high upside and at least one guy who's not 3 years away. Another $5M in payroll room wouldn't hurt; that could absorb all of the raises to guys currently under contract/control while we spend the money freed up from cutting Pavano, Baker, Liriano, & Capps loose on starting pitching (Zack Greinke to the white courtesy phone...paging Zack Greinke...)

#11 UCLA_YANKEE_COLA

UCLA_YANKEE_COLA

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 118 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 07:50 AM

"Do we trust the Twins scouts to be able to pick a diamond out of the vast array of middling prospects? Other than possibly Diamond, they haven't done so well lately." Who has though? It just doesn't happen very often for any teams, not just the Twins. Middling prospects are middling prospects because they're not great players. Sure some will make an unexpected leap but for the most part you're not trading for Travis Buck and getting Josh Hamilton. But Span will bring back more than middling prospects, I think a good defensive CF on a team friendly deal who can get on base is more valuable now than ever.

#12 ltwedt

ltwedt

    Member

  • Members
  • 83 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 08:19 AM

Parmelee - - - in right????? ........ Like EVERYDAY?????? YIKES!!!!! Please . . . not that . . . ANYTHING but that!!!

#13 Crotalo

Crotalo

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 08:35 AM

He has a team friendly deal. Unless the Twins are convinced that they won't be any good until 2015, they should keep him unless they get a ton for him. The OF guys in the minors don't appear to be ready.

#14 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Twins World Champions in 2018

  • Members
  • 9,156 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 02 July 2012 - 08:42 AM

Span's team friendly deal is actually part of the asset here. Last time I checked, Revere has a friendlier deal, is a better fielder, is a better runner, is 4 years younger and pretty much a wash as far as OBP goes this season (and Revere has not yet entered his prime, while Span has been there.). No brainer, but they have to get an MLB-ready SP, at least, in return.
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#15 gmarais66

gmarais66

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 221 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:19 AM

I can see where there's a chance the Twins would trade Span, but I would think it would have to be an awesome deal for Ryan to move him... After all the Twins are not a terrible team... Yes, they've had horrible starting pitching this season, which is why they are in the Central cellar.... If the Twins add a two or three starting pitchers in the offseason, it would completely change the outlook for next season... Getting rid of your top players, who are signed to team-friendly contracts, doesn't make a whole lot of sense, unless you get an awesome deal... Replacing Revere in right with Parmelee? Really?!? Have you seen him play outfield? In a pinch he can play in right, but he has no business being out there on a daily basis...

#16 PopRiveter

PopRiveter

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 300 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:21 AM

I get the reasoning, but I love consistency in baseball. I would rather watch the career arch of my team's better players than root for the new guy over and over. It's totally an irrational, fan-take but I get more satisfaction out of a Span double than a Doumit HR. I hate the trade deadline. I'm sure I'm speaking for a very small minority. Or just myself.

#17 CDog

CDog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 856 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:29 AM

I get the reasoning, but I love consistency in baseball. I would rather watch the career arch of my team's better players than root for the new guy over and over. It's totally an irrational, fan-take but I get more satisfaction out of a Span double than a Doumit HR. I hate the trade deadline. I'm sure I'm speaking for a very small minority. Or just myself.


I know exactly what you mean and don't think it's that small of a minority opinion. It makes me think of the Seinfeld bit that at some point we're just cheering for laundry. I very much like the idea of building from within, staying with "our guys" at the core, and making minor changes at the fringes. That's the ideal for me, so you're not alone. We also have to understand that sometimes there are situations that dictate a move that doesn't go along with that idea. Sometimes it's hard to like, but we move on.

#18 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Now living in Oregon

  • Members
  • 24,232 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:30 AM

What team has ever added 2-3 starting pitchers, that are good enough to win divisions, in 1 year?

One of the best opening day rosters in years. Now go get 'em.


#19 old nurse

old nurse

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,259 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:36 AM

Usually the Twins trade their players in the 5th year of the service with the club. The exception being the players for whatever reason they don't personally like. Lohse, Young and Garza come to mind. The offer would have to be so far in the Twins favor to make a trade that I can't see it happening. The whole details of the proposed trade last year to Washington were never leaked. Storen for Span straight up was not going to happen, look up Seth Stohs story for the details. They still stand.

#20 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 18,039 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks, ND

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:43 AM

Span is one of my favorite players. I don't believe that Revere's play is the reason to trade Span. I would love to see Span and Revere in the same outfield for a long time. I do not want to lose Denard at all. He can play for me anyday. However... This team needs pitching and needs it in the worse way. It isn't a question of picking up 5 guys who can throw for a rotation... You need 8 or 9 guys who can throw for your rotation because pitchers get hurt alot... Right now... The Twins have what... 2 maybe 3 arms that they can throw next year. They will need 6 more... If a Span trade happens... I know that pitching is why it happened and I will have supported the move but I will still feel sick about it. Kudo's to Nick Nelson for his piece. It's hard to advocate the trading of one of the guys you really like. It's takes sensibility and balls. It makes you feel that Nick is worth reading because he is balanced.