Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store

Recent Blogs


Photo

Mark Appel?

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 darin617

darin617

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 608 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 05:17 PM

So it should seem that the Twins should now take Mark Appel.

#2 Einstein

Einstein

    Member

  • Members
  • 89 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 05:31 PM

Seattle passes on him too, I think the Boras thing is holding him back some now.

#3 darin617

darin617

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 608 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 05:38 PM

I guess it is not a good thing for a player to have Scott Boras as an agent. I doubt he makes it past the Cubs at #6.

#4 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 4,918 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 04 June 2012 - 05:48 PM

So it should seem that the Twins should now take Mark Appel.


If he's still there at 32, I concur.

#5 Gernzy

Gernzy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 441 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:53 AM

I orignally wanted him when Houston pasted on him. Today I'm glad we stuck with Buxton. Boras has screwed over Appel. I don't even see him signing with the Pirates. Appel didn't sound happy that they took him, why would he want to come here?
I bent my wookie...

#6 Boom Boom

Boom Boom

    Hydraulic Choppers

  • Members
  • 1,122 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:22 AM

It would appear that the Twins and Astros weren't the only teams not sold on Appel. And I think the Boras angle is overblown. I've heard conflicting reports on Appel's velocity, from mid-90s to high-90s. And there was that story in the Strib last week about Appel being "too nice" to pitch inside.

#7 Puckmen

Puckmen

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 11:56 AM

I have seen Appel pitch in person 6 times this year (live close to Stanford). There is no issue with his velocity...he routinely throws 94-95 and can hit 97 whenever he wants (but he does dial it down to 91 when he needs to throw a strike). The concerns (based on conversations with scouts at these games) are lack of movement of his fastball and the lack of a top-notch secondary pitch (his breaking pitch is hard to describe...sort of a hybrid curve/slider). That said, the last game he pitched for Stanford in the NCAA regional last weekend was pretty incredible as he was pretty much unhittable for the first 6 innings and cruised to a complete game 4-hitter with 11 K's. The only pitcher I saw play at Sunken Diamond (Stanford's baseball stadium) this season who threw harder than Appel was Chargois of Rice. He hit 99 with many of his fastballs and was fun to watch.

#8 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,069 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 01:35 PM

I have seen Appel pitch in person 6 times this year (live close to Stanford). There is no issue with his velocity...he routinely throws 94-95 and can hit 97 whenever he wants (but he does dial it down to 91 when he needs to throw a strike). The concerns (based on conversations with scouts at these games) are lack of movement of his fastball and the lack of a top-notch secondary pitch (his breaking pitch is hard to describe...sort of a hybrid curve/slider). That said, the last game he pitched for Stanford in the NCAA regional last weekend was pretty incredible as he was pretty much unhittable for the first 6 innings and cruised to a complete game 4-hitter with 11 K's.

The only pitcher I saw play at Sunken Diamond (Stanford's baseball stadium) this season who threw harder than Appel was Chargois of Rice. He hit 99 with many of his fastballs and was fun to watch.

Good insight here, thanks for sharing.

#9 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,095 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 01:41 PM

Interesting to note the Chargois sighting! That's something to look forward to out of this "situation" so far.

#10 Gernzy

Gernzy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 441 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:30 PM

If Chargois can hit 99 and actually locate that pitch? Watch out Capps we got someone hunting for your job!
I bent my wookie...

#11 DaTwins

DaTwins

    Member

  • Members
  • 40 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:40 PM

How do you think you pronounce Chargois?

#12 J-Dog Dungan

J-Dog Dungan

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 660 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 03:13 PM

From what i read on MLBTradeRumors, Appel slid because he declined the $6 million contract that the Astros offered him. Also, the 3rd round pick for the Dodgers, Onelkis Garcia, clearly doesn't know much about the new draft rules if he is asking for a $7 MILLION SIGNING BONUS as the 133RD PICK! What the hell is up with that?

#13 Gernzy

Gernzy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 441 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 04:09 PM

From what i read on MLBTradeRumors, Appel slid because he declined the $6 million contract that the Astros offered him. Also, the 3rd round pick for the Dodgers, Onelkis Garcia, clearly doesn't know much about the new draft rules if he is asking for a $7 MILLION SIGNING BONUS as the 133RD PICK! What the hell is up with that?


I'm so glad the Astros said no to Appel. Scott Boras has been destorying salaries for years and teams and standing up to him. He is only hurting his client at this point. I'd be shocked if the Pirates sign Appel at this point. Boras has warped that boy.
I bent my wookie...

#14 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 05:54 PM

Is anybody really shocked that Appel turned down an underslot offer? That being said, I don't see how the Pirates sign him - even if he did a 180 and took $6M, that would just about wipe out Pittsburgh's bonus pool.