Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store


Photo

Ben Revere

  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 Andy4Twins

Andy4Twins

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 03:50 PM

Another night where Willingham is the DH and Revere is playing RF. Can someone explain this to me at all?

#2 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 4,800 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:11 PM

My take: Gardy likes to assign roles to his players. Willingham is the regular LF, Span is the regular in CF. At this point Revere is the third starter, so he gets RF. Plouffe is the utility guy and gets either RF or LF depending on who is sitting. At least, this week.

#3 stringer bell

stringer bell

    Confirmed Hacker

  • Twins News Team
  • 4,044 posts
  • LocationZumbrota MN

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:34 PM

It probably won't matter, but this choice seems pretty foolish.

#4 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 4,957 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:35 PM

This drives me crazy. Nuts.

#5 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 4,800 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:40 PM

Revere's arm is so epically weak that maybe it actually makes sense; could runners routinely be going first-to-third on a single to left when Ben is there? If so, right is not really any worse, and gives Gardy the stability he likes.

#6 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:45 PM

Revere's arm is a problem no matter where you play him. It's only marginally worse in RF. For every runner that goes first to third on Revere in right (that wouldn't have gone first to third anyway), there is some percentage that don't go 2nd to home now, 3rd to home now, or first to third on balls hit to left now, that would do just that were Revere in LF. The number of bases saved by playing him in left isn't likely very large. Some, no doubt, but it's not like Revere's arm won't be taken advantage of if he was in left. Or center, for that matter. Revere's range plays in right just as well as in left. Obsessing over which OF position Revere plays seems to me to be obsessing over trivia.

#7 Scheherezade

Scheherezade

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 115 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:47 PM

Wherever he plays, he is truly a joy to watch. Put your stats down and watch him tumble: http://mlb.mlb.com/v...py_21975557&v=3

#8 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,773 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 04:48 PM

I'd guess Revere's range in right makes up for his his arm.

#9 CDog

CDog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 856 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:13 PM

During spring training, Gardy mentioned not liking the way Revere played LF (and Revere made comments to the effect that he agreed). I don't recall if there were more details than that given (or what they were). Someone give my needle a bump...thanks.

#10 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,092 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:18 PM

During spring training, Gardy mentioned not liking the way Revere played LF (and Revere made comments to the effect that he agreed). I don't recall if there were more details than that given (or what they were). Someone give my needle a bump...thanks.


Yeah, CDog is getting tired pointing this out. So there's that, but my god, why doesn't anyone in the "access" media find out exactly what went on and is going on there? I know there were statements made by Gardenhire, and I think they involved bad routes or something and someone here attested to the fact that he had some miscues. . . . but it was in SPRING TRAINING and it wasn't late in it either (as though that matters). It makes me have conniption fits if I think about it too much. It's just crazy. YET ANOTHER ridiculous decision based on SPRING TRAINING.

#11 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,092 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:19 PM

Revere's arm is a problem no matter where you play him. It's only marginally worse in RF. For every runner that goes first to third on Revere in right (that wouldn't have gone first to third anyway), there is some percentage that don't go 2nd to home now, 3rd to home now, or first to third on balls hit to left now, that would do just that were Revere in LF. The number of bases saved by playing him in left isn't likely very large. Some, no doubt, but it's not like Revere's arm won't be taken advantage of if he was in left. Or center, for that matter. Revere's range plays in right just as well as in left. Obsessing over which OF position Revere plays seems to me to be obsessing over trivia.


Did third base move somewhere else?

#12 spideyo

spideyo

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 603 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:21 PM

Which would you rather have, a slightly stronger arm in RF or someone who can catch? Revere is going to catch a helluva lot more balls than Plouffe, so where is that more valuable? It seems like teams are typically more willing to put their worst defender in LF, and when you have Span, Revere, and Plouffe, Plouffe is far and away the worst one.

#13 CDog

CDog

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 856 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:25 PM

Yeah, CDog is getting tired pointing this out. So there's that, but my god, why doesn't anyone in the "access" media find out exactly what went on and is going on there? I know there were statements made by Gardenhire, and I think they involved bad routes or something and someone here attested to the fact that he had some miscues. . . . but it was in SPRING TRAINING and it wasn't late in it either (as though that matters). It makes me have conniption fits if I think about it too much. It's just crazy. YET ANOTHER ridiculous decision based on SPRING TRAINING.


And as long as I'm repeating myself, let me make it clear that I'm only revealing what I have gathered as the reason for it. Not only do I not have the information to know if it's the correct decision, but I likely wouldn't know what to do with the information if I had it. (As in, I saw precious little during spring training and don't have the expertise of a scout or coach at that level.)

#14 twinstalker

twinstalker

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 166 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:27 PM

His arm is so bad it doesn't matter which field he's in? Wow. I can't really appropriately respond to that logic. Yes I can. Let's say he had no throwing arm attached at all. He'd had to run every ball in. He'd be much more valuable in left than right in that extreme situation. The situation you're looking for is the one where he throws every ball into the stands. I haven't seen him do that yet on a ball in play.

#15 Riverbrian

Riverbrian

    Goofy Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 9,467 posts
  • LocationGrand Forks

Posted 04 June 2012 - 11:10 PM

His arm is below par but too much is made of it. He can find the cut off guy. That will keep the trailing runner held. He's just not gonna rifle one ala Bryce Harper. Guess what... Neither is Span or Willingham. In the same breath... Gardy wrings his hands over RF or LF and permanent positions. The spin is different off the bat. They will figure it out. They've played the game before.

#16 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 05 June 2012 - 12:02 AM

Did third base move somewhere else?


I don't understand why this is hard to comprehend. With Revere in right, and Willingham (or Plouffe) in left, more runners will go 1st to 3rd on a single. But...some runners will not go 1st to 3rd on a single to left, respecting Willingham's arm. Fewer, but not zero. Likewise, a runner here and there will not tag up and score on a fly ball to Willingham, but would tag and score were Revere in left. A couple times a year, a runner on 2nd will stop at third on a sharp single to left if Willingham is there, but would go 2nd to home were Revere in left. So yeah, right field is the worst place for Revere's arm, but it's not a zero sum game. Revere's arm in left, with Willingham in right, will still result in some runners advancing on Revere's arm that would not have advanced were Willingham in left. The net loss of Revere playing RF isn't as big as people make it out to be. There are also generally slightly more balls hit to right than left, so Revere's range is worth slightly more in right than left.

#17 glunn

glunn

    Head Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,259 posts
  • LocationBeverly Hills, CA

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:08 AM

I don't understand why this is hard to comprehend. With Revere in right, and Willingham (or Plouffe) in left, more runners will go 1st to 3rd on a single. But...some runners will not go 1st to 3rd on a single to left, respecting Willingham's arm. Fewer, but not zero. Likewise, a runner here and there will not tag up and score on a fly ball to Willingham, but would tag and score were Revere in left. A couple times a year, a runner on 2nd will stop at third on a sharp single to left if Willingham is there, but would go 2nd to home were Revere in left. So yeah, right field is the worst place for Revere's arm, but it's not a zero sum game. Revere's arm in left, with Willingham in right, will still result in some runners advancing on Revere's arm that would not have advanced were Willingham in left. The net loss of Revere playing RF isn't as big as people make it out to be. There are also generally slightly more balls hit to right than left, so Revere's range is worth slightly more in right than left.


Great explanation, Chief.

#18 Montecore

Montecore

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 121 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:21 AM

I had a great arm. I played RF on a sandlot team with Amos Otis in CF and Garrt Alexander in LF. If it was just my arm alone - I'd have been a first ballot Hall Of Famer. I don't understand how a guy can make the bigs without a cannon or close to it.

#19 John Bonnes

John Bonnes

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 4,957 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:50 AM

Wherever he plays, he is truly a joy to watch. Put your stats down and watch him tumble: http://mlb.mlb.com/v...py_21975557&v=3


It would really have been a joy seeing him get to that double in the fourth inning that Plouffe couldn't get to.

#20 Mauerzy4Prez

Mauerzy4Prez

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 135 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:07 AM

Way too much is made of Ben's arm strength (or lack thereof) and even though I agree it is his greatest weakness I don't think it counts him out as a big league outfielder. The Twins mentality is fundamental baseball, and all Ben needs to do is use his vast range to make up for the weak arm, and be as accurate as he can when hitting the cut off. People!! There is a reason teams take infield/outfield practice everyday, there is a reason the cutoff man exists... This guy is a premier player, a great asset to our team, and just flat out fun to watch. I think the signing of Buxton last night may show us all that the Twins do think highly of Revere, because the may be setting themselves up for an outfield like this in a few years: Revere (LF) Buxton (CF) Hicks (RF).

#21 Mr. Ed

Mr. Ed

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 827 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:10 AM

Way too much is made of Ben's arm strength (or lack thereof) and even though I agree it is his greatest weakness I don't think it counts him out as a big league outfielder. The Twins mentality is fundamental baseball, and all Ben needs to do is use his vast range to make up for the weak arm, and be as accurate as he can when hitting the cut off.

People!! There is a reason teams take infield/outfield practice everyday, there is a reason the cutoff man exists... This guy is a premier player, a great asset to our team, and just flat out fun to watch. I think the signing of Buxton last night may show us all that the Twins do think highly of Revere, because the may be setting themselves up for an outfield like this in a few years: Revere (LF) Buxton (CF) Hicks (RF).


Premiere player? No. A guy who can get on base and set things up? yes.

Concerns. Seeing guys go first/third on any single hit his way, regardless of how deep it is when he's in RF
Seeing the outfield play so shallow that singles with RISP at 2nd are a huge risk on sending guys.
Accuracy, or lack of. The throws to the plate from LF have not been very close.

Edited by Mr. Ed, 05 June 2012 - 07:14 AM.


#22 TCBurgerGuy

TCBurgerGuy

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:13 AM

Yes, I can. It was mentioned during the broadcast last night that Gardy wanted to keep Willingham off of his feet for the night, but still wanted his bat in the lineup. Hence, a start at DH.

#23 Mauerzy4Prez

Mauerzy4Prez

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 135 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:19 AM

Premiere player? No. A guy who can get on base and set things up? yes.

Concerns. Seeing guys go first/third on any single hit his way, regardless of how deep it is when he's in RF
Seeing the outfield play so shallow that singles with RISP at 2nd are a huge risk on sending guys.
Accuracy, or lack of. The throws to the plate from LF have not been very close.


I am not a "Stat guy" but I would be curious to see just what the scoring rate is when a man is on 2nd base for Ben compared to any other major league outfielder... singles with a man on 2nd usually end up in a run, as long as the base runner isn't Jim Thome out there. To your point however, going 1st to 3rd on a single is a concern and something that Ben will need to work on. The nice thing about arm strength is that you can build it, and from what I can see in Revere, he is a hard worker and a pretty athletic individual. I am confident this is something he will work to improve upon (maybe even more so than his bunting) and even though it may always bee his greatest weakness, it won't be such a great point of debate like it is today.

#24 Mr. Ed

Mr. Ed

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 827 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:53 AM

If they're going to play him, keep him in a corner OF spot. I just don't think in CF the arm is going to help them. Not that Span has a cannon either. Just bugs me to see teams run, run, run on them, and the Twins too often are plodding base-to-base. That said, seeing more aggression on the bases, such as Monday night, is a welcome sight. Overdue. Revere has to get more line drives, less chops on the ground. Some gaps. He could, IF he can figure it out, lead the league in 3-baggers.

#25 spideyo

spideyo

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 603 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:48 AM

Way too much is made of Ben's arm strength (or lack thereof) and even though I agree it is his greatest weakness I don't think it counts him out as a big league outfielder. The Twins mentality is fundamental baseball, and all Ben needs to do is use his vast range to make up for the weak arm, and be as accurate as he can when hitting the cut off.

People!! There is a reason teams take infield/outfield practice everyday, there is a reason the cutoff man exists... This guy is a premier player, a great asset to our team, and just flat out fun to watch. I think the signing of Buxton last night may show us all that the Twins do think highly of Revere, because the may be setting themselves up for an outfield like this in a few years: Revere (LF) Buxton (CF) Hicks (RF).


It's a long ways away, but from what I've read on Buxton and what I've seen from Revere, I expect Revere will more likely be our CF if/when Buxton gets to The Show

#26 Boom Boom

Boom Boom

    Hydraulic Choppers

  • Members
  • 1,122 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:55 AM

I don't remember hearing that Revere didn't play LF well. He can't be worse over there than RF. Pretty sure the real reason that Willingham moved to LF was because the Twins wanted Morneau to DH, which meant Doumit had to play a position other than C, and he was most comfortable in RF. Of course, Doumit hasn't played in the outfield in a long time (and for good reason). But if Willingham is the DH there's no reason to keep Revere in RF.

#27 Mauerzy4Prez

Mauerzy4Prez

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 135 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:57 AM

It's a long ways away, but from what I've read on Buxton and what I've seen from Revere, I expect Revere will more likely be our CF if/when Buxton gets to The Show


I actually agree with your take... looking back at my original lineup I think Ben's speed is best used in CF, then you take care of the runners advancing 1st to 3rd on singles issue because his throw is the most direct to 2nd from CF.

#28 Mauerzy4Prez

Mauerzy4Prez

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 135 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:01 AM

I don't remember hearing that Revere didn't play LF well. He can't be worse over there than RF.

Pretty sure the real reason that Willingham moved to LF was because the Twins wanted Morneau to DH, which meant Doumit had to play a position other than C, and he was most comfortable in RF. Of course, Doumit hasn't played in the outfield in a long time (and for good reason). But if Willingham is the DH there's no reason to keep Revere in RF.


The real reason Willingham is in left is A. He is most comfortable defensively there, B. His defensive liability is less of a risk in left over right and center. Willingham DH'd last night because we needed to get Jamey back in the lineup at 3rd, Ploufey still needs to play everyday with his bat starting to pick up, and Mauerzy sat because of his thumb so you insert Doumit at C instead of RF.

#29 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:08 AM

It would really have been a joy seeing him get to that double in the fourth inning that Plouffe couldn't get to.


But it would have sucked for him not to be in RF and thus not get to that drive off Capps in the 9th inning of a game over the past weekend in Cleveland.

Range works in both LF and RF.

#30 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,092 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:14 AM

I don't understand why this is hard to comprehend. With Revere in right, and Willingham (or Plouffe) in left, more runners will go 1st to 3rd on a single. But...some runners will not go 1st to 3rd on a single to left, respecting Willingham's arm. Fewer, but not zero. Likewise, a runner here and there will not tag up and score on a fly ball to Willingham, but would tag and score were Revere in left. A couple times a year, a runner on 2nd will stop at third on a sharp single to left if Willingham is there, but would go 2nd to home were Revere in left. So yeah, right field is the worst place for Revere's arm, but it's not a zero sum game. Revere's arm in left, with Willingham in right, will still result in some runners advancing on Revere's arm that would not have advanced were Willingham in left. The net loss of Revere playing RF isn't as big as people make it out to be. There are also generally slightly more balls hit to right than left, so Revere's range is worth slightly more in right than left.


As long as you admit that there is a net loss, that's fine. It's another little thing, like not batting Mauer second (for instance) that just seems bizarre. And little things add up. That's all.