Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

The Store

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

From MinnCentric


Photo

2012 MLB Mock Draft picks 1-10

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 travistwinstalk

travistwinstalk

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 102 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:05 PM

With the MLB draft coming up I thought I would do a top 10 mock draft and see what people think. 1. Houston Astros- Byron Buxton OF HS Georgia 2. Minnesota Twins- Mark Appel SP Stanford 3. Seattle Mariners- Mike Zunino C Florida 4. Baltimore Orioles- Kyle Zimmer SP San Francisco 5. Kansas City Royals- Kevin Gausman SP LSU 6. Chicago Cubs- Carlos Correa SS Puerto Rico 7. San Diego Padres- Lucas Giolito SP HS California 8. Pittsburgh Pirates- Marcus Stroman SP Duke 9. Florida Marlins- Max Fried SP HS California 10. Colorado Rockies- Richie Shaffer 3b Clemson Now for Twins analysis; There are 6 guys that are plausible in my mind with Buxton, Appel, Zunino, Zimmer, Gausman, and Giolito. However, I don't think Giolito will be the pick because of his injury and everything that we have heard Gausman is a step behind Appel and Zimmer for pitchers. So I believe it comes down to Buxton, Appel, Zunino, and Zimmer. My guess is it will come down to Buxton and Appel and the Twins will take whoever Houston doesn't take. That is of course if Houston doesn't take one of the other top 6 because this class is weak and no clear cut number 1 so the pick will be anyone. I am really hoping for Appel, but in my mind if he is there the Twins will take Buxton as he is the toolsy outfielder that the Twins love. He has a big upside, but he also has substantial risk. I think Appel or Zimmer are more of a sure thing even though neither is likely a top of the rotation starter. The bottom line is the Twins picked the wrong year to have the number 2 pick in the draft as if it was either the last 3 years they would have gotten a stud and next year looks alot better, but this class is not good. If you want true upside the pick should be Buxton who has a chance to be in the Justin Upton mold, but also a high chance he doesn't reach that potential. I will have another one next week and see if there any changes.

#2 IdahoPilgrim

IdahoPilgrim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,424 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:23 PM

The bottom line is the Twins picked the wrong year to have the number 2 pick in the draft as if it was either the last 3 years they would have gotten a stud and next year looks alot better, but this class is not good. If you want true upside the pick should be Buxton who has a chance to be in the Justin Upton mold, but also a high chance he doesn't reach that potential. I will have another one next week and see if there any changes.


Don't worry, they should have the #1 pick next year.

#3 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,568 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:28 PM

If you want true upside the pick should be Buxton who has a chance to be in the Justin Upton mold, but also a high chance he doesn't reach that potential. I will have another one next week and see if there any changes.


Beg to differ. If you want pure upside the pick should be Giolito. Bit more of a risk than Buxton but higher upside. I'd take Verlander upside over Justin Upton upside every day (just because it is more rare.)
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#4 ashburyjohn

ashburyjohn

    Twins Daily Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,862 posts
  • LocationLake Tahoe, Nevada

Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:38 PM

I'd take Verlander upside over Justin Upton upside every day (just because it is more rare.)


This approach risks having the GM equivalent of Trevor Plouffe's batting line this season. :)

#5 twinstalker

twinstalker

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 170 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 04:04 PM

If they're looking at upside with a pretty high floor, I think Correa might be the guy. As far as I'm concerned all pitchers have a pretty low floor, and if none are an 80 (and none are), I don't think you risk it with the #2 pick. Man, just keep Garza. I hope that lesson is learned.

#6 ScottyB

ScottyB

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 634 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 04:07 PM

Beg to differ. If you want pure upside the pick should be Giolito. Bit more of a risk than Buxton but higher upside. I'd take Verlander upside over Justin Upton upside every day (just because it is more rare.)


I totally agree - unless the Twins are going with a 5-man outfield and Butera on the mound, we don't need another 'toolsy' OF'er. We've already got Hicks, Benson, Morales, Kepler, Arcia, not to mention Revere, Plouffe, Parmelee and Span in the system. As proven by this year's pathetic rotation, the Twins desperately need pitchers. Giolito does have the highest upside and I'm hoping he's still a possibility, but I'd settle for Zimmer or Appel. If we can't have Verlander, I'll take anyone else who could win a Cy Young (or at least get a few votes).

#7 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,079 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 04:09 PM

With the MLB draft coming up I thought I would do a top 10 mock draft and see what people think.
Now for Twins analysis; There are 6 guys that are plausible in my mind with Buxton, Appel, Zunino, Zimmer, Gausman, and Giolito. However, I don't think Giolito will be the pick because of his injury and everything that we have heard Gausman is a step behind Appel and Zimmer for pitchers. So I believe it comes down to Buxton, Appel, Zunino, and Zimmer. My guess is it will come down to Buxton and Appel and the Twins will take whoever Houston doesn't take. That is of course if Houston doesn't take one of the other top 6 because this class is weak and no clear cut number 1 so the pick will be anyone. I am really hoping for Appel, but in my mind if he is there the Twins will take Buxton as he is the toolsy outfielder that the Twins love. He has a big upside, but he also has substantial risk. I think Appel or Zimmer are more of a sure thing even though neither is likely a top of the rotation starter. The bottom line is the Twins picked the wrong year to have the number 2 pick in the draft as if it was either the last 3 years they would have gotten a stud and next year looks alot better, but this class is not good. If you want true upside the pick should be Buxton who has a chance to be in the Justin Upton mold, but also a high chance he doesn't reach that potential. I will have another one next week and see if there any changes.


While this draft isn't as good as last years draft, BA still thinks that about 14 of these guys will end up in next years top 100 prospect list. And whoever we take will easily slot in as our second best prospect.

I think Houston takes Appel - I've read that ownership wants a big-time pitcher and that Appel has connections with the Astros. I change my mind on this everyday but I think I'd rather have Gausman right now over Buxton. Good numbers in the SEC, has stamina, good mechanics (so I've read). Hopefully, unlike Gibson, he doesn't get TJ surgery and he could get to the bigs by 14. A rotation with Gibson and Gausman could be a fun start (assume we'll be adding another high draft pick again next year). Buxton might take another six years. Look at how slow Hicks' hit tool is taking to develop (and I'm a big Hicks fan, I still think he'll put it all together). Correa is an interesting wildcard though. If the Twins were hoping to spend a little less than slot at #2, I don't think they would take Gausman, who is only a sophomore and could be draft eligible again next year. Would Correa agree to a 4.5m deal and then let the Twins spend more than slot down the line?

The other thing that I think we Twins fans aren't focusing on enough is the #32 pick. Our first pick last year was Michael at #30. The #32 pick could be a real nice surprise, esp if Giolito somehow fell to us there (very unlikely). Those extra picks in the top 75 are what is really going to make or break this draft.

#8 darin617

darin617

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 616 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 04:42 PM

[quote name='sbknudson']Don't worry, they should have the #1 pick next year.[/QUOTE

I'm too late somebody beat me to the punch. You are not supposed to be thinking about the draft when you say there's always next year.

#9 darin617

darin617

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 616 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 04:44 PM

I hate to be lazy, but who was the last player drafted that has made an impact in the majors? I know it would have been Kyle Gibson if not for the surgery.

#10 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,079 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 05:26 PM

I hate to be lazy, but who was the last player drafted that has made an impact in the majors? I know it would have been Kyle Gibson if not for the surgery.


Depends on what you mean by impact. Valencia had a very strong ROY campaign.

#11 samloupete

samloupete

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 10 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 05:46 PM

I am a big Zunino fan, but I have changed my mind about who I think the Twins should draft. The best position player is Correa. He is big and rangy and can possibly stay in the infield plus he is perhaps the best hitter as well, so I would draft him. The top 20 pitchers are all about the same without a clear #1 starter potential so I can get that guy withnthe 32nd pick. I go with Correa.:cool:

#12 cmb0252

cmb0252

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,803 posts

Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:42 PM

Correa is going to stay on the infield. The only questions is weather he is going to play SS or 3B. Most seem to think he will move to 3B but there are a few experts/scouts out there that think he has a chance to stay at SS. Him or Gausman would be my choices at #2. I understand that an average to above average catcher is valuable but I just don't see him being an impact player in the bigs. Most scouting reports I have read have him a clear grade or two behind Posey or Weiters.

#13 twinsfanstreif

twinsfanstreif

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 200 posts

Posted 22 May 2012 - 12:51 AM

At this point I'd go all in for Giolito, but I'm not the Twins and I highly doubt they do. I don't think he's that much of a risk, the injury just happened at a bad time. He's been compared to Bundy from last year(I don't know how good of a comp that is) and that is working out favorably so far. If you can get a high school arm that works out i.e. Kershaw, you can have an ace for a very long time.

#14 tpb8

tpb8

    Member

  • Members
  • 37 posts

Posted 22 May 2012 - 07:42 AM

If not Buxton, then give me Correa. Do we really want a guy who can throw 98mph but doesn't dominate at the collegiate level? College pitchers scare me anyway, and if none of the top collegiate pitchers are rated at the top end of the scale i'd rather take my chances with a high-upside position player. If Buxton goes #1, i like the idea of drafting Correa and signing him under slot to use that money on pitching with the supplemental picks.

#15 travistwinstalk

travistwinstalk

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 102 posts

Posted 22 May 2012 - 08:18 AM

if he had not gotten hurt Giolito likely is the number 1 pick in the draft. But when pitchers get arm problems in high school that shoots up the red flag with the amount of money that a top 5 pick costs. That is the reason Giolito won't go in the top 5 he will likely go between 6-10 as the potential is there and a little less risk outside top 5.

#16 alarp33

alarp33

    Member

  • Members
  • 79 posts

Posted 22 May 2012 - 08:43 AM

I totally agree - unless the Twins are going with a 5-man outfield and Butera on the mound, we don't need another 'toolsy' OF'er. We've already got Hicks, Benson, Morales, Kepler, Arcia, not to mention Revere, Plouffe, Parmelee and Span in the system. As proven by this year's pathetic rotation, the Twins desperately need pitchers. Giolito does have the highest upside and I'm hoping he's still a possibility, but I'd settle for Zimmer or Appel. If we can't have Verlander, I'll take anyone else who could win a Cy Young (or at least get a few votes).



And thankfully this is why there are experts running the draft not fans. This isn't the NFL or NBA, you never draft for need.