Posted 18 May 2012 - 11:20 AM
Note: One or the other and not both. No cheating by saying Ron Gardenhire or Terry Ryan.
Posted 18 May 2012 - 11:23 AM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 11:32 AM
Rick Anderson, in part because the pitching is so completely terrible, but more in particular because has been so terrible consistently early in games. Something has got to be off with preparation and approach, and I have a hard time believing that each individual pitcher is having the same problem independently.
I agree with this. Plus even when we have had decent pitching in the past, under Anderson the whole starting staff would collapse at the same time (Usually for the month of June).
Posted 18 May 2012 - 11:41 AM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 11:50 AM
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
Posted 18 May 2012 - 11:59 AM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 12:52 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:09 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:35 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:57 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:12 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:27 PM
I don't agree with the parameters either, but to answer the question, I'd probably lean towards Vavra. Yes, the pitching has been worse overall, but the hitting has been worse relative to what it's capable of. I think replacing Vavra is more likely to spark the offense than replacing Anderson is to spark the pitching.
You can't really liken this to the Angels situation. They were expected to content this year, and still think they can. So they canned Hatcher hoping it create a spark while appeasing Pujols, who obviously wasn't happy with Hatcher.
The Twins have already started focusing on next year and beyond. There's no sense trying to salvage this year by firing coaches in hopes it will spark immediate results. And it doesn't seem like the players have quit on these guys or want them gone. So I don't see what's to be gained in firing one guy in May.
The rest of this season should determine the fate of the coaching staff. If we see a miraculous turnaround, fine, keep them. But if this team continues a slow death march to another 90+ losses, it's time for wholesale change this offseason. (And it wouldn't really be fair to whoever replaced Andy or Vavra in May if they had to face an uncertain future with regime change in October.)
This is one of the few times in my life I have nothing to add.
Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:38 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:43 PM
I want Tom Brunansky in the major league dugout working with these batters. Especially Joe Mauer. I have the 1987 World Series DVD set, and Brunansky swings at- and hits- the first pitch each time. That Game 1 of the ALCS is in there, and Bruno - and all the batters around hit- are hitting huge singles and doubles on the first pitch.
Now, I'm not saying that everytime... but when the pitcher is in a first-strike groove... swing.
If he is the one getting Drew Butera hitting, I want him up too.
Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:50 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 03:10 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 03:31 PM
Posted 18 May 2012 - 03:34 PM
I really think Vavra is a good hitting coach. The Twins have been horrible situational hitters this season, but I think that's more of an organizational philosophy that's gone downhill since TK left.
I'd really like to know why you think Vavra is a good hitting coach. I can't see any reason to defend him really. The Twins take lots of walks, but overall I don't think he has really progressed players at the MLB level. Parmelee is a perfect example. This might be a good idea for an article if you really want to try and convince people including myself.
Posted 18 May 2012 - 03:42 PM