Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.
The same great Twins Daily coverage, now for the Vikings.

The Store

Recent Blogs


Photo

BA mock draft

  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,781 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 11:18 AM

http://www.baseballa...12/2613371.html

Callis has Twins taking toolsy OFer Buxton. I think I still prefer Gausman but I understand why we'd take him if the Astros didn't. Another interesting thing, to me, was that catching prospect Stryker Trahan lasting to pick 30 and Giolito (sp) not being drafted. It would be pretty interesting if either of them were still around at #32.

#2 righty8383

righty8383

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 591 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 11:28 AM

I guess the wisdom behind Giolito is that teams in the top 10 may not want to take the risk, and teams below that know they would have to pay him well above slot to get him to sign. So if he IS still around at 32 the Twins would be stupid not to take him. With all that spending flexiblility they could just use much of the remaining top 10 round picks on college seniors that would sign for peanuts. In all honesty I don't think he gets out of the top 10. Klaw said in a chat yesterday that the latest medicals on him arm making teams a little more comfortable. I would not mind the Twins taking the Rochester kid at 32 or 42 if he's still around.

#3 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,095 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:00 PM

Given the state of health for Baker, Gibson, Wimmers, Salcedo, Soliman, etc., and the fact that Pavano, Liriano, Marquis, and Blackburn all either will be gone or suck, it is laughable to think of taking Buxton.

#4 tpb8

tpb8

    Member

  • Members
  • 37 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:10 PM

Given the state of health for Baker, Gibson, Wimmers, Salcedo, Soliman, etc., and the fact that Pavano, Liriano, Marquis, and Blackburn all either will be gone or suck, it is laughable to think of taking Buxton.


Is the pitcher we're going to take at #2 stepping right into the rotation? Is he going to be our staff ace in 2013 and fill a huge hole? if the answer to both questions is no (it is) then you take the best player available, no matter the position. You don't draft for need. This isn't the NFL or NBA.

#5 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 6,140 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:25 PM

What if the BPA is a hitter at every pick? What if the hitter is .1% better, but you know you have no pitching depth in the minors or majors? IF Buxton is way better than the next guy on their board, take him, but be willing to trade prospects for pitchers, or to sign pitchers, or you may never have pitchers. That's all I'm saying. And, from what I read, there are plenty of doubters on line about Buxton. But pure BPA seems like a bad strategy to me, as you might have no pitchers in your system then, theoretically.
Lighten up Francis....

#6 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,781 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:12 PM

What if the BPA is a hitter at every pick? What if the hitter is .1% better, but you know you have no pitching depth in the minors or majors? IF Buxton is way better than the next guy on their board, take him, but be willing to trade prospects for pitchers, or to sign pitchers, or you may never have pitchers. That's all I'm saying. And, from what I read, there are plenty of doubters on line about Buxton. But pure BPA seems like a bad strategy to me, as you might have no pitchers in your system then, theoretically.


I think teams don't look at players as much as this guys #1, this guys #2. I think they tend to group guys in tiers. Tier 1 might be two guys (say Buxton and Gausman) that the team thinks is better than anyone in lower tiers. Tier 2 might be slightly larger and etc. The team would then pick a guy from the highest tier but might still have options. In this case, if the Astros took Gausman, the Twins would take Buxton b/c he's the only player in Tier 1. But if they had Zunino and Zimmer in tier 1 as well, then they could alter the pick and consider other things, including roster construction, $ demands, fan base appeal, in making that pick.

In this specific case, I think the Twins would consider Buxton. According to Klaw, Buxton is generally considered as the guy with the most talent in this draft. At #32, the Twins should have a wide enough pool of possible selections to take a pitcher in whatever tier they have left. Now, if somehow they're sitting at 32 and 3B prospect Schiffer falls to them (he's expected to go in the top 15) well, fine, you grab him. But that's not likely to happen.

#7 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 6,140 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:30 PM

Good point on the tiers. The other major ESPN scout has Buxton as the 2nd best OF prospect (insider article), so the love for him as number 1 is not universal. That said, I think he had him around 7th, I'd have to double check on that.
Lighten up Francis....

#8 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 6,140 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:45 PM

From the latest KLAW chat on ESPN: [h=6]J.P. (Baton Rouge)[/h]If the Astros don't take Buxton they will be punching themselves for the next 20 years. [h=6]Klaw (1:58 PM) [/h]This is my feeling.
Lighten up Francis....

#9 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,095 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:57 PM

Is the pitcher we're going to take at #2 stepping right into the rotation? Is he going to be our staff ace in 2013 and fill a huge hole? if the answer to both questions is no (it is) then you take the best player available, no matter the position. You don't draft for need. This isn't the NFL or NBA.


"Best player available"--as though that is at all clear, especially when comparing high school and college players. Come on.

#10 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,309 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:03 PM

I guess the wisdom behind Giolito is that teams in the top 10 may not want to take the risk, and teams below that know they would have to pay him well above slot to get him to sign. .


Not from this year on based on the new CBA... Paying above slot will pretty much be an extinct practice. I think that Giolito will go in the top 10-15 picks.
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#11 J-Dog Dungan

J-Dog Dungan

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 660 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:13 PM

Unfortunately, as it has been expressed many times this year, there isn't that "number one" candidate for a SP that the Twins should be taking. However, I think that no matter who is available at the #2 position, the Twins need to take a SP, even if their top choice for starter isn't the best player available. The Twins will continue their slide into horrificality if they don't spend a quality number of draft picks on plausible SP prospects.

#12 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,095 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:16 PM

The point, also, is not that whoever they sign is going to be in the rotation by 2013. But it would be nice if that were a possibility for 2014. Anyway, something like Mark Appel (RHP), Rock Rucker (LHP), Kevin Plawecki ©, Kyle Hansen (RHP) . . . would be nice.

#13 James

James

    Sideburns Specialist

  • Members
  • 1,426 posts
  • LocationThe dive bars of NE Minneapolis

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:25 PM

The point, also, is not that whoever they sign is going to be in the rotation by 2013. But it would be nice if that were a possibility for 2014.

Anyway, something like Mark Appel (RHP), Rock Rucker (LHP), Kevin Plawecki ©, Kyle Hansen (RHP) . . . would be nice.

The reports I've been reading are starting to question Appel a bit. He has good velocity, but something in his delivery doesn't translate to strike outs. The more I read on college pitchers, the more I am like Gausman. But it's all speculation at this point anyway. Let's hope whoever they pick turns out to be a future Twins HOF member at their respective position.

You can come up with statistics to prove anything. Forty percent of all people know that.


#14 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,309 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:30 PM

Anyway, something like Mark Appel (RHP), Rock Rucker (LHP), Kevin Plawecki ©, Kyle Hansen (RHP) . . . would be nice.


I suspect that you are talking about the later rounds with the names other than Appel, correct?
Pretty sure that Rucker will follow on Hicks' footsteps and end up being drafted as an OF.
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#15 J-Dog Dungan

J-Dog Dungan

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 660 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:42 PM

I think an easier way to show people who are the lead options for the draft in certain positions would be to make a draft depth chart with data about the players along side of a mock draft. Then, people would be able to see the stats of the player as well as where pundits are expecting them to get picked.

#16 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 4,309 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:54 PM

I think an easier way to show people who are the lead options for the draft in certain positions would be to make a draft depth chart with data about the players along side of a mock draft. Then, people would be able to see the stats of the player as well as where pundits are expecting them to get picked.


Unlike basketball and football, the baseball stats are pretty much meaningless for comparison purposes. Not only the level of competition between let's say a Pac-10 University and a High School in Montana are different, the players do not have to play right away. So a lot of the picks are "speculative" in nature looking at raw stuff and projections. Like a 6-6 170 lbs high school kid who throws 91-92 has only 2 pitches but has good control and command, could with work project to be a mid 90s top of rotation guy, if the other pieces, like the mechanics etc are there. So pre-draft stats are somewhat meaningless...
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#17 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,095 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:56 PM

I suspect that you are talking about the later rounds with the names other than Appel, correct?
Pretty sure that Rucker will follow on Hicks' footsteps and end up being drafted as an OF.


I thought I had read that Rucker was more likely to pitch? Anyway, I am talking about Twins picks, 2, 32, 42, and 63.

#18 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,095 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 03:01 PM

I think the tier system is pretty accurate to what goes on. Let's say that the Twins have needs: starting pitchers (including some lefties), third basemen, and catchers. . . is the "BPA" crowd really going to ignore this? I mean if the Twins had a history of trading prospect depth for major league players, that would be one thing. That doesn't really happen too much (though it is true that something's got to give with the OF situation), so all I am saying is that maybe some need-consideration is quite necessary.

#19 Seth Stohs

Seth Stohs

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 7,497 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 03:40 PM

This is why I choose not to worry too much about the draft. Like everyone else, I want the Twins to pick the "right" player too. Reports are all over the place on each of the players, and frankly, none of the 'experts' know who is going to pan out. To be honest, most of them probably won't. That's why I'll primarily wait, read what I can, and hope that whoever the Best Player Available on the Twins board is the 'right' player... But I would probably lean toward Zunino with the #2 pick.

#20 peterb18

peterb18

    Member

  • Members
  • 87 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 04:44 PM

I agree with Seth. I would go with Zunino, the catcher from Florida. You are getting the number 2 rated player in the draft---plus you can solidify the catcher position for years to come(the catcher thing is a real problem the Twins). Then Joe would be free to play 1st and catch on occasion. Pitchers(outside of a few exceptions) are usually a developmental thing. We can get some quality in the next few picks. The problem with the Twins in the past is there selections of pitchers. Hasen't worked out well.

#21 YourHouseIsMyHouse

YourHouseIsMyHouse

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,235 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:04 PM

I originally thought Zunino was the best pick, but now I'm convinced that drafting pitching, pitching, and more pitching is the way to go. It's not because the Twins need pitchers (they do), but because it's a great way to build a franchise (Think Rays). The only way the Twins will ever have a true ace is if they develop him in their organization. Free agent pitchers simply cost too much in the offseason. Even if a team has a surplus of good pitching, great prospects can be dealt for position players later on (Think Pineda for Montero). It looks as though scouts have soured on Appel because he can't get strikeouts and his production has declined this season. Out of all the pitchers, I think Kyle Zimmer has the biggest upside and is the best choice.

#22 Puckmen

Puckmen

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 12 May 2012 - 07:24 AM

Zunino is hitting .245/.312/.457 in SEC games this year (25 games so far). Not exactly awe-inspiring numbers.

#23 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,781 posts

Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:15 AM

Zunino is hitting .245/.312/.457 in SEC games this year (25 games so far). Not exactly awe-inspiring numbers.


Yeah, that's what made me want one of the pitchers over him. Gausman just threw a 9 inning, 5 hit, 11k game over Vanderbilt and has done pretty well against the SEC.

#24 30whales

30whales

    Member

  • Members
  • 92 posts

Posted 13 May 2012 - 12:33 PM

I want Gausman!

#25 twinkiesfan11

twinkiesfan11

    Member

  • Members
  • 65 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:29 PM

To me, none of the pitchers have established themselves enough to warrant further consideration for the #2 pick and Zunino doesn't have enough upside. If I had the choice I'd draft Carlos Correa over Buxton who hasn't shown enough power this spring and plays a less scarce position. The Twins could do a lot worse than to have two monster 3B prospects in the pipeline at the same time.

#26 Siehbiscuit

Siehbiscuit

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 305 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:04 PM

At the #2 pick, the Twins MUST pick the best overall talent. If that is Buxton, then its another toolsy outfielder. Is there an outfielder in our system with a higher upside? Its not like the Twins have ELITE talent outfielders waiting in the wings. Revere, Benson, Hicks are all good prospects, but not elite by any means (especially if Hicks can't hit RH pitching). I wish there was a Prior/Strasburg-type pitcher available, but there isn't. At #2, the Twins have to take the guy they think has the potential to carry a team. If Zunino was mashing the way he was last year, I would be right there with you Seth, but his SEC (best conference in NCAA) numbers are pretty pedestrian this year. I just hope the Twins don't take reach too far. Everyone in the top 5-6 is rated pretty similarly. Don't reach too far please!

#27 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,714 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:21 PM

Aside from the natural injury concerns that come with a pitcher, Buxton is no safer of a bet than the top arms. He looks exactly like Donavan Tate, the 3rd overall pick of the 2009 draft by the Padres. After one season he fell off BA's top 100 prospect list. If there was a sure thing postion player available, everyone would know and there would be no debate.

#28 nfisch22

nfisch22

    Member

  • Members
  • 38 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:37 PM

Personally I like Gausman at 2, good hard throwing front line starter. If Trahan or Giolito fall to 32 they're the obvious pick there, other then that Jake Barrett out of ASU and Patrick Ramsey of FSU are all viable options in the sandwich round. Ramsey is a possibility because the Twins have taken him before and Barrett seems like a quick to the Majors bullpen arm the Twins could use.

#29 whydidnt

whydidnt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 376 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:51 PM

I think at #2, you have to take the BPA. Hopefully, we won't be picking this high very often, but if you are you have to take whoever you think is going to have the best major league career. It shouldn't even be a question unless you have two guys rated almost exactly the same on the board. After the #2, then you can manage the draft more for organizational needs.

#30 garrioch13

garrioch13

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 16 May 2012 - 10:18 AM

The point, also, is not that whoever they sign is going to be in the rotation by 2013. But it would be nice if that were a possibility for 2014.

Anyway, something like Mark Appel (RHP), Rock Rucker (LHP), Kevin Plawecki ©, Kyle Hansen (RHP) . . . would be nice.


I'd be REALLY disappointed if this were the Twins draft.