Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Do you still view Dozier as "untouchable" ?

  • Please log in to reply
77 replies to this topic

#1 Trevor0333

Trevor0333

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 348 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 06:29 PM

Don't get me wrong, I love Dozier & he's proven his success is no fluke. However, if you can get a young front line starter, do you do it & finish the year with a Santana/Escobar middle infield? Even though Rosario has been up & down a bit since his return I still view him as a very good hitting 2B. Polanco isn't exactly 5 years away either.

The Braves are 1 game behind the Nationals & finally just released Uggla. They have no clear 2nd base options. They have an abundance of near ready pitching prospects. Including one former prospect who has been very good in Alex Wood.

How reasonable would it be to call up the Braves FO & see if they were interested in a Dozier & Corriea swap for Alex Wood. Wood would slot in beautifully behind Hughes & Gibson giving a different look while adding a quality lefty to the rotation.

Hughes/Wood/Gibson/Meyer/May let's play!

#2 Beezer07

Beezer07

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 637 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 07:01 PM

I'm not sure you trade a pretty good 2B (offensively and defensively) for a SP, especially a prospect/recent prospect.

#3 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 838 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 07:14 PM

Don't get me wrong, I love Dozier & he's proven his success is no fluke. However, if you can get a young front line starter, do you do it & finish the year with a Santana/Escobar middle infield? Even though Rosario has been up & down a bit since his return I still view him as a very good hitting 2B. Polanco isn't exactly 5 years away either.

The Braves are 1 game behind the Nationals & finally just released Uggla. They have no clear 2nd base options. They have an abundance of near ready pitching prospects. Including one former prospect who has been very good in Alex Wood.

How reasonable would it be to call up the Braves FO & see if they were interested in a Dozier & Corriea swap for Alex Wood. Wood would slot in beautifully behind Hughes & Gibson giving a different look while adding a quality lefty to the rotation.

Hughes/Wood/Gibson/Meyer/May let's play!

Throw in Duensing, Max Kepler, and (insert other irrelevant low minors reliever) and this deal is done #sarcasm #hypotheticaltrade #donottradeguysinprimewhoareprestillprearbitration #overevaluatingourprospects

#4 Thrylos

Thrylos

    Yes

  • Members
  • 5,077 posts
  • LocationLehigh Valley, PA, USA
  • Twitter: thrylos98

Posted 18 July 2014 - 07:20 PM

I think that the Twins should not have any untouchables in this team, including Dozier (and Perkins).
-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
http://tenthinningst...h.blogspot.com/
twitter: @thrylos98

#5 Beezer07

Beezer07

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 637 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 07:34 PM

For the record, though, nobody on a team should ever be untouchable. Sure, a team might have to give you the moon for a guy to get him, but you should never say "under no circumstances."

#6 howeda7

howeda7

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 440 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:28 PM

Nobody should be untouchable, but you don't dig out of this hole by trading the best young, cheap, established players you have. If someone wants to offer something foolish, sure. Otherwise, you keep him.

#7 drjim

drjim

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,561 posts
  • LocationSt. Paul

Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:52 PM

Nobody should be untouchable, but you don't dig out of this hole by trading the best young, cheap, established players you have. If someone wants to offer something foolish, sure. Otherwise, you keep him.


This.
Papers...business papers.

#8 gunnarthor

gunnarthor

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 3,900 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 09:00 PM

Atlanta actually is using a pretty solid prospect now - La Stella. The Nats and Orioles could use a second baseman. If the Twin were able to pry Gioltio or Bundy back, I'd be ok with moving Dozier but not for a potential #3 pitcher.

#9 kab21

kab21

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,859 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 10:21 PM

I would certainly move him for a pitcher like Alex Wood. He shouldn't be viewed as untouchable but this team should not be in a hurry to move him because of Rosario or Polanco.

The Braves have a pretty obvious 2Bman as gunnarthor mentions. That 2Bman is like this year's version of Dozier but with a better MiLB resume. He has a cumulative .322/.408/.474/.882 line from the minors.

#10 jaimedude2

jaimedude2

    Member

  • Members
  • 210 posts

Posted 18 July 2014 - 11:51 PM

Atlanta actually is using a pretty solid prospect now - La Stella. The Nats and Orioles could use a second baseman. If the Twin were able to pry Gioltio or Bundy back, I'd be ok with moving Dozier but not for a potential #3 pitcher.


This current group of, Dozier, Plouffe, Arcia, Hicks, Gibson et all has done nothing but lose since they have come up to the big leagues. I'm ready to blow this thing up and start over with all of the young prospects and take the lumps including booting the manager. Gardenhire has overstayed his welcome by a half season already. This generation of players does not relate to this manager or his coaching staff (excluding a new guy like Molitor)
Perkins is like having a luxury Mazarati or Ferrari in the garage that never get's used. When your team is in few positions to win ninth inning games do you really need a luxury car as a closer? I like Perkins but fear this team is never going to be in a position to best utilize his talents and become even close to a contender in the next 2-3 years. This team is not close to being a 500 ball club yet, let alone a playoff team.

I know people have said guys like Dozier and Perkins are UN-tradeable but when there some of your only assets that are worth anything to get something desirable back then you should listen. I would do Dozier to the Orioles for Bundy and or Dozier to the Nationals for Giaolito in a heart beat. Chances are neither of those teams would give up that much for Dozier. As good as Dozier might seem his average is low and he plays on a bad team so that taints the goods. You have to pick a direction and go one way or the other. Just sticking with this group or plugging this roster with fading veterans is not working. They need to move the likes of Willingham, Morales and Fuld down the road as soon as possible. As good as Suzuki has been he is on a one year deal and probably want's more money than he would be worth to the Twins, and he is as peak performance standards on a bad baseball team. It is time to trade Suzuki too. To me a Palanco or Rosario can provide what Dozier does right now in the long run anyways. This version of the Twins is like the last three going no where fast and will finish exactly where it has the last three years in last place in the central division.

Edited by jaimedude2, 18 July 2014 - 11:57 PM.


#11 stringer bell

stringer bell

    Shaking the rust off................my golf game

  • Twins News Team
  • 5,278 posts
  • LocationZumbrota MN

Posted 19 July 2014 - 08:12 AM

Is Giancarlo Stanton "tainted" because he plays for the Marlins? My goodness, the Twins could have had ultimate winners Jeter and Rivera in place of Dozier and Perkins and it wouldn't make them a winning team. Good players are good players. Two Twins who would look much better on a winning team IMHO are Dozier and Joe Mauer, because of their more than one-dimensional games. Batting average is such a misleading statistic, especially when BB% can vary so much. Brian Dozier had a good case to be an All-Star despite his .242 average. JJ Hardy had much less of a case despite a .284 BA (.313 OBP).

#12 Jim H

Jim H

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 439 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 09:13 AM

Nobody should be untouchable, but you don't dig out of this hole by trading the best young, cheap, established players you have. If someone wants to offer something foolish, sure. Otherwise, you keep him.


I think this right. There could be a point when trading Dozier makes sense. When Rosario or Polanco get close enough to the majors and show enough to make a solid replacement for Dozier. Dozier may not get much/any better than he is now but barring injury, he is not likely to get worse. Whatever trade value he has, will be there in a year or two, if the Twins want to go in that direction.

When you are rebuilding with young players, it takes a bit of time for all of them to figure things out and finish development. At some point the Arcias and Santanas have to be in the majors working things out. It is clearly better to have a solid team(like the Twins of the mid 2000's) and only have to filter in a young player or twp every year. The Twins aren't there yet, and aren't likely to try to shortcut the process through free agency or trades. At least not massively so. Perhaps we will see selected free agents and a few, mostly minor trades.

I am hopeful that the pitching will be good enough over the next few years, so that we don't have to watch a trainwreck while the young, hopefully premium talent position players figure things out at the major league level. It is possible to be borderline contenders while the young talent grows into what we all hope and project they can be.

#13 jorgenswest

jorgenswest

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,056 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 09:27 AM

The a Twins should always listen. As long as they don't sign Dozier to a long term contract and he plays well, he will retain his value in the trade market.

Perkins trade value dropped with his new contract through age 34. The Padres received a nice return for Street who is a year younger with a shorter commitment. Perkins was in a similar spot last year.

#14 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,698 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 19 July 2014 - 09:52 AM

The a Twins should always listen. As long as they don't sign Dozier to a long term contract and he plays well, he will retain his value in the trade market.

Perkins trade value dropped with his new contract through age 34. The Padres received a nice return for Street who is a year younger with a shorter commitment. Perkins was in a similar spot last year.

That was the point for Perkins in the deal. He wanted to stay, he wanted security, he couldn't get no trade clause, but got something almost as good.

#15 jorgenswest

jorgenswest

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,056 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 10:10 AM

That was the point for Perkins in the deal. He wanted to stay, he wanted security, he couldn't get no trade clause, but got something almost as good.


I agree. No point in bringing him up in trade discussion. The Twins closed the door on a Street like return with the extension.

I hope they don't extend Dozier.

#16 Danchat

Danchat

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 735 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 11:04 AM

I only think about dealing Dozier if the offer we get is really good. Other than that, he's going to be a key contributor for the next few years at 2B and should be kept there.

#17 Brock Beauchamp

Brock Beauchamp

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 10,278 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 11:28 AM

This version of the Twins is like the last three going no where fast and will finish exactly where it has the last three years in last place in the central division.


The Twins were fourth in the division last season.

#18 Kwak

Kwak

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 1,692 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 11:54 AM

No, Dozier is not untouchable. But, a trade of him requires 4-5 "good prospects", not one.
Part of the "attendance problem" is who are these guys? Show producers charge top dollars for stars (and get it), but the Twins don't have these "stars". All the Twins have is Joe Mauer (who sad to say, doesn't shine as bright as before) and 24 "who he?" and why should I pay to watch these guys? Dozier is as close as the Twins have to put on the marquee. Before you mention anybody in the MiLs, re-read Pohlad's quote about minor leaguers in the thread devoted to Pohlad. The fans need connections to the team before they spend their cash. Hopelessly losing seasons using unknowns, hugely reduces the gate receipts. If that problem isn't solved soon, we will be reading about how the payroll is constrained by low revenues (again).

#19 TKGuy

TKGuy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 339 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 01:53 PM

Unless somebody gives you a Herschel Walker type bonanza, you keep him. He is young enough to be part of the next contending team.
Then, we will use our prospects to acquire more talent

#20 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 5,691 posts

Posted 19 July 2014 - 01:55 PM

Nobody should be untouchable, but you don't dig out of this hole by trading the best young, cheap, established players you have. If someone wants to offer something foolish, sure. Otherwise, you keep him.


This. I don't see the Braves selling what I'd want to make it worth while. We don't have an heir apparent to Dozier either, and that is also a problem.