Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Article: Nolasco Presents a Big Problem

  • Please log in to reply
93 replies to this topic

#1 Nick Nelson

Nick Nelson

    Owner

  • Administrators
  • 2,471 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 10:56 PM

You can view the page at http://www.twinsdail...s-a-Big-Problem

#2 Hosken Bombo Disco

Hosken Bombo Disco

    Minnesota Twins

  • Members
  • 3,481 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 11:32 PM

Part of me says just let him pitch through it. We're not going anywhere this year. Neither is Nolasco.

Also, doghouse. He's lucky he got in while there's still room.

#3 Joe A. Preusser

Joe A. Preusser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 821 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 04:54 AM

Just remember, this is all Andy's fault. Hughes himself gets the credit for a good year, but any bad performance is on the pitching coach.

#4 Kirby_waved_at_me

Kirby_waved_at_me

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,140 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 06:37 AM

I want to take this opportunity to apologize to the Twins defense by using them to make excuses for Nolasco back in May. The high BABIP that Nolasco has is not just bad luck, and it certainly isn't bad defense alone. He's giving up frozen ropes all over the field.

I do think something needs to be done about his spot in the rotation. In a three year contract it may be early to dump him, but he doesn't need to start every fifth day if he's just going to have a terrible game that way.

Skip his turn once, or demote him to bullpen duty, or something like that. Use that extra time to really focus on his location and see if there's something off about his mechanics that's making him lose velocity on his fastball.

#5 Buck Nasty

Buck Nasty

    Member

  • Members
  • 63 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 07:02 AM

Find a reason to give him a short stint on the DL and give Meyer his start(s). It's 2015 audition time. I'm not sure I want to see Nolasco come rolling out of the pen right now with the way he's throwing. Give him a week or two to "get healthy" and maybe he comes back to salvage his season without being officially demoted.

#6 Gernzy

Gernzy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 475 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 07:06 AM

Just remember, this is all Andy's fault. Hughes himself gets the credit for a good year, but any bad performance is on the pitching coach.


I hope you're being sarcastic here...
It is unfortunate that Nolasco has struggled so much. Hopefully its just an off year.
I bent my wookie...

#7 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 11,754 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 07:21 AM

Why can't you option him? Or bullpen him? A terrible move by the front office.

#8 tobi0040

tobi0040

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,201 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 07:29 AM

With over 1,000 IP at a 4.37 under his belt prior to this year, I really hope this is an anomoly. I am guessing it is and he will normalize at some point to a slightly higher ERA than that.

#9 Todd_L

Todd_L

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 07:37 AM

I have a perfect Twins Way solution...bring back Pelfrey so Nolasco doesn't seem so bad by comparison.

#10 nicksaviking

nicksaviking

    Senior Member

  • Twins Mods
  • 6,597 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 07:39 AM

I wasn't a Nolasco fan, but I said at the time I was still thrilled that the front office finally had the courage to partake in free agency. I'm still glad they tried.

I just hope that wasting good money in free agency teaches the front office that they were only wrong about what kind of pitcher to get doesn't actually scare them away from it altogether.

#11 Hosken Bombo Disco

Hosken Bombo Disco

    Minnesota Twins

  • Members
  • 3,481 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 07:40 AM

I hope you're being sarcastic here...
It is unfortunate that Nolasco has struggled so much. Hopefully its just an off year.


I read it as sarcasm, but who knows, maybe there's truth in it?


Posters on other Nolasco threads have suggested Nolasco might depend less on his low 90s fastball and work on really varying his pitch selection. And that Suzuki calls more fastballs than other catchers, which doesn't help. Conversely, on the radio this week Gardenhire said Nolasco had to set up his breaking ball by working on command of his fastball, and keeping his shoulder closed (maybe because that's how pitchers from Japan pitch) -- in other words, more fastballs. In other words, Gardy had no idea either. I have no idea what Nolasco's problem is, or what his pitch selection was Sunday, or if he busted out his Hideo Nomo delivery.


I'm also hoping it's just an off year.

#12 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 6,996 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:05 AM

I wasn't a Nolasco fan, but I said at the time I was still thrilled that the front office finally had the courage to partake in free agency. I'm still glad they tried.

I just hope that wasting good money in free agency teaches the front office that they were only wrong about what kind of pitcher to get doesn't actually scare them away from it altogether.


I doubt it will discourage them. Hughes is looking like the Twins got the steal of the FA period and they have him for another 2 years at a cheap rate. That contract is going to be very very very valuable if he's doing the same thing next year at this time. At that point, the Twins should be thinking extension or trade if he's not planning on sticking around. They should have enough pitching in AAA to replace him.

I suspect the Twins just have a very different philosophy. FA is used to find place holders when you are bad and plug a gaping hole when you are good. I'd like to see them target more upside type deals like the Cubs did with Feldman last year, but I think Kubel technically counts as that. I'm still scratching my head with Bartlett though.

#13 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 11,754 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:12 AM

Well, we've never seen TR plug a gaping hole via a legit FA when the team is good, so we don't KNOW that is his strategy in his return. I certainly hope it is.
Used to be mike wants wins

#14 Kirby_waved_at_me

Kirby_waved_at_me

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,140 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:15 AM

Well, we've never seen TR plug a gaping hole via a legit FA when the team is good, so we don't KNOW that is his strategy in his return. I certainly hope it is.


Thome? I agree though, it's been rare that the Twins have been just one piece away, so it's hard to tell what the strategy might should that situation arise again...

#15 JB_Iowa

JB_Iowa

    Let's Keep Winning!

  • Members
  • 5,986 posts
  • LocationNorthwest Iowa

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:20 AM

The Twins went out and spent big on free agent pitching during the offseason, and yet they still can't seem to escape the same old outcome: eroded depth and a totally inadequate starting staff.

At what point do you look at the team's overall pitching philosophy? I'm not making excuses for Nolasco but Nolasco isn't the only problem here. We also have the Pelfrey signing. We have Meyer who has been inconsistent. We have May who was looking pretty good before injury but wasn't given a look-see. We see Worley go to Pittsburgh and have success.

I know that many posters on TD are excited about the depth of pitching talent in the minors. I have concerns about whether that minor league depth will translate to good pitching in the majors.

I'm not specifically blaming Rick Anderson (or anyone else in the organization) for Nolasco's troubles -- most of that falls on Nolasco's shoulders. In looking over the threads from when Nolasco was signed, TD posters were generally supportive but not overwhelmed by the Nolasco signing. He was seen mostly as a solid 3/4 -- an innings eater, not necessarily a staff leader. Obviously he hasn't even done that. There were a few posters who foresaw Nolasco's struggles so even this doesn't come as a complete surprise (and maybe someone with the Twins should have foreseen those struggles).

The question is whether the Twins (1) are good at evaluating major league ready pitching talent; and (2) are capable of nurturing their minor league depth to turn into reliable major league pitchers.

I don't have a very good feeling about the answers to either of those questions.

#16 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 11,754 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:22 AM

Thome? I agree though, it's been rare that the Twins have been just one piece away, so it's hard to tell what the strategy might should that situation arise again...


They spent the entire first decade of this century a DH or LF away, and did nothing at all to add players in terms of FA. You can blame the dome, or you can blame the GM who once said he didn't sign Knoblauch to an extension because he thought salaries would drop the next year.......
Used to be mike wants wins

#17 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 11,754 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:23 AM

Given that they have signed NUMEROUS FA pitchers over the years, and only 1 has worked, you do have to question something about what is going on. Or, you can just accept that they have the jobs, therefore they deserve them, and we should never question them. Either one is a reasonable approach, imo.
Used to be mike wants wins

#18 jharaldson

jharaldson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 297 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:27 AM

Posters on other Nolasco threads have suggested Nolasco might depend less on his low 90s fastball and work on really varying his pitch selection. And that Suzuki calls more fastballs than other catchers, which doesn't help.


I just looked at Fangraphs at his pitch types and he is throwing 8.7% more fastballs this year than last year. That means in 2014 you are getting a mediocre fastball 57.8% of the time vs 2013 when it was only 49.1% of the time. In my mind Gardy, Suzuki, and Anderson need to take a hard look in the mirror and think about if they are truly utilizing the skillset Nolasco has or if their adjustment of his pitch selection is setting him up for failure.

#19 Mike Sixel

Mike Sixel

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 11,754 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:28 AM

That is a 17% increase in a pitch that doesn't work well......some awesome strategy there.
Used to be mike wants wins

#20 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 6,996 posts

Posted 07 July 2014 - 08:32 AM

Well, we've never seen TR plug a gaping hole via a legit FA when the team is good, so we don't KNOW that is his strategy in his return. I certainly hope it is.


Context. TR was always operating under a Metrodome budget when the team was good.