Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Suzuki: Extend or Trade?

  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

#1 jorgenswest

jorgenswest

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,184 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 01:00 PM

Darren Wolfson reports that there have been no extension talks thus far.

Do the Twins buy high and extend Suzuki for his age 31 and 32 seasons?

Do they sell high in a midseason trade?

Catchers (along with shortstops and starting pitching) are the best trade currency during the season. I hope they don't extend him before the trade deadline. The winter bargain in Suzuki could turn into a prospect that will pay off for several years.

#2 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,810 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 18 May 2014 - 01:42 PM

I too hope Twins don't extend him until after the trade deadline. If the Twins can swing a good trade, go for it. I wouldn't mind seeing Fryer backing up Pinto for the rest of the season if it brings back a decent prospect.

#3 Monkeypaws

Monkeypaws

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 944 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:17 PM

At least Fryer might be able to throw a runner out.

#4 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 842 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:35 PM

No way, you extend him and extend him asap. Are we already talking about being sellers at the deadline? Suzuki is one of the reasons we are a .500 club over 6 weeks into the season. If you want to wait until after the trade deadline to extend him, his price tag is going to go up. I would like the deal Doumit got from the Twins at mid-season a few years ago. Extend Kurt for next year with a 2016 option or maybe 2 years (like Doumit's). We have no other catching options in minors above Low-A.

He has been amazing with the bat and has always been great behind the plate. Pinto is not ready to be the everyday catcher (and may never be ready). Sure Pinto is a beast, but I would not want to be the umpire when he is catching.

For all the grief we like to give the front office, they sure hit 2 home runs with Hughes and Suzuki (probably batting .500 when you throw in Pelf and Nolasco).

#5 Shane Wahl

Shane Wahl

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 4,788 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:44 PM

There is no rational justification for extending Kurt Suzuki. This hitting tear he is on will not last.

#6 drivlikejehu

drivlikejehu

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 886 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:49 PM

Ugh. Just enjoy his unsustainable start and hope for a decent prospect at the deadline. Don't ruin it.

#7 diehardtwinsfan

diehardtwinsfan

    Twins Moderator

  • Twins Mods
  • 6,021 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:55 PM

Way too soon for that. His career minor league OPS is just north of .800, so perhaps he's figured something out so to speak. However, his career major league OPS is south of .700, so I'm perfectly fine with letting him ride this out for an entire season. It can be revisited in the offseason, but with two 'offense minded' catchers, you know that just guarantees Herrmann a permanent spot.

#8 Twins Twerp

Twins Twerp

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 842 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:56 PM

-OR- do we just offer him a qualifying offer and take the draft pick at the end of the year?

#9 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 9,387 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:59 PM

There is no rational justification for extending Kurt Suzuki. This hitting tear he is on will not last.


I completely agree with your latter sentence. I rationally disagree with your former sentence. If they can't get a decent prospect in return before the deadline, Suzuki at this point doesn't show his age behind the plate and would make a perfect backup catcher at his career hitting averages- until Turner or someone else proves ready to take that spot. (I'm not ever going to be sold on Hermann, Fryer or anyone else in the upper levels of the minors).

Edited by jokin, 18 May 2014 - 05:01 PM.


#10 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 9,387 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 05:00 PM

-OR- do we just offer him a qualifying offer and take the draft pick at the end of the year?


@ $14-15M for a QO? Surely you jest.

#11 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,792 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 05:23 PM

-OR- do we just offer him a qualifying offer and take the draft pick at the end of the year?


This may be illuminating to your position in this thread.

#12 drivlikejehu

drivlikejehu

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 886 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 06:15 PM

Way too soon for that. His career minor league OPS is just north of .800, so perhaps he's figured something out so to speak.


No, just no.

#13 kab21

kab21

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,920 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 07:25 PM

There is no rational justification to getting rid of Suzuki right now unless the Twins can land a good prospect (top 150ish). He started out his career as a very good catcher and if he has merely returned to anything close to 2010/2011 levels then he is a great option as a part time catcher. At a time when the Twins have almost no catching depth at the MLB level or in the upper minors. Getting rid of him opens the door to some truly dreadful options behind the plate with just one injury to Pinto. And that's if you want Pinto behind the plate every day.

#14 TKGuy

TKGuy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 339 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 07:47 PM

I think it would be good to think about signing him for a couple more years since the catching options are a little thin. That said, if they can get a top 150 prospect at the deadline, then I would pull the trigger. The Orioles will certainly need a catcher if they remain in the race and so would the Rays

#15 Jeremy Nygaard

Jeremy Nygaard

    Twins Draft Czar

  • Twins Database Managers
  • 2,469 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 08:00 PM

The Twins have done a pretty good job when they've dealt catchers. They got the moon for A.J., a warm enough body to swap for Eduardo Nunez for Drew Butera and Sean Gilmartin (who isn't great, but still...) for Ryan Doumit. If the time comes and the Twins can get a guy that casual fans will remember the name of in five years for Kurt Suzuki, you have to... unless he doesn't slow down.

Which in that case, I think 7 years, $184m would be an appropriate extension.

#16 Beezer07

Beezer07

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 637 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 08:05 PM

It was my impression that Suzuki was picked up to bridge the gap between Mauer and whoever takes his place permanently. Why would the Twins extend him now, because he's had a good month and a half?

#17 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 9,387 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 08:29 PM

It was my impression that Suzuki was picked up to bridge the gap between Mauer and whoever takes his place permanently. Why would the Twins extend him now, because he's had a good month and a half?


Because the bridge hasn't been completed yet and he offers cheap insurance in case the bridge still isn't completed until 2016? (And a perfect backup should Pinto accelerate his development behind the plate and go full-time sooner rather than later).

Look, no one expected what he's doing at the plate, but regardless, hitting at his career batting averages, he's cheap insurance and a very valuable commodity behind the plate and in mentoring the younger catchers and pitchers.

#18 kab21

kab21

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,920 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 08:39 PM

It was my impression that Suzuki was picked up to bridge the gap between Mauer and whoever takes his place permanently. Why would the Twins extend him now, because he's had a good month and a half?


Because w/o Suzuki the Twins have Pinto and nothing at C for the near future. I cannot understand why people want to make the Twins worse unless there is a really good prospect involved.

Perhaps people think we are talking about a big extension. Suzuki could be extended relatively cheaply (<2/10 for sure). He might even get one guaranteed year and an option year.

#19 cmathewson

cmathewson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,273 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 08:46 PM

At least Fryer might be able to throw a runner out.


Wow. Just wow. The guy has exceeded everyone's wildest expectations and you have to pick on the one thing he's struggled with, which he has little control over anyway. Fryer is a decent bench guy in an emergency. That is it.
"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

#20 TheLeviathan

TheLeviathan

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 6,792 posts

Posted 18 May 2014 - 08:55 PM

How about not looking to dump him now (it's May, we have over two more months to make the decision to "sell high" if that even still exists then) but if we're grading things on a scale of what's more rational: it's WAY more rational to be talking trade right now than an extension.

There is just zero good reason to be considering that right now.