Jump to content

Providing independent coverage of the Minnesota Twins.

Subscribe to Twins Daily Email

Photo

Chris Herrmann

  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 Fatt Crapps

Fatt Crapps

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 320 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 12:10 AM

Why?

#2 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,605 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 07 May 2014 - 05:36 AM

Necessity is the mother of invention. However, Nick wrote an excellent article about one Mr. Chris Parmelee that may be an alternative to Hermann Munster.

#3 cmathewson

cmathewson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,273 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 05:41 AM

It won't be long before Arcia is up here. Rumors say Friday. I can't come soon enough.

But it is unconscionable that this guy is playing in the majors, when Parmelee is at least serviceable and raking in AAA. I know they need another roster spot, but WTF? DFA Hermann and bring up Parmelee. There's a .01 percent chance Hermann gets claimed at this point. People complain about Florimon, but at least he is providing defensive value. Hermann is practically an automatic out, and a below-average corner outfielder. Yes he can catch, but he has not caught one inning all year, an indication that he is not really a catcher.
"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

#4 Hosken Bombo Disco

Hosken Bombo Disco

    Rochester Red Wings

  • Members
  • 1,861 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 06:20 AM

For a brief moment in time, Herrmann made sense. But that moment has passed.

Also, quit carrying 12, 13, 14, 15 pitchers, or whatever they are at now. Ryan hired a bunch of vet starting pitchers to pitch deeper into games right?

With a 11 or 12 man staff Herrmann is a 25th man who plays once or twice a week as a late inning guy instead of starting every night.

#5 cmathewson

cmathewson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,273 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 06:24 AM

For a brief moment in time, Herrmann made sense. But that moment has passed.

Also, quit carrying 12, 13, 14, 15 pitchers, or whatever they are at now. Ryan hired a bunch of vet starting pitchers to pitch deeper into games right?

With a 11 or 12 man staff Herrmann is a 25th man who plays once or twice a week as a late inning guy instead of starting every night.


He's not bad, as long as he only plays in an emergency. Maybe as the 26th man for double headers or something. But not as a regular player. As such, he's an out machine and a marginal outfielder.
"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

#6 Guest_USAFChief_*

Guest_USAFChief_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 May 2014 - 06:52 AM

Part of the problem is Gardy's fear of "only" two catchers. Part of the problem is multiple OF injuries, compounded by deadwood on the 40 man roster.

#7 amjgt

amjgt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 657 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:26 AM

It won't be long before Arcia is up here. Rumors say Friday. I can't come soon enough.

But it is unconscionable that this guy is playing in the majors, when Parmelee is at least serviceable and raking in AAA. I know they need another roster spot, but WTF? DFA Hermann and bring up Parmelee. There's a .01 percent chance Hermann gets claimed at this point. People complain about Florimon, but at least he is providing defensive value. Hermann is practically an automatic out, and a below-average corner outfielder. Yes he can catch, but he has not caught one inning all year, an indication that he is not really a catcher.


But Gardy's Nooky Blanky 3rd catcher helps him sleep better at night.

#8 TKGuy

TKGuy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 335 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:30 AM

Part of the problem is Gardy's fear of "only" two catchers. Part of the problem is multiple OF injuries, compounded by deadwood on the 40 man roster.


Easy to DFA people off roster, Wilson not needed because of Buxton coming back

#9 cmathewson

cmathewson

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 2,273 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:35 AM

I suppose Antony is worried about Parmelee's options. If you add him and bring him up, you have to DFA him to send him back down. And he already lost Mastro that way. So we limp along until Arcia is ready, and Willingham, and Hicks. All three could be ready within a couple of weeks, and we know Parmelee would not stay on the MLB roster for all three activations.
"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

#10 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 7,955 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:38 AM

so it's better to have Parm in AAA, so you don't lose him, than to have him up in the majors and maybe lose him later? That, um, does not make sense.

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#11 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,605 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:39 AM

Part of the problem is Gardy's fear of "only" two catchers. Part of the problem is multiple OF injuries, compounded by deadwood on the 40 man roster.

Don't forget about the 13 pitchers on the 25 man roster.

#12 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 8,587 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:42 AM

Easy to DFA people off roster, Wilson not needed because of Buxton coming back



Both Raley and Wilson are on the roster because of the teams' somewhat futile need to retaliate against the Cubs and Blue Jays for claiming Twins' DFAd players. Both are in their 7th years in the minors and appear to offer little more than roster filler, clearly some of the deadwood that Chief alluded to.

#13 Boom Boom

Boom Boom

    Hydraulic Choppers

  • Members
  • 1,303 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:46 AM

I suppose Antony is worried about Parmelee's options. If you add him and bring him up, you have to DFA him to send him back down. And he already lost Mastro that way. So we limp along until Arcia is ready, and Willingham, and Hicks. All three could be ready within a couple of weeks, and we know Parmelee would not stay on the MLB roster for all three activations.


I'd call up Parmelee now.

I get that it makes some tough roster decisions, but that's a bridge you can cross later. By the time that decision needs to be made, someone else is likely to be injured.

Who knows how long Hicks will be out? Or Willingham? Or maybe Mauer goes from day-to-day to DL?

#14 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,605 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:47 AM

I suppose Antony is worried about Parmelee's options. If you add him and bring him up, you have to DFA him to send him back down. And he already lost Mastro that way. So we limp along until Arcia is ready, and Willingham, and Hicks. All three could be ready within a couple of weeks, and we know Parmelee would not stay on the MLB roster for all three activations.

Or 2/3 could be out for the rest of the season, but crippled by indecision, the Twins continue for weeks with Mauer active but unable to play, 13 pitchers, 3 catchers, 1 outfielder, 1 DH, 3 SS, 1 1b, 1 3b, 1 2b, because Arcia, Hicks, and Willingham might be ready to play at some point in the future when Hicks has a brain injury that has wreaked havoc on this team in the recent past, and Willingham is 100 years old with a broken wrist and zero fielding skills left.

#15 amjgt

amjgt

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 657 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:50 AM

So, let me get this 3rd catcher theory straight.

We keep a 3rd catcher on roster for two potential scenarios....

Scenario 1) One of our catchers is catching and the other is DHing. The guy that is catching gets injured, so the DH needs to get pulled into the game, "eliminating" the DH and causing the pitcher to get placed in the batting order. If this happens early in a game, it COULD mean that the pitcher spot would come up several times over the course of the rest of the game.

To avoid this 1/50 chance we are now batting Hermann, who is worse at hitting than an average MLB pitcher, several times EVERY game. Under normal circumstances, where the 3rd catcher just sits on the bench week after week, having this player prevents a legitimate late inning PHer from being on the roster, who could have an impact on many games per week.


Scenario 2) One of our two offensive juggernaut catchers gets an off day, but is available to PH. Late in the game we use him to PH. THEN our starting catcher gets hurt, leaving us needing to use our emergency catcher, presumably for no more than an inning or two.

To avoid this "once every 5 years" chance, we are currently using our 3rd catcher in the OF, but he's not any good, and he's one of the guys who we would pinch hit for, so we haven't really avoided this "problem." Under normal circumstances we carry dead weight on our roster so that Eduardo Escobar doesn't need to play catcher for an inning once every 5 years.

#16 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,605 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:51 AM

I'd call up Parmelee now.

I get that it makes some tough roster decisions, but that's a bridge you can cross later. By the time that decision needs to be made, someone else is likely to be injured.

Who knows how long Hicks will be out? Or Willingham? Or maybe Mauer goes from day-to-day to DL?

Agreed, and Burton will pass through waivers

#17 mike wants wins

mike wants wins

    Would Like to be More Positive

  • Members
  • 7,955 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:56 AM

So, let me get this 3rd catcher theory straight.

We keep a 3rd catcher on roster for two potential scenarios....

Scenario 1) One of our catchers is catching and the other is DHing. The guy that is catching gets injured, so the DH needs to get pulled into the game, "eliminating" the DH and causing the pitcher to get placed in the batting order. If this happens early in a game, it COULD mean that the pitcher spot would come up several times over the course of the rest of the game.

To avoid this 1/50 chance we are now batting Hermann, who is worse at hitting than an average MLB pitcher, several times EVERY game. Under normal circumstances, where the 3rd catcher just sits on the bench week after week, having this player prevents a legitimate late inning PHer from being on the roster, who could have an impact on many games per week.


Scenario 2) One of our two offensive juggernaut catchers gets an off day, but is available to PH. Late in the game we use him to PH. THEN our starting catcher gets hurt, leaving us needing to use our emergency catcher, presumably for no more than an inning or two.

To avoid this "once every 5 years" chance, we are currently using our 3rd catcher in the OF, but he's not any good, and he's one of the guys who we would pinch hit for, so we haven't really avoided this "problem." Under normal circumstances we carry dead weight on our roster so that Eduardo Escobar doesn't need to play catcher for an inning once every 5 years.



Math is hard.....Gardy is paid 7 figures to do baseball strategy, Antony and Ryan and the FO are paid a ton of money, and they can't figure this out.

What I just typed is probably an opinion, not a fact. I mean, I'm usually right, so you should maybe assume it is or will be a fact soon, but that's up to you. :) Also, I am NOT trying to convince anyone I am correct, I'm just talking here, not arguing.


#18 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 8,587 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:56 AM

Don't forget about the 13 pitchers on the 25 man roster.


I have to think that the Twins will make their move today or tomorrow- the Wings are just 2 hours down the road at Columbus- they likely kept Darnell around solely in the mop up role for Deduno's first start. It's arguable that 13 pitchers and 3 "catchers" cost them a chance to beat a struggling Indians squad last night- and made the job tougher in the 1-0 win on Monday night. After Mauer went down on Sunday, and coming off of 3 good starts from the rotation against the Orioles- they could have had sent down an excess pitcher and Hermann and added 2 more bats on the roster- at the cost of only needing to add one player to the 40-man- Parmelee and Vargas.

Edited by jokin, 07 May 2014 - 08:10 AM.


#19 Sconnie

Sconnie

    Tatertots R good

  • Members
  • 1,605 posts
  • LocationNW Wisconsin

Posted 07 May 2014 - 08:02 AM

So, let me get this 3rd catcher theory straight.

We keep a 3rd catcher on roster for two potential scenarios....

Scenario 1) One of our catchers is catching and the other is DHing. The guy that is catching gets injured, so the DH needs to get pulled into the game, "eliminating" the DH and causing the pitcher to get placed in the batting order. If this happens early in a game, it COULD mean that the pitcher spot would come up several times over the course of the rest of the game.

To avoid this 1/50 chance we are now batting Hermann, who is worse at hitting than an average MLB pitcher, several times EVERY game. Under normal circumstances, where the 3rd catcher just sits on the bench week after week, having this player prevents a legitimate late inning PHer from being on the roster, who could have an impact on many games per week.


Scenario 2) One of our two offensive juggernaut catchers gets an off day, but is available to PH. Late in the game we use him to PH. THEN our starting catcher gets hurt, leaving us needing to use our emergency catcher, presumably for no more than an inning or two.

To avoid this "once every 5 years" chance, we are currently using our 3rd catcher in the OF, but he's not any good, and he's one of the guys who we would pinch hit for, so we haven't really avoided this "problem." Under normal circumstances we carry dead weight on our roster so that Eduardo Escobar doesn't need to play catcher for an inning once every 5 years.

Calling Hermann a catcher (which I do too) is kinda like calling Escobar a catcher. Hermann is more of a super-futility player who also can't field, in a addition to can't hit. He might be a good catcher, but I wouldn't know since he never catches.

Don't forget the 3rd scenario where Zuke catches, Pinto DHs, Herman is in OF, and Zuke gets injured, so Gardy makes a double shift (see this tangent from the game thread the other night is now meaningful) to move Hermann from the outfield to Catcher, but because of the short bench, there's no one left to play the outfield but Florimon or a pitcher.

#20 jokin

jokin

    Twins News Team

  • Twins News Team
  • 8,587 posts

Posted 07 May 2014 - 08:04 AM

I'd call up Parmelee now.

I get that it makes some tough roster decisions, but that's a bridge you can cross later. By the time that decision needs to be made, someone else is likely to be injured.

Who knows how long Hicks will be out? Or Willingham? Or maybe Mauer goes from day-to-day to DL?


Yep. Plus, if you give Parmelee a chance, you have the opportunity to showcase him to potential suitors in search of cheap in-season help at 1st base to possibly engineer a trade.
Or he sticks with the Twins and then there are others on the roster (like Colabello) who could be sent down. Or conversely, if Parm falls flat on his face, repeat the DFA process back to Rochester. Why do they insist on shooting themselves in the foot with these short benches and sub-standard players like Hermann in the lineup?