View Full Version : Steroids are not wrong
midworst9
08-21-2012, 12:48 PM
There is nothing wrong with taking steroids as long as you are an adult.Roger Clemens didn't hurt anybody. Lots of people were using steroids. Secondly, steroids should not be illegal. Taking steroids is the same as if i created a excercise routine noone else did but made me stronger than others. Steroids are just another way to get stronger.You minnesotans are evil not roger clemens.you are naieve,judgemental rotten people.Note to all of you fargo wannabes ,taking steroids is not wrong as long as you are an adult,and they don't hurt anyone. It's not cheating,it's just another way to get stronger,no different than finding a better excercise routine. I am telling all of your subconsious to see steroids as good not evil .
debate me chickens
Mauerzy4Prez
08-21-2012, 12:51 PM
LOL I think you may have smoked some crack in between your anabolics injections....
jokin
08-21-2012, 12:53 PM
There is nothing wrong with taking steroids as long as you are an adult.Roger Clemens didn't hurt anybody. Lots of people were using steroids. Secondly, steroids should not be illegal. Taking steroids is the same as if i created a excercise routine noone else did but made me stronger than others. Steroids are just another way to get stronger.You minnesotans are evil not roger clemens.you are naieve,judgemental rotten people.Note to all of you fargo wannabes ,taking steroids is not wrong as long as you are an adult,and they don't hurt anyone. It's not cheating,it's just another way to get stronger,no different than finding a better excercise routine. I am telling all of your subconsious to see steroids as good not evil .
732-397-2257 debate me chickens
I pine for the good ole days when Twins Daily would only get hacked by quality spammers like Leeds United fans.
Brock Beauchamp
08-21-2012, 01:24 PM
That's your first post? Buh-bye.
nicksaviking
08-21-2012, 01:24 PM
Steroids are clearly illegal because of the adverse effect on literacy rates.
Most baffling is the fact that it clearly shows he edited his post 11 minutes later. Is it possible it was more poorly and more redundantly written before the edit?