Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Article: 2014 Offseason Minnesota Twins Top 40 Prospect Countdown: 1-5

  1. #1
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,801
    Like
    27
    Liked 320 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198

    Article: 2014 Offseason Minnesota Twins Top 40 Prospect Countdown: 1-5

    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  2. #2
    Why did you mention Buxton's BABIP when you fail to mention Sano's? His BABIP of .397 was nearly identical to Buxton's at the same stop (Fort Myers).

    Buxton's BABIP is more sustainable then Sano's because he's super fast and can beat out infield hits. Both are great prospects though.

  3. #3
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,801
    Like
    27
    Liked 320 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Hitters' BABIPs are to be compared only to themselves, and unlike pitchers', which should be around .290, depending on who you are talking to, they are all over the map depending on the hitter. I compared Buxton's 2013 BABIP to his 2012 BABIP. Would be meaningless to compare to Sano's. Yes, they are great prospects. Top 5 in baseball as a matter of fact

  4. #4
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,379
    Like
    249
    Liked 191 Times in 109 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Remember that HRs aren't included in BABIP

    ed893b7b0405147c8498db6096fce17e.png

    And since roughly 1/4 of Sano's hits have left the park, his BABIP takes a hit (this is partially offset by striking out more though - 31% to 22%).

    If you include HR's as "in play," the BABIP's are:

    Buxton: .421
    Sano: .407

    IMO the whole Cedar Rapids-Mike Trout comps have unfailrly raised expectations for Buxton. Trout has exceeded the highest possible expectations. You could take all the speed out of Trout's game at this point and he'd still be a top 10 hitter. IMO its probably unlikely that Buxton ever becomes that good of a hitter (especially on Trout's timetable).

    On the other hand, Sano's going to pound MLB pitching, its only a question of at what rate. Will he be a Chris Carter or mature into a selective, high OBP guy like Cabrera to go with the power, or something in between.
    Last edited by Willihammer; 12-15-2013 at 11:07 AM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,801
    Like
    27
    Liked 320 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by Willihammer View Post
    IMO the whole Cedar Rapids-Mike Trout comps have unfailrly raised expectations for Buxton. Trout has exceeded the highest possible expectations. You could take all the speed out of Trout's game at this point and he'd still be a top 10 hitter. IMO its probably unlikely that Buxton ever becomes that good of a hitter (especially on Trout's timetable).

    On the other hand, Sano's going to pound MLB pitching, its only a question of at what rate. Will he be a Chris Carter or mature into a selective, high OBP guy like Cabrera to go with the power, or something in between.
    Speaking of selectivity, there is a measure that most people don't talk about these days for some reason, called isoD (and it is analogous to isoP) for isolated discipline and it is OBP-BA. Buxton, Sano and Trout's isoDs have been around .090 all their careers. Sano's got higher in New Britain, but I think it is a SSS glitch because the BA got lower. So, if these guys hit around .300, their OBP will likely approach .400
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,045
    Like
    49
    Liked 72 Times in 43 Posts
    Thanks for these rankings- very thoughtful and very interesting.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    249
    Like
    5
    Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Thank you for these write-ups, Thrylos, I have really enjoyed them... you speak my language.

    Just a nitpick, but remember that options are used to 'remove' someone from the 40-man roster, so calling up Sano in September will not 'use' an option unless you send him back down in September, which would be pointless. And I assume there will still be drek on the 40-man that can be removed in favor of a star prospect (or two, as I am hopeful Buxton also makes a September appearance).

  8. #8
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,801
    Like
    27
    Liked 320 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by TRex View Post
    Thank you for these write-ups, Thrylos, I have really enjoyed them... you speak my language.

    Just a nitpick, but remember that options are used to 'remove' someone from the 40-man roster, so calling up Sano in September will not 'use' an option unless you send him back down in September, which would be pointless. And I assume there will still be drek on the 40-man that can be removed in favor of a star prospect (or two, as I am hopeful Buxton also makes a September appearance).
    Thanks, it was fun.

    Agreed with the options (other than the fact that used to remove someone from the 25-man, and needs to be on the 40 man). Did I indicate otherwise? I just don't think that Buxton (especially, because Sano would need to be added to the 40 man roster before the 2014 Rule 5 draft) would be added to the 40-man roster, unless he can contribute and the Twins would need him to contribute (i.e. if they are competing.) The might want to save that roster spot for someone else before that Rule 5 draft.
    Not a matter of options
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  9. #9
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,786
    Like
    4
    Liked 67 Times in 50 Posts
    Blog Entries
    63
    Other than the Buxton/Sano switch, I like this top five.

  10. #10
    I think the value of defense is a large reason why most people have Buxton ahead of Sano. Buxton has the potential to be a golden glove CF, while Sano could be a decent defensive 3B. I think that "small" difference tends to represent the idea that while Sano may be more feared in the batter's box, Buxton will provide more overall value to a team. However, that's just my take on other people's opinions.
    Also, the wRC+ comparison is quite an interesting one to see. It makes me even more excited for Sano than I was before. I keep forgetting how young he really is. He just looks older because he's so big. I'll have to keep an eye out for more of your writing. Nice work!

  11. #11
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,801
    Like
    27
    Liked 320 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by Shane Wahl View Post
    Other than the Buxton/Sano switch, I like this top five.
    You might find this interesting: I asked someone who watched (and broadcasted) every single game of both Sano's and Buxton's at Fort Myers this season to validate the Sano over Buxton, and here is this discussion.

    These guys are very close. A jump of power by Buxton or continuation of dominance in New Britain might switch the rankings for me. And since age is a wash (Sano is 7 months older, but half a level ahead), I'd go with the higher production guy at this point.
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  12. #12
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,786
    Like
    4
    Liked 67 Times in 50 Posts
    Blog Entries
    63
    Thrylos, I honestly don't really have a problem with flipping those two. I get the point. They are top 3 prospects OVERALL in baseball. That discussion was interesting. If Sano just harnesses his skills at fielding the ball, he could amount to an average or above average defender there.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Triple-A Monkeypaws's Avatar
    Posts
    468
    Like
    35
    Liked 56 Times in 33 Posts
    Regardless of ranking, that is one nice top 5. (I think/hope Stewart will be the best of the bunch)

  14. #14
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    460
    Like
    135
    Liked 53 Times in 40 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13
    x<3.8 seconds to first base can definitely help one's BABIP.

  15. #15
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,801
    Like
    27
    Liked 320 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by twinsfan34 View Post
    x<3.8 seconds to first base can definitely help one's BABIP.
    Did not in 2012
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  16. #16
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    460
    Like
    135
    Liked 53 Times in 40 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrylos View Post
    Did not in 2012
    Data sample was too small.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    460
    Like
    135
    Liked 53 Times in 40 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrylos View Post
    Did not in 2012
    ..."can" help...was the word I used. As opposed to someone else slower.

    We'd have to find something with balls hit in the IF and his AVG there versus the league average. Would be best weighted if we knew speed of each player relative to the average attained. if you're wanting something exact.

    His BABIP is definitely high, but it's not that high for someone with his K% and HR%.

    Mike Trout his .420 BABIP at A-ball. He's at .366 in MLB now.

    Paul Goldschmidt hit .385 in A+, he's a .340 guy in MLB. Add the HRs and his BABIP would be even higher.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    460
    Like
    135
    Liked 53 Times in 40 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrylos View Post
    Did not in 2012
    But yes, you're right - his BABIP and his AVG were definitely lower in 2012.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.