Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: Ask Baseball America - The Rule 5 Draft and Max Kepler

  1. #1
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    433
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Ask Baseball America - The Rule 5 Draft and Max Kepler

    I saw this topic being discussed in the Forums a while back, and I don't think anybody had a clear idea about the rules for how players are protected from the Minor League phases of the Rule 5 Draft, so I asked Baseball America.

    They didn't include all of my questions about how it works, but is a good look at how teams approach a situation such as Kepler's:

    Ask BA: How Do The Minor League Phases Of The Rule 5 Draft Work? - BaseballAmerica.com
    Follow me on Twitter: @HangingSL
    Spring Training Regular since 2010.

  2. #2
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    2,169
    Like
    97
    Liked 54 Times in 38 Posts
    I think this would be more interesting if it was the 2010 Twins instead. That team might not have had a lot of room to play with the 40 man roster. But this team can afford to protect Kepler and just lose an option year. They'll also have the AFL season to look at him first. I think they'll protect him just in case and hope he can get to AA next year. But if they don't protect him, I do think the Astros would risk taking him.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    433
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Ya, I don't see a reason why the Twins can't, or wouldn't want, to put him on their 40-man roster to protect him. Just is weird having a guy that is only going to be in A-ball there.
    Follow me on Twitter: @HangingSL
    Spring Training Regular since 2010.

  4. #4
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    5,920
    Like
    41
    Liked 202 Times in 106 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    It's not that weird. Happens all every couple of years, obviously with an international signing, someone who signed at 16 and took a couple of years to develop into what he can become.

    Another reminder too, Jeremy's Rosters & Payrolls link on the front page of Twins Daily includes a column for when players are eligible for the Rule 5 draft and can become milb free agents and such.

  5. #5
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,164
    Like
    19
    Liked 196 Times in 124 Posts
    Nice work, you didn't just get a question answered, you got BA to write a whole damn article on the minor league Rule V draft, something that is not all that well known.

    Just spitballing, I would think the odds of Kepler getting picked are probably around 10%. Two years ago I would have said zero but between the clear tank/rebuild jobs by Houston and Miami, the Cubs interest in any high level prospect of any kind and the White Sox terrible roster and even more terrible farm outlook, I think there are enough wild cards to guarantee his safety.

    So I'd add him if it is only going to cost the spot of a Wilkin Rameriz, Cole DeVries or even a Pedro Hernandez.

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,164
    Like
    19
    Liked 196 Times in 124 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Lein View Post
    Ya, I don't see a reason why the Twins can't, or wouldn't want, to put him on their 40-man roster to protect him. Just is weird having a guy that is only going to be in A-ball there.
    I think the Twins oddly had Deibinson Romero on the 40-man when he was in Ft. Myers. I don't think he was at New Britain when they added him. I don't know what team they thought would steal him, but that might be a good indicator regarding their intentions with Kepler.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksaviking View Post
    Nice work, you didn't just get a question answered, you got BA to write a whole damn article on the minor league Rule V draft, something that is not all that well known.

    Just spitballing, I would think the odds of Kepler getting picked are probably around 10%. Two years ago I would have said zero but between the clear tank/rebuild jobs by Houston and Miami, the Cubs interest in any high level prospect of any kind and the White Sox terrible roster and even more terrible farm outlook, I think there are enough wild cards to guarantee his safety.

    So I'd add him if it is only going to cost the spot of a Wilkin Rameriz, Cole DeVries or even a Pedro Hernandez.
    I wouldn't add him. Houston, Miami & the Cubs have plenty of their own prospects to protect. I guess the White Sox could find a spot for him but he has zero chance of doing anything for the year except take up a roster spot & truthfully, he isn't that great of a prospect. At least with a power arm, you can use them occasionally.

    The main reason I wouldn't add him isn't for this year but down the road. What happens in 3 years when he runs out of options? You have no choice but to keep him on the team or risk losing him. I don't see his development path being so fast that he will be ready to stay on the ML roster for good in that time frame. Better off taking a very small risk now & gaining the extra year later. IMHO

    I agree, they should have plenty of open spots so that really isn't the main concern.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    433
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Seth Stohs View Post
    It's not that weird. Happens all every couple of years, obviously with an international signing, someone who signed at 16 and took a couple of years to develop into what he can become.

    Another reminder too, Jeremy's Rosters & Payrolls link on the front page of Twins Daily includes a column for when players are eligible for the Rule 5 draft and can become milb free agents and such.
    I know it happens, but it really isn't that common, that's why I say it's weird. As nicksaviking says, they did have Romero protected like that, I know there has been a few others recently, but can't think of the names off the top of my head, Estarlin De Los Santos maybe? But it also wastes that players option years while he is toiling away at lower levels, so it's an interesting point to consider in his case where he isn't that far along. He could potentially be out of options already by the time he even is considered for a callup.

    I also had questions about when a player had to be added to the AA or AAA reserve rosters to be protected from the MiLB phases, but they left those out. Not sure if it works where they have to be put on one of those rosters before those 4 or 5 years from when drafted/signed kicks in for the MLB phase eligibility, or if they aren't eligible for anything in the Rule 5, major or minor league phases, until those years are up. I would think it is the latter, but have seen the former mentioned around here too.
    Follow me on Twitter: @HangingSL
    Spring Training Regular since 2010.

  9. #9
    I just looked up the last 5 years of Rule V selections. It's an overwhelming number of pitchers that get selected. There have been 63 pitchers taken & only 6 OF in the last 5 years. I don't think any of the OF amounted to anything so far. Of course, not a large % of any of the picks work out but there are a few pitchers who have at least had some success...including Scott Diamond & Ryan Pressley.

    I'd put the chance that Kepler gets picked at < 1% & even then there is a good chance he might get returned.

  10. #10
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,164
    Like
    19
    Liked 196 Times in 124 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Lein View Post
    I also had questions about when a player had to be added to the AA or AAA reserve rosters to be protected from the MiLB phases, but they left those out. Not sure if it works where they have to be put on one of those rosters before those 4 or 5 years from when drafted/signed kicks in for the MLB phase eligibility, or if they aren't eligible for anything in the Rule 5, major or minor league phases, until those years are up. I would think it is the latter, but have seen the former mentioned around here too.
    What I took from the article is that there may not be a time requirement for the minor league portion. Being able to protect 78 in the AAA portion and 113 in the AA would lead me to believe that time is not a factor. Otherwise teams just wouldn't have a need anywhere close to 113 spots as most minor leaguers wouldn't be eligible due to due to only being in pro ball for a year or two.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    433
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    ^ That is very true.
    Follow me on Twitter: @HangingSL
    Spring Training Regular since 2010.

  12. #12
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    5,920
    Like
    41
    Liked 202 Times in 106 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksaviking View Post
    I think the Twins oddly had Deibinson Romero on the 40-man when he was in Ft. Myers. I don't think he was at New Britain when they added him. I don't know what team they thought would steal him, but that might be a good indicator regarding their intentions with Kepler.
    Romero just finished a season in Beloit when he was added. It was after a season in Beloit in which he played just 40 games due to a couple of freak injuries (I recall one was a knee injury after catching a pop-up near the dugout).

  13. #13
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    5,920
    Like
    41
    Liked 202 Times in 106 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by golfboy1 View Post
    I just looked up the last 5 years of Rule V selections. It's an overwhelming number of pitchers that get selected. There have been 63 pitchers taken & only 6 OF in the last 5 years. I don't think any of the OF amounted to anything so far. Of course, not a large % of any of the picks work out but there are a few pitchers who have at least had some success...including Scott Diamond & Ryan Pressley.

    I'd put the chance that Kepler gets picked at < 1% & even then there is a good chance he might get returned.
    It is overwhelmingly pitchers, but that's somewhat misleading as well from this standpoint... We can't show who was added. Teams may add all of the position players that they consider possibly lost in the Rule 5, and there are so many more pitchers in the minor leagues.

  14. #14
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    5,920
    Like
    41
    Liked 202 Times in 106 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    I would be shocked if the Twins don't add Jorge Polanco and Max Kepler. They're both no-brainers in my mind, especially considering they have so many players that will (or could) come off of the current 40 man.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Triple-A amjgt's Avatar
    Posts
    333
    Like
    13
    Liked 34 Times in 24 Posts
    I'm kind of with golfboy1.

    Is Kepler really that great of a prospect? He's not a teenager any more but he seems to still get a pass as a youngster. Meanwhile, at the same level that Kepler ended at, you've got Adam Walker crushing it, but he's "old" for the level (he's only a year and a half older than Kepler)

    If the argument is "with the junk on our 40 man roster, why take the 1% chance that he gets taken," I suppose I can listen to that, but as was also point out, we start burning through options for a guy who's probably going to finish next year at Single A.

  16. #16
    We talk about the vultures of rebuilding teams grabbing Rule 5 guys (the Twins could be in that situation, too). The Twins, alone, could have up to 16 spots to fill with their own and prospects from other organizations. That is a lot. But come next year, the Twins may be hard-pressed to find more than 10 spots for the next round of prospects, and the year after that business as normal. Houston and Florida would both have to let some guys slide if they wanted to take a gamble on a lower prospect like Kepler. Is he worth a 25-man spot. Is he worth a year of service. Again, the Arizona League performance will play well for Kepler. It is a gamble the Twins must take, and also shows the new way draftees will be viewed now and in the futre. Can a team afford to not protect anyone that they have invested millions in signing bonus money to, or do they keep them in the fringe on the back of their mind and flip them in a trade. The future of baseball will revolve around teams not able to keep ALL their highly signed picks. Like Meyer...the Twins grabbed him for Span. They didn't have to sign him. They got to watch him develop a bit in anotehr team's organization. They traded a bluechip for a future chip and got to get their own draft pick signed, also, in the process.
    Joel Thingvall
    www.thingvall.com
    rosterman at www.twinscards.com

  17. #17
    Super Moderator All-Star
    Posts
    3,412
    Like
    165
    Liked 309 Times in 184 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Lein View Post
    Ya, I don't see a reason why the Twins can't, or wouldn't want, to put him on their 40-man roster to protect him. Just is weird having a guy that is only going to be in A-ball there.
    I see a big reason... options.

    If they put him on the 40 man, they essentially have to have him in the bigs for good in 3 seasons. Given that he's in A- ball, and didn't exactly do well there, he'd be at best in AA for 2015 and AAA in 2016, his final option year. That makes 2017 a sink or swim year vs. not protecting him for a season and then protecting him next year after completing (hopefully) A+ ball.

  18. #18
    The King In The North All-Star Nick Nelson's Avatar
    Posts
    1,623
    Like
    5
    Liked 65 Times in 24 Posts
    Blog Entries
    292
    I can't see anyone plucking a 20-year-old in Low-A who can't hit LHP. Then again, I've heard a lot of really good reports on this kid going beyond his production on the field.

    The options concern is a legit one.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    433
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by amjgt View Post
    I'm kind of with golfboy1.

    Is Kepler really that great of a prospect? He's not a teenager any more but he seems to still get a pass as a youngster. Meanwhile, at the same level that Kepler ended at, you've got Adam Walker crushing it, but he's "old" for the level (he's only a year and a half older than Kepler)
    The argument with Walker isn't that he is "old" for the level. It's the fact that he had 3 full seasons of college ball under his belt when he was drafted, and 3 very good college seasons at that. I'm in the camp he never should have been in the Low-A Midwest League, and should have crushed the pitching he was seeing there like he did because he is more advanced than that.
    Follow me on Twitter: @HangingSL
    Spring Training Regular since 2010.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    433
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by diehardtwinsfan View Post
    I see a big reason... options.

    If they put him on the 40 man, they essentially have to have him in the bigs for good in 3 seasons. Given that he's in A- ball, and didn't exactly do well there, he'd be at best in AA for 2015 and AAA in 2016, his final option year. That makes 2017 a sink or swim year vs. not protecting him for a season and then protecting him next year after completing (hopefully) A+ ball.
    I already addressed that fact. It's definitely something to consider, but don't think it stops the Twins from adding him.
    Follow me on Twitter: @HangingSL
    Spring Training Regular since 2010.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.