07-16-2013, 10:22 PM #21
- Liked 386 Times in 257 Posts
- Blog Entries
07-17-2013, 08:00 AM #22
I agree that Liriano wouldn't have success under Rick Anderson, except for that time when he had success under Rick Anderson in 2010.
If this was Anderson's fault, Don Cooper would have gotten something out of Liriano last season but he was awful for the White Sox.
Is it really so hard to admit that the pitcher himself might be responsible for his performance, both good and bad? Pitching coaches can certainly try to tweak things but they can't go out to the mound and throw for the guy.
I will never understand why people have to lay blame for. every. single. thing. that. happens.
07-17-2013, 08:55 AM #23
07-17-2013, 09:56 AM #24
- Liked 535 Times in 354 Posts
I don't think it is the pitching coach at all, I think he's healthy again. That simple. Maybe some small change in pitches also. But blaming Anderson seems a bit too easy.Lighten up Francis....
07-17-2013, 10:01 AM #25
- Liked 310 Times in 194 Posts
Even if his 2011-2012 struggles were not necessarily the product of Anderson, Gardy, Target Field, etc., I doubt Liriano was interested in signing a similar deal with the Twins. Certainly he would not have been interested last summer, when he still had a few months to help his value.
07-17-2013, 10:05 AM #26
And I don't even like Rick Anderson that much. I think, at best, he's a mediocre-to-decent pitching coach who hasn't evolved enough as the years progressed.
There are plenty of reasons to get irritated with the coaching staff on this team. I cannot see how Liriano is one of those reasons. The guy appears to be an emotional rollercoaster and after trying to get the best out of him for half a decade (and even succeeding a couple of times), it was time for both parties to move on. There is simply no need for every organizational move to turn into a finger-pointing contest.
07-17-2013, 11:25 AM #27
- Liked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Liriano was a head case, I'm glad he moved on - but you knew he had talent that there was a good chance that he'd figure it out, like he is now.
07-19-2013, 12:42 PM #28
- Liked 54 Times in 30 Posts
I think some folks are forgetting he's only thrown 76 innings this season and in my humble opinion, he's MUCH more likely to blow up or get injured than he is to continue pitching like he has been in said 76 innings. I would've figured most of you have seen enough stretches of Liriano success, followed by significantly longer stretches of mind blowing incompetence to be at least somewhat skeptical about him being able to maintain this level of pitching for any significant period of time.
If he can maintain good numbers over the next year and not start going mental out there on the mound or blow out his arm throwing all those sliders, good for him. He's an exciting pitcher to watch when he's on, but I'm far beyond getting my feathers ruffled over another team getting less than half a season worth of success from him. Give him 200+ innings for the Pirates and we'll see what tune they're singing about him then.
07-19-2013, 01:11 PM #29
It is not Anderson. Anderson wanted him to abandon the four seamer and just throw the sinker, slider and change. That's basically waht he is doing this year.
I'm sure there are many factors, but the biggest one is familiarity. When you pitch five times a year against the same teams, they eventually figure you out. He's the same lazy head case he was in 2010 and 2011. He's just facing different hitters. I wager his success will diminish as teams figure out how to lay off the slider, and wait him out, as the Tigers did."If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."
07-19-2013, 01:33 PM #30
He's pitching for money. Him and his agent saw the lackluster response he got s a free agent (and why Pittsburgh ante up what they did -- originally for him -- is beyond belief). The tell will be next season, when he is again playing for money. If he keeps his head straight, he can dominate. Hopefully he's not staining his arm!
07-19-2013, 03:16 PM #31
The other thing that's probably worth mentioning is that Liriano is now throwing to Russell Martin. We can argue how much framing really affects a guy's ERA and IP, but by some measures, Martin has single-handedly taken the Pirates from one of the worst framing teams to one of the best. Coincidentally their pitching staff as a whole has gotten a lot better.
07-19-2013, 03:25 PM #32
- Liked 53 Times in 21 Posts
07-19-2013, 05:13 PM #33
A. Stick to the sinker
B. Locate the sinker
C. Locate the change
D. Throw the slider as a strikeout pitch, not a strike pitch
Anderson probably told him that stuff hundreds of times. Except for one half of one year, Liriano could not consistently execute on the game plan.
I would be interested in seeing your evidence for the framing argument."If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."
07-19-2013, 06:27 PM #34
example), he returned to leaning on his 2 seemer.
Then he got traded to Chicago, and for whatever reason goes back to the 4 seemer. Does just okay (example).
So I guess I'm still looking for that Rick Anderson quote where he encourages Liriano to use his 2 seemer more and his 4 seemer less. If he said this at press conferences or wh atever, I missed it.
The framing bit you can read here: All-Star Break Pitch-Framing Update | FanGraphs Baseball
It’s interesting when you look at the final column. The second-most-improved team is the Tigers, at plus-eight. Then the Pirates are all the way up there at plus-21, having signed Martin away from the Yankees in free agency even though the Yankees didn’t have a sound backup plan. Martin has singlehandedly turned this from a weakness into a strength.
07-19-2013, 11:24 PM #35
The quote itself invalidates the board's impression that Anderson was doctrinarian. He was pragmatic with Liriano. He was all for whatever worked in spring training.
There is no one way to pitch. Every pitcher has to make adjustments to be successful. I'm glad Liriano has. He struggled to make some of the same adjustments when he was in a Twins uniform. That's on him more than the pitching coach."If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."
07-19-2013, 11:45 PM #36
Did Anderson and Mauer put plans together pre-game? What were the extent of those plans? From the quote in Parker's article, its hard to tell if Anderson was just being sort of agreeable, in which case you wonder if the Twins appreciated how important using the sinker instead of the 4 seemer might have been for Liriano. I for one am struck by how well that usage has correlated to Liriano's success over the years.
Or, was Anderson micromanaging Liriano's pitch selection more than he betrayed in that quote, in which case he may have been, on occassion, mis-micromanaging him? Its a perfectly valid question to ask, I think.
07-20-2013, 06:47 PM #37
07-24-2013, 08:07 AM #38
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
07-24-2013, 08:17 AM #39
- Liked 277 Times in 144 Posts
Slowey was a good Twins starter for a while, a bad starter after he left, and he's probably pitching no worse for Miami now than when he was a Twin.
Kyle Lohse? It took him a long time, and a couple of teams, to become more consistent than he was with the Twins.
It's fair to say that these pitchers have performed elsewhere at a level as high or even higher than when they were Twins, at least for short periods of time, but I don't think it's fair to say they all improved drastically. Who else do you mean?
07-24-2013, 11:05 AM #40
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jesse Crain 6.22 K/9 Twins 10.56 K/9 Sox
Kyle Lohse 5.01 K/9 Twins 5.60 K/9 Since traded
RA Dickey 5.88 K/9 Twins 6.83 K/9 Since traded
Kevin Slowey 6.67 K/9 Twins 7.20 K/9 Marlins
Matt Guerrier 5.91 K/9 Twins 6.53 K/9 Dodgers
Matt Garza 7.11 K/9 Twins 7.68 K/9 Since traded
Vance Worley 4.62 K/9 Twins 7.71 K/9 Phillies
Kevin Correia 5.04 K/9 Twins 6.04 K/9 before Twins
Mike Pelfrey 4.90 K/9 Twins 5.08 K/9 before Twins
Last edited by launchingthrees; 07-24-2013 at 11:16 AM.