Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Why the Twins should not trade Willingham.

  1. #1

    Why the Twins should not trade Willingham.

    The Twins should be viewed as sellers this trade deadline, but they need to do so with an eye to 2014. The moves they do or do not make will impact the roles and expectations for Oswaldo Arcia, Aaron Hicks and Miguel Sano. I understand that Sano might not start 2014 with the Twins, but it seems his rise to the major leagues at some point in time in 2014 is inevitable. Because of all of this, it is my opinion that the Twins should not trade Josh Willingham unless they are totally blown away by an offer. Willingham has had a decrease in production compared to his 2012 season, but that doesn’t change the fact that he is still the best power hitter the Twins have on the team. Normally you would believe Willingham’s production is incredibly replaceable, but that being said, what is the likelihood the Twins will spend to bring in another power bat? Keeping Willingham on the roster does not only give the team a legitimate power option in the middle of their order, but forces Arcia and Sano down in the order which decreases the pressure on them next year. It should also lead to them getting better pitches to hit batting behind Mauer and Willingham. Sano’s early time at AA proves why this is very important. While both he and Arcia begin to learn the major league game, the Twins need to have a lineup in place that forces pitchers to give them pitches to hit so they can have an impact on the game. Having a legitimate power threat in the 4 spot of the lineup does this, and the rest is up to them.

    At this point, I have to believe Willingham has more value to the Twins than he would net in a trade. No reason to sell low.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Please ban me! All-Star stringer bell's Avatar
    Posts
    3,574
    Like
    197
    Liked 532 Times in 346 Posts
    Blog Entries
    32
    Agree that of the three veterans (Morneau, Doumit, and the Hammer) that Willingham should be the one to keep for now. Doumit because of health, position scarcity and relatively robust production, may have increased his value for the deadline, Morneau is not earning his keep now and I can't see a scenario where he will do so for the Twins.

  3. #3
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,817
    Like
    174
    Liked 659 Times in 371 Posts
    The only acceptable answer to this "why?" is:

    Because they should've done it last year during his career year.

  4. #4
    Willingham is a defensive liability who can be a very productive RBI guy. I'm a big advocate of playing for the future - That is, not wasting time and resources on a guy who won't be around when the team could be successful.

    Yeah, selling low is a problem. We did it with Liriano, we did it with Delmon. I'd assume we could get a trade done after the non-waiver deadline with Willingham, like we have in the past with guys like Casilla.. Maybe he'll turn it on and raise his value, or maybe a middle of the lineup guy will go down on a contending team and they will be willing to trade a good prospect for him.

    Nonetheless, I'd rather see Arcia on a daily basis.

  5. #5
    I think Willingham would be good to keep, but mainly because I see him here for the long haul and see Buxton as the potential trade piece this deadline. A great way for us to compete right now and still have Sano.

  6. #6
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,817
    Like
    174
    Liked 659 Times in 371 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Hawk View Post
    I think Willingham would be good to keep, but mainly because I see him here for the long haul and see Buxton as the potential trade piece this deadline. A great way for us to compete right now and still have Sano.
    Please explain how the mid-30 year old outfielder with a litany of career injury problems is more here for "the long haul".

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLeviathan View Post
    Please explain how the mid-30 year old outfielder with a litany of career injury problems is more here for "the long haul".
    Well I like Plouffe and Dozier to be on this team, and I think Willingham is a great hitting tutor for both of them to learn from. Personally, I would like to see Willingham retire a Twin and potentially take over manager.

    So I guess when I say long haul I mean part player part coach. Where I just see Buxton as a flash in the pan and nothing special. Kind of like the JD Durbin of hitters. SO I say trade him while he is hot.

  8. #8
    Senior Member All-Star Boom Boom's Avatar
    Posts
    1,085
    Like
    10
    Liked 214 Times in 100 Posts
    It's weird to think that if Willingham was hitting like last year we'd trade him for whatever we can get... but now that he's been in a 2 1/2 month slump, we want to keep him.

  9. #9
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,817
    Like
    174
    Liked 659 Times in 371 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Hawk View Post
    Well I like Plouffe and Dozier to be on this team, and I think Willingham is a great hitting tutor for both of them to learn from. Personally, I would like to see Willingham retire a Twin and potentially take over manager.

    So I guess when I say long haul I mean part player part coach. Where I just see Buxton as a flash in the pan and nothing special. Kind of like the JD Durbin of hitters. SO I say trade him while he is hot.
    I was hoping for an entertaining response. But a JD Durbin reference along with it?

    Wow.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Hawk View Post
    Well I like Plouffe and Dozier to be on this team, and I think Willingham is a great hitting tutor for both of them to learn from. Personally, I would like to see Willingham retire a Twin and potentially take over manager.

    So I guess when I say long haul I mean part player part coach. Where I just see Buxton as a flash in the pan and nothing special. Kind of like the JD Durbin of hitters. SO I say trade him while he is hot.
    Is this a parody account? Are we all being punk'd? OK, where are the cameras??

  11. #11
    Senior Member All-Star Winston Smith's Avatar
    Posts
    1,283
    Like
    82
    Liked 329 Times in 160 Posts
    Make any trade that will make the team better long term. However, there is no way in hell that the Twins trade either Sano or Buxton.
    Does anyone remember the last time Ryan traded a prospect for help at the "major league level"? The last time I can think of is Castillo from the Marlins for a couple mid level pitchers before the 2006 season. Before that I can't think of any.
    This comment brought to you from the Rosedale Mall studio by Hamm's Beer, brewed in the land of sky blue waters.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Monkeypaws's Avatar
    Posts
    591
    Like
    76
    Liked 112 Times in 67 Posts
    Ramos for Capps?

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Winston Smith View Post
    Make any trade that will make the team better long term. However, there is no way in hell that the Twins trade either Sano or Buxton.
    Does anyone remember the last time Ryan traded a prospect for help at the "major league level"? The last time I can think of is Castillo from the Marlins for a couple mid level pitchers before the 2006 season. Before that I can't think of any.
    and my arguement is that not trading Willingham might be in the best interest of the Twins in 2014. He likely won't bring much in the way of a trade and his bat in the middle of the lineup allows the Twins to ease Arcia and Sano's bats into the lineup without putting all of the pressure to score runs on them.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Boom Boom View Post
    It's weird to think that if Willingham was hitting like last year we'd trade him for whatever we can get... but now that he's been in a 2 1/2 month slump, we want to keep him.
    Weird but valid. I don't see the Twins as a team who will spend next offseason to get another 20+ home run player, and Willingham is cheap. More than that, he probably won't net much of a prospect. Better to keep him to take pressure off of our young hitters IMO.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd God Walker View Post
    Willingham is a defensive liability who can be a very productive RBI guy. I'm a big advocate of playing for the future - That is, not wasting time and resources on a guy who won't be around when the team could be successful.

    Yeah, selling low is a problem. We did it with Liriano, we did it with Delmon. I'd assume we could get a trade done after the non-waiver deadline with Willingham, like we have in the past with guys like Casilla.. Maybe he'll turn it on and raise his value, or maybe a middle of the lineup guy will go down on a contending team and they will be willing to trade a good prospect for him.

    Nonetheless, I'd rather see Arcia on a daily basis.
    My hope is the Twins trade Morneau and Doumit which would move Willingham to more of a DH / sub LF role with the team which is where I feel he fits best.

  16. #16
    Twins found that after a Silver Slugger year, Josh doesnt have trade value so what is he gonna have in a normal year??
    When we signed him, I envisioned a .250 22/23hr 80rbi guy w/65/70bb. That's what he is now for the most part. Just get him out of the field even if it means keeping Doumit on the bench. Gardy is terrified of actually DHing terrible fielding OFs for some reason. He has no clue about OF defense helping this crappy pitching staff.

  17. #17
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,242
    Like
    105
    Liked 103 Times in 75 Posts
    Trade: ____, ______, and/or _____. Please be realistic, Twins players aren't "in demand".
    Any trade the Twins propose will be viewed as a salary dump, refer to: Young an Hardy.

  18. #18
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,988
    Like
    4
    Liked 122 Times in 88 Posts
    Blog Entries
    66
    Letting Willingham just walk away after next year would be a mistake. There are going to be teams interested in him at the deadline (see New York Yankees, and maybe the Rangers, Reds, and Orioles) and the Twins should try to get whatever they can. There is zero long-term possibility for him and 2014 should really be left to the youth movement.

  19. #19
    Twins are in a bad shape financially. Ryan tried to be coy in cutting payroll as he knew they werent trying to be competitive (this season is absolutely been best case) but dealing the 21m of Willy/Justin & getting nothing back (which they wont) cannot be hid.
    Ryan isnt gonna spend a cent in the offseason & they will have a 50-55m payroll next yr (if they use their propsects, few have a problem w/that tho). Its using bargain basement players like Florimon, Walters, Deduno, Thomas that will get people upset.
    This is why I could see them keeping both & letting Justin walk as they wont get anything but they wont be seen as cutting payroll.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Oldgoat_MN's Avatar
    Posts
    665
    Like
    199
    Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Almost no one is going to bend over backwards to get Willingham.

    That said, I appreciate the logic of a team that has no RH power hitters keeping Josh. I believe we can expect a bit of a rebound next year and we badly need power from the right side, even if Plouffe shows he is a real threat.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.