Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 31

Thread: Article: The Key for Mike Pelfrey

  1. #1
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    6,496
    Twitter
    @sethtweets
    Like
    67
    Liked 369 Times in 195 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515

    Article: The Key for Mike Pelfrey


  2. #2
    Senior Member Triple-A Gernzy's Avatar
    Posts
    431
    Twitter
    @Andy_Twitchell
    Like
    1
    Liked 21 Times in 14 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    While Pelfrey is showing signs of improvement, Gibson is nipping at his heels. Currently I don't see Gibson replacing him. A few bad starts though...

  3. #3
    Senior Member All-Star Winston Smith's Avatar
    Posts
    1,282
    Like
    80
    Liked 329 Times in 160 Posts
    Pelfrey has never been anything but a mediocre pitcher. Career sub .500 record, mid 4 era in the NL and 1.5 whip, none of his numbers say anything about him being good. He is what he is probably a little better than what we've seen but nothing more than mediocre.

  4. #4
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    6,496
    Twitter
    @sethtweets
    Like
    67
    Liked 369 Times in 195 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by Winston Smith View Post
    Pelfrey has never been anything but a mediocre pitcher. Career sub .500 record, mid 4 era in the NL and 1.5 whip, none of his numbers say anything about him being good. He is what he is probably a little better than what we've seen but nothing more than mediocre.
    I can't imagine anyone would disagree with that.

  5. #5
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,713
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 563 Times in 368 Posts
    so if he has no upside, really......why would you keep him around next year, when by then maybe Gibson will be consistent enough to be in MN, Worley might be fixed, Meyer might be ready, Albers maybe surprised us all? There is no strategic reason to have Plefry on the roster next year (nor am I sure there is this year.......). Me, I'd cut him. Call up Gibson, see what you have. I'd call up Albers after Gibson reaches his limit, and see what you have. having Pelfrey here does nothing for this team, this year, or next year.
    Lighten up Francis....

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,590
    Like
    62
    Liked 371 Times in 231 Posts
    I would imagine a lot of pitchers who don't have the ability to strike out batters have a similar breakdown in regards to big innings. When guys get on base it's very difficult for them to stop runners from advancing even on routine outs.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Oldgoat_MN's Avatar
    Posts
    665
    Like
    199
    Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Pelfrey is not going to make us all think we are watching a RH Johan Santana.
    He has, however, been improving steadily (?) as he continues to come back from his surgery.

    I am optimistic that he can give us mostly serviceable innings for the balance of the year.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    794
    Like
    15
    Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5
    It was known the first half of the year might not be as good as hoped. He could be good the second half as he gets further away from TJ surgery. No one left in Rochester is forcing their way up here, so give it some time.

  9. #9
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,590
    Like
    62
    Liked 371 Times in 231 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldgoat_MN View Post
    Pelfrey is not going to make us all think we are watching a RH Johan Santana.
    He has, however, been improving steadily (?) as he continues to come back from his surgery.

    I am optimistic that he can give us mostly serviceable innings for the balance of the year.

    How about just until the trade deadline?

  10. #10
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,241
    Like
    105
    Liked 103 Times in 75 Posts
    Pelfrey fits the Twins concept of pitchers: cheap, available to pitch, and "attacks the strikezone".

  11. #11
    Senior Member Double-A chuchadoro's Avatar
    Posts
    106
    Like
    48
    Liked 28 Times in 17 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mike wants wins View Post
    so if he has no upside, really......why would you keep him around next year, when by then maybe Gibson will be consistent enough to be in MN, Worley might be fixed, Meyer might be ready, Albers maybe surprised us all? There is no strategic reason to have Plefry on the roster next year (nor am I sure there is this year.......). Me, I'd cut him. Call up Gibson, see what you have. I'd call up Albers after Gibson reaches his limit, and see what you have. having Pelfrey here does nothing for this team, this year, or next year.
    Pelfrey is here to help this team reach its full 74 win potential. The Twins brass decided a full Houston-style rebuild (exceptions being Mauer and maybe Perkins) would be too big of a PR hit for a team that just got their shiny, new Section 8 housing a few short years ago.

  12. #12
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,590
    Like
    62
    Liked 371 Times in 231 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mike wants wins View Post
    There is no strategic reason to have Plefry on the roster next year (nor am I sure there is this year.......). Me, I'd cut him. Call up Gibson, see what you have. I'd call up Albers after Gibson reaches his limit, and see what you have. having Pelfrey here does nothing for this team, this year, or next year.
    I think you should start a Frey Mike Pelfrey thread.

  13. #13
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,985
    Like
    4
    Liked 122 Times in 88 Posts
    Blog Entries
    66
    What I still don't understand is how the Twins thought Pelfrey was actually ready to go at the beginning of the season. I remember being shocked that reports were good in March. Of course being able to pitch is not the same as being strong enough to pitch for over 5 innings. We are finally now seeing it work out a bit better. Too bad they didn't pitch someone else in April and May.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Oldgoat_MN's Avatar
    Posts
    665
    Like
    199
    Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksaviking View Post
    How about just until the trade deadline?
    LOL. Perfect!

  15. #15
    Senior Member Double-A Wookiee of the Year's Avatar
    Posts
    132
    Like
    9
    Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksaviking View Post
    I would imagine a lot of pitchers who don't have the ability to strike out batters have a similar breakdown in regards to big innings. When guys get on base it's very difficult for them to stop runners from advancing even on routine outs.
    Yeah, that's what I'm wondering--how does Pelfrey's breakdown compare to other pitchers? It's fairly meaningless to me in a vacuum. Does it mean Gardy should be quicker with the hook once Pelfrey allows a few baserunners, or surrenders a run? Is it par for the course with a pitch-to-contact pitcher?

  16. #16
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    6,496
    Twitter
    @sethtweets
    Like
    67
    Liked 369 Times in 195 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by Wookiee of the Year View Post
    Yeah, that's what I'm wondering--how does Pelfrey's breakdown compare to other pitchers? It's fairly meaningless to me in a vacuum. Does it mean Gardy should be quicker with the hook once Pelfrey allows a few baserunners, or surrenders a run? Is it par for the course with a pitch-to-contact pitcher?
    I'd assume it's worse than the average pitch-to-contact pitcher... since his ERA is so high. I mean, 95% of pitchers in the big leagues are pitch-to-contact and most have ERAs south of 5.

  17. #17
    Senior Member All-Star IdahoPilgrim's Avatar
    Posts
    2,421
    Like
    2
    Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
    Blog Entries
    26
    To be honest, did the Twins brass ever see Pelfrey as any more than a placeholder getting them through to when Gibson (& Meyer & maybe May) were ready? I always saw him as insurance in case Gibson had a setback on his recovery rather than somebody the organization was planning to build around. So in that sense, if he can just not suck, he's giving the Twins what they paid for, and he's starting to not suck.

    And I doubt we'll get anything for him at the trade deadline, not with him being a free agent next year anyway. He'll be insurance to the end of the year and then we'll part ways, hopefully amicably.

  18. #18
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,590
    Like
    62
    Liked 371 Times in 231 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Seth Stohs View Post
    I'd assume it's worse than the average pitch-to-contact pitcher... since his ERA is so high. I mean, 95% of pitchers in the big leagues are pitch-to-contact and most have ERAs south of 5.
    That seems awfully high. I suppose we could go off-tangent and get down to what it actually means to be a pitch-to-contact arm but the overriding idea was that Pelfrey doesn't have the ability to bear down and strike guys out when he has runners on the bases. 95% of the pitchers in the league don't have the same issue. If Pelfrey had pitched one more inning he would be a qualifying pitcher and would be fifth from last in K/9. Of course Diamond and Correia are one and three, but that would be off-tangent too.
    Last edited by nicksaviking; 06-18-2013 at 11:35 AM.

  19. #19
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    6,496
    Twitter
    @sethtweets
    Like
    67
    Liked 369 Times in 195 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksaviking View Post
    That seems awfully high. I suppose we could go off-tangent and get down to what it actually means to be a pitch-to-contact arm but the overriding idea was that Pelfrey doesn't have the ability to bear down and strike guys out when he has runners on the bases. 95% of the pitchers in the league don't have the same issue. If Pelfrey had pitched one more inning he would be a qualifying pitcher and would be fifth from last in K/9. Of course Diamond and Correia are one and three, but that would be off-tangent too.
    My definition of pitch-to-contact may be different from others and may vary depending on the day. I think pitch to contact equals lack of walks, so maybe something like a BB/9 of less than 3.7 (or 3.5 or some number)... other days, I might say it is a starting pitcher with a K-rate of less than maybe 9 (or 8.5 or something). (Note - I also only include starting pitchers who have to work for more than one inning at a time in this... for relievers, I would hope for more Ks.)

    I don't think it has anything to do with "bearing down"... 95% (or whatever number you want) aren't going to get a strikeout all the time in that situation, but they may get a weak pop-up, or a double play or something good). "Bearing down" sounds like a form of effort, and I certainly don't question his effort.

  20. #20
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,590
    Like
    62
    Liked 371 Times in 231 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Seth Stohs View Post
    I don't think it has anything to do with "bearing down"... 95% (or whatever number you want) aren't going to get a strikeout all the time in that situation, but they may get a weak pop-up, or a double play or something good). "Bearing down" sounds like a form of effort, and I certainly don't question his effort.
    I don't think it's a lack of effort, it's a lack of ability. However many pitchers with the ability to miss bats do have higher strikeout numbers in high leverage situations, which tells me they in fact can bear down and dial up the heat or make a pitch break a little bit more in a clutch situation.

    There are curretnly 100 qualifying starting pitchers. 55 of them have a K/9 over 7.00, 45 of them have a K/9 of 7.5. So I guess I'd give a satisfactory chance at acquiring a strikeout in high leverage situations to roughly 50% of the pitchers in the league.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.