Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: Updated Comment Policy Thread

  1. #1
    Owner All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar
    Posts
    2,429
    Twitter
    @twinsgeek
    Like
    1
    Liked 158 Times in 94 Posts
    Blog Entries
    240

    Updated Comment Policy Thread

    For discussion about the updated comment policy:

    http://twinsdaily.com/minnesota-twin...nt-policy.html

  2. #2
    Twins News Team All-Star PseudoSABR's Avatar
    Posts
    1,928
    Like
    243
    Liked 182 Times in 105 Posts
    I appreciate the changes. I'm sure others will too.

  3. #3
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,687
    Like
    157
    Liked 613 Times in 342 Posts
    It's nice to see them posted and clarified, thank you.

  4. #4
    A needed update, thanks.

  5. #5
    Owner All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar
    Posts
    2,429
    Twitter
    @twinsgeek
    Like
    1
    Liked 158 Times in 94 Posts
    Blog Entries
    240
    bump

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star James's Avatar
    Posts
    1,248
    Like
    261
    Liked 131 Times in 84 Posts
    Thanks for the update. I appreciate the new definitions.
    You can come up with statistics to prove anything. Forty percent of all people know that.

  7. #7
    Head Moderator MVP glunn's Avatar
    Posts
    5,010
    Like
    4,322
    Liked 697 Times in 366 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    We are working on some updates to the TD comment policy. If any users have any suggestions, please feel free to post them here.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Monkeypaws's Avatar
    Posts
    569
    Like
    69
    Liked 108 Times in 63 Posts
    My policy would read: "Don't let this become the Twins board at MLB.com."

    People should check their hostility and anger at the door.

  9. #9
    Twins Moderator All-Star diehardtwinsfan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,237
    Like
    375
    Liked 747 Times in 463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    I'd caution on vague statements like "negative". It's really vague and can chase off good contributors.

    I don't have a problem with negative posts personally. I have an issue with people (positive or negative) who knowingly post irrational things over and over and over again in multiple threads derailing them all into a *****fest when most of the time their comments are unreasonable... That's my 2 cents.

    You guys have a pretty tough job, so I don't want to knock you, and the tone of the board has improved a lot of late, so I shouldn't complain too much.

  10. #10
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,472
    Like
    66
    Liked 145 Times in 94 Posts
    Blog Entries
    30
    Do the game threads serve their intended purpose?

  11. #11
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    344
    Like
    5
    Liked 50 Times in 30 Posts
    I agree with the game thread thing too. Although, it is fun to joke about random stuff too.

  12. #12
    Head Moderator MVP glunn's Avatar
    Posts
    5,010
    Like
    4,322
    Liked 697 Times in 366 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeypaws View Post
    My policy would read: "Don't let this become the Twins board at MLB.com."

    People should check their hostility and anger at the door.
    And you have also identified a better place for someone to go if he/she is more interested in drama and flame wars than in friendly, intelligent discussion.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Oldgoat_MN's Avatar
    Posts
    665
    Like
    189
    Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jorgenswest View Post
    Do the game threads serve their intended purpose?
    If that purpose is to remind you that you're not the only idiot in Minnesota still following a game when your team is down by a dozen runs, then it worked great for me today.

    Thank you!

  14. #14
    Head Moderator MVP glunn's Avatar
    Posts
    5,010
    Like
    4,322
    Liked 697 Times in 366 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by diehardtwinsfan View Post
    I'd caution on vague statements like "negative". It's really vague and can chase off good contributors.

    I don't have a problem with negative posts personally. I have an issue with people (positive or negative) who knowingly post irrational things over and over and over again in multiple threads derailing them all into a *****fest when most of the time their comments are unreasonable... That's my 2 cents.

    You guys have a pretty tough job, so I don't want to knock you, and the tone of the board has improved a lot of late, so I shouldn't complain too much.
    Thanks for this response. The policy allows people to be as negative as they want, so long as they are respectful of other posters. Some people have mastered the ability to do this, and others need to work a little harder at it. We are going to be providing some useful examples in the new policy thread that we started tonight.

  15. #15
    Head Moderator MVP glunn's Avatar
    Posts
    5,010
    Like
    4,322
    Liked 697 Times in 366 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jorgenswest View Post
    Do the game threads serve their intended purpose?
    At this time, the purpose of the game thread is for fans who seek camaraderie to watch the game together and chat as if they were all sitting together in left field.

    If you think that this can be improved, we are always open to suggestions.

  16. #16
    Twins Moderator All-Star ChiTownTwinsFan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,689
    Twitter
    @Sheradoodles
    Like
    1,332
    Liked 1,837 Times in 1,074 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jorgenswest View Post
    Do the game threads serve their intended purpose?
    I think they do. Game threads are where people hang to watch the game and chatter. Sometimes it's about baseball, often about other stuff. It's not a forum thread or an article; it's a different 'animal.' Would you sit at a baseball game and spend the entire game debating a baseball issue in a manner of a typical forum thread? Or would you be sitting there with your pals, beer in hand, commenting on this or that bad call, good/bad play, in game stuff, while mixing in talk about your day, your job, life in general? Personally, I find the game threads refreshing after reading most of the forum threads. And for someone who is outside of 'Twins' Territory,' it's not like I can gather at the local watering spot to catch the game with a group of like-minded fans.

  17. #17
    Speediest Moderator All-Star snepp's Avatar
    Posts
    4,042
    Like
    1,766
    Liked 1,240 Times in 493 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jorgenswest View Post
    Do the game threads serve their intended purpose?
    Short answer, yes.



    Long answer, yessir!
    "Maybe you could go grab a bat and ball… and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
    - Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

  18. #18
    Senior Member All-Star crarko's Avatar
    Posts
    1,193
    Twitter
    @crarko
    Like
    152
    Liked 750 Times in 394 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jorgenswest View Post
    Do the game threads serve their intended purpose?
    It would be instructive to hear John and Seth's takes on this.

  19. #19
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,625
    Like
    1,121
    Liked 535 Times in 354 Posts
    abj and I chatted on this already, but at some point (and I am guilty of this), once you've made a point 5 times in a thread, maybe it is time to stop.

    Not sure how this works, but once 2 people are talking to each other, with huge quote blocks, for a page or so, it might be time to move on.....

    I like the game threads, they are light and airy, and frankly, this board could use more humor and fun. It is the one place to escape. Compared to the game thread on footballsfuture during the last Vikings game, the threads here are like air in a vacuum (wow, that was bad....).
    Lighten up Francis....

  20. #20
    Owner MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    8,022
    Twitter
    @rocketpig76
    Like
    47
    Liked 1,516 Times in 793 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by crarko View Post
    It would be instructive to hear John and Seth's takes on this.
    Game threads are exactly what we want them to be... Basically, a group of people discussing the events of the game... and whatever else comes to mind. We want to keep it loose and interesting, not necessarily about in-depth game analysis on the fly (though that's okay as well). Basically, a way to hang out and talk with other fans like you're sitting in bleacher seats in the outfield when you can't talk with other fans sitting in the bleacher seats in the outfield.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.