Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Article: Over and Under: Evaluating The White Sox

  1. #1
    Owner All-Star John Bonnes's Avatar
    Posts
    2,449
    Twitter
    @twinsgeek
    Like
    1
    Liked 165 Times in 97 Posts
    Blog Entries
    241

    Article: Over and Under: Evaluating The White Sox


  2. #2
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    799
    Like
    15
    Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5
    White Sox have starting pitching which should be better than last year if healty. Offense with losses and some regression could be far worse. Bullpen is good. Team should be in most games, I do not feel they will score enough to compete, and if the issues start early, could wear the pitching down later in the year.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Triple-A Gernzy's Avatar
    Posts
    432
    Twitter
    @Andy_Twitchell
    Like
    1
    Liked 21 Times in 14 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    This would be a hard one to bet on. I see them winning 75-80 games. Hopefully less. They could finish third behind a suprising Cleveland team.

  4. #4
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,789
    Like
    668
    Liked 385 Times in 215 Posts
    Blog Entries
    10
    I am pretty high on the Sox. Very solid pitching top to bottom, and a lineup that is built to play in the Cell. I could flip a coin between the Sox and the Tigers for the Division.

  5. #5
    Twins Moderator All-Star diehardtwinsfan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,408
    Like
    420
    Liked 824 Times in 518 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    I hate the Sox. They have a history however of generally outperforming expectations while not being dominant... kind of like a team I cheer for. I'd take the over if forced, though I think a smart man would shy away from this bet.

  6. #6
    I hate the Sox as well so I will pick the under. I'll go with 75 wins and 4th place in the division.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Gernzy View Post
    This would be a hard one to bet on. I see them winning 75-80 games. Hopefully less. They could finish third behind a suprising Cleveland team.
    I agree--they will miss AJ and Youk...I dont expect Peavy to regress much keeping them around 78 wins and in the pack in the AL Central.

  8. #8
    Senior Member All-Star Jim Crikket's Avatar
    Posts
    1,094
    Like
    15
    Liked 122 Times in 61 Posts
    Blog Entries
    77
    I probably would stay away, but I checked the "over" box. That's more a reflection of how poor I think the AL Central will be than any real confidence in the Sox being good. Given how many games they'll have against Minn, KC and Cleveland (not to mention that the entire league now gets to play a few games against Houston), it's hard for me to imagine Chicago not reaching .500.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Double-A Wookiee of the Year's Avatar
    Posts
    133
    Like
    9
    Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    I took the under, and it looks like my reasoning is just about opposite Jim Crikket's.

    I expect some downward regression from Dunn, Rios, and Peavy, and some further damage due to the losses of Pierzynski and Youkillis. Given an expected record of 88, though, that's probably not going to be more than enough to push them into 80-83 territory.

    So what really seals the deal for me is that I'm expecting a stronger AL Central this year. The Tigers, Indians, and Royals all look like they should be better than last year (at least marginally); the Twins can't really get much worse. That modestly-improved division plus the above-mentioned regression is enough for me to think the White Sox will be at 80 or less.

  10. #10
    I bet the over - Never been a big Sox fan, but they are still better than KC, Cleveland, and the Twins - . . . so they'll be playing those teams and that should guarantee at least 80

  11. #11
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,719
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 566 Times in 370 Posts
    Under, I see a major regression here.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    877
    Like
    485
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    Under, mainly because KC and Cleveland are underrated. And partly because of their lack of depth and therefore the ability to overcome injuries.

  13. #13
    Over, but that's just because 80 is so low and Houston is so bad. They're not getting anywhere near 85 because they'll easily be worse and CLE and KC won't be the empty jerseys they were last year. (I am just not a believer in Peavy holding up for a whole year either. Not sure why, I don't hate the man, but he just feels like one of those really talented guys that only flashes the whole package a few times in his career.)

  14. #14
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,494
    Like
    156
    Liked 144 Times in 75 Posts
    When evaluating other teams, I notice people tend to always subtract for the losses and regressions, but I rarely see them give credit for the young players who should be expected to improve.

    De Aza will be a really good player. Viciedo looks to have some real pop, and supposedly they've worked hard with him to add a leg kick that should improve his timing and help out his AVG and K rate a little bit.
    Everyone expects a huge regression from Rios, and while I see a small one, I'm just not seeing anything too "fluky" about his numbers last year.
    Same thing with Peavy. He's completely healthy now, and people forget that he was borderline dominant before his injuries.
    Sale is the real deal. If he can keep his arm from flying into the 5th row any time soon, he will join the ranks of Price, Weaver, Felix and CC as one of the premiere aces in the AL.
    Konerko is Mr. Reliable, year in and year out you are going to get .300 with close to 30 HR's.
    Not sure why everyone expects a major regression from Dunn. Looking at his career numbers, it was 2011 that deviates from the norm, not seeing anything unrepeatable about last year.
    Alexei Ramirez and Gordon Beckham have both underachieved compared to what was expected of them, no doubt, but both have seemingly settled nicely in as average to above average middle infielders. I'd take them over our duo any day of the week.
    The rest of their rotation is a bunch of ???, but same can be said for every team in this division except the Tigers.
    For all this talk about their lineup not scoring a bunch of runs, I'm not seeing that.
    Its not elite, but I think its solid, and will probably score more runs than ours.
    I'll take the over.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.