Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 151

Thread: Neal: Twins won't overpay for average pitching

  1. #61
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer 70charger's Avatar
    Posts
    931
    Like
    73
    Liked 56 Times in 26 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TRex View Post
    Please don't take this the wrong way, 70charger, but every time you reply to one of these inane posts (because I read all your posts) you thwart my attempt to block them by using the site's 'ignore' function.
    Duly noted. I shouldn't be feeding the trolls anyway.

  2. #62
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,146
    Like
    378
    Liked 339 Times in 225 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    The thing is that you don't need to go as high as Greinke. Sanchez is well above average. Marcum has been well above average, as has Dempster.

    There are guys who rate quite a bit above "mediocre", yet the Twins aren't signing them and instead, pursue guys like Correia and Saunders, who only qualify as mediocre on their best days.

    So far, the Twins have "overpaid" for awful pitchers. We could only wish they were overpaying for mediocrity.
    How about Edwin Jackson? He produced Dempster numbers and got a Dempster contract and is 7 years younger.

    The guy was in or near the top quintile for SPs in GB%, K/9, K/BB, xFIP, K%...etc. The Twins could have locked him up last year and again this year, if they were willing to just slightly overbid the market....and still come in significantly under their own self-imposed payroll restrictions.

  3. #63
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,701
    Like
    33
    Liked 786 Times in 428 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by jokin View Post
    How about Edwin Jackson? He produced Dempster numbers and got a Dempster contract and is 7 years younger.

    The guy was in or near the top quintile for SPs in GB%, K/9, K/BB, xFIP, K%...etc. The Twins could have locked him up last year and again this year, if they were willing to just slightly overbid the market....and still come in significantly under their own self-imposed payroll restrictions.
    I've been bullish on Jackson for a long time. Given the Twins' payroll constraints, I wanted them to pursue him harder than anyone else. He's solid though unspectacular, still young, and could be had on a 3-4 year deal. He was exactly what the Twins should have been targeting this offseason.

    But they didn't.

  4. #64
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,576
    Like
    7
    Liked 27 Times in 22 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    I've been bullish on Jackson for a long time. Given the Twins' payroll constraints, I wanted them to pursue him harder than anyone else. He's solid though unspectacular, still young, and could be had on a 3-4 year deal. He was exactly what the Twins should have been targeting this offseason.

    But they didn't.
    The early quotes was that they were going to be aggressive this off season. Jackson and others looking at the supporting cast could have said no thank you. Remember also the quote that Ryan said they couldn't give money away. The deals made should make the Twins better down the road but for 2013 the Twins would remain a last choice option.

  5. #65
    Super Moderator MVP USAFChief's Avatar
    Posts
    5,372
    Like
    1,452
    Liked 1,131 Times in 509 Posts
    The idea that the Twins couldn't improve their team because free agents wouldn''t sign here is one possible theory.

    It's a theory completely without evidence, contrary to history, and it defies rational thought, but it's one possible theory.

  6. #66
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,701
    Like
    33
    Liked 786 Times in 428 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by old nurse View Post
    The early quotes was that they were going to be aggressive this off season. Jackson and others looking at the supporting cast could have said no thank you. Remember also the quote that Ryan said they couldn't give money away. The deals made should make the Twins better down the road but for 2013 the Twins would remain a last choice option.
    If I walk into a Ferrari dealership with $5,000 and ask for a new car, I'll be promptly turned on my heel and escorted out the door. At that point, could I frantically wave my arms and scream about how I can't give my money to Ferrari?

    The Twins haven't been rumored to be in the mix for any decent pitcher this offseason. And it's not as if rumors aren't circulating. We've heard about them "being in the mix" on some pretty bad pitchers, just not any good ones.

  7. #67
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    556
    Like
    0
    Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    If I walk into a Ferrari dealership with $5,000 and ask for a new car, I'll be promptly turned on my heel and escorted out the door. At that point, could I frantically wave my arms and scream about how I can't give my money to Ferrari?

    The Twins haven't been rumored to be in the mix for any decent pitcher this offseason. And it's not as if rumors aren't circulating. We've heard about them "being in the mix" on some pretty bad pitchers, just not any good ones.
    At this point, I think walking into a Kia dealer with a crisp new $100 is a more accurate comparison.

  8. #68
    Speediest Moderator All-Star snepp's Avatar
    Posts
    3,638
    Like
    877
    Liked 627 Times in 242 Posts
    First they couldn't give the money away, and now it's that they refuse to "overpay" for anyone that doesn't suck.


    It's either a contradiction, or all of this money they couldn't give away was really just a bunch of low-ball offers with little chance of ever being accepted. I'm guessing the latter.



    Annnnnnnnd Brock basically just said the exact same thing, but did it in a much more entertaining way.
    Last edited by snepp; 12-27-2012 at 01:31 PM.
    "Maybe you could go grab a bat and ballÖ and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
    - Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

  9. #69
    Super Moderator MVP USAFChief's Avatar
    Posts
    5,372
    Like
    1,452
    Liked 1,131 Times in 509 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by edavis0308 View Post
    At this point, I think walking into a Kia dealer with a crisp new $100 is a more accurate comparison.
    The used car dept at a Kia dealer, at that.

  10. #70
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,168
    Like
    19
    Liked 197 Times in 125 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    If I walk into a Ferrari dealership with $5,000 and ask for a new car, I'll be promptly turned on my heel and escorted out the door. At that point, could I frantically wave my arms and scream about how I can't give my money to Ferrari?

    The Twins haven't been rumored to be in the mix for any decent pitcher this offseason. And it's not as if rumors aren't circulating. We've heard about them "being in the mix" on some pretty bad pitchers, just not any good ones.
    And since they pulled this same stunt when "attempting" to negotiate with Santana and Hunter, it's logical to believe this is actually what is happening with this years free agents to whom they "can't give away their money."

  11. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by Boom Boom View Post
    The Pirates. Bumped him. From their (the Pirates') rotation.
    Ha Ha Ha

  12. #72
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,148
    Like
    62
    Liked 74 Times in 50 Posts
    Reducing the team's payroll by ~20% is no accident--it was part of a plan. If that plan results in another throwaway season--it will still be a lucrative year for those on the Executive Committee (also part of the plan!).

  13. #73
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Highabove's Avatar
    Posts
    564
    Like
    13
    Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Sometimes you overpay in one area and balance it out with a bargain in another.
    Last edited by Highabove; 12-27-2012 at 10:39 PM.

  14. #74
    Senior Member All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,082
    Like
    98
    Liked 342 Times in 195 Posts
    The problem is the Twins prize reliability over talent at almost every level. And because they are so risk averse (if ever you could diagnose a sports franchise with a psychological impairment.....) the only time they will make a splash is when the player's number one asset is reliability.

    See: Pelfrey and Correia rather than guys with more talent/upside.

  15. #75
    Senior Member All-Star PseudoSABR's Avatar
    Posts
    1,765
    Like
    141
    Liked 112 Times in 68 Posts
    I think the basic point (coming from TR) is that overpaying for lousy pitching (Corriea) is less expensive than overpaying for average pitching (McCarthy, etc.).

  16. #76
    Senior Member All-Star Jim Crikket's Avatar
    Posts
    1,093
    Like
    15
    Liked 122 Times in 61 Posts
    Blog Entries
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by PseudoSABR View Post
    I think the basic point (coming from TR) is that overpaying for lousy pitching (Corriea) is less expensive than overpaying for average pitching (McCarthy, etc.).
    And that's a perfectly reasonable point, as long as you aren't concerned about your team collecting any of those... oh, what do they call them?... oh yeah... wins.
    I opine about the Twins and Kernels regularly at Knuckleballsblog.com while my alter ego, SD Buhr covers the Kernels for MetroSportsReport.com.

    ~You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant~

  17. #77
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,388
    Like
    50
    Liked 35 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Highabove View Post
    Sometimes you overpay in one area and balance it out with a bargain in another.
    Presumably the pitching has been the bargain (oh god I hope that's what you're saying here) so what talent do you think the Twins will bring in with the other $15-20 million dollars they haven't spent? At this point it looks more like the Twins are just fleecing the fanbase.

  18. #78
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,146
    Like
    378
    Liked 339 Times in 225 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Oxtung View Post
    Presumably the pitching has been the bargain (oh god I hope that's what you're saying here) so what talent do you think the Twins will bring in with the other $15-20 million dollars they haven't spent? At this point it looks more like the Twins are just fleecing the fanbase.
    Your $15-20M number is way off. They essentially offloaded Span's contract and replaced it with Correia and so the Twins have actually only added just $4M for Pelfrey. Minus all of the other numerous castoffs and non-reuturnees, the Twins have more like close to $30M that "they haven't spent" when compared to the 2012 payroll (Pavano, Baker, Span, Marquis, Casilla, Liriano, Capps salaries total to well over $30M that no longer exist on the payroll, replaced thus far by players making around the minimum or a crap-shoot lottery ticket like Harden).

    If you consider equating the outright gutting of the team up the middle as a standard fleece-job, so be it.
    Last edited by jokin; 12-28-2012 at 12:09 AM.

  19. #79
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Highabove's Avatar
    Posts
    564
    Like
    13
    Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    My point was this, The Twins got a bargain with Willingham on one end, overpaying for a reliable Pitcher on the other end would not be a mortal sin.

  20. #80
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,388
    Like
    50
    Liked 35 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jokin View Post
    Your $15-20M number is way off. They essentially offloaded Span's contract and replaced it with Correia and so the Twins have actually only added just $4M for Pelfrey. Minus all of the other numerous castoffs and non-reuturnees, the Twins have more like close to $30M that "they haven't spent" when compared to the 2012 payroll (Pavano, Baker, Span, Marquis, Casilla, Liriano, Capps salaries total to well over $30M that no longer exist on the payroll, replaced thus far by players making around the minimum or a crap-shoot lottery ticket like Harden).

    If you consider equating the outright gutting of the team up the middle as a standard fleece-job, so be it.
    Call it $15m or $30m. Call it a gutting or a fleece job. Those are basically semantics in my question. The poster I quoted above seemed to be implying the Twins were getting "bargains" in the pitching department so that they could splurge elsewhere. My question is where? At this point it is looking incredible likely the Twins will just pocket that extra millions of dollars. I'll be disgusted if that is $10m or $30m. Why the team was unwilling to spend on FA pitching I may never understand. I certainly don't understand it right now.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.